M. Dickensning Майсазордаги гуллар asarida badiiy portretning pragmatik tavsifi - Ingliz tili - Diplom ishlar

M. Dickensning Майсазордаги гуллар asarida badiiy portretning pragmatik tavsifi

Yuklangan vaqt:

26.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

74.6748046875 KB

Ko'chirib olish

M. Dickens ning " Майсазордаги гуллар » asari da b adiiy portretning pragmatik tavsifi MUNDARIJA: Kirish ....................................................................... ................................................2 I bob. Badiiy portretning pragmatik talqini. 1.1. Badiiy nutqdagi pragmatikaning muammolari……………………...................7 1.2. M. Dickens ning " Майсазордаги гуллар » asarida xarakter va g’oyaning uzviy birligi...........................................................................................................14 Birinchi bob yuzasidan xulosa…………………………………………….......... ..23 II. Bob. Badiiylik, obrazlilik va obraz. 2.1. Badiiy portretning pragmatik o’ziga xosligi………………………...............24 2.2. Obra zlar sistemasida yangi q a h ramon konsepsiyasi........................................42 Ikkinchi bob yuzasidan xulosa……………………………………………… …… 5 0 Umumiy Xulosa............................................................................................... ...... 5 1 Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar.......................................................................................5 3 Foydalanilgan lug’atlar...........................................................................................5 5 1

Kirish O’zbekiston Respublikasi birinchi Prezidenti I.A. Karimovning milliy mafko’ra, ma’naviyat va madaniy qa driyatlarga doir asarlari mazk u r Bitiruv Malakaviy Ish ning metodologik asosini tash k il etadi. Adabiyotshunoslik, tarjima tarixi va nazariyasiga oid ilmiy asarlar Bitiruv Malakaviy Ishningning nazariy manbai bo’lib xizmat qilgan. Ilmiy tadqiqot R.Salomov, N.V.Vladimirova, J.Sharipov, I.Sultonov, U.Tuychiev kabi chet el hamda o’zbek tarjimashunos va she’rshunoslarning ilmiy ishlariga tayangan holda bajarildi. Mavzuning dolzarbligi shundan iboratki, lingvistikaning nisbatan yangi yo’nalishi, endigina rivojlanib kelayotgan fanning tushunchalari va muammolari adabiy asarlar misolida tadqiq etiladi, hamma nutqning turlicha ma’lumot berish imkoniyatlari ilmiy tahlil etiladi. Ushbu fan yuzasidan o’tkazilayotgan anjumanlarda uning til boyligini va ifodalash qobiliyatini oshirish sohasidagi ahamiyati ta’kidlanadi. Tadqiqotning o’rganilish darajasi. Mazkur Bitiruv Malakaviy Ish Ch. Pirs va Ch.Morris, N.Arutyunova, G.V.Kolshanskiy, L.A. Kisileva, R.Salomov, N.V.Vladimirova, J.Sharipov, I.Sultonov, U.Tuychiev kabi kupgina chet el va o’zbek olimlarining yaratgan nazariyalari va asarlariga tayangan holda ishlab chiqilgan bo’lib, M.Dikensning badiiy asarlari asosida ushbu nazariyalar amalda tekshiriladi hamda yangi fikrlar va qonuniyatlar olg’a suriladi. Tadqiqotning metodologik asosi va tadqiq usuli sifatida I.A.Karimovning falsafa va metodologik yo’nalishlar va tadqiqot ishlarini olib borish uslublari yuzasidan asarlari, Rossiya FA muxbir a’zosi N.S. Mirqurbanov, prof. L. Qayumov va prof. N.V. Vladimirovning ishlab chiqqan ilmiy izlanish uslubiyotlari, prof. Varfolomeevning chet tillar bilan ishlash uslubiyotlari xizmat qilgan. Tadqiqot ob’yekti bo’lib badiiy asarlar matni, ya’ni mashxur Ingliz/Amerika yozuvchisi M.Dikensning asl nusxa asarlari xizmat qilgan. Ushbu ob’ekt xozirgi 2

davrda tez sur’atlar bilan rivojlanayotgan ingliz tili nutqining ifodalash qobiliyati va xususiyatlarini aniqlab, o’rganish uchun negiz bo’lib xizmat qilgan. Tadqiqot predmeti - badiiy matn, xususan badiiy portret matnlari va vositalarida pragmatik tavsiflarni o’rganish va tahlil etish hamda uning tarjimada aks etishi va tarjimaning sifatiga ta’sir etishdir. Tadqiqotning maqsadi - badiiy portretdagi pragmatikani o’rganish, M.Dikensning badiiy nasriy asarlarini o’rganish va tahlil etish, badiiy matn tarkibidagi tasviriy vositalarni teranroq, tarjima qilish borasida obrazlilik va tasviriylik, ifodalash imkoniyatlarining vositalarini o’rganishdir. Tadqiqot metodi. Ishdagi tadqiqotlar davomida ilmiy qiyoslash – tahlil uslubi, tarixiy-tadqiqot uslubi, tipologiya-tahlil uslubi asosida amalga oshirilgan. Mazkur tadqiqotning nazariy va amaliy a h amiyati. Ushbu ish ingliz tilining uslubiyotini o’rganish, adabiy alo qa lar buyicha maxsus kurslarda qo’llanilishi mumkin. U bu boradagi keyingi ilmiy ishlar uchun dasturilamal bo’lib xizmat qilishi mumkin. Olingan natijalar va ularning yangiligi. Badiiy portretning pragmatik tavsifi buyicha tahlil va tasnif amalga oshirildi, Ingliz/Amerika yozuvchisi M.Dikensning estetikasi hamda qahramonning obrazini pragmatik ta’rifi va portret tavsifi yordamida yaratilishi usullari o’ r g atilgan. Yuqorida zikr etilgan pragmatik tavsiflar quyidagi materialga nisbatan birinchi marta qo’llanilgan. I. Bob Badiiy portretning pragmatik tal q ini. 1.1. Badiiy nutqdagi pragmatikaning muammolari. 3

Tilning muloqot jixatlarini, til belgilarining inson hulqiga, tafakko’riga ta’sirining mexanizmlarini o’rganishga oshib borayotgan qiziqish tilshunoslikning yangi yo’nalishi -lingvopragmatikaning paydo bo’lishiga olib keldi. Uning asosi sifatida Ch.Pirs va Ch.Morris ning ishlari tilga olinadi (1960). Ch.Morrisning ta’rifiga ko’ra "pragmatika - bu belgilarning ularni tal q in etuvchilarga, ya’ni belgi tizimlaridan foydalanuvchilarga munosabatidir, pragmatika til amaliyotida kuzatiladigan barcha psixologik, biologik va sotsiologik hodisalarga daxldordir" . N.Arutyunova pragmatikaning eng asosiy vazifalaridan biri u yoki bu mulo q ot kontekstlarida paydo bo’luvchi nutq, asarlarini tal q in etish nazariyasini ishlab chiqish, deb hisoblaydi. 1 G.V. K olshanskiy pragmatika atamasidan matnning samaradorligini baholasah kategoriyasi sifatida foydalanadi, u nutq harakatida mavjud bo’lgan ma’lum ma q sadga erishishga k o’ maklashuvi ham intra, ham ekstralingvistik omillarni o’z ichiga oladi. 2 L.A.Kiseleva fikricha, pragmalingvistika jamiyat (va ayrim kishilar) tomonidan a’zolarining ruhiyatiga (fikrlari, tuyg’ulari, irodasiga) va shu orqali hulqiga ta’sir etish uchun qo’llaydigan til vositalarini, uning shunda y xususiyatlari va nut q q onuniyatlarini o’rganadi. Umuman olganda pragmatikaga asosan tilning turli muloqot doiralarida muloqot q iluvchilar bilan u zviy aloqada o’rganadi. 3 Shu munosabatda pragmatikaning muammolari doirasi shakllanadi, nutq harakatlarini hamda ularning amalga oshuvi kontekstlarini o’rganish tanlovi matn junatuvchining ta’sir etish vazifalari bilan belgilab beriladigan til birliklarining ishlash jixati, muloqotning samaraliligi, nutqning tinglovchi tomonidan talqin etilishi, nutq qaratilgan kishining gap mazmuniga munosabati, til muloqotning jarayonlarini boshqaradigan qoidalarni ishlab chiqish, hamda til birliklarini amalga 1 . Арутюнова Н.Д. «Фактор адресата». Академия наук М., 1985 К олшанский Г.В. «Коммуникативная функция и структура языка» «Наука» М.,1987 2 3 1 Моррис Ч. «Основания теории знаков». «Наука» М., 1984 2 Киселева Н.А. «Язык как средство воздействия» С-П., 1994 4

oshuvining boshqa ko’pgina masalalari ko’riladi (D.Ashurova). 4 Mazkur ishda badiiy portretda tasvirlangan kishining yosh xususiyati, ijtimoiy, kasbiy maqomi va milliy tegishligi jixatdan pragmatik xususiyatlari o’rganiladi. Muloqotga kirishuvchilarning xususiyatlar, muloqot shart-sharoitlari hamda muloqot vaziyatiga qarab portret ta’riflari Yuqoridagi pragmatik omillar bilan bog’lanadigan ma’lum xususiyatlarga ega bo’ladi. Quyida biz tomondan uchta guru h ga bo’lingan qator misollar keltirib o’tiladi. 5 Misollarning birinchi guruhida tasvirlangan kishining eksplitsit ravishda ifodalangan portret ta’rifining pragmatik tavsiflari mavjud. Tasvirlangan kishining yosh ta’rifiga misol keltiramiz: Mr. Sherman was a lanky, lean old man, with stooping shoulders, a stringy neck, and blue-tinted glasses. After a time, the ptarmigan ceased her struggling. He still held her by the wing, and they lay on the ground and looked at each other. He tried to growl threateningly, ferociousli. She pecked on his nose, which by now, what of previous adventures, was sore. He winced but held on. She pecked him again and again. From wincing he went to whimpering. He tried to back away from her, oblivions of the fact that bu his hold on her he dragged her after him. A rain of packs fell on his ill - used nose. The flood of fight ebbed down in him, and, releasing his prey, he turned tail and scampered off across the open in inglorious retreat. He lay down to rest on the other side of the open, near the edge of the bushes, his tongue lolling out, his chest heaving and panting, his nose still hurting him and causing him to continue his whimper. But as he lay there, suddenli there came to him a feeling as of something terrible impending. The unknown with all its terrors rushed upon him, and he shrank back instinctively info the shelter of the bush. As he did so, a draught of air fanned him, and a lange, 4 5 12. Ашурова Д.У. «Производное слово в свете коммуникативной теории языка» 5

winged body swept ominously and silently past. A hawk, driving down out of the blue, had barely missed him. Portret ta’rifi tasvirlangan kishining yoshini belgilaydi. a lanky, lean, stooping shoulders, a stringy neck, blue - tinted glasses leksik birliklari birgalikda Old man keksa kishini portret ini yaratadi. Shunday qilib, Yuqoridagi leksik birliklari eksplitsit ravishda tasvirlangan kishining yosh tavsifini beradi. Portretning ijtimoiy ta’rifiga bo’lgan keyingi misolni ko’rib chiqamiz: At the Lyceum Theatre the crowds were already thick at the side -entrances. In front a continuous stream of hansoms and four wheelers were rattling up, discharging their cargoes of shirt - fronted men and be - showed, be diamonded women. We had hardly reached the third pillar, which was our rendezvous, before a small, dark, drunk man in the dress of a coachman accosted us. 6 Ushbu misolda portret ta’rifi ijtimoiy ahamiyatli ta’rifni ifodalashning pragmatik vazifasiga ega. Teatrga keluvchi boy kishilarning manzarasini yarata turib, yozuvchi majburiy kiyim elementlaridan foydalanadi: Be so’z qismi jix a tlari va qimmatba ho bezaklarning majburiyligini ta’kidlab, shu bilan q a hramonlarning ma q omiga ishora qiladi. Shuni qayd q ilish kerakki, teatrga borayotgan kishilarning tavsifi keyingi portret ta’rifdagi past taba qa va k ilining qiyofasi bilan keskin farq, qiladi. Shunday qilib, portretning pragmatik yo’nalganligi, uning ijtimoiy ah a miyati ya qq ol ko’rinadi. Portretning milliy tavsifiga misolni ko’rib chiqaylik: At our knocking, however, the door was insantly thrown open by a Hindu servant, clad in a yellow sash. 6 1 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 45 6

Ushbu qahramon kiyimining portret ta’rifi ya’ni qahramonning milliy tegishliligini aniq ko’rsatadi: a yellow turban, white loosefitting clothes, and a yellow sash. Shunday qilib, ushbu portret ta’rifining pragmatik vazifasi qahramonning millatini eksplitsit ravishda belgilab beradi. Shuni qayd qilish kerakki, qahramonning faqat yoshini, ijtimoiy ma qo mini yoki kasbini tavsiflaydigan portret ta’riflash kamdan-kam uchraydi. Tahlil ko’rsatishicha, Yuqoridagi tavsiflarning portret ta’riflari ko’pincha bir-biri bilan uzviy bog’liqlikda keladi. Qa h ramonning ikkita pragmatik tavsifi qo’shilib kelgan misolni keltiramiz: Miss Morton entered the room with a film step and outward composure of manner. She was a blond young lady, small, dainty, well gloved, and dressed in the most perfect taste. There was, however, a plainness and simplicity about her costume, which bore with it a suggestion of limited means. The dress was somber grayish beige, untrimmed and unbraided, and she wore a small turban of the same dull hue, relived only by a suspicion of white feather in the side. Her face had neither regularity of feature nor beauty of complexion, but her blue eyes were singularli spiritual and sumpathetic. Ushbu portret ta’rifida qahramonning yosh va ijtimoiy tavsiflari mavjud. Young ladi leksik birligi yoshini ko’rsatadi, leksik birliklari pragmatik vazifasi qahramonning ijtimoiy maqomini belgilab beradigan portret ta’rifini eksplitsit ravishda namoyon qiladi. Un suffiksi, a somber grayish , same dull hue, sifatlari bu holda ma’lum tavsifning belgilab beruvchi so’zlari bo’lib keladi. Uchta pragmatik tavsif qushilib kelgan keyingi misolni ko’rib chiqamiz. Keltirilgan portret ta’rifida q ah ramonning yosh tavsifi, ijtimoiy ma q omi, shuningdek uning kasbi tegishliligi mujassamlashgan. Ijtimoiy qabul qilishning ma’lum aqidasi insonni birinchi navbatda yosh xususiyatlari, kasbiy tegishliligi, ijtimoiy ma qo mi jixatdan tavsiflaydigan leksik birliklarning yuzaga chi q ishiga yordam beradi. Leksik birlikning ma’nosi qahramonning ijtimoiy holatni tavsiflaydi. Shunday qilib, birgalikda ular qahramonning portretini tash k il qiladi, 7

ularning pragmatik ma’nosi esa qahramonning yosh jixatidan, kasbiy, shuningdek ijtimoiy tavsifini belgilab beradi. Misollarning ikkinchi guruhi implitsit (ochiq bo’lmagan) ravishda ifodalangan qahramon portret ta’riflaridagi pragmatik tavsiflarini mujassamlantirgan. Aytilgan fikrda portret tavsiflanishidagi pragmatik ma’lumotning fa q at ma’lum signallargina mavjud . Shunday signallar tariqasida stilistik usullar va badiiy tafsilotlar kelishi mumkin. Portretning ijtimoiy tavsifi leksik birliklar bilan implitsit ravishda beriladigan misolni ko’rib chiqamiz. Q ah ramonning portret ta’rifida the great Astrakhan collar leksik birligini biz badiiy tafsilot sifatida qaraydigan bo’lsak, u qah ramonning ijtimoiy ma q omini tavsiflaydi. Ma’lumki, qorako’l- boy kishilarning kiyimi edi. Portret ta’rifidagi ushbu tafsilot qahramonning boy kishi ekanligini ko’rsatibgina qolmay, balki aynan u pragmatik jixatdan a h amiyatli bo’lib qoladi, chunki portret ta’rifi qa h ramonning o’ziga xos o’z haqidagi vositali bildiruviga aylanadi. Portretning kasbiy tavsifi leksik birliklar bilan implitsit ifodalanadigan misollarni ko’rib chiqamiz: A heavy step was heard ascending the stair, with a great wheezing and rattling as from a man who was soreli pet to it for breath. Once or twice he stooped, as though the climb were* too much for him, but at last he made his way to our door and entered. His appearance corresponded to the sounds which we had heard. He was an aged man, clad in seafaring garb, with an old peajacket buttoned up to his throat.His back was bowed, his knees were shaky, and his breathing was painfully asthmatic.As he leaned upon a thick oaken cudgel hisshoulders heaved in the effort todraw the air into his lungs. He had a colored scarf round his chin, and I could see little of his face save a pair of keen daek eyes, overhung by busht white brows, and long gray side whiskers. Altogether he gava me the impression of a respectable master mariner who had fallen info years and poverty. 7 7 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 45 . 8

Qahramon qo’llarining thin, workworn hand kabi ta’rifi qahramonni uning kasbiy tegishliligi borasida tavsiflashning pragmatik vazifasini bajaradi. Ozg’in, mehnat bilan suligan qo’llar jismoniy mexnat bilan band bo’lgan kishini tavsiflaydi. Bu holda hand somatik so’zi thin, work worn an iq lovchilari bilan birgalikda pragmatik ma’lumot. Kasbiy yo’nalish signali sifatida yuzaga chiqadi, qizi g’ i shundaki, ushbu kontekstda thin, work worn anilovchilari q a h ramonning h issiy holatini ifodalashning qo’shimcha stilistik ahamiyatini kasb etadi. Ushbu misolda qahramonni badiiy qiyoslash stilistik usuli or q ali obrazli ta’riflash berilgan. Qahramonning obrazini yaratish uchun ishlatilgan bird, bloodhound h ayvon nomlarini muallif bejiz tanlamagan, chunki ular kasbiy detektiv-iz q uvarning asosiy xususiyatlari bo’lgan o’tki r sezgirlik, sergaklik, zehn va bilimdonlikni ochib berishga yordam beradi. Bu stilistik usullarining talqin etilishi ta’riflang qahramonning kasbiy sifatlari h aq ida ma’lum fikr yuritishga imkon beradi. Avvalgi h oldagidek bu yerda h a m qahramonning portret ta’rifi or qa li stilistik va pragmatik xususiyatlarining majmui kuzatiladi. Misollarning uchinchi guruhi portretning ham implitsit, ham eksplitsit ravishdagi pragmatik tavsiflarini o’z ichiga olgan aralash turdagi qahramonning portret ta’rifining pragmatik tavsiflariga ega. Qahramonning portret ta’rifi bu yerda bir qator pragmatik vazifalarni bajaradi: qahramonning yosh jixatidan ta’rifi vazifasi, qahramonning ijtimoiy ta’rifi vazifasi, hissiy baholash vazifasi. Qahramonning yosh jixatidan tavsifi ushbu misolda ham eksplitsit, ham implitsit ifodalanishga ega. Qahramonning ijtimoiy tavsifiga kelsak, u quyidagi signallar bilan implitsit ifodalanadi: ushbu signallar insonning ochi q h a vodagi o g’ ir me h natidan dalolat beradi, bu uni quyi taba q a kishilariga kiritish imkonini beradi. Shuni ta’kidlash lozimki, bu holda ham portret ta’rifini yaratishda pragmatik va stilistik tavsiflarning u zviy o’zaro bog’lanishi k u zatiladi. Bu portretning hissiy baholash vazifasiga epitetlari orqali erishiladi. 9

Shunday qilib, portret ta’riflarini tahlil qilish badiiy qahramon portretining pragmatik tavsiflarini belgilab beradi. Biz portretlarning pragmatik yo’naltirilgan uchta turini ajratdik: 1) yosh jixatidan, 2) ijtimoiy, 3) kasbiy jixatdan. Tahlilning ma’lumotlari yosh, kasbiy, ijtimoiy jixatdan tavsiflarning quyidagi turlarini ajratish imkoniyatini beradi: a) eksplitsit (bevosita) ta’rif; b) implitsit (bevositali) ta’rif; v) aralash turdagi ta’rif. Ushbu maqolaning eng muhim xulosalaridan biri badiiy portretdagi pragmatik va stilistik tavsiflarining uzviy bog’liqligi haqidagi fikr bo’lib, bu o’z navbatida tilning umumiy muloqot nazariyasi doirasida pragmatika va stilistikaning o’zaro bog’lanishidan dalolat beradi. 1.2. M. Dickens ning " Майсазордаги гуллар » asari da rakter va g’oyaning uzviy birligi. Avvalo adabiyotshunoslikda hikoya janridagi xarakter masalasiga nisbatan aytilgan ayrim fikrlar bilan tanishib chiqaylik L.Qayumov yozadi: "Hikoyada xarakter tadrijiy taraqqiyotida berilmaydi. Har bir shax s yaxlit h olda namoyon bo’lib, uning biror xususiyati ochib beriladi. Xarakter shakllangan, tayyor holda ko’rsatiladi. Aks ettirilayotgan vo q eagacha xarakterning qanday bo’lganligi, u tugagandan so’ng qanday bo’lishligi tasvirlanmaydi yoki yo’l-yo’lakay aytib utiladi". 8 Yuqoridagi singari xarakter tadrijiy tara qq iyotida berilmaydi, degan ko’ plab adabiyotshunos va tan q idchilarning fikrini keltirish mumkin. Bu fikrlar to’g’ri bo’lsa-da, ularni hikoya janrining barcha namunalariga nisbatan gapirish to’g’ri emas. Chunki hikoyada xarakter o’zining tadrijiy taraqqiyotida ham ko’rsatilishi mumkin. Xush, janr uchun xarakterning qay yusinda tasvirlanishiga yagona usul yo’q ekan, qaysi hikoyalarda xarakterlar rivoji ko’rsatiladi-yu, qaysilarida 8 Каюмов Л. «Проблемы художественного метода В.Шекспира». Т ., 1983 10

ko’rsatilmaydi va nima uchun? Bunga javob shuki, har bir individual yozuvchining mahorati va o’z oldiga qo’ygan maqsadidan izlash to’g’ri bo’lar edi. Bundan tashqari, hikoyadan tuliqro q boyro q bo’lgan va undan yirikr oq shaklga rivojlanib yetadigan q issa janri xarakterning tadrijiy rivojlanishini tasvirlash uchun ancha kengro q imkoniyatlar ochib beradi. Demak, hikoya- q issa janri uchun xarakterni tasvirlashning yagona usuli bo’lmay, uni yozuvchining maqsadi belgilaydi. Xarakterlar rivoji, ayni q sa, so’nggi yillar hikoyachiligida ko’pro q sezilmo q da. Bunga sabab. Yuksak sur’atlar bilan o’sib borayotgan jamiyatimiz, uning quruvchilari hayoti va xarakterini bir emas, bir necha epizodda kengroq va chuqurroq, ko’rsatib berishga intilishdir. Ingliz hikoyachiligida bu tendenstiya hozirgacha muvaffaqiyat bilan egallanmagan bo’lsa, unga kuchli intilish sezilmoqda. Hikoyada aks ettirilaetgan xarakterdan buyuk voqealarga boy davr va shu davr kishisi aks etib turadi. Lekin hozir g’arbda shunday hikoyalar paydo bo’lmoqdaki, ularda na mazmun, na shakl birligi, na qahramon xarakteri bor. H atto A vstraliyalik yozuvchi Robert M u zel o’zining mashxur romaniga "Fazilatsiz inson" deb nom qo’ ygan. Bularning hammasi g’arb modernizmining bir ko’rinishi, xolos. Hikoyaning zamirida asosan inson, obraz xarakterining muammosi yotganligi uchun hech qanday qiziqarli syujet inson xarakteri o’rnini bosolmaydi. Muvaffaqiyatli yoritilgan xarakter bo’lmagan holda dolzarb va qiziqarli muammo qalamga olinsa-da, hikoya to’la muvaffaqiyatga erisha olmaydi. Ba’zan, hikoyada ishtirok etmayotgan, "orqaroqda" tasvirlangan qahramonga nisbatan berilgan o’tkir so’zli ikki-uch tavsiflar hikoya yoki qissani janr doirasidan xarakterli asar darajasiga ko’tara oladi. Xarakter yaratishda hikoya janriga xos bo’lgan xususiyatlardan biri ham shudir. Bu xususiyat roman va nazm janrlariga xos emas, ularning xajm va qonun-qoidalari xarakterni "orqaroqda" emas, bevosita eng oldinga chiqargan holda ishtirok ettirib tasvirlash xususiyatiga egadirlar. 11

Yuksak san’atkorlar hikoyasidagi xarakter taqdirida ma’lum darajada davr va mamlakat, qolaversa, jamiyat taqdiri aks etadi, bor bo’yi namoyon bo’ladi. Lekin hikoyada xarakter asosiy mezon bo’lishiga qaramay, u hikoyaning mazmuniga aylana olmasa, qahramon xarakteri asar g’oyasiga singdirib yuborilmasa va, aksincha, asar g’oyasi qahramon xarakterida o’z ifodasini topa olmasa, asarning g’oyaviy-badiiy qimmati yo’qoladi. Va aksincha, insonning, obrazning xarakterini tasvirlash ikkinchi o’ringa tushib qolib, faqatgina qiziqarli syujetga berilib ketish ham salbiy oqibatga olib keladi. Aniqrog’i, voqea tutuqsiz sochma holatlar bo’lmay, ma’lum bir obraz xarakterining ichki dunyosi ochish uchun xizmat qilishi, shu xarakter tevaragida jipslashuvi lozim. Bundan kelib chiqadiki, hikoya janrida insonni tasvirlash syujet va boshqa masalalarga nisbatan asosiy, hal qiluvchi ahamiyatga ega. Umuman, badiiy ijod sohasida muayyan andaza bo’lmaganidek, hikoya yoki qissada xarakter yaratilishi uchun ham andaza bo’lmaydi, u yozuvchining mahorati va muayyan maqsadidan kelib chiqadi. Xarakter qotib qolgan h olda ham rivojlanayotgan holda ham berilishi mumkin. Biroq bu o’sish jarayoni janrning xajm jixatdan chegaralangani sababli, romandagi singari keng davrni qamrab olmaydi, faqat bir yoki bir necha epizoddan iborat bo’ladi. Biroq, hajm cheklanishi ushbu janrning qimmatini tushirmaydi, hikoyada ham, qissada ham xarakter boshqa janrlardayoq o’ziga xos davrlarni ko’tarib chiqishga qodir. Masalan: "The last dog had been driver back. The hubbub died down. Find White Fang licked his hurts and meditated upon this, his fist taste of pack-cruelty and his introduction to the pask. He had never dreamed that his own kind consisted of more than One Tye, his mother, and himself. They had constituted a kind apart, and here, abrupli, he had discovered many more creatures apparently of his own kind.And there was a subconscious resentment that these, his king, at first had pitched upon him and tried todestroy him. In the same way he resented his mother being tied with a stick, even though it was done by the superior man-animals. It savored of the trap, of bondaje. Yet of the trap and of bondage he knew nothing. Freedom to roam and run and lie down at will, had been his heritage; and here it 12

was bein infringed upon. His mother's movements were restricted to the length of a stick, and the length of that same stick restricted him, for he had not yet got beyond the need of his mother's side. He did not like it. Nor did he like it when the man-animals arose and went on with their march; for a tiny man-animal took the other end of the stick and led Kite captive behind him, and behind Kite follower White Fang, greatly perturbed and worried by this new adventure he had entered upon. They went down the valley of the stream,far beyond White Fans widest ranging, until they came to the end of the valley, where the stream ran into the Maskenzie River. Here, where canoes were cached on poles high in the air and where stool fish-racks for the druing of fis, camp was made; and White Fang looked on with wondering eyes. The superiority of these man-animals increased with every moment. There was their mastery over all these sharp-fanged dogs. It breathed of power. But greater than that, to the wolf-cub, was their mastery over things not alive; they're capacity to communicate motion to unmoving things; their capacity to change the very face of the world ". 9 Hikoya va qissada boshqa epik janrlardagi singari birinchi navbatda mazmun va syujet taraqqiyoti jarayonida ko’rinadigan xarakter emas, xarakterlarga singdirilgan g’oya olg’a chiqishi kerak. Bu o’rinda g’oya va obrazlarning o’zaro munosabati (masalasi) kelib chiqadi. Bular bir masalaning ikki jixatdan mohiyati bo’lib, g’oya obrazda ifodalanadi, obraz esa g’oyani tashuvchi tip. " Q a h ramon - personajga aylangan ideyadir",- degan edi Balza k . H o zir matbuotimizda bosilayotgan k o’ p hikoyalarning muvaffaqiyatsizligining asosiy sababi ham ana shu - g’oya noaniq, va mavhum bo’ladi, binobarin, qahramonlar xarakterining o’ziga xosligi ham bo’lmaydi. Chunki g’oya noaniqligi qahramon muammosining muvaffaqiyatsiz h al bo’lishiga olib keladi va aksincha. 9 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 72. 13

M. Dickens ning " Майсазордаги гуллар » asari ni olaylik Asar qahramoni bilan hech kim do’stlashmaydi, chunki u gapira olmaydi. Ikki d o’ sti bor, biro q ular ham, o’ziga o’xshagan tilsiz bo’lgan singarilar. Uni hamma q uvib soladi. Ko’rinib turibdiki, qahramon hayoti ayanchli bir ahvolda. Lekin u bilan tili bor bir bola do’stlashib qoladi. Tilsiz mavjudot bilan tili bor odamning do’stlashuvi juda nozik masala. Uning sababini ochib berishga bir necha sahifa, ehtimol, butun boshli hikoya talab qilinishi mumkin edi. Hikoyada bir tafsilot orqali uni tasvirlash esa katta mahoratni talab qiladi. Jek London bir necha satrlik fikr tasvirlar bilan dohiyona ravishda buning uddasidan chiqa olgan. Masalan : "He came down a shelving bank to the stream. He had never seen water before. The footing looked good. There were no inegualities of surface. He stepped boldli out on it; and went down, cruing with fear, info the embrace of the unknown. It was cold, and he gasped, breating quickli. The water rushed into his lungs instead of the air that had always accompanied his act of breathing. 10 The suffocation he experienced was like the pand of death. To him it signified death. He had no conscious knowledge of death, bat like every animal of the Wild, he possessed the instinct of death. To him it stood as the greatest of hurts. It was the very essence of the unknown; it was.the sum of the terrors of the unknown, the one culminating and unthinkable catastrophe that could happen to him, about which he knew nothing and about which he feared everything. He came to the surface, and the sweet air rushed into his open mouth. He did not go down again. Quite as though it had been a long -established custom of his, he struck out with all his legs and began to swim. The near bank waa a yard away; but had come up with his back to it, and the first thing his eyes rested upon was the opposite bank, toward which he immediately began to swim. The stream was a small one, but in the pool it widened out to a score of feet ". Yuqoridagi tasvirlash xarakter mantiqidan kelib chiqadi. Boshqa janrlar singari tafsilot berish va tasvir bilan isbotlash holati realizm xususiyatlaridan 10 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 39. 14

biridir. Realist s an’atkorlardagina tafsilot va realistik tasvir orqali isbotlash amalga oshirilishi mumkin. Peyzaj tasviri qahramon xarakterini yorqinroq ifodalaydi, uning ichki dunyosi va kayfiyatini ochib beruvchi element sifatida muhim o’rin egallaydi. Portretning qay yo’sinda chizilishi qahramon fazilati va xususiyatlarini o’ylashga yordam beradi, xarakter mantqini tuldiradi. Hikoyada va qi ssada manzaraning tutgan vazifasi, asosan, q uyidagilardan iborat. 1. Qahramon harakat qilayotgan sharoit bilan tanishtirish. 2. Q a h ramonning ruhiy holati va xarakterini ko’rsatish uchun eng yaqin komponent . 3. Lirizm va dramatizmni kuchaytirish. 4. Insonning tabiat, moddiy dunyo bilan chambarchas bog’liq ekanligini qayd etish. Ba’zi novelistlar qahramon portretini boshidayoq, chizib tanishtiradilar. Bu muvaffaqiyatli yo’l emas. Chunki u asar davomida qahramon xarakteri, ichki dunyosini ochish uchun foydalanilmay, portretligicha qolib ketadi, xolos. Mohir novellistlar asar syujeti davomida, xarakterning ochilishi jarayonida shunga muvofiq va mos ravishda portret tasvirini chizib boradilar. Bu o’rinda portretning ko’rsatila turib, "ishlatilmay", foydalanilmay qolib ketadigan ortiqcha buyoqlari chizilmaydi. Hikoyada qahramon xarakteri harakatda, o’sishda tasvirlanar ekan, tabiat shunga monand usib-o’zgarish jarayonida tasvirlanadi. Biroq hamma vaqt ham manzara tasviri bilan qahramon dunyosi mos kelishi shart emas. U quyilgan maqsadga muvofiq, o’zgarishi mumkin. Masalan, ba’zi hikoyalarda manzara qahramonning ruhiy holatga nisbatan kontrast usulda qo’llaniladi. Atrofda bahor, go’zallik, xandalar, bayram yashnamoqda. Lekin qahramon qalbida esa motam, u bugun yeridan ayrildi. Na bayram, na bahor uning ko’ngliga sig’adi, nazarida butun tabiat motam libosini kiygandek. G’oya bilan syujetni ham aralashtirib yubormaslik kerak syujet asardagi voqealar tizmasi bo’lsa, g’oya - shu voqeadan kelib chiquvchi mantiliy xulosa, da’vat va yakdil fikdir. Masalan, dahshatli urush manzarasi yaratilar ekan, undagi jang, kurash, qiyinchiliklar, muvaffaqiyatsizlik va g’alabalar hikoya syujetini 15

tashkil qilsa, shu dahshatlarga nafrat tinchlikka, vatanparvarlikka, mardlik, jasurlikka tahsin va muxabbat uning g’oyasidir. Demak, xarakter ham, g’oya ham bevosita syujetdan kelib chiqadi. Hikoyada har bir harakat, har bir voqea ham xarakterni ochib beruvchi vosita, ham o’z-o’zidan ro’y beradigan voqea uchun zamin bo’lishi kerak Hikoyadagi har bir voqea mana shu ikki xususiyatdan bittasi, masalan, xarakterni ochib berish uchungina xizmat qiladigan bo’lsa, bu o’rinda ko’pgina hikoyalarda uchrovchi voqealarning bog’liqligi yo’qolib, ma’lum tarqoqlikka yo’l quyiladi. Yoki, aksincha, agar bir voqea o’zidan keyin keluvchi voqea uchun faqatgina zamin bo’lib kelsa-yu, xarakter ochish uchun xizmat qilmasa, asarda xarakter yaratilmay, quruq, bayon etish birinchi o’ringa chiqadi. Ikkala holat ham asarda bir yoqlamalikni yuzaga keltirib, uning g’oyaviy-badiiy qiymatini pasaytiradi. Hikoyada Yuqoridagi ikkala holat ham bir-biriga chambarchas ulanishi lozim. Masalan: "Midway in the passage, the current picked up the cub and swept him down-stream. He was caught in the miniature rapid at the bottom of the pool.Here was little chance for swimmang. The quiet water had become suddenli angry. Sometimes he was under, sometimes on top. At all times he was in violent motion, now being turned over or around, and again, being smashed against a rock. And with every rock he struck, he yelped. His progress was a siries of yelps, from which might have been adduced the number of rocks he encountered. Bellow the rapid was a second pool, and here, captured by the eddy, he was gently borne to the bank and as gently deposited on a bed of gravel. He crawled frantically clear of the water and lay down. He had learned some, more about the world. Watter was not alive. Yet it moved. Also, it looked as solid as the earth, but was without any solidity at all. His conclusion was that things were not always they appered to be. The cub's fear of the unknown was an inherited ditrust, and it had now been strengthened by experience. Thenceforth, in the nature of things, he would possess and the days were thronged with experiece for White Fang. During the time that Kite was tied by the stick, he rfd about over all the camp, inquiring, investigating, learning. He quickly came to know much of the ways of the man-animals, but 16

familiarity did not breed contempt. The more he came to know them, the more they vindicated their vindicated their superiority, the more they displayed their mysterius powers, the greater loomed their god-likeness. To man has been the grief, often, of seeing his gods overthrown and his altars crumbling; but to the wolf and the wild dog that have come in to crouch at man's feet, this grief has never come. Unlike man, whose gods are of the unseen and the over guessed, vapors and mists of fancy eluding the garment of reality, wandering wraiths of desired goodness and power, intangible outcroppings of self into the realm of spirit -unlike man, the wolf and wild dog that have come in to the fire find their gods in the living flesh, solid to the touch, occupying earth - space and requiring time for the accomplishment of their ends and their existence. No effort of faith is necessary to belive in such a god; no effort of will be able to induce disbelief in such a god. There is no getting way from it. There it stands, on its two hind- legs, club in hand, immensely potential, passionate and wrathful -and loving, god and mystery and power all wrapped up and around by flesh that bleeds when it is torn and that is good to eat like any flesh" 11 Hikoya qisqa janr bo’lganligi tufayli asar mazmuni syujetning tugashi bilan emas, ko’rsatib utilgan q is q agina syujetdan ham xulosa chiqarilib, tugal g’oya bilan yakunlanishi lozim. Ko’rsatib berilgan voqealardanoq asar davomining qanday bo’lishi bilinib turishi lozim. Syujet asosan hikoyadagi ichki nizoda namoyon bo’ladi. Syujetni yuqorida biz xarakter rivoji orqali namoyon bo’ladigan asarning voqeasi deb aytdik. Ingliz hikoyachiligida esa psixologizm masalasi turli halqlarning madaniy merosining ta’siri bilan bir qatorda, asosan, qardosh, ingliz va jahon realistik prozasining ta’siri tufayli yuzaga keldi. Psixologizmning nazmdan nasrga utishi esa inson ichki dunyosini bir namoyon bo’lishda emas, kengroq va chuqurroq xilda tasvirlanishi maqsad qilib olinganligi bilan bog’liqdir. 11 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 67. 17

Hikoyada va qissada psixologizm nihoyatda katta ahamiyatga ega, qahramon ichki dunyosining dialektikasi, qarama-karshiliklarini keng ko’lamda, atroflicha tasvirlash katta epik janrlarga xos bo’lsa, kichik janrga qahramon ichki dunyosini mayda chiziqlar orqali tasvirlash xosdir. Ya’ni hikoyalarga ko’pincha lirik, ba’zan liro-epik roman va qissaga ko’pincha liro-epik va epik psixologizm taalluqlidir. Agar psixologizm tushunchasi faqat qahramon shaxsiy dunyosining ochilishi bo’lganda edi, bu juda tor tushuncha bo’lib qolar edi. Kichik hajmli hikoyaga qahramon hayotining o’zigina emas, uning timsolida ijtimoiy hayot, ma’lum ijtimoiy nizo asos qilib olinganidek qahramon psixologiyasida ham jamoat psixologiyasining bir uchquni o’z ifodasini topmog’i lozim. Qahramon q a lbini ocha bilish uchun davr qalbini ko’ra olish, uni his qilish lozim. Qahramon orqali yozuvchi o’zini ham tasvirlaydi, deydi L.Qayumov. Yozuvchining tutgan o’rni, fikri asarda g’oyat katta ahamiyatga ega. Chunki uning mavhumligi asar g’oyasining mavhumligiga olib keladi. Har bir badiiy asarning ozmi-ko’pmi sub’yektiv ekanligi, ya’ni unda yozuvchi tutgan o’rni va fikri muqarrar ravishda ifodalanishini bundan yigirma yil oldin L.Qayumov ham ta’kidlab o’tgan edi. Yozuvchining fikri turli ko’rinishda: syujetning muallif tili bilan izohlab berilishida, qahramonning ichki dunyosini ko’rsatish jarayonida, tabiat va portret tasviri borasida namoyon bo’ladi. Biroq muallifning fikri kitobxonga aql o’rgatish degan gap emas. Qisqa hajmli bo’lgan bu ikkita janr uchun xarakterlar evolyutsiyasining har vaqt ko’rsataverish mumkin bo’lmagani sababli ham ba’zi o’rinlarda muallif ishtiroki, uning qarashlarining asar ruhiga ta’siri asr g’oyasi va qahramon xarakterining ochilishida katta ahamiyat kasb etadi. Yozuvchi Jek Londonning tutgan o’rni, uning fikri uning keng dunyoqarashi, fikrlash diapazoni bilan chambarchas bog’liq. Hikoyada va qissada yozuvchi tutgan o’rni, fikrining eng kuchli ahamiyati shuki, biz tasvirlanayotgan voqealarni, olamni, xarakterni yozuvchining ko’zi bilan ko’ra olishga, uning tafakko’ri bilan fikrlay bilishga o’rganamiz. 18

Birinchi bob yuzasidan xulosa. Bitiruv Malakaviy ishimizning birinchi bobi hikoyalardagi qahramonlar va badiiy nutqning g’oyaviy uyg’unligi kabi pragmatik muommolar o’z ifodasini topgan. Shuningdek bu bobda biz badiiy asar pragmatikasi haqida lingvopragmatik olimlarning qarashlarini taniqli Amerika yozuvchisi M. Dickens ning " Майсазордаги гуллар » asari dan keltirilgan misollar yordamida pragmatik muammo va tavfsiflar tadqiq etdik. Xarakter shakl va mazmunning ajralmas tarkibiy qismi o’laroq, hamma vaqt badiiy mahorat va talant mezoni bo’lib koladi. U murakkab to’qnashuvlar, ba’zan fojiaviy munosabatlar tuguni tariqasida faqat ijobiy bo’libgina qolmay, salbiy bo’lishi ham mumkin. Xarakterning ma’naviy mohiyati uning ijobiy yoxud salbiy ekanligini belgilovchi asosiy ko’rsatkich hisoblanadi. Kishilar til vositasi orqali o’zaro aloqa qiladilar, bir-birlarining fikrini tushunadilar. Fikr esa tilning eng muhim elementlaridan biri bo’lgan so’z va turli grammatik vositalar orqali ifodalanadi. Umumiy ma’noda tilning vazifasi bu bilan cheklanmaydi, u his- tuyg’ularni ifodalash uchun ham xizmat qiladi. Insoniy his-tuygularsiz hech qachon odamlarda haqiqat izlash sodir bo’lmagan, bo’lmaydi va bo’lishi ham mumkin emas. So’zlovchi predmet, hodisalar to’g’risida yoki suhbatdoshi haqida 19

ma’lumot berar ekan, borliqqa nisbatan ob’yektiv munosabatda bo’ladi. Bunday paytda u o’z fikrini neytral so’zlar va intellektual nutq shakli yordamida ifodalaydi. Bunda nutq ifodalash belgisining ehtimoliy ma’lumot darajasi, harakatning normal-odatdagi sur’ati, voqelikning ob’yektiv holati, So’zlovchining tinglovchiga yoki o’zga shaxsga nisbatan betaraf munosabati bayon etiladi. Ba’zi novelistlar q a h ramon portretini boshidano q chizib tanishtiradilar. Bu - muvaffa q iyatli usul emas. Chunki u asar davomida q a h ramon xarakteri, ichki dunyosini o chish uchun foydalanilmay, portretligicha qolib ketadi xolos. Mohir novelistlar asar syujeti davomida, xarakterning ochilishi jarayonida shunga muvofiq va mo s ravishda portret tasvirini chizib boradilar. Bu o’ rinda portretning ko’rsatila turib, «ishlatilmay», foydalanilmay qolib ketadigan orti q cha buyoqd o r chizilmaydi. tuxta II. Bob. Badiiylik, obrazlilik va obraz. 2.1. Badiiy portretning pragmatik o’ziga xosligi . Badiiylik obrazlilikdan kengroq tushunchadir. Badiiylik barcha san’at turlarining, shu jumladan, adabiyotning o’ziga xos va eng muhim xususiyatidir. Badiiylik tushunchasi tarkibiga obrazlilik kiradi, ammo badiiylik faqat obrazlilikdan iborat bo’lmaydi. Adabiyotni badiiy shaklga keltirgan narsa faqat obrazlilik bo’lmay, balki uning vazifalari. Mazmuni va shakliga ta ’ llu q li k o’ pgina xususiyatlardir. Badiiylik (arabcha "bada’a" fe’lidan kelib chi qq an bo’lib, yangilik kiritish, ijod qilish ma’nolarini beradi) hayotni jonli va ta’sirli qilib tasvirlashning umumiy belgisi, o’xshash tarzda qa yta yaratilgan olamning h ayotiyligi, mo’jizakorligini, 20

ta’sirchan va jozibadorligini ta’minlovchi holatdir. Ya’ni badiiylik - badiiy ijodning hamma elementlarini (obraz, xarakter, tip, syujet, detal, kompozitsiya, badiiy, til, ifoda- ta’sir vositalari. Poetik sintaksis, janrlar.....) o’z ichiga q amrab oladi, ularning h ar biriga va ayni paytda, ular turli-tuman tarzda birlashib, yaxlitlashganlarida hammasiga jon ato etadi. Demak, badiiylik deganda hayotni jonli va ta’sirli qilib qaytadan yaratish san’ati, h ayotiy hodisalari ustidan chiqargan " h ukmi" shu "hukm" ruhida tarbiyalash tushuniladi. 12 Shu muloxazaga suyansak, badiiylikning o’zagi obrazlilik ekani aniqdashadi, u san’atning "tili", boshqacha aytganda san’atning san’at bo’lishini ta’minlovchi ruh (jon) dir. Obrazlilik badiiylik ichida yashaganidek, obraz obrazlilikning mohiyatini o’zida mujassam etadi. Shu sabab obraz tushunchasi ( demakki, keng ma’noda badiiylik) Adabiyot ilmining bosh masalalaridan sanaladi, chunki unda obrazlilikning mohiyati borligicha namoyon bo’ladi. Demak, yozuvchi- san’atkorning butun salohiyati (mahorati, ruhshunosligi, kashfiyoti, donishmandligi ...) u yaratgan obrazlarda muhrlanadi. "Obraz" atamasi "raz" ("chiziq") so’zidan olingan bo’lib, "raz '' so’zidan "razit" ("chizmoq", yunmoq, uymoq) va undan "obrazit" ("chizib, yunib, uyib, shakl yasamoq") so’zi yasalgan. "Obrazit" dan "Obraz" ("umumiy olingan tasvir") vujudga kelgan. Obraz nazariyasi, dastavval, Aristotel ("Poetika") estetik qarashlarida uchrasa-da, unga birinchi bor olmon faylasufi Gegel ilmiy ta’rif bergan ("San’at obrazlar orqali fikrlashdir"). 13 Shuni esdan chiqarmaslik muhimki, obraz faqatgina san’atga tegishli hodisa emas. Buni san’at va tanqid, yozuvchi va tanqidchi o’rtasidagi farqlarda ham yaqqol ko’rish mumkin. Yozuvchi o’z qarashlarini, orzu-istaklarini obrazlar vositasida qalbining "dardi", his-hayajoni bilan o’quvchilar ommasiga etkazsa, asosiy maqsad qilib 12 Normatov u “hayot adabiyot va romantika” Sharq yulduzi. T 1984, 235- bet 13 Головенченко Ф.М. «Введение в литературоведение». М ., 1984 21

o’quvchilar ruhiy olamiga, tuyg’ulariga ta’sir qilishni nazarda tutsa, adabiy tanqidchi o’z fikr-mulohazalarini va qarashlarini izchil mantiq, asos va isbot asosida aniq bayon qilish yuli bilan ommaga etkazadi, asosiy maqsad qilib, kitobxon aqliga ta’sir qilishni nazarda tutadi. Yozuvchi M. Dickens ning fikricha, munaqqid - go’zallikdan (badiiy asardan) olgan taassurotini ya’ni shaklga yoki ya’ni vositalar bilan ifodalab berishga qodir insondir. To’g’ri, tanqidchi ham badiiy vositalarsiz, his-hayajon va "dard"siz ish ko’rmasligi kerak. Chunki falsafada isbotlanganidek, "kishi his-tuyg’ularisiz insonning haqiqatni izlashi bo’lmagan, bo’lgan emas va bo’lishi ham mumkin emas!" Tanqidchi badiiy asarni baholash jarayonida shu asar tufayli qalbida tug’ilgan hislarni, hayajonni ifodalashi lozim, ya’ni tanqidchi o’z ilmiy tafakko’riga, uning mantiqiga o’z badiiy tafakko’rini buysundirgandagina shu yul bilan ularning o’zaro dialektik birligini ta’minlagandagina o’z vazifasini bajarishga qodir bo’ladi. Chunki, his-hayajon va obrazlilik bilan charxlangan fikr sovuqqon hissiz fikrga nisbatan o’quvchida kuchli ishonch hosil qiladi. Lekin, tanqidning bu xususiyatini ba’zi yozuvchi va tanqidchilar adabiyotdagi obrazlilik tushunchasiga tenglashtiradilar yoki tanqidga xos bo’lgan badiiy tafakko’rni ilmiy tafakko’rdan ustun quyadilar. Masalan, yozuvchi J.Sharipov: "Men adabiy-tanqidiy' maqolalar to’plamini roman kabi o’qishni hoxlardim", - deganda, xuddi shu qarashni yoqlagandek ko’rinadi. San’at va adabiyotdagi obraz jonli harakati, jozibadorligi va yorqinligi bilan o’zida hodisaning qonuniyatini asosli va chuqur mujassam qilgani va hokazo xususiyatlari bilan farq qiladi. Demak, adabiyotga hayotning hamma (inson, narsa-buyum, xayvon, hodisa, predmet, usimlik ko’chma ma’no beruvchi so’zlar, iboralar, leksik resurslar, ifoda vositalari kabi) elementlari kirar ekan, kirganda ham san’atkor ongi va qalbida jilolanib, boyib, kattalashib, eng muhimi insonlashib muhrlanarkan - ularning barchasini obraz deb yuritish qonuniyatdir. 22

Obrazning "badiiy to’qima yordamida yaratilgan, estetik qiymat kasb etgan inson hayotining umumlashma va ayni chog’da, aniq manzarasidir" degan asosli ta’rifiga tayansak, uning to’rtta asosiy, har biri alohida tahlil qilinadigan xususiyati borligi va ayni paytda. Obraz fikrini umumlashtirishning tejamli, bo’rtib chiqqan, mubolag’ali usuli ekanligi ayon bo’ladi. Badiiy obrazning umumlashmaligi. Asalari minglab gullarga qo’nib, uning eng asl sharbatlarini emib, bir yerga yig’ib bol to’plaganidek, yozuvchi ham muayyan obraz (dukondor)ni yaratish uchun, ko’plab dukondorlarning qiyofasini belgilovchi o’ziga xos xususiyatlarini, odatlarini so’zlash odoblarini, ma’naviyatini va hokazolarni o’rganadi va ularning eng saralarini umumlashtirib, bir obrazda jamlaydi. Shu sababdan birgina obraz mohiyatida yuzlab kishilarga xos hislat va belgilarini ko’rish, "tanish ko’ringan notanish kishilarni uchratish mumkin bo’ladi. Ya’ni, obraz kishilardan eng muhim hislatlar asosida umumlashtirilgani, shu asosda yaxlitlashtirilgani bilan farq qiladi. Badiiy obrazning aniqligi (individualligi). Hayotda bir-biriga aynan o’xshaydigan odam. Barg, q or uchquni bo’lmaganidek, hislatlar ham, fazilatlar ham betakror ekan, badiiy obrazlar olami ham xuddi h ayot kabi turfa xildir. Shunga binoan, obrazlar rang-barang, boy, k o’ p q irralidirki, bu o’z navbatida har bir obrazning xarakterli aniq q iyofasi, o’ziga xos original qili g’ i, odati, o’ y-xayoli, orzusi, tili muhokamasi, mushohadasi, ma’naviyati, salo h iyati bo’lishligini taqozo qiladi. Individuallashtirish qonuniyati ishga tushadi, o’ziga xoslik kashf etiladi, ta’kidlab ko’rsatiladi, esda qoladigan qilib tasvirlanadi. Ana shundagina individual obraz jonliligi va tabiiyligi, hayotiyligi va betakrorligi bilan kitobxon qa lbidan joy oladi. Obraz yaratishda 'badiiy to’qima obraz umumlashmalik va individuallik qonuniyatlarining birlashuvidan yuzaga kelar ekan, ularni, san’atkor dilidan o’tqazib, o’zligini qo’shib tasvirlarkan, albatta, undan badiiy to’qimaning, fantaziyaning qay darajadadir qudrati qushilgan bo’ladi. Uchinchidan, badiiy to’qima o’ylab chiqarilishidan qat’iy nazar uning asosi hayotiylikdan mahrum bo’lmasligi lozim. U o’quvchini ishontirishi shart. 23

Odamlar kitobxonlarning hislarini qo’zg’atish, "tuyg’ularimiz to’lqinlarni" uyg’otmoq orqali hayajonlantirish -estetik ta’sirchanlik ekan, badiiy obraz mag’zi to’q, hayotiy, umriboqiy bo’lgandagina badiiy qimmatga ega bo’ladi; obraz yaratishga o’tadi, undan xayajonlanib o’rnak olamiz yoki nafratlanamiz, his- tuyg’ularimizning yaxshilari (ijobiylari)ga "oziq," beramiz, yomonlarini (salbiylari)ni yetti qavat chuqurga ko’mamiz. Umumlashtirish, individuallashtirish, badiiy to’qima va estetik ta’sirchanlik adabiy asarning hamma elementlariga taalluqli universal tamoyil - badiiylikning ko’rsatkichi bo’lganidek, mubolag’asiz birorta san’at asarini yaratish ham mumkin emas. Mubolag’a san’atning barcha komponentlariga xos xususiyatdir. Masalan: Now that the terrible unknown had let go of him, he forgot that the unknown had any terrors. He was aware only of curiosity in all the all the things about him. He inspected the grass beneath him, the moss berry plant just beyond, and the dead trunk of the blasted pine that stood on the edge of an open space among the trees. A squirrel, running around the base of the trunk, came full upon him, and gave him a great fright. He cowered down and snarled. But the squirrel was as badly scared. It ran up the tree, and from a point of safety chattered back savagely. This helped the cub's courage, and though the woodpecker he next encountered gave him a start, he proceeded confidently on his way. Such was his confidence, that when a moosebird impudently hopped up to him, he reached out at it with a playful paw. The result was a sharp peck on the end of his nose that made him cower down and. The noise he made was too much for the moosebird, which sought safety in flight. 14 Demak, yozuvchi-san’atkor hamma vaqt (asarning eng nozik chizgilariga) yangilik yaratadi. Chunki, uning vazifasi - tabiat va odamning nusxasini berish emas, balki, o’xshash qilib yaratilgan narsaga jon va harakat ato etishda, uning qalbi, mazmuni, namunaviy va o’ziga xos ko’rinishi haqida taassurot uyg’otishdadir. 14 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 90 24

Agar obrazni yong’oqqa qiyoslasak, xarakter shu yong’oqning mag’zidir. Chunki mag’izda yong’okning mohiyati, tirikligi, zaruriyligi, joni jamul-jamdir. Shu sababli "yaratilsagina badiiy asar yaratiladi". Xarakterning mazmunini aniqlaydigan ikkita asosiy xususiyati bor. Birinchisi, "bu bir shaxsni ikkinchi bir shaxsdan ajratib turadigan ahloqiy va psixologik belgilar majmuasidan iboratdir. Hayotda shunday kishilarni uchratish mumkin: ujar yo tajang, og’ir yo engil, kamgap yo ko’p gapiradigan va xokazo. Ruhiy xususiyatiga nisbatan tabiiy xususiyatga yaqin belgilar yozuvchi uchun asosan obrazni individuallashtirish uchun zarur bo’ladi. Ikkinchisi - bu individual belgilarini ham o’z ichiga olgan holda ma’lum bir ijtimoiy sharoitda paydo bo’lgan, ijtimoiy ma’no kasb qilgan shaxs iroda yo’nalishi va bu iroda yo’nalishining asardagi badiiy ifodasidan iboratdir. Faqat ijtimoiy sharoit asosida yuzaga chiqqan shaxs irodasi xarakterning asarda badiiy va g’oyaviy negizini ta’min qiladi. Busiz yozuvchi yaratgan xarakter badiiy va estetik qiymatga ega bo’lmaydi". Demak, xarakter - bu aniq iroda yo’nalishiga ega bo’lgan, o’z xatti harakatlari, intilishlari, o’y-xayollari, dunyoqarashi, ma’naviyati, ma’rifati, fe’l - atvori bilan ajralib turadigan to’laqonli shaxslar obrazidir. Shu sabab badiiy asardagi hamma obrazlar ham xarakter deb sanalmaydi. Xarakter va uning psixologiyasining tahlili adabiyotning kamoloti, yozuvchining mahorati darajasini belgilovchi bosh omildir. Badiiy portretning pragmatik o’ziga xosligi - personajning yoshi, ijtimoiy maqomi va millati nuqtai nazaridan o’rganiladi. Masalan: But the cub was learning. His misty little mind hadalready made an unconscious classification. There were live things and things not alive. Also, he must watch out for the live things. The things not alive remained always in one place; but the live things moved about, and there was no telling what they might do. The thing to expect of them was the unexpected, and for this he must be prepared. He traveled very clumsily. He ran into sticks and things. A twig that he thought a long way off, would the next instant hit him on the nose or rake along his 25

ribs. There were inequalities of surface. Sometimes he overstepped and stubbed his nose. Quite as often he under stepped and stubbed his feet. Then there were the pebbles and stones that turned under him when he trod ifpon them; and from them he came to know that the things not alive were not all in the same state of stable eguilibrim as was .his cave; also, that small things not alive wera more liable than largs to fall down or over. But with every mishap he was learning. The longer he walked, the better walked. He was adjusting himself. He was learning to calculate his own muscular movements, to know his phasilf. He was learning to calculate his own muskulat movements, to know his physical limitations, to measure distances between objects, and between objects and himself. 15 Xullas, romanda yozuvchi uchun ichki dunyoning kechinmalarini tashki qiyofa, holat va xatti-harakatlarda ko’rinishini tasvirlash, ya’ni dinamik tamoyil asosiy mezondir. "Talant - hech qachon yangiligini yo’qotmaydigan yagona yangilikdir", xulosasiga kelgan X.Umarov guyo yuqoridagi fikr— muloxazalarni davom ettirib, lo’nda qilib deydi: Adabiyotda hamisha ikki toifa ijodkorlar davr surib kelganlar. Ulardan birinchisi, ta’bir joiz bo’lsa, kosiblardir. Adabiyotda kosib faqatgina o’z istak va orzulariga ko’ra, balki tirikchilik taqozosi tufayli yoxud nom qozonib yashash ishtiyoqida qo’liga qalam oladi. Ba’zilari esa bu soxaga mutlaqo tasodif tufayli aralashib qolgan omadsiz mexnatkashlar bo’lib chiqadi. Nima bo’lgan taqdirda ham qanchalik yashovchan bo’lsada, adabiyotda kosiblik uning soxibiga obru keltirgan emas. Ikkinchi toifa esa, qalb amri bilan ijod qiluvchi, o’zi yoqqan alangada qovriluvchi, cheksiz mashaqqatli mehnatdan huzur va halovat oluvchi, qisqasi, ijodni qismat deb biluvchi shaxslardir. Ularni ko’pincha tug’ma istedod egalari deb ham atashadi. 15 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 6 26

Ma’lumki, san’atkor to’ppa-to’g’ri hayotdan nusxa kuchirmaydi, balki, unga haqiqatdan o’xshash qilib yangi bir dunyo yaratadi, kashf etadi. Boshqacha aytganda, hayotiy haqiqatdan badiiy haqiqat yaratadi hayotiy fakt va xodisalarni o’zining ruhiy laboratoriyasida "qaynatish", ishlashi, sintez qilishi, ya’ni tasavvuri, xayoli, orzusi, tajribasi, qalbi, tabiati, dunyoqarashi bilan boyitgan va muayyan g’oyaga xizmat qiluvchi xos va zaruriy tafsilotlarini, fakt va xodisalarni tanlagan holda tugallig kasb etgan (obrazli) badiiy hayotni yaratishi zarur, yaratganda ham bu hayot kitobxon ko’z o’ngida jonli va real, ishonchli va go’zal, ta’sirchan va yaxlit bo’lib gavdalanishi shart. Obrazli qilib aytganda, bu paytda u borliqni tamoman unutadi, guyo qadimgi yunon faylasuflari aytganidek, ma’naviy "ilxom" holatda bo’ladi, ya’ni o’zi qilayotgan ishni to’liq anglamaydi; o’zligini o’zi yashayotgan dunyoni unutadi, o’zi yaratayotgan yangi olamda va shu olam "kishilari" - qahramonlari bilan birga yashay boshlaydi, ularning faoliyat va nutqlarini juda engillik bilan qog’ozga tushirib boradi. Yozuvchi o’zi his qilmagan narsa to’g’risida yozsa, buni o’qigan o’quvchi ham hech narsani his qilolmaydi. O’quvchining qalbiga ta’sir qilmagan narsaning adabiyotga hech tegishligi yo’q. Demak, kuydirish uchun kuyish, ardoqlash uchun ardoqlanish shart. Busiz bo’lmaydi. His qilinmasdan yozilgan narsa qog’ozdan qilingan gulga o’xshaydi. Haqiqiy asar dunyoga kelguncha, qalamkash ham taxminan shuncha aziyat chekadi" Lekin, bu aziyat ham kamlik qiladi: Hayotni, inson ruhini tahlil va tasvir etuvchi san’atkorda saviya baland, donishmandlik va payg’ambarlik hislatlarining bo’lishini ham taqozo qiladi. Kuchlarni yaratayotgan qahramonlariga "ulashganda", berganda buning sifati qandayligini, fikriy doirasi, ichki dunyosini teran, boy yoki cheklangan va qashshoqlikni kitobxon baholaydi. Demak, yozuvchining qahramonlar kechinmalarini birga his qilish, ularga singish iste’dodi qahramonlarga sub’ektiv munosabati katta rol o’ynaydi. U o’zini tasvirlanayotgan shaxs o’rniga quya olsagina, o’sha shaxs qiyofasiga kira bilsagina asardagi xarakter jonlanadi. Buning uchun yozuvchi, dastavval, obrazni ko’z 27

ungida jonli shaxs qiyofasiga kirguncha o’rganadi. Yozuvchi o’z qaxramonining tug’ilishidan tortib umrining oxirigacha bo’lgan hayotini va u harakat qilishi lozim bo’lgan voqelikni - sharoitni tasavvur qila bilishi kerak. Adabiyotshunoslikda ilxomning ikki darajasi borligi qayd etilgan. Biz birinchisini - mu’tadil ilxom va ikkinchisini -zavqu shavqqa tuliq ilhom deb atadik. Birinchisiz asar yozish mumkin emas, ikkinchisiz har qalay mumkin. Birinchisi juda sodda, tashqi ko’rinishidan o’zini juda xotirjam tutadi. Hamma holatini ongli idrok etadi. Ma’lumki, ilhom yozuvchi fikr-mushohadasining chuqo’rliklarida tug’iladi va etiladi. Ba’zan u birdaniga vulqondek otilib chiqadi, san’atkor yaratayotgan olamiga shunchalik ehtiros va hayajon bilan beriladiki, reallikni sezmaydi. Uning tomirlarida shiddat bilan qon yugura boshlaydi. Bular - ijod psixologiyasi nuqtai nazaridan xaqiqatdan ham afsona qahramon qalbida sodir bo’layotgan kechinma, iztirob, og’riqni o’z boshidan kechirayotgan shaxs holiga tushadi. Q ahramonning o’zigagina tegishli olamning eng chuq u r sirlarini tuliq his qilishga erishadi. Badiiy ijod tarixida bundan ham og’ir ma’naviy iztirob chekkan, azobli holatlarga tushgan yozuvchilarning iqrornomalarini eslash mumkin. Ushbu aytganlardan shu narsa aniqlanadiki, yozuvchi tasavvuridagi qaxramonning azob va quvonchlari, xayajon va tashvish-kechinmalarini birga tortar ekan, yaratayotgan, uydirma asosiy ko’rilgan lavxasini ko’z ungida ko’rar ekan, u bu holatlar va predmetlarni shunchalik aniq va jonli sezadiki, natijada uni o’z qalbida, ko’z oldida, haqiqiy hayotda yuz berayotgan kechinma va hodisadek qabul qiladi. Shuning natijasi o’laroq ijodiy jarayonning ba’zi "afsona"lari yuzaga chiqadi. Lekin, yozuvchi tasavvurida uyg’ongan hissiyot, qanchalik kuchli va chuqo’r, tiniq va ta’sirchan bo’lmasin, san’atkor o’zining "men"ini, yo’qotmaydi. Qalb ong va irodaga buysunadi. Shu sabab voqea bo’layotgan hamma xodisalarning real, ob’yektiv sababi yo’qligini yozuvchi tushunadi. Yuqoridagi yozuvchilarning "afsona" lari guyo hayvoniy aktyorlarning yig’isi, uh tortishi, azoblanishi, kulishi - bu o’sha o’ynayotgan obrazlarning yig’isi. Ux tortig’i, azoblanishi, kulgisi niqobini echishini unutmaydi, o’zining ilgarigi fikrlariga, 28

hayotiga qaytadi. U sahnada o’ynar ekan, o’zligini butunlay unutib quymaydi, garchi tomoshabin ko’ziga bu narsa tashlanmasa ham, u "kuylar ekan, eshitadi, harakat qilar ekan, ko’zatadi". Badiiy asarda hayot - so’z vositasida yaratilgan ekan, oddiy til bevosita real fikr va hissiyotning obrazli ifodasidir. "Jajji" (mikro) obraz, har qanday so’z konteksda (boshqa so’zlar bilan aloqada) hayotiyligini, o’zining xususiyatini, ohangini ko’rsata oladi. Yozuvchi so’zning grammatik, leksik, stilistik ma’no ko’rinishlaridan eng zarur va kerakligini konteksga qahramonning his-tuyg’ulari, kayfiyat va kechinmalarini o’zida mujassam etishiga - shu yukni qanchalik ko’tarishga qarab uning ahamiyati va kuchini belgilaymiz. Mahoratni egallash uzluksiz davom etadigan, chegarasiz jarayondir. Yo zuvchi o’z ijodining ma’lum davrida - usta san’atkor darajasiga k o’ tarilishi mumkin. Agar u shu bilan cheklansa, badiiy ma h oratini ustirmasa, h ayotdan va san’atdan o’rganishda davom etmasa. U or q aga ketaveradi, o’q uvchilari soni kamayaveradi. Adabiyot va san’at sirlarini etarli tushunmagan kitobxon real h ayot bilan poetik reallikni, tabiat bilan san’atni, boshdan kechirilgan bilan tasvirlangan kechinmaning farqiga bormasligi, hayotni adabiyot bilan baravarlashtirishi mumkin. Shuning uchun ham real h ayot bilan poetik ijodining munosabatlari muammosini tekshirish badiiy ijod jarayonini to’g’ri va asosli tushunishga olib kelganidek, yozuvchilar ijod laboratoriyasining ba’zi q irralarini ham tahlil qilishga imkon beradi. Jahon adabiyoti - bu insoniyat hamjamiyati taraqqiyotining turli davrlarini aks ettirgan, chuqur mazmunli xarakterlar badiiy ifodalanishining galereyasidir. Xarakter ifodasi o’ziga xos eng oddiy shaklidan eng murakkab shakligacha yozuvchi uchun hayotiy haqiqatni aks ettirishda asosiy yordamchi vositadir. Inson adabiyotda avvalo, xarakter, ya’ni his qiluvchi, fikrlovchi, ma’lum fe’l-atvorli tip kabi namoyon bo’ladi. Xarakterni belgilab, ifodalash adabiyotshunoslikning oldida t u rgan mu h im vazifalardan biri bo’lib qoladi. Yirik nazariy olim J.Sharipovning fikricha: 29

"Xarakter - ma’lum jamiyat muhiti yuzaga keltirgan insoniy ahloq, ma’naviyat tipidir". Adabiy asardagi xarakter - avvalo muayyan hayotiy sharoitdagi o’z hissiyotlari va individual hatti - harakat egasi bo’lmish ma’lum bir insondir. Inson va uning ichki dunyosi adabiyotda doim xarakter yaratuvchi bosh vosita sifatida namoyon bo’ladi. Xarakter shunday ahamiyatga egaki, u asarning estetik mazmunini ochib beruvchi o’ziga xos shakl sifatida nafaqat utmish yoki bugungi kun kishilarining obrazlarini, balki kelajak odamlarining o’ziga xos alomatlarini ham ifodalay olish mumkin. Xarakter shakl va mazmunning ajralmas tarkibiy qismi o’laroq, hamma vaqt badiiy mahorat va talant mezoni bo’lib qoladi. U murakkab to’qnashuvlar, ba’zan fojiaviy munosabatlar tuguni tariqasida faqat ijobiy bo’libgina qolmay, salbiy bo’lishi ham mumkin. Xarakterning ma’naviy mohiyati uning ijobiy yoxud salbiy ekanligini belgilovchi asosiy ko’rsatkich hisoblanadi. Kishilar til vositasi orqali o’za ro aloqa qiladilar, bir-birlarining fikrini tushunadilar. Fikr esa tilning eng muhim elementlaridan biri bo’lgan so’z va turli grammatik vositalar orqali ifodalanadi. Umumiy ma’noda tilning vazifasi bu bilan cheklanmaydi, u his-tuyg’ularni ifodalash uchun ham xizmat qiladi. Insoniy his-tuyg’ularsiz hech qachon odamlarda haqiqat izlash sodir bo’lmagan, bo’lmaydi va bo’lishi ham mumkin emas. So’zlovchi predmet, x o disalar to’g’risida yoki suhbatdoshi haqida ma’lumot berar ekan, borliqqa nisbatan ob’yektiv munosabatda bo’ladi. Bunday paytda u o’z fikrini neytral so’zlar va intellektual nutq shakli yordamida ifodalaydi. Bunda nutq, ifodalash belgisinin g ehtimoliy ma’lumot darajasi, harakatning normal - odatdagi sur’ati, vo q elikning ob’yektiv holat, s o’zlovchining tinglovchiga yoki o’zga shaxsga nisbatan betaraf munosabati bayon etiladi. Inson tabiat va jamiyat hayotida mavjud bo’lgan, ruy beradigan voqea - xodisalarning normal holatni betaraf tarzda his etish bilan cheklanmaydi. Inson ongida nutq belgisining o’z imkoniyati darajasidan ustun yoki kamligi, harakatning tezlik bilan yoki bir laxzada sodir bo’lishi, davomiyligi, keskinligi, 30

takroriyligi kabi nozik tomonlari ham aks etadi. Shuningdek, so’zlovchi voqelikka yoki suhbatdoshiga nisbatan sub’ektiv munosabatda ham bo’ladi. Falsafiy nu q tai nazardan qaraganda, buyum-predmetlar ob’yektiv bo’lib, predmetdagi, uning harakatidagi belgilar esa o’zaro nisbiydir. Masalan, "katta"lik "kichi k "likka, "keng"lik "tor"likka (va aksincha), "shirin"lik "bemaza"likka yoki boshqa ta’mlarga, "tez"lik "sekin"likka, "oz"lik yoki "bitta"lik "k o’ p"lik sifatlariga nisbatan qo’llana d i- -Ya’ni har qanday belgi o’zining aks belgisi va bosh q a belgilarga nisbatan tasavvur qilinadi. Belgilar o’zining aks belgisi yoki bosh q a belgilarga ko’ra (bir predmet yoki harakatga xos turli belgilar yuzasidan) nisbiy bo’lishi bilan birga, ayni bir belgining o’zida ham yana bosh q acha nisbiyliklar mavjud. Masalan, "katta" lik belgisi odatdagi ehtimoliy chegara doirasida deb hisoblansa, "eng katta" lik, "juda katta" lik, "kattaro q " lik, "kattagina" liklar belgining nor mal holatga. Potenstial chegara doirasidagi holat ("katta" lik) ga nisbatan qo’llanilgan ust belgilardir. Predmet harakatlari ham bir xil sharoitda, bir xil sur’atda sodir bo’lmay, turlicha sharoitlarda, turli sur’atda sodir bo’ladi. Inson esa ob’yektiv olamda mavjud bo’lgan, belgi darajalari, sodir bo’ladigan harakat, uning darajasi (sur’ati) kabi xodisalarni ongli ravishda chuqurroq o’rganib boradi. Ob’yektiv borliqdagi ana shunday o’zaro nisbiy holatlar inson ongida qiyos qilish jarayoni orqali aks etadi. Demak, qiyos qilish ob’yektiv olam xodisalarini bilishda katta ahamiyatga ega. Qadim zamonlardayoq faylasuflar qiyos qilish bilishning onasidir, deb ushbu kategoriyaga alohida e’tibor berganlar. Haqiqatan ham narsalarni, ularning belgilari, ayni bir xil belgilarda mavjud bo’lgan daraja qiymatlarini qiyos qilish orqali tasavvur qiladigan bo’lsak, ularning obrazi ongimizda aniqroq va yorqinroq aks etadi. Bu xaqda dialektik-olim quyidagicha yozadi: "Figura tushunchasiga borib etish imkoniyatiga ega bo’lishdan oldin, muayyan shakli bo’lgan narsalarning mavjud bo’lishi va bu shakllar ongda taqqoslab ko’rilishi lozim edi" 16 16 Normatov u “hayot adabiyot va romantika” Sharq yulduzi. T 1984, 235-bet 31

Til jamiyat taraqqiyoti, inson tafakko’ri, hissiyoti bilan uzviy bog’liq, bo’lganligi tufayli, qiyos qilish jarayonida inson ongida paydo bo’lgan tushunchalar va sub’ektiv munosabatlar ham nutq orqali yuzaga chiqadi, namoyon bo’ladi. So’zlovchining voqelikka bo’lgan bunday munosabatlari tilda turli modal shakllar, emotsional, ekspressiv stilistik vositalar yordamida amalga oshadi. Shunday qilib, inson o’z nutqida ob’yektiv olam manzarasini betaraf shaxs sifatida tasvirlashi yoki shunga qushimcha ravishda ob’yektiv haqiqatga o’zining shaxsiy munosabatini ham qushib ifodalashi mumkin. So’zlovchining voqelikka nisbatan betaraf va sub’ektiv munosabatiga ko’ra nutqning ikki xil shakli: a) intellektual nutq) intellektual- emotsional nutq shakllari yuzaga keladi. So’zlovchining ruhiyatidagi shu psixo-fiziologik holat uning nutqida o’z aksini topadi, albatta. Demak tilning ikki xil: a) kommunikativ ; b) stilistik vazifasi mavjud. So’zlovchining intellektual holat tilning kommunikativ funkstiyasida, emotsional- h issiy holat esa stilistik funkstiyasida namoyon bo’ladi. Intellektual va hissiylik kategoriya sifatida bir-biriga zid quyilsa-da, tildagi ifodalanishida ular uzviy chambarchas bog’liq o’za ro ajratib bo’lmaydigan, biri ikkinchisini ta qo zo qiladigan xodisalardir. Har qanday h issiylik zamirida intellektual mazmun - xabar beruvchi ma’nosi bo’ladi. H a tto undov so’zlarda ham ma’lum darajada xabar berish mavjud bo’ladi. Lekin hissiylik ba’zi gaplarda sezilmas darajada bo’lsa, boshqa birida bu ma’noda birinchi darajali bo’lib qoladi. Emotsional nutq shakli degan da ana shu keyingi turdagi gaplar nazarda tutiladi. Shunday qilib, intellektual va emotsional nutq shakllari deb gaplarni ikki turga ajratish yuqoridagi f i krlarni inkor etmaydi. Tilning ikki xil funkstiyasi, vazifasi mo s holda ikki xil nutq shaklida a) intellektual nutq shakli; b) intellektual- emotsional shaklida namoyon bo’lishi tadqiq etilishi mumkin. Nutqning birinchi shakli neytral so’zlar va odatdagi grammatik vositalar orqali amalga oshadi. Ikkinchi shakl maxsus ekspressiv-stilistik buyoqda ega 32

bo’lgan so’zlar, affikslar, so’z shakllari, maxsus gap tiplari, so’z tartibi va spetsifik konstrukstiyalar vositasida reallashadi. Ikki xil nutq shakli borligini ko’rib, tahlil qildik. Mazkur ishda nutqning ikkinchi xil shakli - ekspressiv-emotsional nutq shakli haqida fikr yuritamiz. Ekspressivlik, emotsionallikning tilda qay usul va yo’llar orqali, qanday vositalar yordamida ruyobga chiqishini tekshirish ishimizning ob’yekti bo’ladi. Har bir xodisa kategoriya sifatida o’zining muxolif tomoniga nisbatan aniqlangani kabi obrazlilik, tasviriylik, ekspressivlik, emotsionallik kabi kategoriyalar ham hodisa. Belgi va fikrning neytral holatiga nisbatan belgilanadi. Ma’lumki, obrazlilik, tasviriylik, ekspressivlik kabi atamalar qo’llanishi jixatdan juda keng ma’noli. Ularning ba’zilari (obrazlilik, tasviriylik) adabiyotshunoslik atamasi sifatida ham, tilshunoslik atamasi sifatida ham qo’llanadi. Atamalar, avvalo. Bir ma’noli, qolaversa o’zining aniq izoh-talqiniga ega bo’lmog’i kerak Bu holatlar bir-biridan farqli tushunchalar ekaniga qaramay, bizda ularning har birini aniq baholaydigan ta’rif yo’q. Ularning har biriga "nutqning ta’sirchanligi. Rang- barangligi uchun xizmat qiladi", - degan bir xil umumiy ta’rif beriladi. Bu x i l mazkur holatlarning deyarli bir xil tushuncha sifatida qaralishiga olib keladi. Obrazlilik, tasviriylik, ekspressivlik, emotsionallik kabi holatlar fikrning ta’sirchanligi uchun xizmat qilishi jixatdan ma’lum yagonalikka egadir (ta’sirchanlik darajasi ham turlicha bo’ladi). Lekin qo’llanish ko’lami, qaysi til uslublariga xosligi jixatidan ular ancha farq qiladi. Obrazlilik, tasviriylik kabi holatlar asosan yozma nutqda, badiiy uslubga xos vositalardir. Ekspressivlik va emotsionallik esa nutqning barcha uslublariga (garchi bir xil darajada bo’lmasa ham) mansub bo’ladi. Shunga ko’ra obrazlilik, tasviriylikka oid bo’lgan badiiy vositalar adabiyotshunoslikning tadqiqot ob’yekti bo’lib xizmat qiladi. Obrazlilik, tasviriylik asosan yozma uslubga xos bo’lgan uchun faqat til vositalari orqali ifodalanadi. Ekspressivlik va emotsionallik nutqning barcha uslubiga xos bo’lgani tufayli lingvistik va ekstralingvistik vositalar bilan ham 33

ifodalana oladi. Ya’ni, ekspressivlik va emotsionallik kabi holatlarning qo’llanish k o’ lami ularga nisbatan keng va xilma-xildir. "Ekspressivlik nafaqat san’atkor yozuvchilar tiliga, balki jamoat arboblari, publististlar, h atto olimlar tiliga ham xosdir". Ekspressivlik va emotsionallik tushunchalari utasida ma’lum darajada umumiylik, yaqinlik bo’lib, ikkalasi ham nutqning ta’sirchanligi uchun xizmat qiladi. Shuning uchun bo’lsa kerak, tilshunoslar ko’pincha ularni umumlashtirib "emotsional-ekspressiv" (yoki aksincha) tarzda qo’llaydilar. Ba’zi tadqiqotchilar tilning lug’at tarkibida hissiy buyalgan -emotsional leksikaning borligi, lekin ekspressiv leksikaning yo’qligi haqida fikr yuritadilar. Ularning fikricha, ekspressivlik til birliklarining maxsus qo’llangan holda yaratiladi. Emotsionallik yaratildagina mavjud bo’ladi, ekspressivlik esa imo-ishoralar, yuz ifodasi va kishining xatti-harakatida, hattoki mexnat jarayonida ham mavjud bo’ladi. Bu mualliflarning fikriga asosan qo’shilsa bo’ladi, lekin ekspressiv leksikaning o’zi yo’q, degan fikr nizoli fikrga o’xshaydi. O’zbek tilida mavjud bo’lgan holatlar bu fikrni tasdiqlamaydi. 17 O’zbek tili fani buyicha chiqqan darslik va qo’llanmalarda ekspressiv leksikaga alohida urin ajratilgan. Masalan, M.Mirzaev, S.Usmonov va I.Rasulovning kitobida "tushuncha ifodalashdan tashqari ko’pincha ta’sirchanlikka erishish va nutqning ma’lum uslubini yaratish maqsadida qo’llanadigan so’zlar ekspressiv-stilistik leksika deyiladi", degan ta’rif berilgan. To’g’ri, har qanday so’z va boshqa til birliklari o’z odatdagi qurshovidan tashqari chiqsa va boshqa maqsadda maxsus qo’llansa, ekspressivlik yuzaga keladi. Lekin undan tashqari ham o’zbek tilining lug’at tarkibida lavang, galvars, lapashang, jajji, tabassum, tirmizak kabi bir qator so’zlar borki, ular o’zicha ekspressivlik ifodalovchi so’zlardir. Ba’zi olimlarim i z ekspressiv leksika o’zi ham mavjud degan fikrni ilgari suradilar. Nutqning ekspressivligi faqat ayrim so’zlar bilangina emas, balki turli- tuman sub’ektiv baholashning darajalanishi - sinonimlardan iborat so’z birikmalari 17 1 Abdulla Qahhor “ Tanlangan asarlar” 3 tomlik 1-tom T.1980 34

bilan ham ifodalanadi. Bu gapdagi ".faqat ayrim so’zlar bilangina emas..." degan qismga e’tibor bersak, ekspressivlikni ifodalovchi alohida so’zlar h am borligi, binobarin aynan ekspressiv leksika mavjud ekanligi ma’lum bo’ladi. Ekspressivlikni odatda ikki guruhga: ekspreesiv -emotsional va ekspressiv - sub’ektiv baholash ma’nolariga ajratadilar. Ekspressivlik belgilarining ma’no jixatdan bir xil bo’lmasligini hisobga olib, so’zlarning ma’nosini ekspressiv - emotsional va ekspressiv-bah o lash turlariga ajratish odat bo’lgan. Ekspressivlik va emotsionallik bir-biridan keskin ajratiladigan holatlar emas. Bu holatlarning birida ekspressivlik ustun turishi, bosh q asida emot s ionallik ustun kelishi, yana birida har ikkisi teng bo’lishi mumkin. Shunga ko’ra, birinchisini ekspressiv, ikkinchisini emotsional, uchinchi xilini esa emotsional-ekspressiv, deb atash maqsadga muvofiq bo’ladi. Demak, ekspressivlik nutqning obrazliligi, tasviriyligining kuchaytirilishi, fikr ta’sir kuchining orttirilishi demakdir. "Nutqni uning xabar berish mazmunidan tashqari yanada yorqinroq, ta’sirchanroq, taassurotliroq qiladigan narsalarning hammasi ekspressiyadir. Demak, nutq ekspressivligi - nutqni yorqin, ta’sirchan, tasviriy, taassurotli qiluvchi vositalardir". Dunyoda til mavjud bo’lganligi uchun ham jamiyatlar mavjud. Muayyan jamiyatda yashovchi kishilarning so’zlasha olgani, bir-biri bilan muloqotda bo’la olgani tufayli jamiyat mavjud. Jamiyatning ustqurmasi, ma’naviy jixati til tufayli takomillashadi, unda yangi fikr va g’ oyalar shakllanadi. Jamiyat inson va uning qudratidan yaralgan adabiyot b ilan tirikdir. Jamiyat keng ma’noda kishilarning tarixan tarkib topgan birlashgan faoliyati shakllaridan iborat bo’lsa, tor ma’noda esa tarixan muayyan ijtimoiy tizim va ijtimoiy munosabatlarning shakli sifatida mavjud. Jamiyat tara qq iyotida, uning ravna q , topishida, unda yashovchilarning fikrlash tarzi shakllanishida tarjimaning urni ham benihoya kattadir. Tillar va adabiyotlarning taraqqiy topishida badiiy tarjimaning hissasi buyukdir. Asl nusxani tahlil va tarjima qilayotib, til va tafakko’rning o’zaro teran bog’liqligini anglaymiz. Bundan tashqari, tarjima jarayonida til me’yorlari urtasida mutanosiblik vujudga 35

kelishi mumkin, ya’ni asl nusxaning lisonning shakllari tarjima tili me’yorlari bilan muqobillashishi ro’y berishi tabiiy. Aynan shu jixatdan halqlarning yaqinlashuvi yuzaga keladi. Tarjimonning jamiyatdagi xizmatlaridan biri uning o’zgacha adabiy uslublarini o’zlashtirishi va o’z jamiyatiga bag’ishlab berishida namoyon bo’ladi. "Tillararo tafovut bor ekan, tarjimalar amalga oshirilar ekan, og’zaki va yozma tarjima bilan shug’ullanuvchilar bashariyatning eng maqbul kishilari bo’lib qoladilar, shu boisdan tarjimaning mohiyati va ahamiyati haqidagi bahsu munozaralar davom etaveradi", degan edi mashxur tarjima nazariyotchisi J.Kamol. Tarjimon ikki halq urtasidagi vositachiga aylanadi. U ko’p hollarda begona halq ma’naviyatining o’z halqi ma’naviyatiga payvand qiladi. Ma’naviyat jixatdan yetuk kishilar jamiyat taraqqiyotiga katta hissa qo’shadilar. 18 Jamiyatning tarixiy hayotini vujudga keltirishda til qanday muhim omil hisoblansa, badiiy va boshqa turdagi tarjima ham shunday ahamiyatga molikdir. Badiiy tarjima hozirgi zamon tilshunosligi va tarjimashunosligidagi eng murakkab muammolardan biri bo’lib qolmoqda. Tarjima jarayonida tillar bir - biriga ziddek tuyulsa-da, ammo tarjima matni vujudga kelgach. Ularning bir-birini t o’ ldirishi zo x ir etadi. Badiiy ijodning har qanday turi singari tarjima ha m jamiyat rivoji yo’lida xizmat qiladi. "Olim, - deydi, J.Sharipov, - hech narsani yaratmaydi, balki tabiatdagi tayyor va yashirin haqiqatni ochadi. San’atkor esa haqiqatga o’xshash narsani yaratadi, ya’ni u kuzatgan haqiqat fantaziyasida aksini topadi va bu aksini o’z asariga olib o’tadi. Demak, badiiy haqiqat va hayot haqiqati bir xil narsa emas. Turmush hayotdan butunicha san’at asariga olib kirilsa, u hayotiy haqqoniyligini yo’qotadi va badiiy haqiqat ham bo’lmaydi. 18 Tagor “Asarlar” 8-tomlik 4-tom T. 1982. Tagor “Asarlar” 8-tomlik 4-tom T. 1982. 36

His was the luck of the beginner. Born to be a hunter of meat, (though he did not know it), he blundered upon meat just outside his own cavedoor on his first foray into the word. It was by sheer blundering that he chaneed upon the shrewdly hidden ptarmigan nest. He had essayed to walk along the trunk of a pine. The rotten bark gave way under his feet, and with a despairing yelp he pitched down the rounded descent, smashed through the leafage and stalks of a small bush, and in the heart of the bush, on the ground, fetched up amongst seven ptarmigan chicks. They made noises, and at first he was frightened at tliem. Then he perceived that thay were very little, and he became bolder . They moved. He plased his paw on one, and its movements ware accelerated. This was a source of enjoyment to him. he smelled it. He picked it up in his mouth. It struggled and tickled his tongue. At the same time he was made aware of a sensation of hunger. His jaws closed together. There was a crunching of fragile bones, and warm blood ran in his mouth. The taste of it was good. This was meat, the same as his mother gave him, only it was alive between his teeth and therefore butter. So he ate the ptarmigan. Nor did he stop till he had devoured the whole brood. Then he licked his chops in quite the same way his mother did, and began to crawl out of the bush. 19 San’atkor t o’ ppa-to’g’ri tabiat va h ayotdan yozmaydi, balki unga haqiqatdan o’xshash qilib yaratadi. Va xuddi ana shunda ijod jarayonning mohiyati mujassamlashgan". Yozuvchi hayot haqiqatiga o’xshash narsa (badiiy haqiqat)ni yaratish uchun, hayotiy fakt va hodisalarni o’zining ruhiy laboratoriyasida "kaynatishi", ishlashi, sintez qilishi ya’ni tasavvuri, hayoli, tajribasi, qalbi, dunyokarashi, tabiati bilan boyitgan va muayyan mavzuga, g’oyaga xizmat qiluvchi eng zarur tafsilotlarni, o’ziga xos va kerakli fakt va hodisalarni tanlagan holda tugallik kasb etgan hayotni yaratishi lozim. Ana shundagina "san’atkor - uydirmalar ijodkori - odamlarni xudo, tabiat yoki tarix yaratganidan ko’ra a’loroq, mislsiz darajada go’zal qilib yarata oladi". 1 19 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 56 37

Realizm adabiyot rivojining etuk bosqichi bo’lib, u bo’lishi mumkin bo’lgan hayotni, real hayotdagi odamlarning obrazlarini jonlashtiradi asl hayotga nisbatan tasodiflar, ikir-chikirlardan holi bo’lgan to’liqroq, ta’sirliroq qilib qayta yaratilgan olamning tasvirini beradi. 20 2.2. Obrazlar sistemasida yangi qa h ramon konsepsiyasi. M. Dickens asarlarining tili jozibali, obrazli tasviriy tildir, tasviriy ligi esa, analitik, tafsiliydir. U q anday hodisa haqida gapirmasin, vo q ealarning q aerda, qanday paytda, q ay tarzda, qanday sharoitda sodir bo’layotganini birma-bir, izchil tasvirlaydi, predmetlarning holati va ko’rinishi, rangi va shaklini aniq ifodalab berishga erishadi. M. Dickens asarlari tilidagi bu badiiylik e stetik nafosat, eng avvalo, tasvirning aniqligi va konkretligidan kelib chiqadi. Tarjimada tasvirning ana shu aniqligi va konkretligini sa q lash va sh unga mo s ekvivalentlar toppish 20 Ёқубов O. «Acapлap» T., 1983 38

M. Dickens asarlari tilining badiiyligini va estetik nafosatini berishning mu h im shartlaridan biridir. Har bir iste’dodli yozuvchi o’zi qalamga olgan voqea-hodisani, inson va predmetni aniq, tasvirlashga harakat qiladi va bu hol, umuman olganda, barcha so’z san’atkorlariga xosdir. Ammo M. Dickens tilidagi sifatlashlar, o’xshatishlar, obrazli fe’llar, tur-jins otlari o’ziga xosligi bilan ajralib turadi va avtor tilining aniqligi va obrazliligini ta’minlaydi. He encountered a feathered whirlwind. He was confused and blinded by the rush of it and the beat of angry wings. He hid his head between his paws and yelped. The blows incresed. The mother ptarmigan was in a fury. Then he became angry. He rose up, sharling, striking out with his paws.He sank his tiny teeth into one of the wings and pulled and tugged sturdily. The ptarmigan stuggled against him, showering blows upon him with her free wing. It was his first battle. He was elated. He forgot all about the unknown. He no longer was afraid of aything. He was fighting, tearing at a live thing that was striking at him. Also, this live thing was meat. The lust to kill was on him. He had just destroyed little live things. He would now destroy a big live thing. He was too busy and happy to know that he happy. He was thriling and exulting in ways new to him and greater to him than any he had known before. He held on to the wing and growled berween tight - clenched teeth. The ptarmigan dragged him out of the bush. When she turned and tried to drag him back into the bush's shelter, he pulled her away from it and on into the open. And all the time she was making outcry and sriking with her wing, while feathers were flying like a snowfall. The pitch to which he was aroused was themendous. All the fighting blood of his breed was up in him and surging through him. This was living, though he did not know it. He was realizing his own meaning in the world; he was doing that for which he was made - killing meat and battling to kill it. He was justifying his existence, that wich life can do no greater; for life achieves its summit when it does to the uttermost that which it was equipped to do". 21 21 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 31. 39

M. Dickens o’z asarlarida epitetlardan, metaforalardan keng foydalanganidek, o’xshatishlarga ham tez-tez murojaat qilib turadi. M. Dickens o’xshatishlarida ham yozuvchi uslubiga xos bo’lgan real h ayot bilan bog’liqli q predmetlilik, aniqlik, moddiylik, konkretlik ko’zga tashlanib turadi. Shuning uchun ham M. Dickens o’xshatishlari original, oxiri to’qilmagan o’xshatishlardir. Uning o’xshatishlaridagi ana shu xususiyatlarni o’zbek tilida ham bermay turib, albatta originalning o’ziga xosligini tarjimada saqlab bo’lmaydi. Masalan: "He had miscalculated once, but he would not be guilty of it a second time. Hans paid out the rope,parmitting no slack, while Pete kept it clear of coils. Buck held on till he f was on a line straight above Thornton; then he turned, and " with the speed of an express train headed down upon him. Thornton saw him coming, and, as Buck struck him like a battering ram, with the whole force of the current behind him, he reached up and closed with both arms around the shaggy neck. Hans snubbed the rope around the tree, and Buck and Thornton were jerked under the water. Strangling, suffocating, sometimes one uppermost and sometimes the other, dragging over the jagged bottom, smashing against rocks and snags, they veered in to the bank. Thorhton camee to, belly downward and being violently propelled back and forth across a drift log by Hans and Pete. His first glance was for Buck, over whose limp and apparently lifeless body Nig was setting up a howl, while Skeet was licking the wet face and closed eyes. Thorhton was himself bruised and he went carefully over Buck's body, when he had been brought around, finding three broken ribs. "That settles it," he announced. "We camp right here." And camp they did, till Buck;s ribs knitted and he was able to travel. That winter, at Dawson, Buck performed another exploit, not so heroic, perhaps, but one that put his name many notches higher on the totem pole of Alaskan fame. This exploit was particularly gratifying to the three men; for they stood in need of the outfit which it finished, and were enabled to make a long- desired trip into the virgin East, where miners had not yet appeared. It was brought about by a conversation in the eldora do Saloon, in which men waxed boastful og 40

their favorite dogs. Buck, because of his record, was the target for these men, and Thorhton was driven stoutly to defend him. At the end of half an hour one man stated that his dog could start a sled with five hundred pounds and walk off with it: a second bragged six hundred for his dog; and a third, seven hundred. "Pooh! Pooh!" said John Thorhton, :Buck can start a thousand pounds." "And break it out? And walk off with it for a hundred yards?" demanded Matthew son, a Bonanza kin he of the seven hundred vaunt. "And break it out? and walk off with it for a hundred yards," John Thorhton said coolly. "Well," Mathew son said, slowly and deliberately, so that all could hear, "I've got a thousand dollars that says he can't. And there it is." So saying, he slammed a sack of gold do’st of the size of a bologna sausage down upon the bar". 22 Bu tarjimalarda originalning ruxi, uslubi yaxshi saqlangan. Yozuvchi iltifot bilan tasvirlayotgan q ahramonining ma’lum bir vaqtdagi harakatini yoki ruhiy holatini aniqroq ko’rsatish uchun uni biron narsaga o’xshatar ekan, hamma vaqt ijobiy mazmunga ega bo’lgan predmetni, voqeani tanlaydi. Masalan, « Nobody spoke. Thornton's bluff it was, had been called. He could fed a flush of warm blood creeping up his face. His tongue had tricked him. He did not know whether Buck could start a thousand pounds. Half a ton! The enormousness of it appalled him. He had great faith in Buck's strength and had often thought him capable of starting such a load; but never, as now, had he faced the possibility of it, the eyes of a dozen men fixed upon him, silent and waiting. Further, he had no thousand dollars; nor had Hans or Peter. "I've got a sled standing outside now, with twenty fifty-pound sacks of flour on it," Matthew son went on with brutal directness, "so don't let that hinder you.'' 22 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 31. 41

Thorhton did not reply. He did not know what to say. He glanced from face to face on the absent way of a man who has lost the power of thought and is seeking somewhere to find the thing that will start it going again. The face of Jim O’Brien, a Mastodon king and old-time comrade, caught his eyes. It was as a cue to him, seeming to rouse him to do what he would never have dreamed of doing. "Can you lend me a thousand?" he asked, almost in a whisper. "Sure," answered O’Brien, thumping down a plethoric sack by the side of Matthew son's. "Though it's little faith I'm having, John, That the beast can do the trick." The Eldora do emptied its occupants into the street to see the test. The tables were deserted, and the dealers and gamekeepers came forth to see the outcome of the wager and to lay odds. Several hundred men, furred and kittened, abnked around the sled within easy distance. Matthew son's sled, loaded with athousand pounds of flour, had been standing for a couple of hours, and in the intense cold So there was no damming up the tide of Jive that was rising within him—rising with every mouthful of meat he swallowed, with every breath he drew. In the end, one day, fear and obedience were swept away by the rush of life, and the cub straddled and sprawled toward the entrance". 23 E.Hemingway salbiy qa h ramonlar h aqida gapirayotganda esa butunlay boshqacha tusdagi o’xshatishlardan foydalanadi. Yuzaki staraganda, guyo o’xshatishlarni tarjimada saqlash oddiy va oson bir ishday ko’rinadi. Haqiqatda esa unday emas. Tarjimonning ozgina e’tiborsizligi yoki obrazning ijro etayotgan funkstiyasini, vazifasini tushunmasligi har xil xatolarga olib kelishi mumkin. Masalan, «Unlike any other wall with which he had had experience, this wall seemed to recede from him as he approached No hard surface collided with the tender little nose he thrust out tentatively before him. The substance of the wall seemed as permeable and yielding as light. And as condition, in his eyes, had trie 23 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 20. 42

seeming of form, so he entered into what had been wall to him and bathed in the bubstance that composed it. It was bewildering. He was Sprawling through solidity And ever the light grew brighter. Fear urged him to go back, but growth drove him on. Suddenly he found himself at the mouth of the cave. The wall, inside which he had thought himself, as suddenly leaped back before him to an immeasurable distance. The light had become painfully bright. He was dazzled by it. Likewise he was made dizzy by this!: abrupt and tremendous extension of space. Automatically, his eyes were adjusting themselves to the brightness, focusing them to meet the increased distance of objects. At first, the wall had japed beyond his vision. He now saw it again; but had taken upon itself a remarkable remoteness. Also, its appearance had changed. It was now a variegated wall, composed of the trees that fringed the stream, the opposing mountain that towered above the trees, and the sky that out- towered the mountain. A great fear came upon him. This was more of the terrible unknown. He crouched down on the lip of the cave and gazed out on the world. He was very much afraid. Because it was unknown, it was hostile to him. Therefore the hair stood up on end along his back and his lips wrinkled in an attempt at a ferocious and intimidating snarl. Out of his puniness and fright he challenged and menaced the whole wide world". Yuqorida ko’rib o’ tgan misollarimizdan ma’lum bo’ladiki, M. Dickens tarjimonlari asosan yozuvchi ishlatgan o’xshatishlarning o’zbek tilidagi variantlarini topganlar, asliyot ruhini sa q lashga katta e’tibor berganlar. Ba’zi hollarda esa obrazlilik sa q langan bo’lsada o’xshatishlar yo metafora, yoinki sifatlashlar orqali berilgan. O’xshatishlarni tashlab ketish, buzish h o llari esa, asosan, tarjimonlarning e’tiborsizligi o q ibati bo’lib, bu kamchiliklarni bartaraf qilish jiddiy ijodiy izlanishni, me h natni talab qiladi. « While he lay in the bush, recoveering from this fright and pering fearfully out, the mother-ptarmigan on the other side of the open space fluttered out of the ravaged nest. It was because of her loss that she paid no attention to the winged 43

bolt of the sky. But the cub saw' and it was a warning and a lesson to him—the swift downward swoop of the hawk, the short skim of its body, just above the ground, the strike of its talons in the body of the ptarmigan, the tarmigan'ssquawk of agony and fright, and the hawk's rush upward into the blue, carrying the ptarmigan away with it. It was a long time before the cub left his shelter. He had learned much. Live things were meat. They were good to eat. Also, live things when they were large enough, could give hurt. It was better to eat small live things like ptarmigan chicks, and to let alone large live things like ptarmigan hens. Nevertheless he felt a little prick of ambition, a sneaking desire to have another battle with that ptarmigan hen—only the hawk had carried her away. Maybe there were other ptarmigan hens. He would go and see". 24 M. Dickens ning sinonim fe’llardan foydalanishdagi mahorati alohida diqqatga sazovor. Masalan, yozuvchi gapirish bilan bog’liq bo’lgan harakatni bir necha o’nlab fe’llar vositasida ifodalaydi. O’zbek tarjimonlari M. Dickens asarlari tilidagi fe’llarning ana shu rang-barangligini tarjimada saqlay olganlar va asarlar tarjimasida «gapirmoq» tushunchasining turli rang-barangligini ifodalash uchun kuyidagi so’zlarni mohirlik bilan urinli qo’llaganlar: «Nothing happened. He continued to gaze, and in his interest he forgot to snarl. Also, he forgot to be afraid. For the time, fear had been routed by growth, while growth had assumed the guise of curiosity. He began to notice near objects-an open portion of the stream that flashed in the sun, the balsted pine tree that stood at the base of the slope, and the slope itself, that ran right up to him and ceased two feet beneath the lip of the cave on which he crouched. Now the gray cub had lived all his days on a level floor. He had never experienced the hurt of a fall. He did 24 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 6 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 31. 44

know what a fall was. So he stepped boldly out upon the air. His hind-legs still rested on the cave-lip, so he fell forward head downward. The earth struck him a harsh blow on the nose that made him yelp. Then he began rolling down the slope, over and over. He was in a panic of terror. The unknown had caught him at last. It had gripped savagely hold of him and was about to wreak upon him some terrific hurt. Fear, and he now routed growth like any frightened puppy. The unknown bore him on he knew not to what frightful hurt, and he yelped and unceasingly. This was a different proposition from crouching in frozen fear while the unknown lurked just alongside. Now the unknown had caught tight hold of him. Silence wouldfdo no good. Besides, it was not fear, but terror, that convulsed him. But the slope grew more gradual, and its base was grass-covered. Here the cub lost momentum. When at last he came to a stop, he gave one last agonized yelp and then a long, whimpering wail. Also, and quite as a matter of course, as though in his life he had already made a thousand toilets, he proceeded to lick away the dry clay that soiled him. After that he sat up and gazed about him, as might the first man of the earth who landed upon Mars. The cub had broken through the wall of the world, the unknown had let go its hold of him, and here he was without hurt. But the first man on Mars would have experienced less unfamiliarity than did he. Without any antecedent knowledge, without any warning whatever that such existed, he found himself an explorer in a totally new world.» 25 Tarjimon romandagi ellik-oltmish sinonim so’zlarning har biriga mo s ekvivalentini topish ustida q unt bilan ishlagan. Natijada E.Hemingway iboralaridagi nozik ma’no q irralarini ham, rang-baranglikni ham o’zbek tilida t o’ la-t o’ kis berishga muvaffaq bo’lgan. Avtor tilining o’ziga xos xususiyatlarini chuqur anglash, sifatlash, majoz, fe’llarning uslubiy xususiyatlarini yurakdan his qilish va shu asosda asl nusxadagi leksik komponentlarga mos va teng keladigan 25 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 10. 45

ekvivalentlarni topish tarjimada yozuvchi uslubi va mahoratini aks ettirishning muhim tomonlaridan biridir. And so it was with White Fang. The man-animals were goods unmistakable and inescapable. As his mother, Kite, had^rendered her allegiance to them at the first cry of her name, so he was beginning to render his allegiance. He gave them the trail as a privilege indubitably theirs. When they walked, he got out of their way. When they called, he came. Whe they threatened, he cowered down. When they commanded him to go, he went away hurriedly. For behind any wish of theirs was power to enforce that wish, power that hurt, power that expressed itself in clouts and clubs, in flying stones and stinging lashes of whips. But it did not all happen in a day, this giving over of ftimselfy body and soul, to the man-animals. He could not immediately forego his wild heritage and his memories of the wild. There were days when he crept to the edge of the forest and stood and listened to something ailing him far and away. And always he returned, restless and uncomfortable, to whimper softly and wistfully at Kite's side and to lick her face with eager, questioning tongue. Flowers on the Grass learned rapidly the ways of the camp. He knew the injustice and grediness of the older dogs when meat or fish was thrown out to be eaten. He came to know that men were more just, children more cruel, and women. 26 Ikkinchi bob yuzasidan xulosa. Bitiruv Malakaviy ishimizning ikkinchi bobida badiiy hikoyalar qahramonlarining o’ziga xos badiiy portreti haqida bo’lib obraz tizimida yangi qahramonlar tushunchasi misollar yordamida o’rganilgan. Hikoyada qahramon xarakteri harakatda, o’sishda tasvirlanar ekan, tabiat ham shunga monand o’sish va o’zgarishda tasvirlanadi. Biroq hamma vaqt ham peyzaj tasviri bilan qahramon dunyosi mos kelishi shart emas. Bu - qo’yilgan maqsadga 26 M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page 61. 46

muvofiq o’zgarishi mumkin. Masalan, ba’zi hikoyalarda peyzaj qahramon ruhiy holatga nisbatan zid uslubda qo’llaniladi. Atrofda bahor, go’zallik, xandalar, bayram. Lekin qahramon qalbida esa motam, u bugun yoridan ayrildi. Na bayram, na ba ho r uning k o’ ngliga si g’ adi, nazarida butun tabiat motam libosini kiygande k. Umuman olganda pragmatika asosan tilning turli muloqot doiralarida muloqot qiluvchilar bilan uzviy aloqada o’rganadi. Shu munosabatda pragmatikaning muammolari doirasi shakllanadi: nutq, harakatlarini hamda ularning amalga oshuvi kontekstlarini o’rganish, tanlovi matn junatuvchining ta’sir etish vazifalari bilan belgilab beriladigan til birliklarining ishlash jixati, muloqotning samaraliligi, nutqning tinglovchi tomonidan talqin etilishi, nutq qaratilgan kishining gap mazmuniga munosabati, til muloqotining jarayonlarini boshqaradigan qoidalarni ishlab chiqish, hamda til birliklarini amalga oshuvining boshqa ko’pgina masalalari ko’riladi (D.Ashurova). Mazkur ishda badiiy portretda tasvirlangan kishining yosh xususiyati, ijtimoiy, kasbiy maqomi va milliy tegishliligi jixatidan pragmatik xususiyatlari o’rganiladi, muloqotga kirishuvchilarning xususiyatlari, muloqot shart-sharoitlari hamda muloqot vaziyatiga qarab portret ta’riflari Yuqoridagi pragmatik omillar bilan bog’lanadigan ma’lum xususiyatlarga ega bo’ladi. Shuni qayd qilish kerakki, qahramoning faqat yoshini, ijtimoiy maqomini yoki kasbini tavsiflaydigan portret ta’riflar kamdan-kam uchraydi. Taxlil ko’rsatishicha, Yuqoridagi tavsiflarning portret ta’riflari ko’pincha bir-biri bilan uzviy bog’lilikda keladi Umumiy xulosa . Bizning Bitiruv Malakaviy ishimizda badiiy portretning pragmatik tavsiflariga bag’ishlangan bo’lib , badiiy asardagi insoniy va umummilliy tushunchalarni o’z ichiga qamrab olgan mashhur Amerika yozuvchisi M. Dickens qalamiga mansub asarlari obrazlarining pragmatik muommolari tadqiq etilgan. Mazkur Bitiruv Malakaviy ishi ikki bob xulosa, (summary) qisqa bayoni va foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro’yxatidan iborat. 47

Bitiruv Malakaviy ishimizning kirish qismi mazkur ishning maqsadi va vazifalari, predmeti, metodlari, nazariy va amaliy ahamiyati va ilmiy yangiligi kabi muhim muommolarni qamrab olgan. Bitiruv Malakaviy ishimizning birinchi bobi hikoyalardagi qahramonlar va badiiy nutqning g’oyaviy uyg’unligi kabi pragmatik muommolar o’z ifodasini topgan. Shuningdek bu bobda biz badiiy asar pragmatikasi haqida lingvopragmatik olimlarning qarashlarini taniqli Amerika yozuvchisi M. Dickens ning “ Maysazordagi gullar” asaridan keltirilgan misollar yordamida pragmatik muammo va tavfsiflar tadqiq etdik. Bitiruv Malakaviy ishimizning ikkinchi bobida badiiy hikoyalar qahramonlarining o’ziga xos badiiy portreti haqida bo’lib obraz tizimida yangi qahramonlar tushunchasi misollar yordamida o’rganilgan. Hikoyada qahramon xarakteri harakatda, o’sishda tasvirlanar ekan, tabiat ham shunga monand o’sish va o’zgarishda tasvirlanadi. Biroq hamma vaqt ham peyzaj tasviri bilan qahramon dunyosi mos kelishi shart emas. Bu - qo’yilgan maqsadga muvofiq o’zgarishi mumkin. Masalan, ba’zi hikoyalarda peyzaj qahramon ruhiy holatga nisbatan zid uslubda qo’llaniladi. Atrofda bahor, go’zallik, xandalar, bayram. Lekin qahramon qalbida esa motam, u bugun yoridan ayrildi. Na bayram, na ba ho r uning k o’ ngliga si g’ adi, nazarida butun tabiat motam libosini kiygande k. Umuman olganda pragmatika asosan tilning turli muloqot doiralarida muloqot qiluvchilar bilan uzviy aloqada o’rganadi. Shu munosabatda pragmatikaning muammolari doirasi shakllanadi: nutq, harakatlarini hamda ularning amalga oshuvi kontekstlarini o’rganish, tanlovi matn junatuvchining ta’sir etish vazifalari bilan belgilab beriladigan til birliklarining ishlash jixati, muloqotning samaraliligi, nutqning tinglovchi tomonidan talqin etilishi, nutq qaratilgan kishining gap mazmuniga munosabati, til muloqotining jarayonlarini boshqaradigan qoidalarni ishlab chiqish, hamda til birliklarini amalga oshuvining boshqa ko’pgina masalalari ko’riladi (D.Ashurova). Mazkur ishda badiiy portretda tasvirlangan kishining yosh xususiyati, ijtimoiy, kasbiy maqomi va milliy tegishliligi jixatidan pragmatik xususiyatlari o’rganiladi, muloqotga 48

kirishuvchilarning xususiyatlari, muloqot shart-sharoitlari hamda muloqot vaziyatiga qarab portret ta’riflari Yuqoridagi pragmatik omillar bilan bog’lanadigan ma’lum xususiyatlarga ega bo’ladi. Shuni kayd qilish kerakki, qahramoning faqat yoshini, ijtimoiy maqomini yoki kasbini tavsiflaydigan portret ta’riflar kamdan-kam uchraydi. Taxlil ko’rsatishicha, Yuqoridagi tavsiflarning portret ta’riflari ko’pincha bir-biri bilan uzviy bog’lilikda keladi. Shunday qilib, portret ta’riflarini taxlil qilish badiiy qahramon portretining pragmatik tavsiflarini belgilab beradi. Biz portretlarning pragmatik yunaltirilgan uchta turini ajratdik: 1) yosh jixatidan, 2) ijtimoiy; 3) kasbiy jixatidan . Taxlilning ma’lumotlari yosh. Kasbiy, ijtimoiy jixatidan tavsiflarning quyidagi turlarini ajratish imkoniyatini beradi: a) eksplitsit (bevosita) ta’rif; b) implitsit (vositali) ta’rif; v) aralash turdagi ta’rif. Ushbu ishning eng muhim xulosalaridan biri badiiy portretdagi pragmatik va stilistik tavsiflarning uzviy bog’liqligi haqidagi fikr bo’lib, bu o’z navbatida tilning umumiy nazariyasi doirasida pragmatika va stilistikaning o’zaro bog’lanishidan dalolat beradi. San’at va adabiyotdagi obraz jonli harakati, jozibadorligi va yorqinligi bilan o’zida hodisaning qonuniyatini asosli va chuqur mujassam qilgani va hokazo xususiyatlari bilan farq qiladi. Demak, adabiyotga hayotning hamma (inson, narsa buyum, hayvon, hodisa, predmet, o’simlik ko’chma ma’no beruvchi so’zlar, iboralar, leksik resurslar, ifoda vositalari kabi) elementlari kirar ekan, kirganda ham san’atkor ongi va qalbida jilolanib, boyib, kattalashib, eng muhimi insonlashib muhrlanarkan - ularning barchasini obraz deb yuritish qonuniyatdir. Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar. 1. Islom Karimov. "Yuksak ma'naviyat - y engilmas kuch". Toshkent "Ma'naviyat" bet .83 2 . Каримов И.А. Ўзбекистан свой путь обновления и прогр ессов. Т.,Ўзбекистон 1993 . 3. Каримов И.А. На пути духовного возрождения. Т., Ўзбекистан 1998 . 49

4. Каримов И.А. Наша высшая цель - независимость и процветание Родины, свобода и благополучие народа. Т., Ўзбекистан 2000 . 5. Karimov I . A . Barkamol avlod O ’ zbekistan tara qq iyotining poydevori . T., 2001 6. Jack London “ the call of the wild” M., 1991 7. Jack London. “ White Fang” M., 1993 8. Abdulla Q a hh or «Ustoz». Shar q yuldo’zi T., 1980 9. Abdulla Q ah h or bilan uchrashuv. O’zbekiston. 1982 10. Abdulla Qahh or «Tanlangan asarlar». 3 tomli k 1-tom, T., 1980 11. Abdulla Q odiriy. «Mayda hikoyalar yozganda so’zni qanday tejash kerak» Badiiy ijod haqida. T ., 1980 12. Арутюнова Н.Д. «Фактор адресата». Академия наук М., 1985 13. Ашурова Д.О. «Производное слово в свете коммуникативной теории языка» 14. Белкина А. «Художественное мастерство» Мастерство русских классиков. М., 198 7 15. Головенченко Ф.М. «Введение в литературоведение». М., 1984 16. Yo q ubov O . « Asarlar » T ., 1983 17. M. Dickens ning Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 page – 319 p. 18. Juraev A. «Tong yorishgan soxilda». Toshkent, 1982 19. Juraev A. «Yul. Roman». Shar q yuldo’zi. 7-son. 1984 20. Қ аюмов Л. «Проблемы художественного метода В.Шекспира». Т., 1983 21. Киселева Н.А. «Язык как средство воздействия» С-П., 1994 22. К олшанский Г.В. «Коммуникативная функция и структура языка» «Наука» М.,1987 23. Лацис В. «Жанровое многообразие мировой литературы». М.,1992 24. Лидии В. «О писательском деле». М., 1983 25. Моррис Ч. «Основания теории знаков». « Наука » М ., 1986 26. Normatov U. «Hayot, adabiyot va romantika». Shar q yuldo’zi. T., 1984 27. Saboxiddin Ali «Turk hikoyalari «Baxtli laycha». T., 1978 50

28. Sayd Axmad. «Oydin kechalar». Hikoyalar. T., 1989 29. Tagor «Asarlar». 8 tomli k 4-tom. T., 1982 30. Tagor. «Tanlangan asarlar». 8 tomli k 4-tom. T ., 1982 31. Тимофеев Л.И. Основы теории литературы М., 1983 32. Ho shimov O’ . «U ketdi...Gunafsha». T.,1985 33. Chexov A.P. «Tanlangan asarlar». Uch tomli k 1-tom. T., 1977 34. Sholoxov M. «Asarlar t o’ plami». Sakkiz tomli k VIII tom. T., 1989. 35.X i koyalar. Toshkent, 1981 Foydalanilgan lug’atlar. 1. Гальперин . И. Р. Большой Англо руссский словар ь .М 1988. 2. Уилсон.Е. А. Англо Русский учебн ы й словарь. 1984. 3. Oxford Russian Dictionary. Bishkek. 2008. 4. Qiyomov.R. “Contemporary English- Uzbek dictionary” Toshkent. 2009. 5. Smirnitskiy “Russian English dictionary” M. 1991 Monica Dickens, granddaughter of Charles Dickens Flowers on the Grass, Bloomsbury publishing-London.., 1949 Майсазордаги гуллар Monica Dickens, MBE, 10 May 1915 - 25 December 1992, great- granddaughter of Charles Dickens and author of over 40 books for adults and children. Disillusioned with the world she was brought up in - she was expelled from St Paul's Girls' School in London before she was presented at court as a debutante - she decided to go into service and her experiences as a cook and general servant formed the basis of her first book, One Pair Of Hands in 1939. She married a United States Navy officer and moved to America where she continued to write, most of her books being set in Britain. Monica Dickens had strong humanitarian interests and founded the Cape Cod and the Islands Samaritans in 1977, and it is for this charity that she recorded this audio edition of A Christmas Carol to benefit Samaritan crisis lines, 51

support groups for those who have lost someone to suicide, and community outreach programs. In 1985 she returned to the UK after the death of her husband, and continued to write until her death on Christmas Day 1992. Writes: Children's, General Fiction, Horror Author of : Ballad of Favour, Cry of a Seagull, The Messenger, The Haunting of Bellamy 4, The Fancy, Dear Doctor Lily, The Listeners, One of the Family, The Room Upstairs, Joy and Josephine, The Angel in the Corner, Man Overboard, No More Meadows, Spring Comes to World's End, Summer at World's End, World's End in Winter, Closed at Dusk, The Happy Prisoner, Flowers on the Grass, The House at World's End, Kate and Emma, Enchantment Foydalanilgan lug’atlar. 5. Гальперин . И. Р. Большой Англо руссский словар ь .М 1988. 6. Уилсон.Е. А. Англо Русский учебн ы й словарь. 1984. 7. Oxford Russian Dictionary. Bishkek. 2008. 8. Qiyomov.R. “Contemporary English- Uzbek dictionary” Toshkent. 2009. 5. Смирнитски “Russian English dictionary” M. 1991 E.Hemingway ning « alvido qurol »asarida badiiy portretning pragmatik tavsifi 52

O'xshashlar

XX asr Amerika adabiyotida tanqidiy realizm tamoyillarining aks ettirilishi(Mark Tven ijodi misolida)

Ingliz tilidagi sifatlarning semantik maydonlari va ularning tematik bo‘linishlari, semantik strukturasi

Ingliz va o‘zbek hayvonlar nomlari ishtirok ertgan maqollar va fraseologizmlarning qo‘llanishi

Shekspir asarlarida ayol obrazining talqin etilishi

Veliyam Sheksper tragediyalari va “Yuliy Stezar