The problem of grammatical categories - Ingliz tili - Referatlar

The problem of grammatical categories

Yuklangan vaqt:

20.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

47 KB

Ko'chirib olish

The problem of grammatical categories Problems to be discussed: 1. The grammatical structure of a language 2. The morphemic structure of the English language 3. The types of morphemes 4. What linguistic phenomenon is called a "grammatical category" 5. The types of grammatical categories.

The grammatical signals have a meaning of their own independent of the meaning of the notional words. This can be illustrated by the following sen tence with nonsensical words: Woggles ugged diggles. According to Ch. Fries (32) the morphological and the syntactic signals in the given sentence make us understand that “several actors acted upon some objects”. This sentence which is a syntactic signal, makes the listener understand it as a declarative sentence whose grammatical meaning is actor - action - thing acted upon. One can eas ily change (transform) the sentence into the singular (A woggle ugged a diggle.), negative (A woggle did not ugg a diggle.), or interrogative (Did a woggle ugg a diggle?) All these operations are grammatical. Then what are the main units of grammar - structure. Let us assume, for example, a situation in which are involved a man, a boy, some money, an act of giving, the man the giver, the boy the receiver, the time of the transaction - yesterday... Any one of the units man, boy, money, giver, yesterday could appear in the linguistic structure as subject. The man gave the boy the money yesterday. The boy was given the money by the man yesterday. The money was given the boy by the man yesterday. The giving of the money to the boy by the man occurred yesterday. Yesterday was the time of the giving of the money to the boy by the man. "Subject" then is a formal linguistic structural matter. Thus, the grammatical meaning of a syntactic construction shows the relation between the words in it. We have just mentioned here "grammatical meaning", “grammatical utter - ance”. The whole complex of linguistic means made use of grouping words into utterances is called a grammatical structure of the language. All the means which are used to group words into the sentence exist as a certain system; they are interconnected and interdependent. They constitute the sentence structure.

All the words of a language fall, as we stated above, under notional and functional words. Notional words are divided into four classes in accord with the position in which they stand in a sentence. Notional words as positional classes are generally represented by the fol - lowing symbols: N, V, A, D. The man landed the jet plane safely NVAND Words which refer to class N cannot replace word referring to class V and vice versa. These classes we shall call grammatical word classes. Thus, in any language there are certain classes of words which have their own positions in sentences. They may also be considered to be grammatical means of a language. So we come to a conclusion that the basic means of the grammatical struc ture of language are: a) sentence structure; b) grammatical word classes. In connection with this grammar is divided into two parts: grammar which deals with sentence structure and grammar which deals with grammatical word - classes. The first is syntax and the second - morphology. W. Francis: "The Structure of American English". The Structural grammarian regularly begins with an objective description of the forms of language and moves towards meaning. An organized whole is greater than the mere sum of its parts. (23), (30) The organized whole is a structural meaning and the mere sum of its parts is a lexical meaning. Five Signals of Syntactic Structure 1. Word Order - is the linear or time sequence in which words appear in an utterance. 2. Prosody - is the over-all musical pattern of stress, pitch, juncture in which the words of an utterance are spoken

3. Function words - are words largely devoid of lexical meaning which are used to indicate various functional relationships among the lexical words of an utterance 4. Inflections - are morphemic changes - the addition of suffixes and morphological means concomitant morphophonemic adjustments - which adopt words to perform certain structural function without changing their lexical meanings 5. Derivational contrast - is the contrast between words which have the same base but differ in the number and nature of their derivational affixes One more thing must be mentioned here. According to the morphological classification English is one of the flexional languages. But the flexional languages fall under synthetical and analytical ones. The synthetical-flexional languages are rich in grammatical inflections and the words in sentences are mostly connected with each-other by means of these inflections though functional words and other grammatical means also participate in this. But the grammatical inflections are of primary importance. The slavonic languages (Russian, Ukraine…) are of this type. The flectional-analytical languages like English and French in order to connect words to sentences make wide use of the order of words and functional words due to the limited number of grammatical flexions. The grammatical means - order of words – is of primary importance for this type of languages. Lexical and Grammatical Meaning In the next chapter we shall come to know that some morphemes are independent and directly associated with some object of reality while others are depended and are connected with the world of reality only indirectly. Examples: desk-s; bag-s; work-ed; lie-d … The first elements of these words are not dependent as the second elements. Morphemes of the 1 st type we’ll call lexical and meanings they express are lexical. The elements like - s, -ed, -d are called grammatical morphemes and meanings they express are grammatical.

Thus, lexical meaning is characteristic to lexical morphemes, while grammatical meanings are characteristic to grammatical morphemes. Grammatical meanings are expressed not only by forms of word – changing, i.e. by affixation but by free morphemes that are used to form analytical word- form, e.g. He will study, I shall go. The meaning of shall, will considered to be grammatical since comparing the relations of invite - invited - shall invite we can see that the function of shall is similar to that of grammatical morphemes -s, -ed. The notion of 'grammatical meaning'. The word combines in its semantic structure two meanings - lexical and grammatical. Lexical meaning is the individual meaning of the word (e.g. table). Grammatical meaning is the meaning of the whole class or a subclass. For example, the class of nouns has the grammatical meaning of thingness . If we take a noun (table) we may say that it possesses its individual lexical meaning (it corresponds to a definite piece of furniture) and the grammatical meaning of thingness (this is the meaning of the whole class). Besides, the noun 'table' has the grammatical meaning of a subclass - countableness. Any verb combines its individual lexical meaning with the grammatical meaning of verbiality - the ability to denote actions or states. An adjective combines its individual lexical meaning with the grammatical meaning of the whole class of adjectives - qualitativeness - the ability to denote qualities. Adverbs possess the grammatical meaning of adverbiality - the ability to denote quality of qualities. There are some classes of words that are devoid of any lexical meaning and possess the grammatical meaning only. This can be explained by the fact that they have no referents in the objective reality. All function words belong to this group - articles, particles, prepositions, etc. The grammatical meaning may be explicit and implicit. The implicit grammatical meaning is not expressed formally (e.g. the word table does not contain any hints in its form as to it being inanimate). The explicit grammatical

meaning is always marked morphologically - it has its marker. In the word eats the grammatical meaning of plurality is shown in the form of the noun; eat's - here the grammatical meaning of possessiveness is shown by the form's; is asked - shows the explicit grammatical meaning of passiveness. The implicit grammatical meaning may be of two types - general and dependent. The gen e ral grammatical meaning is the meaning of the whole word- class, of a part of speech (e.g. nouns - the general grammatical meaning of thingness). The dependent grammatical meaning is the meaning of a subclass within the same part of speech. For instance, any verb possesses the dependent grammatical meaning of transitivity/in-transitivity, terminativeness/non- terminativeness, stativeness/non stativeness; nouns have the dependent grammatical meaning of contableness/uncountableness and animate-ness/inanimateness. The most important thing about the dependent grammatical meaning is that it influences the realization of grammatical categories restricting them to a subclass. Thus the dependent grammatical meaning of countableness/uncountableness influences the realization of the grammatical category of number as the number category is realized only within the subclass of countable nouns, the grammatical meaning of animateness/inanimateness influences the realization of the grammatical category of case, teminativeness/non-terminativeness - the category of tense, transitivity/intransitivity - the category of voice. Grammatical categories are made up by the unity of identical grammatical meanings that have the same form (e.g. singular : plural). Due to dialectal unity of language and thought, grammatical categories correlate, on the one hand, with the conceptual categories and, on the other hand, with the objective reality. It follows that we may define grammatical categories as references of the corresponding objective categories. For example, the objective category of time finds its representation in the grammatical category of tense , the objective category of quantity finds its representation in the grammatical category of number . Those grammatical categories that have references in the objective reality are called referential grammatical categories. However, not all of the grammatical categories

have references in the objective reality, just a few of them do not correspond to anything in the objective reality. They are called significational categories. To this type belong the categories of mood and degree . Speaking about the grammatical category of mood we can say that it has modality as its conceptual correlate. It can be explained by the fact that it does not refer to anything in the objective reality - it expresses the speaker's attitude to what he says. Any grammatical category must be represented by at least two grammatical forms (e.g. the grammatical category of number singular and plural forms). The relation between two grammatical forms differing in meaning and external signs is called opposition - book::books (unmarked member/marked member). All grammatical categories find their realization through oppositions, e.g. the grammatical category of number is realized through the opposition singular::plural. Taking all the above mentioned into consideration, we may define the grammatical category as the opposition between two mutually exclusive form- classes (a form-class is a set of words with the same explicit grammatical meaning). Means of realization of grammatical categories may be synthetic (near - nearer) and analytic (beautiful- more beautiful). Transposition and neutralization of morphological forms. In the process of communication grammatical categories may undergo the processes of transposition and neutralization. Transposition is the use of a linguistic unit in an unusual environment or in the function that is not characteristic of it (He is a lion). In the sentence He is coming tomorrow the paradigmatic meaning of the continuous form is reduced and a new meaning appears - that of a future action. Transposition always results in the neutralization of a paradigmatic meaning. Neutralization is the reduction of the opposition to one of its members: custom :: customs - x :: customs; x:: spectacles. language.

There are many conceptions on the problem today. According to B. Golovin (13) “a grammatical category is a real linguistic unity of grammatical meaning and the means of its material expression”. It means that in order to call a linguistic phenomenon a grammatical category there must be a grammatical meaning and grammatical means. M.Y. Blokh (6), (7) explains it as follows: “As for the grammatical category itself, it presents, the same as the grammatical "form", a unity of form (i.e. material factor), and meanings (i.e. ideal factor) and constitutes a certain signemic sys tem. More specifically the grammatical category is a system of expressing a generalized grammatical meaning by means of paradigmatic correlation of grammatical forms. The paradigmatic correlations of grammatical forms in a category are ex posed by the so - called “grammatical oppositions”. The opposition (in the linguistic sense) may be defined as a generalized correlation of lingual forms by means of which a certain function is expressed. The correlated elements (members) of the opposition must possess two types of features: common features and differential features. Common features serve as the basis of contrast while differential features immediately express the function in question. The grammatical categories are better to explain by comparing them with logical categories. The grammatical categories are opposed to logical ones. The logical categories are universal for all the languages. Any meanings can be expressed in any language. For instance there's a logical category of pos session. The meaning of possession can be expressed in all the languages, compare: My book (English) - Моя книга (Russian) - Менинг китобим (Uzbek). As it is seen from the examples the meaning of possession in English and Russian is expressed, by the possessive pronouns (lexical means) while in Uzbek it can be expressed either by the help of a discontinuous morpheme (... нинг ... им ) or by one overt morpheme (… им ). This category is grammati cal in Uzbek but lexical in the other two languages. Thus the universal logical categories can be expressed

by grammatical and non - grammatical (lexical, syntactic) means. The grammatical categories are those logical ones that are expressed in languages by constant grammatical means. The doctrines mentioned above one - side approach to the problem. It is a rather complicated issue in the general linguistics. But unfortunately we don't have universally acknowledged criteria to meet the needs of individual languages. One of the most consistent theories of the grammatical categories is the one that is suggested by L. Barkhudarov. (2), (3) According to his opinion in order to call a linguistic phenomenon a gram - matical category there must be the following features: - general grammatical meaning; - this meaning must consist of at least two particular meanings; - the particular meanings must be opposed to each - other: - the particular meanings must have constant grammatical means to express them. Thus, any linguistic phenomenon that meets these requirements is called a grammatical category. English nouns have a grammatical category of number. This category has all the requirements that are necessary for a grammatical category: 1. it has general grammatical meaning of number; 2. it consists of two particular meanings; singular and plural; 3. singular is opposed to plural, they are antonymous; 4. singular and plural have their own constant grammatical means: singular is represented by a zero morpheme and plural has the allomorphs like (s), (z), (iz). There are some other means to express singular and plural in English but they make very small percentage compared with regular means. Schematically this can be shown as follows: Number 0 (s), (z), (iz) singular plural

Another example. In English adjectives there's one grammatical category - the degrees of comparison. What features does it have? 1. It has a general grammatical meaning: degrees of comparison; 2. The degrees of comparison consist of three particular meanings: posi tive, comparative and superlative; 3. They are opposed to each - other; 4. They have their own grammatical means depending on the number of syllables in the word. If in the category of number of nouns there are two particular meanings, in the grammatical category of degrees of comparison there are three. Thus, a grammatical category is a linguistic phenomenon that has a general grammatical meaning consisting of at least two particular meanings that are opposed to each - other and that have constant grammatical means of their own to express them.

Literature 1. Ирискулов М., Кулдашев A. A course in theoiretical English Grammar. T., 2008 2. Л. Бархударов. Структура простого предложения современного английского языка. М., 1966 3. Л. Бархударов, Д. Штелинг. Грамматика английского языка. М. , 1994 4. М. Блох. Теоретическая грамматика английского языка. М. , 1994 5. М. Блох. Теоретические основы грамматики. М. , 2002 6. M. Blokh. A Course in Theoretical English Grammar. M., 1983

O'xshashlar

The problem of parts of speech

Grammatical problems of translation

The analysis of the grammatical features of English and Uzbek adjectives used in different discourse

General principles of grammatical analisys

Verb as a part of speech in modern english