The problem of parts of speech - Ingliz tili - Referatlar

The problem of parts of speech

Yuklangan vaqt:

20.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

66 KB

Ko'chirib olish

The problem of parts of speech Problems to be discussed: 1. Contemporary criteria for classifying words to parts of speech 2. Structural approach to the classification of words (the doctrine of American descriptive School) 3. Notional and functional parts of speech 4. Nouns as a part of speech 5. The grammatical categories of nouns number case 6. The meaning of gender in Modern English

A thorough study of linguistic literature on the problem of English parts of speech enables us to conclude that there were three tendencies in grouping English words into parts of speech or into form classes: 1. Pre - structural tendency; 2. Structural tendency; 3. Post - structural tendency; Pre - structural tendency is characterized by classifying words into word - groups according to their meaning, function and form (H. Sweet, O. Jespersen, O. Curme, B. Ilyish and other grammarians). The second tendency is characterized by classification of words exclu sively according to their structural meaning, as per their distribution (Ch. Fries, W. Francis, A. Hill and others). The third one combines the ideas of the two above-mentioned tenden cies. They classify words in accord with the meaning, function, form; stem-building means and distribution (or combinability). To this group of scientists we can refer most Russian grammarians such as: Khaimovitch and Rogovskaya (22), L. Barkhudarov and Shteling (4) and others. (25) One of the central problems of a theoretical Grammar is the problem of parts of speech. There is as yet no generally accepted system of English parts of speech. Now we shall consider conceptions of some grammarians. H. Sweet's (42) classification of parts of speech is based on the three principles (criteria), namely meaning, form and function. All the words in English he divides into two groups: 1) noun-words: nouns, noun-pronouns, noun-numerals, infinitive, gerund; 2) verbs: finite verbs, verbals (infinitive, gerund, participle) I. Declinable Adjective words: adjective, adjective pronouns, adjective- numeral, participles II. Indeclinable: adverb, preposition, conjunction, interjection As you see, the results of his classification, however, reveal a considerable divergence between his theory and practice. He seems to have kept to the form of words. Further, concluding the chapter he wrote: "The distinction between the two

classes which for convenience we distinguish as declinable and inde clinable parts of speech is not entirely dependent on the presence or absence of inflection, but really goes deeper, corresponding, to some extent, to the distinction between head - word and adjunct-word. The great majority of the particles are used only as adjunct-words, many of them being only form-words, while declinable words generally stand to the particles in the relation of head words. O. Jespersen. (34) According to Jespersen the division of words into certain classes in the main goes back to the Greek and Latin grammarians with a few additions and modifications. He argues against those who while classifying words kept to either form or meaning of words, he states that the whole complex of criteria, i.e. form, func tion and meaning should he kept in view. He gives the following classification: 1. Substantives (including proper names) 2. Adjectives In some respects (1) and (2) may be classed together as "Nouns ". 3. Pronouns (including numerals and pronominal adverbs) 4. Verbs (with doubts as to the inclusion of "Verbids") 5. Particles (comprising what are generally called adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions- coordinating and subordinating - and interjections). As it is seen from his classification in practice only one of those features is taken into consideration, and that is primarily form. Classes (1-4) are declin able while particles not. It reminds Sweet's grouping of words. The two conceptions are very similar. Tanet R. Aiken kept to function only. She has conceived of a six-class system, recognizing the following categories: absolute, verb, complement, modifiers and connectives. Ch. Fries ' (31), (32) classification of words is entirely different from those of tradi tional grammarians. The new approach - the application of two of the methods of structural linguistics, distributional analysis and substitution - makes it pos sible

for Fries to dispense with the usual eight parts of speech. He classifies words into four form - classes, designated by numbers, and fifteen groups of function words, designated by letters. The form-classes correspond roughly to what most grammarians call noun and pronouns (1 st clause), verb (2 nd clause), adjective and adverbs, though Fries warns the reader against the attempt to translate the statements which the latter finds in the book into the old gram matical terms. The group of function words contains not only prepositions and conjunctions but certain specific words that more traditional grammarians would class as a particular kind of pronouns, adverbs and verbs. In the follow ing examples: 1. Woggles ugged diggles 2. Uggs woggled diggs 3. Diggles diggled diggles The woggles, uggs, diggles are "thing", because they are treated as English treats "thing" words - we know it by the "positions" they occupy in the utter ances and the forms they have, in contrast with other positions and forms. Those are all structural signals of English. So Fries comes to the conclusion that a part of speech in English is a functioning pattern . 1 All words that can occupy the same "set of positions" in the patterns of English single free utter ances (simple sentences) must belong to the same part speech. Fries' test-frame-sentences were the following: Frame A The concert was good (always) Frame B The clerk remembered the tax (suddenly) Frame C The team went there 1 «the difference between nouns and verbs lies not in what kinds of things they stand for, but in what kinds of frames they stand in: I saw Robert kill Mary. I witnessed the killing of Mary by Robert” “Language process” Vivien Tartter. N.Y., 1986, p.89

Fries started with his first test frame and set out to find in his material all the words that could be substituted for the word concert with no change of structural meaning (The materials were some fifty hours of tape-recorded conversations by some three hundred different speakers in which the participants were entirely unaware that their speech was being recorded): The concert was good food coffee taste..... The words of this list he called class I words. The word “was” and all the words that can be used in this position he called class 2 words. In such a way he revealed 4 classes of notional words and 15 classes of functional words. These four classes of notional words contain approximately 67 per cent of the total instances of the vocabulary items. In other words our utterances consist prima rily of arrangements of these four parts of speech. Functional words are identified by letters Class A Words the concert was good the a/an every no my our one all both that some John’s All the words appearing in this position (Group A) serve as markers of Class 1 words. Sometimes they are called "determiners". The author enumerates fourteen more groups of function words among which we find, according to the traditional terminology Group B - modal verbs Group I - interrogative pr-ns and adverbs Group C - n.p.not Group J - subordinating conj-s

Group D - adverbs of degree Group K- interjections Group E - coordinating conj-s. Group L- the words yes and no Group F - prepositions Group M - attention giving signals look, say, listen Group G - the aux-v. do Group N - the word please Group H - introductory there Group O - let us, let in request sentences. The difference between the four classes of words and function words are as follows: 1. The four classes are large in number while the total number of function words amounts to 154. 2. In the four classes the lexical meanings of the separate words are rather clearly separable from the structural meanings of the arrangements in which these words appear. In the fifteen groups it is usually difficult if not impossible to indicate a lexical meaning apart from the structural meanings which these words signal. 3. Function words must be treated as items since they signal different structural meanings: The boys were given the money. The boys have given the money. Russian grammarians in classifying words into parts of speech keep to different concepts; A.I. Smirnitsky identifies three criteria. The most important of them is the syntactic function next comes meaning and then morphological forms of words. In his opinion stem-building elements are of no use. His word-groups are: Notional words Function words 1. Nouns link - verbs 2. Adjectives prepositions conjunctions 3. Numerals modifying function words 4. Pronouns (article, particle) 5. Adverbs only, even, not 6. Verbs

Khaimovich and Rogovskaya identify five criteria 1. Lexico - grammatical meaning of words 2. Lexico - grammatical morphemes (stem - building elements) 3. Grammatical categories of words. 4. Their combinability (unilateral, bilateral) 5 . Their function in a sentence. Their Classification 1. Nouns 2. Adjectives 3. Pronouns 4. Numerals 5. Verbs 6. Adverbs 7. Adlinks (the cat. of state) Ex. asleep, alive 8. Modal words 9. Prepositions 10. Conjunctions 11. Particles (just, yet, else, alone) 12. Interjections 13. Articles 14. Response words (yes, no) As authors state the parts of speech lack some of those five criteria. The most general properties of parts of speech are features 1, 4 and 5 . B. A. Ilyish (15) distinguishes three criteria : 1. meaning; 2. form, 3. function. The third criteria is subdivided into two: a) the method of combining the word with other ones b) the function in the sentence. a) has to deal with phrases; b) with sentence structure. B. A. Ilyish considers the theory of parts of speech as essentially a part of morphology, involving, however, some syntactical points.

1. Nouns 7. Adverbs 2. Adjective 8. Prepositions 3. Pronoun 9. Conjunctions 4. Numerals 10. Particles 5 . Statives (asleep, afraid) 11. Modal words 6. Verbs 12. Interjections L. Barkhudarov, D. Steling (4). Their classification of words are based on four principles. But the important and characteristic feature of their classification is that they do not make use of syntactic function of words in sentences: meaning, grammatical forms, combinability with other words and the types of word - building (which are studied not by grammar, but by lexicology). 1. Nouns 2. Articles 3. Pronouns 4. Adjectives 5. Adverbs 6. Numerals 7. Verbs 8. Prepositions 9. Conjunctions 10. Particles 11. Modal words 12. Interjections We find another approach of those authors to the words of English. All the words are divided into two main classes: notional words and function - words: connectives, determinatives Function words are those which do not have full lexical meaning and cannot be used as an independent part of sentences. According to their function these words, as has been mentioned, are subdivided into connectives and determinatives:

connectives form phrases as to believe in something or as in the hall. To connectives authors refer: prepositions, conjunctions, modal and link verbs; determinatives are words which define the lexical meaning of notional words (they either limit them, or make them more concrete). These words include articles and particles. The consideration of conceptions of different grammarians shows that the problem of parts of speech is not yet solved. There's one point which is gener ally accepted: in M-n English there are two classes of words-notional and functional - which are rather distinct. The Noun In most cases in treating parts of speech in English we shall keep to the conception of scientists that we refer to post-structural tendency. It's because they combine the ideas of traditional and structural grammarians. The nouns are classified into a separate word - group because: 1. they all have the same lexical - grammatical meaning : substance / thing 2. according to their form - they've two grammatical categories: number and case 3. they all have typical stem-building elements: - er, - ist, - ship, - merit, -hood ... 4. typical combinability with other words: most often left-hand combinability 5. function - the most characteristic feature of nouns is - they can be observed in all syntactic functions but predicate. Some words about the distribution of nouns. Because of the fact that nouns express or denote substance / thing, their distribution is bound with the words which express the quality of substance, their number, their actions and their relation to the other words /nouns/ in English. When the quality of nouns are described we make use of adjectives: big, red apple

energetic crisis a long, dusty track and others. When the quantity and order of nouns are described the numerals are to be used: the six continents 25 th anniversary 12 students.... When we denote the action of substances we make use of the verbs: An apple-tree grows in the garden Russia assisted India in Mounting Bokaro Steal Plant When the relation of nouns to other words are described we make wide use of prepositions a window of the school to the park at the construction of the bridge In all these cases with the exception of verbs the noun is characterized with left-hand combinability / in overwhelming majority/. So far as to the verbs are concerned they may both precede and follow them. The Problems of Number and Case in Modern English Nouns Number is a grammatical category of nouns which denotes the number of objects, expressed by a word. In English there are two numbers: singular and plural. The formal signal of the singular number is a zero morpheme, while the usual signal of plurality -/e/s. The formation of plural by means -/e/s is considered to be productive, but in Modern English there are some non-productive types of plural number, as for instance: a) suffix - en : ox - oxen b) variation of vowels in the root of a word: tooth-teeth; goose-geese; mouse-mice; man-men,

c) variation of vowels of the root suffix- "ren" children; d) homonymous forms for both sing and plural: sheep – sheep deer – deer swine – swine With regard to the category of number English nouns fall under two sub - classes: countable and uncountable. The latter is again subdivided into those having no plural form and those having no singular. The former type is called Pluralia tantum: clothes, goods, the latter - singularia tantum: milk, water. The Category of Case in Nouns The problem of the number of cases in English has given rise to different theories which were based on the different ways of approaching the descrip tion of English grammatical structure. Case is an indication of a relation in which the noun stands to some other word. H. Sweet's conception of the number of cases in English doubtful. He is not sure whether in English there are five or two cases. O. Curme distinguishes four cases: 1. Nominative-performs 3 functions: subject, predicate and direct object 2. Accusative - performs 3 functions: object, adverbial modifier, predicate. The dog bit my brother /obj./ He stayed an hour /adverbial acc/ I believed to be him /predicate/ 3. Dative: When an action directed toward smb: He makes coat for John. 4. Genitive: girl's ... O. Jespersen distinguishes two cases: common and genitive. M. Bryant is of the same opinion:

H. Whitehall distinguishes two cases in nouns on analogy with the pro nouns which can substitute for them: nominative and objective. B.A. Ilyish considers that – ‘s is no longer a case inflexion in the classical sense of a word. Unlike such classical inflections, -‘s may be attached: a) to adverbs: yesterday's events b) to a word group: Mary and John's apartment c) to a whole clause: the man I saw yesterday’s son. Ilyish concludes that the – ‘s morpheme gradually develops into a "form- word", a kind of particle serving to convey the meanings of belonging, possession”. G.U. Vorontsova does not recognize -'s as case morpheme. She treats it as a "postposition", "a purely syntactical form - word resembling a preposition", used as a sign of syntactical dependence". To Khaimovich and Rogovskaya -' s still function as a case morpheme, be - cause: 1. The-'s morpheme is mostly attached to individual nouns, not noun groups /in 96 %/. 2. It's general meaning – “the relation of a noun to another word” - is a typical case meaning. 3. The fact that -‘s occurs, as a rule, with a more or less limited group of words bears testimony to its not being a "preposition like form word". The use of the preposition is determined, chiefly by the noun it introduces: on /in/ under the table ... 4. oxen’s - cows' /z/, /θ/ and /of/ alternants: identical meanings and in complementary distribution. 5. –‘s not a “preposition like word” since it has no vowel as it is found in other prepositions in English. The Adjectives Problems to be discussed: - the characteristic features of the adjectives as a part of speech

- the types of adjectives - the grammatical category of degrees of comparison - the means of formation of the degrees of comparison of adjectives - substantivization of adjective Pronouns - general characteristics of this class of words - the difference between pronouns and other parts of speech - the personal pronouns - the possessive pronouns - the reflexive pronouns The characteristic features of the adjective as a part of speech are as follows: their lexical-grammatical meaning of attributes or we may say that they express property of things /persons/; from the morphological view point they have the category of degrees of comparison; from the point of view of their combinality they combine with nouns, as it has already been stated above, they express the properties of things. The words that express things we call nouns. It seems to be important to differenti ate the combinability of a word with other words and reference of a word of a part of speech to another part of speech. We put this because adjectives modify nouns but they can combine with adverbs, link verbs and the word “one”: a white horse. The horse is white. The sun rose red. The sun rose extremely red. the stem-building affixes are: -ful, -less, -ish, -ous, -ive, -ir, un-, -pre-, in-...; their syntactic functions are: attribute and predicative It is important to point out that in the function of an attribute the adjectives are in most cases used in pre-position; in post- position they are very seldom: time immemorial; chance to come. The category of comparison of adjectives shows the absolute or relative quality of a substance.

The Grammatical Category of Degrees of Comparison Not all the adjectives of the English language have the degrees of comparison. From this point of view they fall under two types: 1) comparable adjectives 2) non- comparable adjectives The non-comparable adjectives are relative ones like golden, wooden, silk, cotton, raw and so on. The comparable ones are qualitative adjectives. The grammatical category of degrees of comparison is the opposition of three individual meanings: 1) positive degree 2) comparative degree 3) superlative degree The common or basic degree is called positive which is expressed by the absence of a marker. Therefore we say that it is expressed by a zero morpheme. So far as to the comparative and superlative degrees they have special material means. At the same time we’ll have to admit that not all the qualitative adjec tives form their degrees in the similar way. From the point of view of forming of the comparative and superlative degrees of comparison the qualitative ad jectives must be divided into four groups. They are: 1) One and some two syllabic adjectives that form their degrees by the help of inflections - er and -est respectively, short - shorter - the shortest strong - stronger - the strongest pretty - prettier - the prettiest 2) The adjectives which form their degrees by means of root-vowel and final consonant change: many - more - the most much - more - the most little - less - the least far - further - the furthest

(farther - the farthest) 3) The adjectives that form their degrees by means of suppletion good - better - the best bad - worse - the worst Note: The two adjectives form their degrees by means of suppletion. It concerns only of the comparative degree (good - better; bad - worse). The suppletive degrees of these adjectives are formed by root - vowel and final consonant change (better - the best) and by adding “t” to the form of the comparative degree (in worse - the worst). 4) Many - syllabic adjectives which form their degrees by means of the words "more" and "most": interesting - more interesting - the most interesting beautiful - more beautiful - the most beautiful So far we have not been referring to the works of grammarians on the problem since the opinions of almost all the grammarians coincide on the ques tions treated. But so far as to the lexical way of expressing the degrees is concerned we find considerable divergence in its treatment. Some authors treat more beautiful, the most beautiful not as a lexical way of formation of the degrees of comparison but as analytical forms. Their arguments are as follows: 1. More and -er identical as to their meaning of “higher degree”; 2. Their distribution is complementary. Together they cover all the adjec tives having the degree of comparison. Within the system of the English Grammar we do not find a category which can be formed at the same time by synthetic and analytical means. And if it is a grammatical category it cannot be formed by several means, therefore we consider it to be a free syntactic unit which consists of an adverb and a noun. Different treatment is found with regard to the definite and indefinite articles before most: the most interesting book and a most interesting book. 5) Khaimovich and Rogovskaya: One must not forget that more and most are not only word-morphemes of comparison. They can also be notional words.

Moreover they are poly- semantic and poly-functional words. One of the meanings of most is “very, exceedingly”. It is in this meaning that the word most is used in the expression a most interesting book". As has been stated we do not think that there are two homonymous words: most - functional word; most - notional word. There is only one word - notional /adverb/ which can serve to express the superlative degree by lexical means and since it's a free combination of three notional words any article can be used according to the meaning that is going to be expressed. The difference in the meaning of the examples above is due to the difference in the means of the definite and indefinite articles. Substantivization of Adjectives As is known adjectives under certain circumstances can be substantivized, i.e. become nouns. B. Khaimovich states that "when adjectives are converted into nouns they no longer indicate attributes of substances but substances possessing these at tributes. B. Khaimovich speaks of two types of substantivization full and partial . By full substantivization he means when an adjective gets all the morphological features of nouns, like: native, a native, the native, natives. But all the partial substantivization he means when adjectives get only some of the morphological features of nouns, as far instance, the adjective “rich” having substantivized can be used only with the definite article: the rich. B. Ilyish is almost of the same opinion: we shall confine ourselves to the statement that these words are partly substantivized and occupy an intermediate position. More detailed consideration of the problem shows that the rich and others are not partial substantivization. All the substantivized adjectives can be ex plained within the terms of nouns.

Literature 1. Ирискулов М., Кулдашев A. A course in theoiretical English Grammar. T., 2008 2. Л. Бархударов. Структура простого предложения современного английского языка. М., 1966 3. Л. Бархударов, Д. Штелинг. Грамматика английского языка. М. , 1994 4. М. Блох. Теоретическая грамматика английского языка. М. , 1994 5. М. Блох. Теоретические основы грамматики. М. , 2002 6. M. Blokh. A Course in Theoretical English Grammar. M., 1983 7. Дж. Буранов. Сравнительная типология английского и тюркских языков. М. , 1989 8. Ж. Б ў ронов. Инглиз ва ў зб ек тиллари қ иёсий грамматикаси. Т., 1973

O'xshashlar

The problem of grammatical categories

The subject matter of the theory of translation

Divisions of the subject of lexicology

Mastering the sounds of the language

The autobiography of Alisher Navai