Sensivity to difference and personal growth (kurs ishi) - Ingliz tili - Referatlar

Sensivity to difference and personal growth (kurs ishi)

Yuklangan vaqt:

20.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

36.7705078125 KB

Ko'chirib olish

Sensivity to difference and personal growth CONTENT Introduction Chapter I Sensitivity to difference and Personal growth 1.1 Potential Problem Areas 1.2 Explanation of Problems Chapter II Capacity to understand Sensitivity 2.1 More definitions of wisdom and spirit 2.2 Spiritual growth and personal development 2.3 Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity Conclusion Used literature

Introduction INFPs are creative, sensitive souls who take their lives very seriously. They seek harmony and authenticity in their relationships with others. They value creativity, spirituality, and honoring the individual self above all else. They are very tuned into inequity and unfairness against people, and get great satisfaction from conquering such injustices. Actuality of the work: An INFP is a perfectionist who will rarely allow themselves to feel successful, although they will be keenly aware of failures. INFPs also get satisfaction from being in touch with their creativity. For the INFP, personal success depends upon the condition of their closest relationships, the development of their creative abilities, and the continual support of humanity by serving people in need, fighting against injustice, or in some other way working to make the world a better place to be. As an INFP, you have gifts that are specific to your personality type that aren't natural strengths for other types. By recognizing your special gifts and encouraging their growth and development, you will more readily see your place in the world, and how you can better use your talents to achieve your dreams. Aim of the work: To grow as an individual, the INFP needs to focus on opening their perspective to include a more accurate picture of what is really going on in the world. In order to be in a position in which the INFP is able to perceive and consider data that is foreign to their internal value system, the INFP needs to know that its value system is not threatened by the new information. The INFP must consciously tell himself/herself that an opinion that does not concede with their own is not an indictment of their entire character.

Subject of the work: The INFP who is concerned with personal growth will pay close attention to their motivation for taking in information. They take in information to better understand a situation or concept. They take in information to support a personal idea or cause. At the moment when something is perceived, is the INFP concerned with twisting that perception to fit in with their personal values. To achieve a better understanding of the external world, the INFP should try to perceive information objectively, before fitting it into their value system. They should consciously be aware of their tendency to discard anything that doesn't agree with their values, and work towards lessening this tendency. They should try to see situations from other people's perspectives, without making personal judgments about the situations or the other people's perspectives. In general, they should work on exercising their intuition in a truly Extraverted sense. In other words, they should use intuition to take in information about the world around them for the sake of understanding the world, rather than take in information to support their own conclusions. The INFP who successfully perceives things objectively may be quite a powerful force for positive change.

Chapter I. Sensitivity to difference and personal growth INFPs are creative, sensitive souls who take their lives very seriously. They seek harmony and authenticity in their relationships with others. They value creativity, spirituality, and honoring the individual self above all else. They are very tuned into inequity and unfairness against people, and get great satisfaction from conquering such injustices. An INFP is a perfectionist who will rarely allow themselves to feel successful, although they will be keenly aware of failures. INFPs also get satisfaction from being in touch with their creativity. For the INFP, personal success depends upon the condition of their closest relationships, the development of their creative abilities, and the continual support of humanity by serving people in need, fighting against injustice, or in some other way working to make the world a better place to be. Allowing Your INFP Strengths to Flourish As an INFP, you have gifts that are specific to your personality type that aren't natural strengths for other types. By recognizing your special gifts and encouraging their growth and development, you will more readily see your place in the world, and how you can better use your talents to achieve your dreams. 1.2 Potential Problem Areas Nearly all INFPs will recognize the following characteristics in themselves. They should embrace and nourish these strengths: Nearly all INFPs will recognize the following characteristics in themselves. They should embrace and nourish these strengths:  Highly creative, artistic and spiritual, they can produce wonderful works of art, music and literature. INFPs are natural artists. They will find great satisfaction if they encourage and develop their artistic abilities. That doesn't mean that an INFP has to be a famous writer or painter in order to be content. Simply the act of

"creating" will be a fulfilling source of renewal and refreshment to the INFP. An INFP should allow himself or herself some artistic outlet, because it will add enrichment and positive energy to their life. They're more spiritually aware than most people, and are more in touch with their soul than others. Most INFPs have strong Faith. Those that don't may feel as if they're missing something important. An INFP should nourish their faith. They're more spiritually aware than most people, and are more in touch with their soul than others. Most INFPs have strong Faith. Those that don't may feel as if they're missing something important. An INFP should nourish their faith. INFPs are very aware of social injustice, and empathize with the underdog. Their empathy for the underdog and hyper-awareness of social injustice makes them extremely compassionate and nurturing towards disadvantaged members of our society. INFPs will feel most useful and fulfilled when they are fighting to help people who have been misfortunate in our society. They may be teachers, ministers, writers, counsellors or psychologists, but they will most likelyINFPs are very aware of social injustice, and empathize with the underdog. Their empathy for the underdog and hyper-awareness of social injustice makes them extremely compassionate and nurturing towards disadvantaged members of our society. INFPs will feel most useful and fulfilled when they are fighting to help people who have been misfortunate in our society. They may be teachers, ministers, writers, counsellors or psychologists, but they will most likely all spend extra time trying to help people with special problems. An INFP can find a tremendous amount of satisfaction by enacting some kind of social change that will help the underdog. all spend extra time trying to help people with special problems. An INFP can find a tremendous amount of satisfaction by enacting some kind of social change that will help the underdog. They're usually good listeners who genuinely want to hear about someone's problems, and genuinely want to help them. This makes them outstanding

counsellors, and good friends. An INFP may find great satisfaction from volunteering as a counselor. They accept and value people as individuals, and are strongly egalitarian. They believe that an individual has the right to be themself, without having their attitudes and perspectives brought under scrutiny. Accordingly, they have a great deal of tolerance and acceptance dealing with people who might encounter negative judgment from society in general. They can see something positive in everyone. They believe in individuals. If they give themselves the opportunity, an INFP can become a much-needed source of self-esteem and confidence for people who cannot find it on their own. In this way, they can nurture a "sick soul" back to health. Usually deep and intelligent, they're able to grasp difficult concepts with relative ease. They usually do quite well academically, and will find that educating their minds nourishes their need to think deeply. INFPs who have developed their Extraverted iNtuition to the extent that they can perceive the world about them objectively and quickly will find that they enjoy these special gifts: They will have a great deal of insight into people's characters. They will quickly and thoroughly understand where a person is coming from by assessing their motives and feelings. These well-developed INFP individuals make outstanding psychologists (such as Isabel Briggs Myers herself) and counselors. They might also be great fiction writers, because they're able to develop very complex, real characters. They will quickly understand different situations, and quickly grasp new concepts. They will find that they're able to do anything that they put their mind to, although they may not find it personally satisfying. Things may seem to come easily to these INFPs. Although they're able to conquer many different kinds of

tasks and situations, these INFPs will be happiest doing something that seems truly important to them. Although it may be depressing to read about your type's weaknesses, please remember that we offer this information to enact positive change. We want people to grow into their own potential, and to live happy and successful lives. Most of the weaker characteristics that are found in INFPs are due to their dominant Feeling function overshadowing the rest of their personality. When the dominant function of Introverted Feeling overshadows everything else, the INFP can't use Extraverted iNtuition to take in information in a truly objective fashion. In such cases, an INFP may show some or all of the following weaknesses in varying degrees: Although it may be depressing to read about your type's weaknesses, please remember that we offer this information to enact positive change. We want people to grow into their own potential, and to live happy and successful lives.  May be extremely sensitive to any kind of criticism  May perceive criticism where none was intended  May have skewed or unrealistic ideas about reality  May be unable to acknowledge or hear anything that goes against their personal ideas and opinions  May be extremely sensitive to any kind of criticism  May perceive criticism where none was intended  May have skewed or unrealistic ideas about reality  May be unable to acknowledge or hear anything that goes against their personal ideas and opinions  May blame their problems on other people, seeing themselves as victims who are treated unfairly  May have great anger, and show this anger with rash outpourings of bad temper

 May be unaware of appropriate social behavior  May be oblivious to their personal appearance, or to appropriate dress  May come across as eccentric, or perhaps even generally strange to others, without being aware of it  May be unable to see or understand anyone else's point of view  May value their own opinions and feelings far above others  May be unaware of how their behavior affects others  May be oblivious to other people's need  May feel overwhelmed with tension and stress when someone expresses disagreement with the INFP, or disapproval of the INFP  May develop strong judgments that are difficult to unseed against people who they perceive have been oppressive or suppressive to them  Under great stress, may obsess about details that are unimportant to the big picture of things  Under stress, may obsessively brood over a problem repeatedly  May have unreasonable expectations of others 1.2 Explanation of Problems Nearly all of the problematic characteristics described above can be attributed in various degrees to the common INFP problem of only taking in data that justifies their personal opinions. INFPs are usually very intense and sensitive people, and feel seriously threatened by criticism. They are likely to treat any point of view other than their own as criticism of their own perspective. If the INFP does not learn how to deal with this perceived criticism, the INFP will begin to shut out the incoming information that causes them pain. This is a natural survivalistic technique for the INFP personality. The main driver to the INFP personality is Introverted Feeling, whose purpose is to maintain and honor an intensely personal

system of values and morals. If an INFP's personal value system is threatened by external influences, the INFP shuts out the threatening data in order to preserve and honor their value system. This is totally natural, and works well to protect the individual psyche from getting hurt. However, the INFP who exercises this type of self-protection regularly will become more and more unaware of other people's perspectives, and thus more and more isolated from a real understanding of the world that they live in. They will always find justification for their own inappropriate behaviors, and will always find fault with the external world for problems that they have in their lives. It will be difficult for them to maintain close personal relationships because they will have unreasonable expectations, and will be unable to accept blame. Its not an uncommon tendency for the INFP to look to the external world primarily for information that will support their ideas and values. However, if this tendency is given free reign, the resulting INFP personality is too self-centered to be happy or successful. Since the INFP's dominant function to their personality is Introverted Feeling, they must balance this with an auxiliary Extraverted iNtuitive function. The INFP takes in information via Extraverted iNtuition. This is also the INFP's primary way of dealing with the external world. If the INFP uses Extraverted iNtuition only to serve the purposes of Introverted Feeling, then the INFP is not using Extraversion effectively at all. As a result, the INFP does not take in enough information about the external world to have a good sense of what's going on. They see nothing but their own perspective, and deal with the world only so far as they need to in order to support their perspective. These individuals usually come across as selfish and unrealistic. Depending on how serious the problem is, they may appear to be anything from "a bit eccentric" to "way out there". Many times other people are unable to understand or relate to these people. Solutions

To grow as an individual, the INFP needs to focus on opening their perspective to include a more accurate picture of what is really going on in the world. In order to be in a position in which the INFP is able to perceive and consider data that is foreign to their internal value system, the INFP needs to know that its value system is not threatened by the new information. The INFP must consciously tell himself/herself that an opinion that does not concede with their own is not an indictment of their entire character. The INFP who is concerned with personal growth will pay close attention to their motivation for taking in information. Do they take in information to better understand a situation or concept? Or, do they take in information to support a personal idea or cause? At the moment when something is perceived, is the INFP concerned with twisting that perception to fit in with their personal values? Or is she/he concerned with absorbing the information objectively? To achieve a better understanding of the external world, the INFP should try to perceive information objectively, before fitting it into their value system. They should consciously be aware of their tendency to discard anything that doesn't agree with their values, and work towards lessening this tendency. They should try to see situations from other people's perspectives, without making personal judgments about the situations or the other people's perspectives. In general, they should work on exercising their iNtuition in a truly Extraverted sense. In other words, they should use iNtuition to take in information about the world around them for the sake of understanding the world, rather than take in information to support their own conclusions. The INFP who successfully perceives things objectively may be quite a powerful force for positive change. Living Happily in our World as an INFP Some INFPs have difficulty fitting into our society. Their problems are often a result of an unawareness of appropriate social behavior, an unawareness of how they come across to others, or unrealistic expectations of others. Any one of these

three issues stem from using Extraverted iNtuition in a diminished manner. An INFP who takes in information for the sake of understanding the world around them, rather than one who takes in information only to support their own ideas, will have a clearer, more objective understanding of how society values social behaviors and attitudes. He or she will also be more aware of how they are perceived by others, and will have more realistic expectations for others' behavior within a relationship. Such well-adjusted INFPs will fit happily into our society. Unless you really understand Psychological Type and the nuances of the various personality functions, it's a difficult task to suddenly start to use iNtuition in an Extraverted direction. It's difficult to even understand what that means, much less to incorporate that directive into your life. With that in mind, I am providing some specific suggestions that may help you to begin exercising your Extraverted iNtuition more fully: Take care to notice what people look like in different social situations. Look at their hair, their skin, their makeup (or lack thereof), their clothes, the condition of their clothes, their shoes, their facial expressions. Don't compare others to your own appearance, or pass judgment on their appearance, simply take in the information. Think of a situation in your life in which you weren't sure how to behave. Now try to understand how one or two other people would see the situation. Don't compare their behavior to your own, i.e. "she would know better than me what to do", or "why is it so easy for her, but so hard for me". Rather, try to understand how they would see the situation. Would it be seen as a problem, or as an opportunity? Would it be taken seriously or lightly? Try to determine their point of view without passing judgment or comparing it to your own.

When having a conversation with a friend or relative, dedicate at least half of your time to talking about the other person. Concentrate on really understanding where that person is coming from with their concerns. Ask questions. Think of the people who are closest to you. As you think of each person, tell yourself "this person has their own life going on, and they are more concerned with their own life than they are with mine." Remember that this doesn't mean that they don't care about you. It's the natural order of things. Try to visualize what that person is doing right now. What things are they encountering, what thoughts are they having? Don't pass judgment, or compare their situation to your own. Try to identify the personality type of everyone that you come into contact with for any length of time. Ten Rules to Live By to Achieve INFP Success Feed Your Strengths! Encourage your natural artistic abilities and creativity. Nourish your spirituality. Give yourself opportunities to help the needy or underprivileged. Face Your Weaknesses! Realize and accept that some traits are strengths and some are weaknesses. Facing and dealing with your weaknesses doesn't mean that you have to change who you are, it means that you want to be the best You possible. By facing your weaknesses, you are honoring your true self, rather than attacking yourself. Express Your Feelings. Don't let unexpressed emotions build up inside of you. If you have strong feelings, sort them out and express them, Don't let them build up inside you to the point where they become unmanageable! Listen to Everything. Try not to dismiss anything immediately. Let everything soak in for awhile, then apply judgment.

Smile at Criticism. Remember that people will not always agree with you or understand you, even if they value you greatly. Try to see disagreement and criticism as an opportunity for growth. In fact, that is exactly what it is. Be Aware of Others. Remember that there are 15 other personality types out there who see things differently than you see them. Try to identify other people's types. Try to understand their perspectives. Be Accountable for Yourself. Remember that YOU have more control over your life than any other person has. Be Gentle in Your Expectations. You will always be disappointed with others if you expect too much of them. Being disappointed with another person is the best way to drive them away. Treat others with the same gentleness that you would like to be treated with. Assume the Best. Don't distress yourself by assuming the worst. Remember that a positive attitude often creates positive situations. When in Doubt, Ask Questions! Don't assume that the lack of feedback is the same thing as negative feedback. If you need feedback and don't have any, ask for it. Spiritual growth and wisdom have something to do with living right and positive change. Or does it? I have been fascinated with this aspect of spirituality for over two decades now. This is what it is all about. This page is a combination of short quotes, contributions by readers on the topic (taken from an earlier page that is now gone) and links to the truckload of articles on the topic by Katinka Hesselink (that's me) and others on my sites. Accepting things we cannot change

The essence of wisdom is to have the serenity to accept the things we cannot change, the courage to change the things that we can, and the wisdom to know the difference. Adapted from the Serenity Prayer The section on accepting things we can not change was particularly meaningful for me right now...how much time do I spent being frustrated and anxious about the actions of someone I know who will never change. I'm typically very good about not trying to control or change others but I have a family member I am responsible for and it's testing my limits. Chapter II The Capacity to understand Sunyata (~emptiness) Whilst people may refer to various things as knowledge, experience, strategy, etc. as wisdom, pure wisdom itself is actually defined as 'The capacity to understand Emptiness'. This sort of true. Certainly in Mahyana Buddhism, the the realisation of 'emptiness' is the deepest kind of wisdom there is. However, the word

'emptiness' can easily get in the way of understanding here. One way of putting it is that nothing we grasp onto is the way we think of it. The sociology of racism is the study of the relationship between racism, racial discrimination, and racial inequality. While past scholarship emphasized overtly racist attitudes and policies, contemporary sociology considers racism as individual- and group-level processes and structures that are implicated in the reproduction of racial inequality in diffuse and often subtle ways. Although some social scientists decry this conceptual broadening, most agree that a multivalent approach to the study of racism is at once socially important and analytically useful for understanding the persistence of racial inequality in a purportedly “post- racial” society. Keywords Bias; colonialism; discrimination; ethnicity; immigration; inequality; prejudice; psychology; race; racism; sociology; social psychology; stereotyping; stratification Body text At root, racism is “an ideology of racial domination” (Wilson, 1999, 14) in which the presumed biological or cultural superiority of one or more racial groups is used to justify or prescribe the inferior treatment or social position(s) of other racial groups. Through the process of racialization (see 3.3), perceived patterns of physical difference—such as skin color or eye shape—are used to differentiate groups of people, thereby constituting them as “races”; racialization becomes rac ism when it involves the hierarchical and socially consequential valuation of racial groups. Racism is analytically distinct from racial discrimination and racial inequality. Racial discrimination concerns the unequal treatment of races, while racial inequality concerns unequal outcomes (in income, education, health, etc.). While racism is often implicated in both processes, contemporary racial inequalities and forms of discrimination are not always the immediate result of contemporary racism (Pager and Shepherd, 2008). The sociology of racism investigates the

relationships between these three phenomena, asking when, how, why, and to what extent they reproduce one another. In the post-Civil Rights era, with (overt) racism now widely condemned, one challenge for social scientists is to conceptualize and measure its more subtle and diffuse manifestations and lasting effects. 1. Definitions Racism cannot be defined without first defining race. Among social scientists, “race” is generally understood as a social construct. Although biologically meaningless when applied to humans—physical differences such as skin color have no natural association with group differences in ability or behavior —race nevertheless has tremendous significance in structuring social reality. Indeed, historical variation in the definition and use of the term provides a case in point. The term race was first used to describe peoples and societies in the way we now understand ethnicity or national identity. Later, in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as Europeans encountered non-European civilizations, Enlightenment scientists and philosophers gave race a biological meaning. They applied the term to plants, animals, and humans as a taxonomic sub-classification within a species. As such, race became understood as a biological, or natural, categorization system of the human species. As Western colonialism and slavery expanded, the concept was used to justify and prescribe exploitation, domination, and violence against peoples racialized as non-white. Today, race often maintains its “natural” connotation in folk understandings; yet, the scientific consensus is that race does not exist as a biological category among humans—genetic variation is far greater within than between “racial” groups, common phenotypic markers exist on a continuum, not as discrete categories, and the use and significance of these markers varies across time, place, and even within the same individual. For most social scientists, “race” is distinct from “ethnicity.” A major distinction is the assumption of a biological basis in the case of race. Races are distinguished by perceived common physical characteristics, which are thought to

be fixed, whereas ethnicities are defined by perceived common ancestry, history, and cultural practices, which are seen as more fluid and self-asserted rather than assigned by others (Cornell and Hartmann, 2006). Thus, Asian is usually considered a “race,” whereas Tibetans and Bengalis are considered ethnicities. Although ethnicity and nationality often overlap, a nationality, such as American, can contain many ethnic groups (e.g. Italian-Americans, Arab-Americans). Yet, all three categories—race, ethnicity, and nationality—are socially constructed, and, as such, groups once considered ethnicities have come to be seen as races, and vice- versa. Moreover, some groups who are now taken-for-granted as “white,” such as the Irish, Italians, and Jews, were once excluded from this racial category. The definitional boundaries of race and ethnicity are shaped by the tug and pull of state power, group interests, and other social forces. 2.1 More definitions of wisdom and spiritual growth, by readers Wisdom is understanding. Wisdom-is the ability to change your life around and show people how u did change your life around and to be honest and truthful Development is beyond the body. The body is critical to growth, but so is constant growth of the mind, spirit and the body achievements (not getting fatter and fatter, but health body goals and successes). The person never stops developing and in my opinion most likely still develops in ways God knows after the mortal death. Wisdom is sensibility and sensitivity at the same time. ( sponias lm ) Wisdom is perfection of knowledge and spiritual growth take place through the practice of wisdom.

Spiritual growth can be measured only be the individual and is the ability to see the best in yourself and others despite appearances. Wisdom is knowing what is your best choice at every decision and comes from knowledge, love and intuition. To me spiritual growth means getting closer to God. For me it means learning to "harm not others and harm not myself," it means celebrating life, all life as being sacred. It means striving to learn from my enemies and my friends alike. ( ayngel boshemia ) For me it is a lifelong experience of continuing to discover more and more of my true nature. I would ask the vital question "Who is it that needs to grow - spiritually or otherwise?" Is the "you" that needs to grow a concept or thought? Do you really exists as an entity at all? For me, spiritual growth has had a lot to do with grounding myself in everyday life. I'd prefer to have my head in the clouds but apparently I require roots as well. ( Jacqueline Marshall ) Spiritual growth, for me, is always a lesson in love - who am I critizing? why am I fault-finding? trying to stay in a loving place even when I feel angry. Removing from myself anything that allows me to criticize or grumble about another human being. That's a full time job! Spiritual growth is a process! for sure! What is spiritual growth? I can't say what it is, just a little of what it is not. It is not wallowing in the past, or worrying about the future. And it is connected I think with staying 'in your body' which has a tranformative power. The 'acceptance' part is a struggle for me. I would cite the famed story of Edison and his 10,000 attempts at creating a working lightbulb. Perhaps Edison's wisdom was in realising that 'he hadn't failed 10000 times; he had succeeded in finding

10000 ways that wouldn't work. And having found the ways that won't work, it was inevitable that he'd find the way that would!' 2.2 Spiritual growth and personal development Spiritual growth has been linked to spiritual experiences and growing success. To me spiritual growth has mostly to do with growing in wisdom. Spiritual experiences may happen. Success may follow. But neither success nor spiritual experience are proof of spiritual growth. Courage: We live in a changing world, an unfair world. Some of us are born into great circumstances (I consider myself lucky that way). Others are born into places where it will take a lot to get out. In order to get out, to be different, to grow beyond what you learned as a kid - you need courage. This applies to all of us. Whether we are rich or poor, whether our parents had a great education or not even finished highschool - we all have a choice: do we stick with what we grew up with, or change into something different. That takes COURAGE. Sometimes it's just easy to be what you are. Sometimes it seems like all you can do is hang on, change is just too much to ask. Sometimes - or all the time - doing things differently, being different, just doesn't seem even possible. Take courage, and change just that one little thing you know you CAN change. When that has become your new normal, you may just be ready for the next small change. Ups and downs in spiritual growth

Can you have a spiritual growth plan? Sometimes it's obvious people are growing spiritually: they are calmer, nicer, more balanced. But sometimes genuine spiritual growth requires going through what's called a dark night of the soul. Because you grow spiritually, you become more sensitive - and that's not easy. This sensitivity may bring along a deep sorrow about the state of the world. It may mean that unresolved issues from your past come up to haunt you... Although in the long run this is good - in the short run it may make a person less happy and even less kind to others. How are THEY doing ? Part of real spiritual growth is recognizing that unless you can see into a persons soul - you can't really tell how another is doing on the spiritual path. Spiritual growth is something of the soul, not of the personality we can see. The wisdom to know the difference - discernment Knowing what's what is just plain hard. What should we accept, and what should we change? Trying to change too much is not going to work - we have our lives to live in the meantime. That's why new years resolutions usually don't stick. Change can be as small as not drinking soda anymore. Or parking your car a bit further from work. Or making a point to smile at the cleaning lady - perhaps even talk to her. One thing that helps is to read up about spiritual growth. To read about spirituality in general. Perhaps join a discussion group (or start one) that focuses on some book you think is inspiring. Wisdom - and facing challenges

It is so easy to get stuck in a rut. I've recently been impressed by the necessity (for me) of stepping outside of my comfort zone. It's so easy to just be comfortable with the choices I made 10 years ago about how I would live my life - but do those choices really make as much sense as I thought they did? Or do they limit more than help? I guess it has to do with stepping outside my comfort zone - to face the world that is, instead of the world as I'd want it to be. The Bennett scale , also called the Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity ( DMIS ), was developed by Dr. Milton Bennett. The framework describes the different ways in which people can react to cultural differences . Organized into six “stages” of increasing sensitivity to difference, the DMIS identifies the underlying cognitive orientations individuals use to understand cultural difference. Each position along the continuum represents increasingly complex perceptual organizations of cultural difference, which in turn allow increasingly sophisticated experiences of other cultures. By identifying the underlying experience of cultural difference, predictions about behavior and attitudes can be made and education can be tailored to facilitate development along the continuum. The first three stages are ethnocentric as one sees his own culture as central to reality. Climbing the scale, one develops a more and more ethnorelative point of view, meaning that one experiences one's own culture as in the context of other cultures. By the fourth stage, ethnocentric views are replaced by ethnorelative views. Individuals experience their own culture as the only “real” one. Other cultures are either not noticed at all or are understood in an undifferentiated, simplistic manner. People at this position are generally uninterested in cultural difference, but when confronted with difference their seemingly benign acceptance may change to aggressive attempts to avoid or eliminate it. Most of the time, this is a result of

physical or social isolation, where the person's views are never challenged and are at the center of their reality. 1. Defense against Difference One’s own culture is experienced as the most “evolved” or best way to live. This position is characterized by dualistic us/them thinking and frequently accompanied by overt negative stereotyping. They will openly belittle the differences among their culture and another, denigrating race, gender or any other indicator of difference. People at this position are more openly threatened by cultural difference and more likely to be acting aggressively against it. A variation at this position is seen in reversal where one’s own culture is devalued and another culture is romanticized as superior. [1] 2. Minimization of Difference The experience of similarity outweighs the experience of difference. People recognize superficial cultural differences in food, customs, etc.,. but they emphasize human similarity in physical structure, psychological needs, and/or assumed adherence to universal values. People at this position are likely to assume that they are no longer ethnocentric, and they tend to overestimate their tolerance while underestimating the effect (e.g. “privilege”) of their own culture. In other words, as explained by the Canadian Center for Intercultural Learning, “people who adopt this point of view generally approach intercultural situations with the assurance that a simple awareness of the fundamental patterns of human interaction will be sufficient to assure the success of the communication. Such a viewpoint is ethnocentric because it presupposes that the fundamental categories of behavior are absolute and that these categories are in fact our own." 3. Acceptance of Difference

One’s own culture is experienced as one of a number of equally complex worldviews. People at this position accept the existence of culturally different ways of organizing human existence, although they do not necessarily like or agree with every way. They can identify how culture affects a wide range of human experience and they have a framework for organizing observations of cultural difference. We recognize people from this stage through their eager questioning of others. This reflects a real desire to be informed, and not to confirm prejudices. The key words of this stage are “getting to know” or “learning.” Adaptation to Difference Individuals are able to expand their own worldviews to accurately understand other cultures and behave in a variety of culturally appropriate ways. Effective use of empathy, or frame of reference shifting, to understand and be understood across cultural boundaries. It is the ability to act properly outside of one’s own culture. At this stage, one is able to “walk the talk.” 4. Integration of Difference One’s experience of self is expanded to include the movement in and out of different cultural worldviews. People at this position have a definition of self that is “marginal” (not central) to any particular culture, allowing this individual to shift rather smoothly from one cultural worldview to another. 2.3 The Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity Intercultural development and communication expert Dr. Milton Bennett has been recognized for his Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity. The model describes, in a series of six stages, a continuum of attitudes toward cultural differences. The goal is to move from the ethnocentric stages of denial, defense,

and minimization, to the ethnorelative stages of acceptance, adaptation and integration. Bennett describes ethnocentrism as an attitude or mindset which presumes the superiority of one’s own worldview, sometimes without even acknowledging the existence of others. Ethnorelativism, on the other hand, assumes the equality and validity of all groups and does not judge others by the standards of one’s own culture. Bennett’s six-stage model is summarized below. Ethnocentrism: A simple way to conceive of the three stages of ethnocentrism is in terms of attitudes toward cultural differences: those in the denial stage deny the existence of cultural differences, those in the defense stage demonize them, and those in the minimization stage trivialize differences. Denial : People in the denial stage do not recognize the existence of cultural differences. They are completely ethnocentric in that they believe there is a correct type of living (theirs), and that those who behave differently simply don’t know any better. In this phase, people are prone to imposing their value system upon others, believing that they are “right” and that others who are different are “confused.” They are not threatened by cultural differences because they refuse to accept them. Generally, those who experience cultural denial have not had extensive contact with people different from themselves, and thus have no experiential basis for believing in other cultures. A key indicator of the denial stage is the belief that you know better than the locals. Defense : Those in the defense stage are no longer blissfully ignorant of other cultures; they recognize the existence of other cultures, but not their validity. They feel threatened by the presence of other ways of thinking, and thus denigrate them in an effort to assert the superiority of their own culture. Cultural differences are seen as problems to be overcome, and there is a dualistic “us vs. them” mentality. Whereas those in the denial stage are unthreatened by the presence of other cultural value systems (they don’t believe in them, after all), those in the defense stage do

feel threatened by “competing” cultures. People in the defense stage tend to surround themselves with members of their own culture, and avoid contact with members from other cultures. Minimization : People in the minimization stage of ethnocentrism are still threatened by cultural differences and try to minimize them by telling themselves that people are more similar than dissimilar. No longer do they see those from other cultures as being misguided, inferior, or unfortunate. They still have not developed cultural self-awareness and are insistent about getting along with everyone. Because they assume that all cultures are fundamentally similar, people in this stage fail to tailor their approaches to a cultural context. Ethnorelativism: Acceptance : In this first stage of ethnorelativism, people begin to recognize other cultures and accept them as viable alternatives to their own worldview. They know that people are genuinely different from them and accept the inevitability of other value systems and behavioral norms. They do not yet adapt their own behavior to the cultural context, but they no longer see other cultures as threatening, wrong, or inferior. People in the acceptance phase can be thought of as “culture-neutral,” seeing differences as neither good nor bad, but rather as a fact of life. Adaptation : During the adaptation phase, people begin to view cultural differences as a valuable resource. Because differences are seen as positive, people consciously adapt their behaviors to the different cultural norms of their environment. Integration : Integration is the last stage in one’s journey away from ethnocentrism. In this stage, people accept that their identity is not based in any single culture. Once integrated, people can effortlessly and even unconsciously

shift between worldviews and cultural frames of reference. Though they maintain their own cultural identity, they naturally integrate aspects of other cultures into it. Once you have progressed to an ethnorelativistic view of cultural differences, you will in essence be bicultural. You will revel in cultural differences, and be able to effortlessly take on subtle characteristics of the local culture. Your intercultural sensitivity will also affect how others view and treat you. Being trusted and accepted by local people into a culture you have recently come to know and accept will be thrilling and fulfilling, and will allow you to be a more effective volunteer. Conclusion To achieve a better understanding of the external world, the INFP should try to perceive information objectively, before fitting it into their value system. They should consciously be aware of their tendency to discard anything that doesn't agree with their values, and work towards lessening this tendency. They should try to see situations from other people's perspectives, without making personal judgments about the situations or the other people's perspectives. In general, they

should work on exercising their intuition in a truly Extraverted sense. In other words, they should use intuition to take in information about the world around them for the sake of understanding the world, rather than take in information to support their own conclusions. The INFP who successfully perceives things objectively may be quite a powerful force for positive change. Racism cannot be defined without first defining race. Among social scientists, “race” is generally understood as a social construct. Although biologically meaningless when applied to humans—physical differences such as skin color have no natural association with group differences in ability or behavior —race nevertheless has tremendous significance in structuring social reality. Indeed, historical variation in the definition and use of the term provides a case in point. The term race was first used to describe peoples and societies in the way we now understand ethnicity or national identity. Later, in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as Europeans encountered non-European civilizations, Enlightenment scientists and philosophers gave race a biological meaning. They applied the term to plants, animals, and humans as a taxonomic sub-classification within a species. As such, race became understood as a biological, or natural, categorization system of the human species. As Western colonialism and slavery expanded, the concept was used to justify and prescribe exploitation, domination, and violence against peoples racialized as non-white. Today, race often maintains its “natural” connotation in folk understandings; yet, the scientific consensus is that race does not exist as a biological category among humans—genetic variation is far greater within than between “racial” groups, common phenotypic markers exist on a continuum, not as discrete categories, and the use and significance of these markers varies across time, place, and even within the same individual.

Used literature 3 Alba, R.D., Nee, V., 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 4 Allport, G., 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 5 Anderson, E., 2000. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. Norton, New York.

6 Banaji, M.R., Greenwald, A.G., 2013. Blindspot: The Hidden Biases of Good People. Delacorte Press, New York. 7 Blalock, H. M., 1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. Wiley, Somerset, NJ. 8 Blauner, R., 1969. Internal colonialism and ghetto revolt. Social Problems 16: 393-408. 9 Bobo, L., Hutchings, V.L., 1996. Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer's theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review 61: 951-972. 10 Bobo, L., Kluegel, J., Smith, R.A., 1997. Laissez-faire racism: The crystallization of a ‘kinder, gentler’ anti-black ideology, in: Martin, J.K., Tuch, S.A. (Eds.), Racial Attitudes in the 1990s. Greenwood, Westport, CT, Chapter 2. 11 Bonacich, E., 1972. A theory of ethnic antagonism: The split labor market. American Sociological Review 37: 547-59. 12 Bonilla-Silva, E., 1997. Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review 62(3): 465–480. 13 Bonilla-Silva, E., 2010. Racism Without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and Racial Inequality in Contemporary America, third ed. Rowman & Littlefield, New York. 14 Collins, P.H., 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge, New York. 15 Cornell, S., Hartmann, D., 2006. Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World, second ed. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA. 16 Denis, J.S., 2012. Transforming meanings and group positions: Anishinaabe- white relations in 17 Northwestern Ontario, Canada. Ethnic and Racial Studies 35(3): 453-470.

18 Denis, J.S., 2014. Contact theory in a small-town settler-colonial context: The reproduction of prejudice in indigenous-white Canadian relations. [Manuscript under review] 19 Dixon, J.C., 2006. The ties that bind and those that don’t: Toward reconciling group threat and contact theories of prejudice. Social Forces 84(4): 2179-2204. 20 Essed, P., 1991. Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory. Sage, New York. 21 Feagin, J.R., 2010. The White Racial Frame: Centuries of Racial Framing and Counter-Framing. Routledge, New York. 22 Feagin, J. R., Sikes, M. P., 1995. Living With Racism: The Black Middle-Class Experience. Beacon Press, Boston. 23 Fiske, S.T., 2010. Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination, in: Fiske, S.T., Gilbert, D.T., Lindzey, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, fifth ed. Wiley, New York. 24 Frideres, J., Gadacz, R.R., 2008. Aboriginal Peoples in Canada, eighth ed. Pearson, Don Mills, ON. 25 Hall, S., 1980. Race, articulation, and societies structured in dominance, in: UNESCO (Ed.), Sociological Theories: Race and Colonialism. UNESCO, Paris, pp. 305-45. 26 Henry, F., Tator C., 2010. The Colour of Democracy: Racism in Canadian Society, fourth ed. Thomson-Nelson, Scarborough, ON.

O'xshashlar

When and how to correct errors (kurs ishi)

Classroom management and feedback (kurs ishi)

Encouraging peer and self-correction (kurs ishi)

Assessment - Continuous assessment and Testing (kurs ishi)

Issues of vocabulary acquisition and learning (kurs ishi)