Assessment - Continuous assessment and Testing (kurs ishi) - Ingliz tili - Referatlar

Assessment - Continuous assessment and Testing (kurs ishi)

Yuklangan vaqt:

20.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

40.111328125 KB

Ko'chirib olish

Assessment - Continuous assessment and Testing Content Introduction Chapter I Measuring Pupil Achievement 1.1 Continuous Assessment 1.2 Continuous Assessment and Teacher Development Chapter II Continuous Assessment for Primary Schools i 2.1 Continuous Assessment for Primary Schools in Malawi 2.2 Continuous Assessment in Out-of-School Education Settings 2.3 Testing shows high prevalence of bias Conclusion Used literature

Introduction Continuous assessment is a classroom strategy implemented by teachers to ascertain the knowledge, understanding, and skills attained by pupils. Teachers administer assessments in a variety of ways over time to allow them to observe multiple tasks and to collect information about what pupils know, understand, and can do. These assessments are curriculum-based tasks previously taught in class. Actuality of the work: Continuous assessment occurs frequently during the school year and is part of regular teacher-pupil interactions. Pupils receive feedback from teachers based on their performance that allows them to focus on topics they have not yet mastered. Teachers learn which students need review and remediation and which pupils are ready to move on to more complex work. Thus, the results of the assessments help to ensure that all pupils make learning progress throughout the school cycle thereby increasing their academic achievement. Aim of the work: In continuous assessment, teachers assess the curriculum as implemented in the classroom. It also allows teachers to evaluate the effectiveness of their teaching strategies relative to the curriculum, and to change those strategies as dictated by the needs of their pupils. In addition, continuous assessments provide information on achievement of particular levels of skills, understanding, and knowledge rather than achievement of certain marks or scores. Thus, continuous assessment enables pupils to monitor their achievement of grade level goals and to visualize their progress towards those goals before it is too late to achieve them. Subject of the work: In continuous assessment, teachers assess the curriculum as implemented in the classroom. It also allows teachers to evaluate the effectiveness of their teaching strategies relative to the curriculum, and to change those strategies as dictated by the needs of their pupils. In addition, continuous assessments provide information on achievement of particular levels of skills, understanding, and

knowledge rather than achievement of certain marks or scores. Thus, continuous assessment enables pupils to monitor their achievement of grade level goals and to visualize their progress towards those goals before it is too late to achieve them. Task of the work: Continuous assessment allows teachers to monitor the impact of their lessons on pupil understanding. Teachers can modify their pedagogical strategies to include the construction of remediation activities for pupils who are not working at the expected grade level and the creation of enrichment activities for pupils who are working at or above the expected grade level. Hence, the continuous assessment process supports a cycle of self-evaluation and pupil-specific activities by both pupils and teachers. Frequent interactions between pupils and teachers means that teachers know the strengths and weaknesses of their learners. These exchanges foster a pupil-teacher relationship based on individual interactions. Pupils learn that the teacher values their achievements and that their assessment outcomes have an impact on the instruction that they receive. One-to-one communication between the teacher and the pupil can motivate pupils to continue attending school and to work hard to achieve higher levels of mastery.

Chapter I Measuring Pupil Achievement In today’s policy environment, testing has become a critical component of education reform. Policy makers and education administrators often view test scores as a measure of educational quality and use test scores to hold schools accountable for teacher performance. Continuous assessment, an alternative or supplement to high stakes testing of pupil achievement, offers a methodology for measuring pupil performance and using those findings to improve the success of pupils. What is continuous assessment? Continuous assessment is a classroom strategy implemented by teachers to ascertain the knowledge, understanding, and skills attained by pupils. Teachers administer assessments in a variety of ways over time to allow them to observe multiple tasks and to collect information about what pupils know, understand, and can do. These assessments are curriculum-based tasks previously taught in class. Continuous assessment occurs frequently during the school year and is part of regular teacher-pupil interactions. Pupils receive feedback from teachers based on their performance that allows them to focus on topics they have not yet mastered. Teachers learn which students need review and remediation and which pupils are ready to move on to more complex work. Thus, the results of the assessments help to ensure that all pupils make learning progress throughout the school cycle thereby increasing their academic achievement. The continuous assessment process is much more than an examination of pupil achievement. In order to understand how children move between stages, it's important to understand how children take in stimuli from the environment and use it to grow. Most theorists agree that there are periods in children's lives in which they become

biologically mature enough to gain certain skills that they could not have easily picked up prior to that maturation. For example, research has shown that babies and toddlers' brains are more flexible with regard to learning to understand and use language than are older children's brains. Children are ready and open to develop certain things during specific stages; however, it doesn't just happen. Instead, they need proper environmental stimuli to develop these abilities. For example, babies have the ability to grow in length and weight in amazing amounts during the first year, but if they're not fed and nurtured enough during that time, they will not have the tools and building blocks to grow and will not grow and thrive. This is why it's so important for parents and caregivers to understand how their children are growing in all ways and channels and to know what stimuli, or stuff, they need to give their children to help them thrive. From time to time children without any cognitive or physical problems at birth may not be able to develop certain milestones during the stage or time period they are most receptive. There may be an injury, illness, caregiver neglect or abuse, or a shortage of needs such as food or medical care, that make it difficult for a child to absorb all the basic building blocks and stimulation they need to gain certain abilities at certain times in life. When this occurs, affected children will generally have a harder time gaining those abilities even if they later get special attention and resources designed to help them compensate. It's like children have a window of opportunity when they are ready to grow in certain ways if they have the right stuff and tools in their environment. When that window closes, it will never be as easy to grow in those ways again. Theorists disagree about how important it is for children to have that special stimuli at each growing stage in order to reach their milestones. Some theorists call these times critical periods, but other theorists call them sensitive periods

The difference between critical periods and sensitive periods is subtle. Theorists who believe in critical periods believe that children who do not get special stimulation during their window of receptivity are going to be "stuck" forever and never gain the abilities they should have gained in that period. However, other theorists believe that those very sensitive times in a child's life are just sensitive periods. They agree that children who do not get the right nurturing at the right times to jumpstart their developmental potential are going to have problems later in life, but they do not think that this inability to develop is permanent. 1.1 Continuous Assessment Continuous assessment is also a powerful diagnostic tool that enables pupils to understand the areas in which they are having difficulty and to concentrate their efforts in those areas. Continuous assessment also allows teachers to monitor the impact of their lessons on pupil understanding. Teachers can modify their pedagogical strategies to include the construction of remediation activities for pupils who are not working at the expected grade level and the creation of enrichment activities for pupils who are working at or above the expected grade level. Hence, the continuous assessment process supports a cycle of self-evaluation and pupil-specific activities by both pupils and teachers. Frequent interactions between pupils and teachers means that teachers know the strengths and weaknesses of their learners. These exchanges foster a pupil-teacher relationship based on individual interactions. Pupils learn that the teacher values their achievements and that their assessment outcomes have an impact on the instruction that they receive. One-to-one communication between the teacher and the pupil can motivate pupils to continue attending school and to work hard to achieve higher levels of mastery.

In continuous assessment, teachers assess the curriculum as implemented in the classroom. It also allows teachers to evaluate the effectiveness of their teaching strategies relative to the curriculum, and to change those strategies as dictated by the needs of their pupils. In addition, continuous assessments provide information on achievement of particular levels of skills, understanding, and knowledge rather than achievement of certain marks or scores. Thus, continuous assessment enables pupils to monitor their achievement of grade level goals and to visualize their progress towards those goals before it is too late to achieve them. Although this is a commonsense finding, it is not a trivial one. It means that vocabulary instruction typically works. However, thin instruction—for ex ample, giving students a set of words and asking them to look up the words in the dictionary, or giving them a set of words and their definitions—only serves to teach the basic meanings of the words. That is, simply giving students definitions of words will not result in their learning rich and full meanings. For example, recent findings from research conducted by August (2010) found that 2nd-grade Spanish-speaking ELLs learned vocabulary from exposure to the vocabulary with comprehensible definitions embedded in text, but did not learn vocabulary that they merely heard in the context of a shared book reading lesson. In this study, the vocabulary words taught in various conditions were matched for difficulty level, so findings are attributable to method rather than word types. While simply having students work with definitions of words can improve their word knowl edge, giving them both definitional information and contextual information, has repeatedly proven to be a stronger approach. In fact, except in situations where there are far too many unknown words in an upcoming selection to teach and you are forced to simply give students a glossary, using a procedure that gives students both definitional and contextual information is the thinnest approach we recommend.

Two recent studies with ELLs have shown the advantages of including both definitions and context. In one of them August found that 2nd-grade Span ish- speaking ELLs learned vocabulary from exposure to the vocabulary with com - prehensible definitions embedded in the text during shared book reading, but learned the words less well than they did with instruction that included both defi nitions and context. Various activities were used to develop context for the target ed vocabulary, including introducing it as a lesson objective, using picture cards to clarify its meaning, reinforcing it through discussion during daily shared interac tive reading, and reviewing it through the use of glossaries. In another study in which 30 teachers in 18 schools implemented an intervention to develop the academic vocabulary of 509 3rd- and 4th-grade ELLs, findings indicated that instruction that included both definitions and context was much more effective than instruction in which students were only provided with Learning Words. Child-friendly definitions of the target academic vocabulary. Again, various activi ties were used to develop context for the targeted vocabulary, including introduc ing it as a lesson objective; using picture cards to clarify its meaning; reinforcing it through discussion during daily shared interactive reading; and reviewing it through the use of glossaries and concept maps. Instruction that involves activating prior knowledge and comparing and contrasting word meanings is likely to be more powerful than simple combi nations of contextual information and definitions . Such instruction has also been shown to improve comprehension of selections containing the words taught. The best known and most widely researched techniques falling in this category are semantic mapping and semantic fea ture analysis. In a study with upper-elementary-grade, learning- disabled, bilingual students, Bos, Allen, and Scanlon found that semantic/feature analysis led to significantly higher vocabulary scores than more traditional vocabulary

instruction, and that seman tic mapping led to significantly higher comprehension scores than more tradi tional vocabulary instruction. More lengthy and robust instruction that involves explicit teaching that in cludes both contextual and definitional information, multiple exposures to tar get words in varied contexts, and experiences that promote deep processing of words meanings is likely to be more powerful than less time-consuming and less robust instruction. Working with native English speakers, Beck and McKe own and their colleagues have developed, refined, and repeatedly tested several forms of rich vocabulary instruction that involve students in extensive and var ied experiences with words have also developed, refined, and tested forms of rich vocabulary instruction that generally have consisted of: introducing words through the rich context of authentic children’s litera ture or grade- appropriate expository text; clear, student-friendly definitions and explanations of target words; questions and prompts to help students think critically about the mean ing of words; examples of how words are used in other contexts; opportunities for younger children to act out the meaning of words when applicable; visual aids illustrating the meaning of words in authentic contexts other than the book in which the word was introduced; opportunities for students to compare and contrast words; repetition and reinforcement of the target words; and activities that develop word consciousness such as listening for word meanings as text is read aloud. A series of recent studies, students read eight multimedia texts and received em bedded vocabulary instruction on 40 “power” words. The intervention, termed Improving Comprehension Online (ICON), embodied a variety of features, in cluding

Spanish translations of all texts and directions; human read-alouds of each text in Eng lish and Spanish; English monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual pedagogical “coaches «who provided assistance with using the system and responding to prompts; a revisable electronic work-log that collected student responses; a multimedia glossary; and pictures illustrating the narrative and informational text content. In comparison to a control group, there were significant intervention effects on a standardized measure of vocabulary and researcher-developed measures of vo - cabulary depth, but not on comprehension or on researcher-developed measures of vocabulary breadth. Taken together, these studies clearly show that rich instruction in which stu - dents have multiple thoughtful encounters with words is very worthwhile, and that more encounters with words produce better learning than fewer encounters. However, it needs to be remembered that rich instruction comes at a huge cost. Instruction of this kind may require up to 30 minutes per word and involves activi ties outside of class as well as in class. Considering the number of words that ELLs need to learn to close the gap with their native English-speaking peers, we cannot provide rich instruction for all of the words we need to teach. Teaching Word-Learning Strategies The three word-learning strategies most frequently recommended for native English speakers are teaching students to use context to infer the meanings of un - known words, teaching students to use word parts to glean word meanings, and teaching students to use the dictionary. There is a fair amount of research on us ing context and word parts but very little research on teaching students to use the dictionary. The second-language research literature is much more limited, but has

investigated teaching students these strategies as well as helping students use cognate knowledge to uncover unknown word meanings of second-language. As was the case for other vocabulary methods, the second-language studies generally taught strate gies as part of a multifaceted vocabulary program, making it difficult to disen tangle the effects of strategy instruction from that of other methods. Nevertheless, like all students, ELLs must master word-learning strategies—using context, using word parts, using the dictionary, and using first cognate knowledge when stu dents’ native language shares cognates with English. However, mastering word-learning strategies is particularly important for ELLs because they have so many words to learn. 1.2 Linking Continuous Assessment and Teacher Development Work in primary schools suggested that monthly progress tests in Spanish and math helped teachers to use more transparent evaluation criteria and provided more attention to children who were falling behind. Thus, in the process of developing integrated curriculum materials, Educatodos/IEQ established continuous assessment processes designed to enhance the quality of the non-formal education experience and to learn what students were and were not mastering in the curriculum. For instance, volunteer class facilitators received training that allowed them to give feedback on assessment sessions to learners. In addition, and perhaps more importantly, the learning materials included self-assessment exercises that enabled learners to continuously review and strengthen their own understanding of the material and to work together to peer review each other’s understandings. Infancy is the time when children first learn they can trust an adult or parent to take care of all their needs, keep them safe, and give them love. Some infants live in orphanages where there are far too many babies for the few nurses and staff members

to take care of them. These children go through their first years with hardly any touch or affection that would teach them to trust and to show affection to caregivers. If these children are eventually adopted by a loving family later on in their childhood, they often have trouble adjusting to having an affectionate, loving parent. There have been many cases in which children who start out in that kind of orphanage environment never gain the ability to show affection and emotion toward family or even the ability to show remorse or compassion toward other people, no matter how loving and nurturing their adoptive family was being in their middle childhood and on. Such a child's ability to trust and love would have essentially become "stuck" in infancy, even though the rest of their body continued to grow. The question of whether the critical period idea or the sensitive period idea is more correct boils down to whether this stuckness can be overcome, in full or in part, in the child's later life. Theorists who support sensitive periods believe that while it will be far more difficult for the child and the child's teachers and caregivers to learn what was not learned during the window of opportunity, these children can still develop the missing capacities and skills later that they did not develop earlier. While some children do seem to get stuck permanently, there is evidence to support the sensitive period idea as well. Some children born in the same understaffed orphanages who are later adopted do go on to learn to love, to trust, and to show affection to their family and friends. In these situations, the families have to have extreme patience and perseverance as they nurture these older children because they are not going to be able to learn that trust and love as fast and as easily as infants. However, it's also important to remember that critical or sensitive periods can also affect children in other ways than just neglect or deprivation. For example, there is a critical or sensitive period for language acquisition that occurs during infancy. Children begin learning how to understand and create language from the time they're born. They will absorb and copy the language they hear all around them during that

critical or sensitive period early in life. However, for many different reasons, children, and adults, may leave their original home and move to a new country or region where people speak a different language. They will need to learn to understand and create the new language, even though they were not exposed to it during that early important period. However, while it will take more time and special tutoring, many children, and adults, can learn a new language proficiently later in life. (different parts of the brain are used for sensitive period learning, vs. later learning, but both can get the job done)

Chapter II Continuous Assessment for Primary Schools in Malawi High dropout rates, overcrowded classrooms, and poorly trained or untrained teachers characterized Malawi’s education system after Free Primary Education was introduced in 1994. By 1999, a USAID-funded study by the Improving Educational Quality (IEQ) project confirmed that pupils in grade 3 did not have basic literacy and numeracy skills. USAID partnered with the Malawi Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology to conduct a feasibility study of the impact on pupil achievement of the implementation of continuous assessment into the primary schools through the USAID-supported IEQ II project. The IEQ/Malawi team developed a model of continuous assessment that took into consideration the Malawi primary school curricula for Maths, Chichewa, and English, the lack of teacher preparation, and the large class sizes. The continuous assessment model was implemented in 21 primary schools in the Ntcheu district and the achievement of 122 pupils in these schools was compared to that of 603 pupils in the districts of Mangochi and Balaka. At the beginning of the year, pupils in Ntcheu were able to recognize about the same numbers of common English words as were pupils in the other two districts (14 in Ntcheu, 9 in Mangochi and Balaka) but by the end of the year they recognized almost twice as many. During the same year, pupils in Ntcheu increased the percentage of math problems they answered correctly by 14 percentage points compared to a six percentage point increase by pupils in Mangochi and Balaka. Policymakers are now considering integrating the continuous assessment model into all of Malawi’s primary schools beginning with the primary school curriculum and the teacher training colleges. P A H

2.1 Southern African Continuous Assessment The Examination Council of Zambia, assisted by USAID, hosted a sub-regional conference on assessment, “Learner Assessment for Improved Educational Quality: An Exchange of Current Ideas and Best Practices” in Livingston, Zambia. Presentations and discussions revolved around three sub-themes: continuous assessment at the primary and secondary levels; competence testing at the primary school level; and learner assessment in non-formal education environments. Among the key issues noted was the need for teacher education on the tasks of the administration, interpretation, recording, and reporting of assessments, with a suggestion to integrate continuous assessment course work into teacher training colleges. Other observations that came out of the meeting included making continuous assessment complementary to national examinations, relating continuous assessment to remedial interventions, and having a strong process of inspection to ensure and to monitor the use of continuous assessment in schools. The group plans to meet in 2004 in Zimbabwe to continue the forum on assessment. Finally, teachers can share assessment results with important education stakeholders including parents, other teachers, community members, and the learners themselves. Parents especially want to know how their children are doing in school. Regular reports from the teacher based on continuous assessments allow the parents to know about their children’s progress. With this knowledge in hand, parents can assist and support children with their studies during the school year before opportunities for grade level achievement have passed. Research with native English speakers indicates that education al television programs can be a source of language learning for these students. Several studies have also found that exposing ELLs to high-quality television can also be effective in developing their vocabu lary. For example, Neuman and Koskinen found that middle-grade ELLs who watched captioned episodes of 3-2-1 Contact, a high- quality science program, outperformed their classmates who just read from their

science textbooks on mea sures of word recognition, understanding sentences, and word meaning. In addi tion, these students also performed better than their classmates who watched the television program without captions. It should also be noted that only ELLs with sufficient English proficiency benefited from the television programming, indicat ing the need to consider this variable when designing instruction. In a similar study, Uchikoshi found that watching Arthur , a television program that emphasizes narrative storytelling, improved Spanish-speaking kin dergarten ELLs’ oral language development more than watching Between the Lions , a television program emphasizing phonics. Taken together, these studies indicate that ELLs may benefit from increased exposure to rich language experiences using media such as television. It seems likely that similar material presented digitally on the Web and on the various pad devices now available will have similar results. There is a large, robust, easily interpretable, and very consistent body of re - search on teaching individual words to native English-speaking students as well as a number of summaries of the research on vocabulary instruction. These in clude traditional reviews of research by Petty. These studies lead to several generalizations. In organizing them, we pro ceed from considering effects that can be achieved by brief and relatively shal low instruction to effects that can be achieved from more lengthy and more robust instruction. Relevant studies here include investigations of what students understand from typical dictionary entries and investigations of how to improve dictionary entries. For native English speakers, dictionary definitions alone are not sufficient to help students understand word meaning, because the definitions are deliberately decontextualized. While there are no studies with ELLs, we posit that this is even more true for ELLs because of their limited depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge. In one study illustrating the difficulty native English speakers have with dic - tionary definitions, Miller and Gildea investigated the ability of 5th- and 6th-grade

students to generate appropriate sentences after reading traditional dic tionary definitions. Results indicated that over 60% of the sentences students con structed were judged to be odd, often because students appeared to select only a fragment of the definition on which to base their sentence. For example, based on the dictionary definition of eroding including the phrase “eating out,” one student generated the sentence, “My family erodes a lot.” In another study with 4th- and 6th-grade English-speaking students, Scott and Nagy (1997) investigated the ef - fects of modifying traditional definitions by using everyday English that clarified the subject and object of the verb being defined, rather than the conventional for - mat, and by including an illustrative example. Results indicated that neither type of modification significantly affected students’ performance, and that even the performance of high-ability 6th-grade students was far from perfect. A study by McKeown with 5th-grade native English speakers was more successful. She examined the effects of traditional definitions and definitions revised in a very systematic and principled way, creating what she called “student- friendly” definitions. For example, the traditional definition for conspicuous was”easily seen,” while the revised definition was, “describes something you notice right away be cause it stands out.” Students showed improvement in a task that required them to write sentences after reading traditional and revised definitions, and on a task requiring them to answer questions about the meaning of words. In summary, using the dictionary to define words is possible but difficult, even for native English speakers, and some traditional dictionary entries can be improved significantly. Given these results, it appears that ensuring all students, including ELLs, use newer dictionaries that have been revised to ensure second- language definitions are student friendly would be important. For ELLs, dictionar - ies that provide entries in students’ first language, student-friendly first-language definitions, student-friendly English definitions, and examples of the target words in sentences that further clarified target word meaning might be helpful. Addition - ally, teaching ELLs to more effectively use dictionaries to learn word meanings

might be useful. See Chapter 5 on word learning strategies for information about dictionary use. Cognate Knowledge. Recognizing and using cognates—words that are similar in the student’s native language and in English—has been shown to be an important strategy for ELLs whose first language shares cognates with English. ELLs’ ability to use cognate knowledge is mediated by developmental factors, the typological or perceived distance between the first and second languages, and students’ knowledge of the word’s meaning in their first language. Teaching children to take advantage of their cognate knowledge can be a pow erful tool for Spanish-speaking ELLs, because many English words that are cog nates with Spanish are high-frequency Spanish words, but low-frequency English words. Thus, students are likely to know both the concept and the label in Spanish but lack the English label. Moreover, many cognates ( infirm/enfermo; profound/pro fundo ; and fortunate/afortunado ) are important to know, are characteristic of mature language users, and appear frequently across a variety of domains. Several studies have examined the effect of teaching students to use their first-language knowledge in inferring the meaning of unknown second-language words that are cognates (August, 2009; August, Branum-Martin, Cardenas-Hagan, & Francis, 2009; Carlo et al., 2004). For example, in the Vocabulary Improvement Project (Carlo et al., 2004), English-proficient and Spanish-speaking ELLs worked together to figure out which words in their reading passages were cognates and to jointly define them. In a study designed to assess the extent to which students in the Vocabulary Improvement Project used their knowledge of cognates in infer ring word meaning, Dressler, Carlo, Snow, August, and White (2011) found that cognate performance depended to some extent on the characteristics of cognate pairs, including the degree of phonological transparency between the cognates and the degree of orthographic overlap shared by the cognate pair. Additionally, their findings indicate that even students who are not literate, but are orally profi cient in Spanish, might benefit from instruction in cognate awareness.

It is important to acknowledge that while in most cases cognate knowledge is helpful, in some cases it may result in ELLs inferring the wrong meaning to unknown words, as when words are false cognates (look and sound alike in both languages but do not have any of the same meanings) or when the words share some meanings in common but not the meaning required in a particular context. 2.2 Continuous Assessment in Out-of-School Education Settings In 1999, Hurricane Mitch had destroyed many schools and USAID wanted to meet the immediate needs of middle grade learners now out of school by providing expanded learning opportunities through Educatodos. USAID’s Improving Educational Quality (IEQ) project partnered with the Educatodos program in Honduras to extend its already successful education program for primary level learners (grades 1-6) outside of the formal school system to the secondary level (grades 7-9). Work in primary schools suggested that monthly progress tests in Spanish and math helped teachers to use more transparent evaluation criteria and provided more attention to children who were falling behind. Thus, in the process of developing integrated curriculum materials, Educatodos/IEQ established continuous assessment processes designed to enhance the quality of the non-formal education experience and to learn what students were and were not mastering in the curriculum. For instance, volunteer class facilitators received training that allowed them to give feedback on assessment sessions to learners. In addition, and perhaps more importantly, the learning materials included self-assessment exercises that enabled learners to continuously review and strengthen their own understanding of the material and to work together to peer review each other’s understandings. The sustained use and support of the continuous assessment methodology and the incorporation of it into the revised grade 1-6 program illustrate its importance to the quality of the learning experience provided by the Educatodos alternative mode of education delivery.

Assessment the process of determining how well a model computes good outputs from input data that is not used during training. Assessment statistics are automatically computed when you train a model with a modeling node. By default, assessment statistics are calculated from the validation data set. Vaughn, Mathes, et al., 2006) by using students’ first language to help them learn vocabulary in English, providing additional scaffolding and reinforcement, and differentiating instruction, topics that are discussed further at the end of this chap - ter. In the remainder of this section, we list each of the four components of a com - prehensive vocabulary program listed above and described in Chapter 1 and make a series of research-based generalizations, supporting each generalization with a representative study or several studies. Throughout the activities that take place during comprehensive vocabulary instruction, students should be given ample opportunities and encouraged to communicate with English-proficient speakers for it is in this way that second languages are predominately acquired. Language is primarily acquired incidentally, through listening, talking, and reading. Thus, to the extent possible, teachers need to immerse students in lan - guage-rich environments that provide them with many opportunities to acquire Learning Words in a Second Language. Children can be exposed to rich language through having text read aloud to them, their own reading of texts, and media such as television. Shared Book Reading. As noted in the Introduction, one method that has been used frequently and successfully to develop vocabulary in children is shared book reading in which adults read aloud to children, periodically stopping to highlight and discuss individual words as well as other aspects of what they are reading. Research with native English speakers indicates that this method has an impact on oral language outcomes, including vocabulary, grammar, and listening com prehension

In a study with young ELLs, Rob erts and Neal compared small-group comprehension-oriented instruction, which consisted of shared book reading, vocabulary instruction, and comprehen sion activities, with emergent literacy instruction, which consisted of naming and writing letters and recognizing and generating rhymes. Findings indicated that children in the comprehension-oriented instruction outperformed children in the emergent literacy instruction in vocabulary and print concepts, while emergent literacy instruction resulted in better letter-naming and writing. Additionally, Eng lish oral proficiency was more correlated with the comprehension-related skills than with the decoding-related skills. There is evidence that shared book reading can be an effective component for programs for older learners as well. In a study conducted by Carlo et al. (2004), a 15-week intervention was designed to build breadth and depth of vocabulary knowl edge and reading comprehension in 254 bilingual and native English- speaking children from nine 5th-grade classrooms in four schools in California, Virginia, and Massachusetts. The intervention used immigration as a theme. Each weekly lesson began with shared reading of one of a variety of text genres, including newspaper articles, diaries, first-hand documentation of the immigrant experience, historical accounts, and fiction. In accordance with research indicating that words are best learned from rich semantic contexts, target words were selected from the brief, en gaging reading passages. Twelve words that students at this level were likely to encounter repeatedly across texts in different domains were introduced each week. Although there were relatively few words introduced each week, activities helped children make semantic links to other words and concepts and thus to attain a deep er and richer understanding of each word’s meaning, as well as to learn other words and concepts related to the target words. The lessons also taught students to infer meanings from context and to use roots, affixes, cognates, morphological relation ships, and comprehension monitoring. All the strategy instruction used the reading passages as a springboard. Findings indicated that the ELLs did better in generat ing sentences that conveyed

different meanings of multi-meaning words, in com pleting cloze passages, on tests of knowledge of word meanings, and on measures of word association and morphological knowledge. On a cloze test used to evalu ate comprehension, students showed significant improvement, but the impact on comprehension was much lower than on vocabulary. These results indicate that this multifaceted training led to improved knowledge of the words studied. Independent Reading. One great advantage of independent reading is that it has the potential to expose learners to massive amounts of vocabulary in a variety of registers that may not be available through spoken language. This clearly affords rich learning opportunities. There is ample evidence to show that incidental learning of vocabulary through reading does occur for both native English- speaking students and ELLs. For example, Nagy, Anderson, and Herman (1987) had English proficient stu dents read four natural passages and found that the probability of students learn - ing a word well enough to answer a multiple-choice question was .05. They went on to note that even though the probability of learning a word from context is small, given the volume of texts students can potentially read, they could learn a very large number of words from context. Based on their findings, they estimated that the average middle-grade child learns between 800 and 1,200 words from con - text annually. As a cautionary note, the authors also pointed out that their study revealed “no learning from context for words at the highest level of conceptual difficulty.” Based on a meta-analysis of 20 studies that examined how native English- speaking students learn from context when not directly prompted to do so, Swan - born and de Glopper concluded that students can and do learn words incidentally, and that the probability of learning a word from one exposure in a naturally occurring context is .15. They also showed that students at higher grade levels and students with higher reading ability are better able to use context, and that texts containing fewer unknown words better facilitate learning from context.

Research conducted with ELLs indicates that silent sustained reading in which students select and regularly read books of their choice for a period of time each day leads to improvements in comprehension and oral language development. With regard to ELLs, an important question is what students learn about vo - cabulary through reading. Schmitt (2010, p. 30) argues that “incidental vocabulary learning from reading is more likely to push words to a partial rather than a full level of mastery, and that any recall learning is more prone to forgetting than rec - ognition learning.” Additionally, incidental acquisition appears to include only content words—function words are generally not attended to. These limitations may explain why even very advanced second-language learners continue to mani - fest lexical errors in such areas as the use of prepositions and collocations. Final ly, research with ELLs indicates that independent reading along with structured support for comprehension and language development facilitates ELLs’ language A related issue concerns the number of exposures to a word or expression needed for incidental acquisition to occur. Summarizing the research, Schmitt concluded that “8–10 reading exposures may give learners a reason able chance of acquiring an initial receptive knowledge of words.” However, the number is likely to be highly variable depending on a variety of factors such as the language proficiency of the readers, the difficulty of the texts, and the conceptual difficulty of the words. It will also depend on the depth of processing involved when readers encounter words. “Exposure” may involve no more than fleeting at tention to a word, or it may involve more deliberate attempts to process the form and meaning of the word. All in all, these studies of learning from context show that context can pro - duce learning of word meanings for both native English speakers and ELLs, that the probability of learning a word from a single occurrence is low, and that the probability of learning a word from context increases substantially with additional occurrences of the word. In giving students books to read on their own, it is im - portant to ensure that the texts are ones they can read with accuracy, fluency, and good comprehension.

1.3 TESTING SHOWS HIGH PREVALENCE OF BIAS The implicit association test has been given to thousands of people across the United States and the world. The advent of the Internet allows millions of people to take it, and therefore vastly increases the database of information. The results from the IAT show a reasonable degree of scientific certainty about the following results regarding implicit bias concerning both attitude/preference and knowledge/stereotype: 1. Implicit bias can be large . Implicitly if not explicitly, the magnitude of bias toward particular social groups is large. Whether it is age, race, class, ethnicity, religion, physical appearance, or sexual orientation, there is now strong evidence that negative associations automatically arise when we think about the less favored (gay, elderly, African Americans, Arabs, Jews--when compared to Christians, the obese). 2. The bias is widespread . Many, including the test developers themselves, show evidence of implicit biases, even in the absence of any conscious bias, and sometimes in opposition to the consciously expressed attitude. 3. Not all groups demonstrate the bias equally . Quite often implicit attitudes, like explicit ones, favor the groups to which we belong. There are some surprising and psychologically meaningful deviations. For example, members of disadvantaged minorities and even statistical minorities do not show the same implicit ingroup preference as do members of majority and dominant groups. This finding often stands in contrast to the consciously expressed, strong in-group preference by members of disadvantaged or small groups. 4. Not all individuals demonstrate the bias equally . Following from the above finding, within groups, there is a wide range of individual differences. We have also learned that there are individual differences in the degree to which each person

is contaminated, and that these individual differences in the strength of the bias is meaningful – those with stronger biases are likely to be more discriminatory in other behaviors than those who show a weaker bias. 5. Implicit bias is related to explicit bias . The work shows that consciously held attitudes and stereotypes may indeed be associated with the degree of implicit bias, such that those who report lower explicit bias also appear to be lower in their implicit bias (this finding can vary quite a bit depending on the category – race, political attitudes, etc.), but it is no longer possible to ignore the fact that the two are related. Since conscious attitudes are controllable and can be consciously adopted, this provides a path whereby implicit attitudes can be influenced. 6. Implicit bias is plastic . Among the more optimistic revelations from recent data is the finding that seemingly minor shifts in the environment (such as an imagery exercise or the presence of a particular person) can change the magnitude of the bias that is observed. For example, the presence of an African American experimenter appears to lower anti-Black bias (Lowery, et al. 2001) and imagining women in positions of authority lowers the Female+weak bias (Blair, 2001). These findings raise questions about the power of the immediate situation in determining which one of may possible attitudes is expressed. Source Mahzarin Banaji - Notes on Implicit Bias - The ideas and data of implicit association and the IAT clearly makes visible the bottom end of the scale of those motivations prevented by Title VII. It shows that the nature of bias includes an entire range of motivations and conscious awareness. It makes known the true extent of bias within our society. Finally, it either is, or soon will be able to establish that the possession of attitudes measure by the IAT actually causes motivation that can adversely impact on protected groups.

Conclusion Continuous assessment is also a powerful diagnostic tool that enables pupils to understand the areas in which they are having difficulty and to concentrate their efforts in those areas. Continuous assessment also allows teachers to monitor the impact of their lessons on pupil understanding. Teachers can modify their pedagogical strategies to include the construction of remediation activities for pupils who are not working at the expected grade level and the creation of enrichment activities for pupils who are working at or above the expected grade level. Hence, the continuous assessment process supports a cycle of self-evaluation and pupil-specific activities by both pupils and teachers. Frequent interactions between pupils and teachers means that teachers know the strengths and weaknesses of their learners. These exchanges foster a pupil-teacher relationship based on individual interactions. Pupils learn that the teacher values their achievements and that their assessment outcomes have an impact on the instruction that they receive. One-to-one communication between the teacher and the pupil can motivate pupils to continue attending school and to work hard to achieve higher levels of mastery. Finally, teachers can share assessment results with important education stakeholders including parents, other teachers, community members, and the learners themselves. Parents especially want to know how their children are doing in school. Regular reports from the teacher based on continuous assessments allow the parents to know about their children’s progress. With this knowledge in hand, parents can assist and support children with their studies during the school year before opportunities for grade level achievement Finally, teachers can share assessment results with important education stakeholders including parents, other teachers, community members, and the learners themselves. Parents especially want to know how their children are doing in school. Regular reports from the teacher based on continuous assessments allow the parents to know about their children’s progress. With this knowledge in hand, parents can assist and support

children with their studies during the school year before opportunities for grade level achievement have passed. Continuous assessment is a classroom strategy implemented by teachers to ascertain the knowledge, understanding, and skills attained by pupils. Teachers administer assessments in a variety of ways over time to allow them to observe multiple tasks and to collect information about what pupils know, understand, and can do. These assessments are curriculum-based tasks previously taught in class. Continuous assessment occurs frequently during the school year and is part of regular teacher-pupil interactions. Pupils receive feedback from teachers based on their performance that allows them to focus on topics they have not yet mastered. Teachers learn which students need review and remediation and which pupils are ready to move on to more complex work. Thus, the results of the assessments help to ensure that all pupils make learning progress throughout the school cycle thereby increasing their academic achievement. The continuous assessment process is much more than an examination of pupil achievement.

USED LITERATURE 1. Ainslie, Susan. (1994). Mixed Ability Teaching: Meeting Learners.needs. Netword 3: Teaching Language to Adults . London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research. 2. Baker, Joanna. (2000). The English language teacher’s handbook: how to teach large classes with few resources . New York: Continuum; London: Cassel. 3. Berry, Eve and Williams, Molly. (1992). Teaching Strategies for Multilevel ESL classes. Facilitator’s Guide . Oregon: Clackamas Community College. 4. Bowman, Brenda. (1992). Teaching English as a Foreign Language to Large Multilevel Classes . Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. 5. Brown, Douglas H. (2002). Strategies for Success: a practical guide to learning English . New York: Longman. 6. Dornyei, Zoltan. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7. Goldstein, Sam. (1998). Overcoming underachieving: an action guide to helping your child succeed in school . New York; Chicester: J. Wiley & Sons. 8. Green, Simon. (2000). New Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Modern Languages . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 9. Hess, Natalie. (2001). Teaching Large Multilevel Classes . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10. Kelly, A.V. (1974). Teaching mixed ability classes: an individualized approach . London: Harper & Row Ltd. 11. Leiding, Darlene. (2002). The won’t learners: an answer to their cry . Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press.

12. Lessow-Hurley, Judith. (2003). Meeting the Needs of Second Language Learners: An educators guide . Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. 13. Shank, Cathy C, and Terrill Lynda R. (1995). Teaching Multilevel Adult ESL Classes. Eric Digests . Washington DC: Adjunct ERIC Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education. 14. Supplee, Patricia L. (1990). Reaching the gifted underachiever: program strategy and design . New York: Teachers College Press. 15. Tomlinson, Carol Ann. (1999). The differentiated classroom: responding to the needs of all learners . Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and curriculum Development. 16. Wright, Trevor. (2005). How to be a brilliant English teacher . New York: Taylor & Francis Inc. 17. Sweden. Skolverket.. Curriculum for the non-compulsory school system Lpf 94. Odeshog, Sweden, 2006.

O'xshashlar

Assessment of vocabulary and grammar

Classroom management and feedback (kurs ishi)

Encouraging peer and self-correction (kurs ishi)

Issues of vocabulary acquisition and learning (kurs ishi)

When and how to correct errors (kurs ishi)