Assessment of vocabulary and grammar - Ingliz tili - Referatlar

Assessment of vocabulary and grammar

Yuklangan vaqt:

16.12.2023

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

28.228515625 KB

Ko'chirib olish

Assessment of vocabulary and grammar Plan: 1. Assessment of language performance in English. 2. Language portfolio.

Assessment of language performance in English Assessment of language subskills Linguistic competence refers to the mastery of knowledge of the language code itself. It involves controlling the format organization of the language for producing or recognizing «correct» sentences and organizing them to form texts. Pronunciation is tested globally in different types of conversational exchange. Interview, reading aloud, etc., that go in the classroom. The purpose of testing pronunciation is not only to evaluate knowledge and award grades, but also to motivate students to be sensitive to this aspect of English. The most effective way of testing pronunciation is to actually listen to the learner. But it is not always possible in the teaching condition. So, the alternatives are: testing segments and word stress with the help of dictation exercises, listening activities designed to test the learners’ ability to discriminate phonemes or group of phonemes. The following exercises can be used for this purpose: 1. «Same or Different? »: The students listen to a pair of words or pair of sentences and indicate whether they are the same or different: Bad – bed; suck – sock; spring – springer. 2. Fill in the Gap: the students listen to a sentence and select from a set of words the one they hear and need for the sentence: Where did you see th ? (pupil, purple) He can … national songs? (think, sing, thin). Vocabulary and grammar skills are the integral part of communicative skills (reading, listening, speaking and writing). They influence the effectiveness of speech reception and production. Vocabulary and grammar skills are tested when language is used. Examples for testing vocabulary skills: 1. Choose the appropriate synonym to the given word. Shape a) form, b) size, c) rate, d) oval 2. Complete the sentence with suitable words.

Use this_____ to find an ________ answer to the problem. (option/ appropriate) Do not spend _________time _____________ piano. (much/playing) Examples for testing grammar skills: 1) Complete the dialogue with will or be going to . Stan: _______ you _____ (have) lunch with me tomorrow? Tess: Sorry, I _____ (not be) in town tomorrow. 2) Write questions to the given short answers. - Yes, I am. - No I can’t. - Yes, he did. Assessing of speaking An assessment of spoken proficiency is carried out within production and interaction aspects, given or chosen themes, dialogue or monologue, prepared or spontaneous talk. Speaking is in a close interrelation with listening, because one of the communicants is a speaker-producer of the verbal/oral speech, the second one is a listener-receptor. Among the macro-skills of language, it has been widely recognized that speaking in EL is the most difficult language skill to assess. Assessment of spoken speech is shaped as the use of activities undertaken to acquire and streamline the data about students’ speaking outcomes during and after teaching/learning activities. Assessment of speaking performance can be organized through different speaking activities such as discussions, problem- solving, role- plays, conversations, story-telling, and so on. Arthur Hughes singled out the operations and skills for assessing oral abilities 1 , which we should take into consideration (see Table 20). Below we present a sample of testing students’ speaking performance. 1 Hughes A. Testing for Language Teachers. The 2-d ed. - Cambridge: CUP, 2003.

There are five components generally recognized by educators in analysis of the oral speech process: 1) pronunciation, including segmental features, vowels and consonants, the stress and intonation patterns; 2) grammar; 3) vocabulary; 4) fluency; 5) comprehension. These components can be taken as macro-criteria for testing students’ speaking performance. Three frameworks about general purposes of testing oral skills were suggested: 1) linguistically-oriented, 2) communication-oriented, 3) situation- based. 2 1. Linguistically -o riented framework concerns vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation . This work/goal can be carried out/achieved by structured speaking tasks , and short-answer questions , reacting to phrases tasks . Structured speaking tasks are typically used to evaluate pronunciation, spoken vocabulary and spoken grammar skills. Short-answer questions and reactions to phrases can also be used to evaluate overall understanding and comprehensibility. Short- answer questions test shows comprehension of questions and ability to give relevant information in response. The difference between this and more extended simulations is that the questions and answers are limited and all the information needed for answering the questions is usually provided in the task materials. Reacting to phrases is another structured task which is often used in tape-based tests. The task usually tests the examinees’ knowledge of conventional politeness exchanges such as greetings, thanks, apologies, expressions of agreement and polite disagreement, and so on. 2. Communication-oriented framework refers to the overall communication activity in such a task as telling a narrative or expressing and defending an opinion, discussing factors that support the chosen opinion and argue against others – for the beginning and intermediate levels, comparing and contracting things through which advanced oral skills for description are needed. 2 Luoma S. Developing Speaking Tasks. In Assessing Speaking. - Cambridge: CUP, 2004. -Pp. 139-169.

3. Situation-based task design belongs to the task-based approach to defining the test construct. This approach is typically used in specific-purpose testing – ESP at colleges. The first two frameworks are appropriate for testing students’ speaking performance at schools, lyceums and colleges. We can find out how students understand linguistic rules and use them in communication. In Table 21 you find some examples, suggested by S. Luoma 3 , that show the types of test items and their functions. Assessing of reading Assessment of reading performance is carried out within skimming (reading for gist), scanning (reading for details), and extensive (reading for pleasure focuses on informational content). Reading presupposes forming receptive and comprehension skills. At the beginning level of reading in English classrooms, the receptive tasks include: recognition of alphabetic symbols, capitalized and lowercase letters, punctuation, words, and grapheme-phoneme correspondences. They are referred to as «literacy» tasks, implying that the learner is in the early stages of becoming ‘literate’. The following tasks for testing are used: 1) reading aloud; 2) written response; 3) multiple-choice; 4) picture-cued. Scanning and skimming reading . A combination of bottom-up and top- down processing may be both used to assess lexical and grammatical aspects of reading ability. These types of reading involve the different testing tasks: 1) question-answer; 2) cloze tasks; 3) multiple-choice (form-focused and for reading comprehension); 4) true or false; 5) matching tasks; 6) editing tasks; 7) picture- cued tasks; 8) gap-filling tasks; 9) ordering tasks; 10) to get the main ideas or details/facts; 11) non-verbal tasks for information transfer such as charts, maps, graphs, and diagrams; 12) transformation; 13) extending or compression; 14) 3 Luoma S. Developing Speaking Tasks. In Assessing Speaking. - Cambridge: CUP, 2004. -Pp. 139-169.

summarizing (a synopsis or overview of the text) and responding (personal opinion on the test as a whole); 15) note-taking and outlining. Testing (exam) focuses on evaluation of reading comprehension, which can be involved in macro- and micro-skills. Macro-skills for testing reading comprehension are: skimming to obtain the general idea (gist) of the text; scanning to locate specific information in the text; identifying the stages and arguments; identifying examples in support of the argument in topic sentence. Micro-skills for testing can be: identifying referents of pronouns; infer the meaning of words using the text as a context; understanding the structure. Assessing of written work Writing involves content, organization, style, syntax, mechanics , grammar and spelling. It was pointed out that «If we limit our feedback to pointing out or correcting errors, our students will concentrate on producing error-free writing, neglecting the interest or even the meaning of the content. The equation teaching writing – error elimination is counterproductive» 4 . So it is necessary to conduct feedback in fair balance of content feedback and form feedback. The experienced teachers consider that teachers should ignore the language mistakes that do not hinder learning, so teachers may correct only those mistakes which are very basic and those which affect meaning. Study the ways and strategies of errors correction 5 (Table 22) and discuss them in the group. 4 Balan R., Cehan A. & et.al. In-service Distance Training Course for Teachers of English. -Romania: Polirom, 2003. - P. 201. 5 It was adapted from the book: Balan R., Cehan A. & et.al. In- service Distance Training Course for Teachers of English. - Romania: Polirom, 2003. - P. 202-203.

Independent work: 1. http :// waucondastore . com / methods - teaching - english / 2. www.Content-English.org 3. http://www.onestopenglish.com/

O'xshashlar

Investigating the learning and teaching of grammar

Assessment - Continuous assessment and Testing (kurs ishi)

Issues of vocabulary acquisition and learning (kurs ishi)

Aspects of teaching Grammar to elementary and intermediate level students

Content of teaching English The questions