Translating metaphor and similes

Yuklangan vaqt:

20.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

41 KB

Ko'chirib olish

Translating metaphor and similes Plan: 1. Metaphors 2. The translation of metaphors 3. Similes 4. Stock or standard metaphors

Metaphors and similes are found in many languages. They are comparison He ran like the wind. The moon is like blood. Benjamin is like a wolf. In English a simile has the words "like" and "as". Metaphors don't have the word "like" or "as". The comparison is always that of some likeness. We find the similarity of two objects in metaphors. the child is a greedy little pig he is an ox he is a rock These could just as well be said as similes: that child is like a greedy little pig, he is like an ox he is like a rock Metaphors and similes represent two propositions in the semantic structure. A proposition consists of a topic and the comment about that topic. "John is tall" consists of the topic "John" and the comment "is tall." The comparison comes in the comment part of the propositions. John is as tall as a bean pole. The topic of the first proposition is compared to the topic of the second. 1. John is tall 2. a bean pole is tall. The sentence "that animal is a tiger" is not metaphorical, but the sentence "John is-a tiger" is a metaphor. John is being compared to a "tiger" because of some point of similarity. Metaphors are divided into "dead metaphors" and live metaphors "dead metaphors" are those which are a part of the idiomatic constructions of the lexicon of the language. An idiom is a dead metaphor. Run into debt; foot of the stairs; the head of the state. They are dead metaphors because native speakers who use them do not think about comparison. But think directly of the meaning of the idiom. They are understood directly without giving attention to the primary series of each of the words.

Live metaphors are constructed on the spot-by the author or speaker to teach or illustrate. A live metaphor is understood only after paying special attention to the comparison which is being made. It is easy for a native speaker to recognize the difference between "live" and "dead" metaphors his language. For one who is translating it is important to make "distinction since idioms will be translated directly without any attempt to keep the metaphorical content of the idiom. However, live metaphors are treated differently in the translation process. Not all metaphors and similes are easily understood. If they are translated literally, word-for-word into a second language they fifteen will be misunderstood. There are a number of reasons why metaphors "are-hard to understand and cannot be translated literally. First of all, the image used, in the metaphor or simile maybe unknown in the receptor language. A simile based on "snow" would be meaningless to people who live in some parts of the country where snow is unknown. In English: I washed my clothes white as snow; In a language in the South: I washed my clothes: as seashells or as bone. In Uzbek: Oppoq paxtadek qilib kiryuvdim. Sometimes it is a point of similarity that is implicit and hard to identify. The sentence "he is a pig" doesn't include the point of similarity. In some cultures a reference to pigs would be given the idea of "dirty". But in other cultures it migfrt mean one who is glutton and in other culture it might mean someone who doesn't listen to people. When the point of similarity is not stated it is often hard to interpret the metaphor. "He is an ox" could have various meanings. One could think of the characteristics of an ox as "strong", "huge" or "unintelligent". This makes it very different to interpret the metaphor in order to translate it. John is a rock, may mean differently in different cultures: 1.. he's still

2. he can't talk 3. he's always there 4. he's very strong He is a sheep, have different meaning from one culture to another: 1. long haired man 2. a drunkard .3. a person who doesn't answer back 4. one who just follows without thinking 5. a young fellow waiting for girls to follow him 6. one who is very calm Translating "he is a sheep" into a second language could lead to a very wrong meaning if the point of similarity is not made clear. The translator must give careful consideration' whenever a metaphor is found in the source text. The first step towards adequate translation of a metaphor is to determine whether the comparison is a live metaphor or simile or whether it is simply a dead figure. If the words which are figurative are simply an idiom, i.e. a, dead metaphor, then the meaning can be translated directly, i.e. nonfigurative. If the comparison is a "live" metaphor, man the first task of the translator is to analyze the metaphor carefully. It can-be very helpful to write down. The aim of the translator is to avoid wrong zero meaning. In the sentence "the rod is a snake" "Snake" means smth like "crooked". If the "snake" means something like "crooked". If the snake has this metaphorical meaning in the receptor language there would not "be a problem in a rather literal translation. In some languages it- would be much clearer if the metaphor was changed to a simple and the sentence was the road is like a snake it may be that the comparative is correctly understood in the receptor language in this form if not, it can be spelled out more carefully in a form such as" the road is as crooked as a snake", Similaries are more easily understood then metaphors in most language. It may be that the translator will want to substitute a different metaphor in the receptor language one that carries the same meaning as the source language.

Ex. There was a storm in parliament. It might be good in some languages to chance the metaphor from "storm" to "fire" and the translation would" read the parliament was on fire last night. If this is the metaphor which will be most clearly understood and indicate that there was "juice debate in parliament". As long as the nonfigurative meaning of the metaphor is not lost or distorted, a metaphor from the receptor language will be substituted. There will be sometimes when the translator will simply need to ignore the image in the source text. This is, he will simply translate the meaning directly without using a metaphor. The source text «there was a storm in the national parliament last night" might simply be translated directly "there was a lot of argument and debate in the national parliament last night" or the sentence "he was a pig" night simply be translated "he is a messy person. In summary, there are fire ways that metaphors may be 1. The metaphor may be kept if the receptor language permits (that is, if it sounds and is understood correctly by the readers) 2. A metaphor may be translated as a simple (adding "like or as") 3. A, metaphor of the receptor language which has the same meaning may be substituted. 4. The metaphor may be kept and the meaning explained (that is, the topic and or, point similary may be added). 5. The meaning of the metaphor may be translated without keeping the metaphor Images comparing with the above list, the metaphor “no man is an island" a). No man is an island. b). No man is like an island. c). No man is a mountain peak. d). No man is an island. An island is by itself, but no person is isolated from others. e). No man is isolated from all other people.

The translation of metaphors Defin i tions Which the central problem of translation is overall choice of a translation method for a text, the most important particular problem is the translation of metaphors. By metaphor any figurative expression: The transferred sense of a physical word; the personification of an abstraction; the application of a word or collocation to what it does not literally denote, i.e. to describe one thing in terms of another. All polysemous words (a 'heavy' heartland most English phrasal verbs (put off, dissuader, troubles etc) are potentially-most metaphorical. Metaphors may be ' single'- viz, one word-or 'extended' (a collocation, an idiom, a sentence, a proverb, an allegory, a complete imaginative text.) So much for the substance. The purpose of metaphor as basically twofold: its referential purpose is to describe a mental process or state, a concept, a person, an object, a quality or an action more comprehensively and concisely than is possible in literal or physical language; its pragmatic purpose, which is simulations, is to appeal to the senses, to interest, to clarify graphically, to please, to delight, to surprise. The first purpose is cognitive, the second aesthetic. In a good metaphor, the two purposes fuse like (and are paralled with) content and form; the referential purpose is likely dominate in a textbook, the aesthetic often reinforced by sound- effect in an advertisement, popular journalism, an art-for-art's sake work or a pop song; "Those stars make towers on vowels' (Saxophone song, Kate Bush Metaphor, both purposes, always involves illusion: like a lie where you are pretending to be someone you're not, a metaphor is a kind of deception, often used to conceal an intention “Cruise tauntingly amicably in the lanes” -The Economist). Metaphor incidentally demonstrates a resemblance, a common semantic area between two or more or less similar things - the image and the project. This is seen first as a process not, as is often stated, as a function. The consequence of a surprising metaphor (a papery cheek ?- thin, white, flimsy, frail, fable, cowardly?) may be. The recognition of a resemblance, but that is not its purpose. The translation of metaphor.

$One of the problems in understanding and translating an original or adapted and, to a lesser extent, a stock metaphor is to decide how much space to allot to the criss- crossed area is: a) positive or negative; b) connotative or denotative. Thus in the sentence: "Bissinger”. A TV "portrait" featuring a Matternichi of today? it .is not clear whether "Metternicli" refers to": a) Metternich "s career as a European statesman; b) his craftiness( negative ); c) his shrewdness (positive); d) less' likely , his autocratic nature. This may be clarified in the subsequent, sentences. Metaphor: the figurative word used, which may be one word, or "extended"' over any stretch of language from a collocation to the whole text. Metonymy a one-word image which replaces the "object". It may be a cliché metaphor ("crown" as monarchy), recently standardized ("juggernaut") or original ('sink'- as hold-al receptacle). Metonym includes synecdoche (i.e., pan for whole for part) e.g.: 'bottom' (boat) or "army' (one soldier). Many technical terms such as orbre, tour, metier, elements, pile, chien are metonyms. Symbol: a type of cultural metonymy where are material object represents a concept-thus "grapes" as fertility or sacrifice. . . Usually cultural metaphors are harder to translate than universal or personal metaphors. Language is not primarily as a deposit expressing a culture but as a medium for expressing universals and personality as well. Translating metaphors Whenever you meet a sentence that is grammatical but does not appear to make sense, you have to test its apparently nonsensical element for a possible metaphorical meaning, even if the writing is faulty, since it is unlikely that anyone, in an otherwise sensible text, is suddenly going to \write deliberate nonsense. If it is an authoritative or expressive text, you translate 'In the afternoons, the rain always kills the window-panes', and perhaps leave interpretation for a footnote. But if it is an anonymous text, you must make an attempt: "In the afternoons, the rain darkens /muffles/ blocks the light from the window-panes’. You cannot avoid this; you make to have sense of everything. Usually, only "the more common words have connotations but, at a pinch, any word can be a metaphor, and its sense$

has to be teased out by matching its primary meaning against its linguistic, situational and cultural contexts. Stock or standard metaphors It is defined a. stock metaphor as an established metaphor which in an informal context in an efficient and concise method of converting a physical and/or mental situation both referentially and pragmatically a stock metaphor has certain emotional warmth- and which is not deadened by overuse. Stock metaphors are sometimes tricky— to translate, since their apparent equivalents may be out of dote attested or used by a different social classes or age group. You should not use a stock metaphor that does not come naturally you. The first and the most satisfying procedure for translating a stock metaphor are to reproduce the same image in the and register, e.g.: 'Keep the pot boiling’, "earn a living ", 'Keep something going'. This is rare for extended metaphors (but probably more common for English- German than English-French), more common for. Single 'universal' metaphors, such as 'wooden face Yrise', 'drop in prices'. For instance, the metaphor 'in store can be translated as "a reserve" in marry but not all collocations. But a more common procedure for translating stock metaphors is to replace the S and image with another established T and image, if one exists that is equally frequent within the register. Such one-word metaphors a rare. Extended stock metaphor, often change their, images, particularly when the embedded in proverbs, which are often cultural, e.g. 'that upset the applecart. This example is characteristic of translated. Stock metaphors, in that the equivalence is far from accurate: The English denotes an Upset balance or harmony; and. is between informal and colloquial has the stronger emotional impact. A stock metaphor can only be translated exactly the image is transferred within a correspondingly acceptable and established collocation. When we translate there is always the danger of pursuing a particular too far accreting, superfluous meaning, and so the whole thing set out of balance.

Everything is possible, when the reproduction of the sound effects, but at the cost of economy. The same caveat applies to the third and obvious translation procedure for stock metaphors, reducing to sense or literal language: not only will components of sense be missing, or added, but the emotive or pragmatic impact will be impaired or lost. Thus the metaphor: 'I can read him like a book' has an immediacy which is lacking when I can read him as in a book, which weakens half the metaphor into a simile; English metaphor is standard, it still has the surprising element of a good metaphor, the French version is prosaic in comparison.

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yxati: 1. Karimov I. A. “Yuksak ma’naviyat – yengilmas kuch“ Toshkent “ Ma’naviyat” 2008-yil 2. Karimov I. A. “Asosiy vazifamiz- vatanimiz taraqqiyoti va xalqimiz farovonligini yanada yuksaltirish”. Toshkent “O‘zbekiston” 2010 yil 3. Karimov I. A. “ 2010- yil Barkamol avlod yili” Davlat dasturi. Toshkent ”O‘zbekiston” 2010 yil 4. Karimov I. A. “ Yangicha fikrlash va ishlash davr talabi”. Toshkent – 1997 yil 5. Karimov I. A. “ Bu muqaddas vatanda azizdir inson”. Toshkent – 2010 yil

O'xshashlar

Fiction and nonfiction

Translation and culture

Language and speech levels

Modernist poetry and prose

Uzbekistan and the World