Investigating the motivations of parents choosing language immersion education for their child - Ingliz tili - Diplom ishlar

Investigating the motivations of parents choosing language immersion education for their child

Yuklangan vaqt:

26.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

126.5 KB

Ko'chirib olish

CONTENT Introduction ………………………………………………………………………3 Chapter I. General information about investigating the motivations of parents choosing language immersion education for their child….………………………4 1.1 To investigate the motivations of parents choice……………………………..6 1.2 Selecting language immersion education for their child…………………….12 1.3 Teaching and learning immersion education……………………………….14 Chapter II. Immersion education for young learners……………..…………….15 2.1 Parents’ educational goals……………………………………………………24 2.2 Parents’ own school experience……………………………………………..34 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………35 Key words ……………………………………………………………………….36 Bibliography ……………………………………………………………………37 1

Introduction The actuality of the work: Language immersion schools, which are the focus of this study, require parents’ support and involvement as they generally need to make extra strides in attracting students, locating funds, and justifying their worth and success. In a language immersion program, students, mostly at the elementary school age, learn another language by learning content taught to them in the second language. Immersion education effectively provides its students with “academic achievement, bi- or multilingualism, literacy in at least two languages, and enhanced levels of intercultural sensitivity”. The aim of the work: The aim of the course work is to give detailed information about investigating the motivations of parents choosing language immersion education for their child. The task of the work:  Investigating the motivations of parents choosing language immersion education for their child.  To describe the children’s psychology.  To analyse the motivation of parents for their child.  To study choosing language immersion education for their child. The investigation of the work: Many scholars and critics investigated and learned investigating the motivations of parents choosing language immersion education for their child. There are two main language immersion models: foreign language and bilingual immersion. Foreign language immersion programs, also referred to as one-way immersion, serve a student body which largely consists of “speakers of the societally dominant language ” 2

The practical value of the work: This course work can be used as principal information for investigating the motivations of parents choosing language immersion education for their child. It comprises a great deal of materials which can be fruitful for self studying of choosing immersion education. It can be used as a fundamental source of materials which supports wide range of information about investigating the motivations of parents choosing language immersion education for their child. 3

Chapter I General information about investigating the motivations of parents choosing language immersion education for their child Much educational research of recent years has been examining the role of parents in their children’s education. Numerous studies have shown that parental involvement can enhance students’ academic achievements, behavioral outcomes, and their sense of well-being. Yet parents not only impact their children’s education but also are invaluable assets to schools. Parents’ beliefs and attitudes about a school or program have a tremendous impact on the decisions of other parents seeking a good school for their child as well as on the success and effectiveness of the school itself. It seems established among practitioners and researchers alike that parents are key stakeholders in their child’s education and simply need to be part of successful educational planning and decision making. In order to continue improving the partnership between schools and parents, it is vital to know how parents approach educational decisions such as which school to choose for their child and the various factors that guide their thoughts and beliefs. Particularly language immersio 1 n schools, which are the focus of this study, require parents’ support and involvement as they generally need to make extra strides in attracting students, locating funds, and justifying their worth and success. In a language immersion program, students, mostly at the elementary school age, learn another language by learning content taught to them in the second language. Immersion education effectively provides its students with “academic achievement, bi- or multilingualism, literacy in at least two languages, and enhanced levels of intercultural sensitivity”. This way of language learning has proven to be very successful and powerful since its first implementation in the United States at the beginning of the 1970s. There are two main language immersion models: foreign language and bilingual immersion. Foreign language immersion programs, also referred to as one-way immersion, serve a student body which largely consists of “speakers of the societally dominant language ” . At the 1 The act of immersing or the condition of being immersed. 4

elementary level, these programs use the immersion language for at least 50% of the school day to teach subject matter . To date there are about 310 one-way immersion programs in the U.S. serving languages such as Spanish, French,German, Italian, Russian, or Arabic . Bilingual or two-way immersion programs serve a student body where “ideally, half of the students in each class are members of the majority language group and half are members of a minority language program . In these programs, minority language use varies from 90% to 50% in Kindergarten, to 50% of instruction time in each language in the remaining elementary grades. Two-way immersion programs, in particular, have seen a dramatic increase in recent years with currently 319 schools in states . Both one-way and two-way immersion models are subgroups of what is termed dual language education by a number of researchers and educators serving a variety of purposes and contexts. One way immersion programs aim to create high proficiency foreign language speakers with an enhanced level of understanding and appreciation for cultural diversity . The same applies to two-way immersion programs in addition to their offering language minority children a path to “higher levels of academic language and literacy development in English” . Indigenous immersion and developmental bilingual immersion are two additional subgroups within dual language education. Due to the nature of a given immersion program and the specific need it fulfills in its community “no one program will exactly resemble another” . Nonetheless researchers have described certain core characteristics that any immersion program needs to contain to a “greater or lesser degree” in order to qualify as a prototypical immersion program. Johnson and Sweet established eight core features: (a) The L2 [the language that is taught] is a medium of instruction (b) The immersion curriculum parallels the local L1 curriculum (c) Overt support exists for the L1 5

(d) The program aims for additive bilingualism (e) Exposure to the L2 is largely confined to the classroom (f) Students enter with similar (and limited) levels of L2 proficiency (g) The teachers are bilingual (h) The classroom culture is that of the local L1 community Due to the steady rise in numbers of especially the Hispanic school population nationwide, two-way immersion programs in Spanish have increased noticeably. Much of the related research has focused on two-way immersion programs; likely because these programs dominate the landscape as far as language education is concerned yet also because bilingual education has been under attack nationally with antibilingual initiatives in a number of states . Stritikus and Garcia describe Arizona’s Proposition 203 for example as “a direct challenge to the belief that languages other than English have a legitimate and valuable place in the education of students who are diverse” . Walker and Tedick make the point that no school involved in language learning and teaching “can escape the wide social issues surrounding language policy and statu within the United States” .As a direct result of such initiatives and the understanding that parents are key stakeholders in their child’s education, research involving the two-way immersion concept 2 has been done on parents’ attitudes and beliefs about the effectiveness and quality of such language immersion programs . These studies often focused on American parents versus immigrant parents and their different perspectives on their child’s education in a two-way immersion setting and the success of these programs. The link between English/Spanish two-way immersion programs and the national debate which focuses on immigration has, however, resulted in limited research on programs which offer a language other than Spanish as the immersion language. Inspiration and Statement of the Problem While working on my Master’s degree, I was contacted by an American family who was looking for a German tutor for their daughter. Her father explained to me that his daughter had attended a German 2 An understanding retained in the mind. 6

elementary school in the area, was very fluent in German, and that they were looking for someone who could continue working with her on the language, as she did not attend any German classes at this point and they did not want her to loose the language. I still remember that it puzzled me when he said, “she had attended a German school” as I did not know of any “German school” in the area. I expected a tutoring job like any other – reviewing grammar concepts and working on vocabulary. I still remember vividly the first time I met the daughter – Mary – and how impressed I was by her near-native fluency and knowledge of German. This was the beginning of my personal involvement with immersion language learning. My knowledge of and fascination with immersion programs started then – nine years ago – and has resulted in this dissertation study. Before meeting Mary Beth, I knew very little about the concept of immersion education. Coincidentally, the very same school Mary Beth had attended – a one-way total German immersion elementary school –hired me as a second grade teacher after I completed my Master’s degree. For two years, I had the opportunity to observe and learn first hand about all aspects involved in immersion education; curriculum design, teacher training, administrative challenges, and school population. Yet one thing I have always been intrigued by, from the day I met Mary Beth and her family, is why parents would want to send their child to an elementary school of this nature and why of all languages they chose German. I still wonder about this today and have come to realize while working on this study that research is scarce on exactly these questions. Purpose and Significance of the Study The purpose of this study is to explore the motivations of parents who chose to send their child to a newly opened language immersion program. It describes the various factors that influence their decision-making as well as the perceptions and expectations these parents have of their child’s program. The immersion language of focus in this research study is German. The invaluable role parents play in a child’s education has been well documented in empirical research . It has been proven that parents who are involved play a significant role in their child’s academic success and learning experiences. Research studies have shown that 7

parental beliefs often influence these involvement decisions. In addition, parental attitudes, aspirations, and encouragement improve children’s performance in school and influence their attitudes and values about school and about learning . Parents are also fundamental in their role as volunteers giving their time, energy and sometimes even money to schools, most of which have been affected by recent budget cuts for teacher aides and paraeducators. Educational reforms such as Goals 2000 or the No Child Left Behind Act have made efforts to define parental participation and stipulate the promotion of family-school relationships . Parental involvement is of vital importance to a school, yet it is often enough underestimated and undervalued. Parents serve as advertisers and communicators of a school’s success and quality of education it provides . They promote the school in the community as well as amongst other parents who are seeking a good school for their child. Parents’ beliefs and attitudes about programs play a vital role in a program’s continuation or its termination . Language immersion schools in particular rely heavily on parents’ patronage since they generally need to make extra strides in attracting students. Parents, as invested participants in their children’s education, are a key feature in making a school program effective and successful . Hence more research is needed to understand their motivations and decision-making processes. Studies in immersion language education have aimed at shedding light on parents’ perceptions, attitudes, and expectations of these programs . Yet as far as parents are concerned who choose some form of immersion education for their child, this research has often been carried out using forced choice survey methods and involved well-established programs. Studies also often revolved around the attitudes and beliefs of immigrant versus non-immigrant parents or high-demand languages such as Spanish. It is to be expected that a lot of attention has fallen on Spanish programs as they clearly dominate the language education landscape. Draper and Hicks report that in grades seven through twelve alone Spanish accounts for nearly 70% of all language enrollments. These programs also visibly represent the current changes in American society. According to the U.S. Census Bureau there has been a 62% rise 8

in Spanish speakers from 17.3 million in 1990 to 28.1 million in 2000. In 2003 of the 33.5 million foreign-born living in the U.S. 53.3% were from Latin America Consequently, this has had an impact on the demographics in our public schools as well. Of those school-aged children and adolescents who speak a language other than English at home, 75% speak Spanish . In order to keep up with these changes in American society and its implications on public education, much of educational research has simply had to focus on bilingualism and the various forms of Spanish language programs. In order to add to and expand the existing knowledge base of immersion education, my research study will employ qualitative methods to explore the motivations parents have for sending their child to a newly opened German immersion elementary school and the various factors behind this decision. Through an in- depth study of these families, I hope to provide arguments that speak for the early and prolonged learning of a foreign language especially when such programs face a decrease in fiscal support and difficulties in staffing nationwide. Additionally, this study attempts to explore how languages such as German which have not seen a significant increase in learner numbers recently, can regain a stronger student base. The organization of this research around parents stresses the important role they play as partners to schools, teachers, and administrators. The results of this study will aid school districts and new language programs on how best to utilize and work with those parents who consider enrolling their child at a newly opened immersion school. It will provide practical and realistic insights into parents’ expectations and concerns. This in turn can benefit language teachers who regularly interact with parents and who play a crucial 3 role in parents’ views of schools. Lastly, this study can influence other parents considering the decision of sending their child to a language immersion program. Research Questions This descriptive study explores the motivations of sixteen parents who chose to send their children to newly established German immersion schools focusing on 3 Being essintial or decisive for determining the outcome. 9

why they chose immersion education for their child and what influenced these decisions. Semistructured interviews are used to answer the following research questions: 1. What are the stated motivations for parents to enroll their child in an immersion language program? 1.1 What educational goals do immersion parents have for their child? 1.2 What perceptions and expectations do parents have of their child’s immersion program? 1.3 Do beliefs about the German language influence immersion parents’ decision? 2. What are the stated factors that influence immersion parents’ decision-making? 2.1 Does an immersion parent’s own school experience influence his/her decisions? 2.2 Does an immersion parent’s role perception influence his/her decision? Conceptual Framework Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler’s model of the parental involvement process served as the underlying framework in the development of the research questions this study is based on as well as the questions guiding the parent interviews. In their research on parental involvement, Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler have taken a strictly psychological perspective to explain why parents become involved in their children’s education, illustrating that “status does not determine parents’ thinking, actions, or influence related to their involvement in children’s schooling”. They put forth a theoretical model with the intention “to explain the process of involvement and its influence than to prescribe educational or parental practice” . The model consists of five sequential levels, ranging from factors that influence parents’ basic involvement decisions, to modes of parents’ involvement, to child/student outcomes. A decade of research has resulted in the development and revision of Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler’s original model. For my study the revised model by Walker et al. will serve as the conceptual framework . It should be oted that within the model’s revised levels I chose to focus on one specific construct in level 1: parents’ motivational beliefs . 10

In the original model, Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler hypothesized that “parents’ basic involvement decisions were primarily influenced by what they believe they should and can do in the context of their child’s education” . Two constructs are suggested to reflect these beliefs. In the revised model, Walker et al. organized these two ideas under one conceptual umbrella: parents’ motivational beliefs. Although this model was developed to explain why parents become involved in their child’s education, the psychological predictor of motivational beliefs is applicable to this study as it focuses on parents’ own attitudes, ideas and experiences as basis of their decisions within their child’s education. As Nell suggests, “Hoover-Dempsey’s perspective uses a more caring, realistic, and judgment-free model for understanding parents’ perspectives” Figure 1 Revised Levels 1 and 2 of Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler’s theoretical model of the parental involvement process Figure 2 Conceptual framework for this study Parents’ Motivational Beliefs defined as Parental Role Construction Parental Self- Efficacy Parental Role Construction Walker define role construction within parents’ involvement process “as parents’ beliefs about what they should do in relation to the child’s education” . This includes beliefs about parents’ rights, responsibilities, and obligations as well as their “personal history with and affective responses to school”. These beliefs and attitudes help parents to “imagine and anticipate” behavior towards best practices necessary for their child’s educational success. In addition, they define the kinds of involvement activities parents consider important, necessary, and permissible. Parents develop these beliefs and understandings while being members and participants in groups relevant to child-rearing such as families, schools, churches, and the broader culture .While assessing the construct of parental role construction, three major patterns were suggested: (a) parent-focused, (b) school-focused, and (c) 11

partnership-focused . A parent-focused role construction sees the ultimate responsibility for the child’s education with the parents whereas a school-focused role construction sees the responsibility with the schools. Lastly, a partnership- focused role construction reflects “beliefs and behaviors that parents and schools together are responsible for the child’s education” Parental Self-Effical define parental self- efficacy as “beliefs in one’s capability to act in ways that will produce desired outcomes people’s goal selection, effort, persistence, and ultimate goal accomplishment” (p. 93). Parents’ beliefs in their abilities to help their child succeed in school influence their goals, persistence and what they will do. Self- efficacy theory applied to parental involvement suggests that parents’ actions are guided “by thinking through, in advance of their behavior, what outcomes are likely to follow the actions they might take. They will develop goals for their behaviors, based on these anticipations, and will plan actions designed to achieve these goals” . Parents with positive self-efficacy are more likely to conceptualize their contributions to their child’s learning and engage in a range of involvement activities than parents with low self-efficacy . It is therefore suggested that schools “need to be aware of a parent’s efficacy levels in light of the impact it has on the parent’s decision making concerning school” . In order to offer an in-depth exploration of parents’ motivations and their perceptions and expectations of their child’s immersion program, I chose a qualitative research design as the methodological framework for this study. Convenience and snowball sampling resulted in the participation of sixteen parents in this study who had enrolled their child in one of two newly opened German immersion schools; one located in California, one in the Midwest. Data were generated through semi- structured interviews. Demographic questionnaires and reflective journal notes provided an additional source of biographical and background information. Due to the qualitative nature of this study, the process of data analysis began with the first 12

parent interview and went through the writing and editing of the final document. The digitally-recorded interviews were transcribed and coded employing content analysis to find emerging patterns and themes with reference to the conceptual framework and research questions presented earlier. Constantly comparing participants’ responses allowed me to establish categories within parental motivations, beliefs, and expectations. To ensure the trustworthiness of this study, I collected several sources of data and requested the assistance of a fellow doctoral candidate to check the codes and themes I had established. Definition of Terms L1 – (first language) refers in the context of this study to a person’s first or native language. L2 – (second language) refers in the context of this study to the foreign/target language to be acquired. Heritage language learner / background – “a student of language who is raised in a home where a non-English language is spoken. The student may speak or merely understand the heritage language and be, to some degree, bilingual in English and the heritage language.” . In the context of this study, the home language is also the language of instruction in the child’s educational program. Bilingual education – “education in an English-language school system in which students with little fluency in English are taught in both their native language and English” .Immersion education – a language learning approach where the L2 is used as a tool to teach subject content. Immersion education aims to make its students functionally proficient in the L2, to maintain and develop the L1, and to offer cross-cultural understanding .Two-Way Immersion programs – serve a linguistically heterogeneous student group. In the U.S. context, this group is generally composed of language majority as well as language minority students . One-Way Immersion programs – serve a linguistically homogeneous student group. In the U.S. context, this group is generally composed of language majority students with limited to no proficiency in the immersion language. Foreign Language in the Elementary School programs – non-immersion language 13

programs with the goal “for students to acquire listening and speaking skills, gain an understanding of and appreciation for other cultures, and acquire limited amounts of reading and writing skills” . 14

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE Since parents are considered primary stakeholders in their child’s education, I will begin this chapter with a discussion of relevant literature on the importance of parents in education and the crucial role they play as partners to schools but particularly immersion programs. The present study mainly draws on research on parental involvement in their child’s education. I will highlight studies done on the various benefits of parent participation and how it influences students’ academic achievements, motivations, and well-being. In order to examine parents’ motivations and the underlying factors for choosing immersion education, I will continue this chapter with a review of relevant literature that has aimed at exploring attitudes and beliefs of parents. I will highlight studies done in the education field in general as well as in different language learning contexts: (a) two-way immersion settings – as they have become the focus of much of the immersion research; (b) one-way immersion programs; and (c) elementary non- immersion language options called Foreign Language in the Elementary School programs. This literature is designed to provide a theoretical background to my study of parents’ motivation 4 to send their child to an immersion school. It is to make a case for the exploration of parental attitudes and beliefs in school choice and decision-making particularly in immersion education. The Importance of Parents in Education. It is well documented that parents play an important part not only in their child’s education but also as founders and continuous supporters of alternative education programs such as immersion or FLES . When reviewing the body of literature, it becomes evident that parents are crucial to their children’s education, and invested partners to schools and their staff. As such, parental support needs to be solicited and their motivations and decision-making processes understood to ensure the continuation of all forms of language programs. Even the very first immersion program in North America, the St. Lambert experiment in Canada, would not have been possible without the 4 Willengness of action especially in behaviour. 15

determination, enthusiasm, hard work, and dedication of a group of parents who wanted to improve their children’s education.Parental Involvement The amount of current research on parental involvement is extensive. This is most likely due to its empirically proven positive effects, which appeal to educators and the public alike, who in turn consider “parental involvement an important ingredient for the remedy for many problems in education” . However, parental involvement has also become a federal mandate within the No Child Left Behind Act. To be entitled to federal funding, schools have to make every effort and employ appropriate practices based on the most current research to involve parents in their children’s education .In reviewing the literature it becomes apparent that various definitions for the concept of parental involvement are applied in current research. Examples include parents’ educational aspirations for their child , parenting behaviors or engagement at home . It is therefore suggested to see parent involvement as multifaceted since it encompasses a range of parenting practices and patterns of behavior. Introduced in Ias the conceptual framework of this study, I primarily draw on Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler’s revised model of the parental involvement process . Hoover- Dempsey and Sandler have taken a strictly psychological perspective to explaining why parents become involved in their children’s education. Within their model of parental involvement, they suggest that parents’ basic involvement decisions are largely shaped by two belief systems: (a) their role construction and (b) their sense of efficacy define role construction as parents’ “beliefs aboutwhat they are supposed to do in relation to their children’s education and the patterns of parental behavior that follow those beliefs” . Parents are hereby influenced by their knowledge of and attitude toward child rearing and development, effective parenting as well as educational support at home. Parents develop these beliefs and understandings while being members and participants in groups relevant to the parent and child-rearing such as families, schools, churches, and the broader culture . In addition, parents’ role construction is shaped by their personal experiences with and affective responses to school. It is socially constructed and therefore subject to change . Studies have examined the influence 16

of parents’ social groups on parental involvement and decision-making. In a study on parents’ social networks and beliefs as predictors of parent involvement, Sheldon surveyed mothers of elementary students. He found that “over and above parents’ individual beliefs, parents’ social networks are significantly associated with levels of parent involvement” . Another study on parental motivation, attitudes, support, and commitment for a two-way immersion program by Giacchino-Baker and Piller confirmed that parents’ social networks impacted the schooling decisions parents made for their children. In this study, Spanish- speaking parents reported that mostly other parents influenced their decision- making whereas English-speaking parents were mostly influenced by teachers and/ or administrators. The child’s school as an important social group to parents was also identified by Anderson and Minke . In their study of elementary school parents, invitations for involvement specifically from teachers had a strong relationship with parental involvemen.t Identified as another construct affecting parents’ involvement decisions is their sense of efficacy defined as “the belief that personal actions will help their child learn” . Self-efficacy theory suggests that parents think about their involvement, their capabilities to help, as well as the results their involvement may have . Thus, parents with high self-efficacy “will tend to make positive decisions about active engagement in the child’s education … and are likely to persist in the face of challenges” . Parents with weak self-efficacy, on the other hand, expect little of their efforts to help their child succeed in school and have low persistence when faced with challenges. Parental efficacy is also socially constructed and based on personal experiences . In her study on parents’ aspirations for their children’s educational attainments,Wentzel surveyed parents of elementary school students and found that parental self-efficacy as well as other parent attributes such as parental beliefs or theories of intelligence about children “were positive predictors of parents’ aspirations for their children’s educational success” . This indicates that parental efficacy is connected to parents’ educational goal-setting and confidence in their child. Yamamoto, Holloway, and Suzuki examined both self-efficacy and role 17

construction in Japanese mothers of preschool children. They found that mothers reported more involvement in their preschooler’s education when they felt efficacious and perceived their role to be an active supporter of their child’s intellectual development.This sample of the literature underlines the influence of motivational beliefs in parents’ involvement decisions and behaviors. To illustrate the educational impact of parents, the next segment will highlight some of the research on parent involvement and the reported benefits of such engagement to children’s academic achievements as well as to schools and programs. Parental Involvement Benefits Students Parental involvement has been a topic of interest in educational research for many years. Even though its benefits to a child’s education have always been clearly assumed, current research has focused on providing scientific evidence to shed more light on the various dimensions of parent involvement and its specific attributes to areas of academic achievement, students’ motivation and well-being. Since the literature on parental involvement is extensive, this section will only review some of the more recent studies. Fan and Chen conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of twenty-five studies on parental involvement and students’ achievement since they found empirical studies to be rather scarce. Their overall findings “make a good case for the positive influence of parental involvement on students’ academic achievement” .Particularly the expectations and values parents have regarding education are strongly related to a child’s academic achievement. Parental involvement at home – such as monitoring time doing homework or time spent watching TV – were found to only have a weak relationship with their children’s performance at school. Hung and Marjoribanks found similar results in their study of Taiwanese sixth graders. The perception 5 these middle school students had of their parents’ educational aspirations for them had significant associations with their achievement. However, these results need to be seen in the Taiwanese context of this study, where 5 Conscious understanding of something. 18

family life and status play a different role than in many western countries. Another metaanalysis conducted by Jeynes focusing on particularly urban elementary students found a strong relationship between academic achievement and parents’ involvement and concluded that “any group can experience the advantages of parental involvement” Sénéchal and LeFevre investigated parental involvement in the area of children’s literacy development – probably the most influenced subject by parent involvement. Their five-year longitudinal study examined early home literacy activities of parents and their kindergarten and first grade children. Literacy experiences at home included activities such as reading a bedtime story or teaching reading and writing . Their findings suggested “clear links from home experiences, through early literacy skills, to fluent reading” .Parental involvement tends to decline as students get older . Mo and Singh therefore examined the ongoing involvement of parents and its effects on students’ school engagement and performance. Data from seventh and eighth grade students was employed to study their behavioral , emotional , and cognitive engagement . The study “confirmed the importance and significance of parents’ involvement in middle school students’ school engagement and performance”. Once again parental aspirations stood out as having a direct effect on students’ cognitive and emotional engagement. In a report on family involvement at the secondary level data from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988 was analyzed. The report found evidence that parental involvement still influenced students’ educational outcomes at the high school level, however to a lesser degree than in earlier grades. Parental expectations and encouragement were seen as the most important involvement practices .Particularly educational expectations of parents were shown to have long-term effects .As can be seen in this sample of the literature, parent involvement plays a vital role in many aspects and at all levels of a child’s education. The studies reviewed show that parental expectations and aspirations in 19

particular have an impact on students’ educational outcomes. Yet parental involvement also shapes students’ motivations and sense of efficacy. Gonzal found in their review of the literature on the relationship between parental influence and student motivation that positive relationships exist between the two constructs. They concluded, When parents show an interest in their child’s education by getting involved, students adopt a mastery goal orientation to learning where they are more likely to seek challenging tasks, persist through academic challenges, and experience satisfaction in their schoolwork . Second language learning is particularly influenced by attitudes and motivation. Donato studied a Japanese FLES program over the course of a number of years and observed a “strong, positive correlation between the children’s awareness of parental encouragement for language study and their attainment in Japanese” . In a study of American fourth to twelfth graders learning an Asian language , Sung and Padilla found that parent involvement was important for student motivation. Especially the participation of ethnic heritage parents had an influence on students’ language learning motivation. This review of current research highlights the influence parental involvement has on students’ educational outcomes. Parents also shape the motivations of their children through their own views and expectations. This underscores the need to learn more about what parents want for their children and the thought-processes behind their actions. With the next section, the focus will shift from the importance of parental involvement to students’ education to the significance of parents as supporters of and partners to schools. Parental Involvement Benefits Schools and Programs Parents’ attitudes and involvement not only influence their own children’s education but also the programs and schools in which these children are enrolled. As pointed to earlier, the St. Lambert experiment in Canada would not have taken shape and continued if it had not been for the efforts and perseverance of some involved parents 20

who wanted to improve their children’s education . A lack of parental support, on the other hand, can result in a program’s disappearance – as happened with a number of FLES programs during the 1970s . As Heining-Boynton and Haitema put it succinctly, “A positive attitude can translate into increased support for the program, whereas a negative attitude may often lead to the program’s termination” Alternative education programs such as immersion or FLES are particularly dependent on parents’ support and involvement to justify their worth and to continue serving their communities. Often founders and supporters of immersion programs are faced with resistance from school authorities on the grounds that resources need to be reallocated or that these programs tend to not serve all students . Parents are therefore asked to step to the fore and “contribute to the success of their schools in a variety of ways” . Parents serve as advertisers and communicators of a school’s success and the quality of education it provides; they are willing to provide funds when schools are financially stressed; and they promote their school within the community and among other parents . Also, the impact parental recommendations have on other parents cannot be underestimated . In a qualitative study on parents’ involvement and decision-making in immersion programs, 19% of survey respondents reported being influenced in their decision to enroll their child by personal experience or their social networks . In Maslowski’s case study of immersion teachers, participants observed parents “as huge supporters because of their exuberance displayed when talking with others about immersion. Many encouraged their friends to find out more about it” . Moreover, parental involvement not only impacts other parents but also administrators – as had also been seen in the St. Lambert experiment. In a study conducted by Baranick and Markham , elementary school principals in the state of Maryland were surveyed about their attitudes toward foreign language instruction. The study found that “where principals perceived parental interest as high, their attitudes were more positive” . Researchers and practitioners agree that parents’ support is essential for the success of foreign language education programs. No one has a greater interest in the quality of a child’s education than his/her parents. For that 21

reason, it behooves foreign language educators to not ignore parental opinions and motivations. Within this first part of the literature review, I highlighted some of the extensive research on parental involvement and gave evidence of the impact it has on students’ academic achievements and motivations. Additionally, I discussed how parents function as partners to schools and their staff, and thus shape educational policies and decisions. It is the parents who make early educational choices for their children. They can ignite an enthusiasm for life-long language learning, for example, by sending their child to an immersion program. Thus, it is not surprising that many of these alternative forms of education were started by groups of parents and heavily depend on them for continuation. Current educational research, therefore, must include the voice of parents, why they do what they do, and what they want for their children. In the next segment, I will review literature related to research on parental beliefs and attitudes, its educational impact and consequences. The Importance of Parental Attitudes and Beliefs in Education. As highlighted in the previous section, parents’ involvement greatly influences their children’s educational outcomes and they often function as invested partners to schools. Like all human beings, parents rely on their experiences, perceptions, values and emotions to understand situations and make decisions. Goodnow notes “to focus only on parents’ overt behaviors is to treat parents as unthinking creatures, ignoring the fact that they interpret events, with these interpretations probably influencing their actions and feelings.” It is therefore warranted to examine how and to what extent parental cognitions such as attitudes and beliefs influence parents’ educational actions and the choices they make. The conceptual framework of this study is particularly beneficial as it allows for a psychological exploration of parents involvement. As previously presented, the model suggests that parents are motivated by beliefs that they should be involved and that they have the skills and the knowledge to make a positive impact. In a study on predictors of parental involvement a diverse sample of mothers of urban elementary school students was interviewed. The study found that mothers 22

who believed they are efficacious and felt they can be a teacher to their child were more likely to be involved in exposing their children to intellectually stimulating activities. Sheldon also examined predictors of parental involvement focusing on parents’ social networks and beliefs. He could confirm positive links between parental beliefs and parent involvement. Sheldon found that “the more parents believe that all parents should be involved in their children’s education, the more likely they are to be involved themselves” . Since beliefs are seen as the driving force behind actual involvement practices,Drummond and Stipek examined low- income parents’ beliefs about their role in their children’s academic learning. They could find evidence that this particular parent group also believed it was their responsibility to be involved and strongly valued parental involvement in their children’s education. Interestingly, in open-ended interviews in his study, six of eleven parents admitted to not helping their child with math due to their own inadequate knowledge. This underscores the linkage between involvement and parents’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs of being able to help their child. Efficacy beliefs have also been explored in other contexts. In a study of Japanese mothers and determinants of parental involvement in early schooling, Holloway, Yamamoto, Suzuki, and Mindnich found that “the construct of parenting self-efficacy is as powerful a predictor of parental involvement in Japan as it is in Western countries” . Interestingly, some of these Japanese mothers who felt less efficacious to support their child’s education were more likely to choose extra lessons and activities. Thus, in this particular context where education is highly competitive a low sense of efficacy did not necessarily result in noninvolvement. Parental attitudes and beliefs do not only influence parents and the ways in which they act and make decisions. They also have an impact on children and their choices actions, and values. Research conducted by Jacobs and Bleeker studied the relationship between parents’ attitudes, activity involvement, purchases, and children’s later math and science interests and activities. The study found that parental attitudes were linked to children’s later achievement beliefs and behaviors 23

in math and science. Mothers in this study, for example, were reported to be more likely to buy math- and science-related toys for sons than for daughters regardless of the child’s school grade; thereby conveying the attitude that boys have a higher math and science aptitude. In a different study focused on attitudes towards science, Tenenbaum and Leaper examined parent-child conversations about science. The study provided evidence that associations could be drawn bet ween parents’ and children’s science-related attitudes. Parents were found to believe that their daughters were less interested in science than sons and that they would find science difficult. In addition, parental attitudes were reported to significantly predict children’s interest and self-efficacy in science. Parents are guided in their educational decisions and behaviors by attitudes and beliefs. They convey these consciously and subconsciously to their children, thereby influencing their values, choices, and actions. I now want to focus on research that has aimed at exploring particularly parental attitudes and beliefs in language learning contexts. Parental Attitudes and Beliefs in Language Learning .Similar to the exploration of parental attitudes and beliefs in math and sciences, for example, educational researchers have made attempts to examine these constructs in the learning of languages. In this section, I will review relevant literature that has reported on the influences of parents’ attitudes and beliefs in language learning contexts. While also discussing parental attitudes and beliefs in language learning in general, due to the nature of this study, I will mainly focus on three particular contexts: (a) two- way immersion settings; (b) one-way immersion programs; and (c) FLES programs. Bartram conducted a qualitative study of parental influences on attitudes 6 toward language learning. He surveyed 411 European high school students learning English, French, or German as a foreign language. His study found that positive language learning attitudes in parents were reflected in their children’s attitudes. Parents were seen as positive influences if they provided help and encouragement or served as language learner role models. The findings also suggested that parents help their children shape an understanding of the importance 6 The position of the body or way of carrying oneself posture/. 24

of language, its usefulness and status by successful communicating “educational regrets” or the “utilitarian value of language learning” Henkel studied Hungarian minority students in Ukraine and their motivations for studying Ukrainian. Participants were 211 students aged between sixteen and eighteen who had been studying Ukrainian from six to eleven years. The researcher hypothesized that parents played an influential role in their children’s motivation to master the second language. Using students’ questionnaire responses, the study could provide evidence that parents actively shaped and advanced these students’ language learning motivation through their encouragement of and attitude toward language learning. In an ethnographic inquiry on Chinese immigrant families in examined parental ideologies and family language policies. The researcher wanted to learn more about how parents perceived and valued multilingualism and studied ten families whose children learned Chinese, English, and French. The study found that participants had high educational expectations for their children and also positive beliefs regarding multilingualism. Curdt-Christiansen concluded that “these strong beliefs, attitudes, expectations and aspirations about the importance of multilingual education and high academic standards can be translated into active involvement and investment in the children’s school and educational lives” . These Chinese parents were guided by their strong beliefs in education and language learning; their values and beliefs influenced aspects such as their parenting goals or the educational support provided. Two-way immersion programs are also often referred to as dual- language or bilingual programs . In the United States, most two-way immersion programs use English and Spanish to teach their curriculum . . Two-way immersion programs follow four central goals for their students to achieve: (a) functional L1 proficiency and literacy; (b) functional L2 proficiency and literacy; (c) same high academic achievements as English-only students; and (d) positive cross-cultural attitudes and behaviors . Due to the demographic changes in this country, two-way immersion schools have seen a dramatic growth over the last 15 years, which has promoted an 25

increased interest in these programs and their educational outcomes . Since “bilingual education is not, and never has been, a neutral process” much attention has been given to this educational approach, not only by researchers and practitioners but also by politicians and the general public alike. Because bilingual education is embedded in the divisive and contested issue of immigration, various states in recent years have seen antibilingual initiatives come to pass. As a result, many promoters and researchers in the field of bilingual education have turned to parents and their attitudes and perspectives to attest to the benefits of two-way immersion schooling. Parents’ involvement is vital not only to students’ academic achievement but also for maintaining schools and programs – especially those offering an alternative form of education like immersion. Parents are important constituents in education, “ choice and voice … are fundamental to the implementation of quality educational programs”. In order for language teachers and administrators to gain the support of parents and assist them in making informed educational decisions, they need to be regarded as allies. Administrators and teachers but also policy makers must continue to consider parents’ viewpoints, their motivations, and the factors that drive their decision-making. So as to learn more about parents’ perspectives as well as to restrain anti bilingual initiatives and sentiments in the public, researchers in the field of bilingualism have carried out survey studies with parents whose children attended two-way immersion programs. Shannon and Milian , for example, conducted a study in Colorado and found strong evidence that parents were enthusiastic about and committed to the two-way immersion programs their children attended. In regards to parents’ attitudes about such programs, they determined that Parents view these programs to be academically sound, an innovative vehicle for promoting communication and respect among children from different cultures, and effective in teaching a second 26

language. Indeed, parents view these programs as an excellent educational opportunity for their children and expressed their desire for these programs to expand in Colorado. In a different study, Stritikus and Garcia employed data from a statewide survey of randomly sampled parents in Arizona to delve deeper into parents’ perspectives on matters of bilingualism in schools. They found most parents to favor English and Spanish as the languages of instruction for English- language learners, which suggested that, “educational policies, at least in this state, may be seriously out of sync with majority perspectives of parents” . Two-way immersion programs lend themselves especially well to research on differences in motivations between the diverse groups of parents represented at many of these schools. Cava , for example, studied the attitudes, involvement, and satisfaction of parents at three different two-way immersion elementary schools. He compared parents of Hispanic heritage to parents of Euro-American heritage. When asked about their primary enrollment reason, Euro-American parents stressed the educational or career advantage a two-way immersion program could provide their children. Hispanic parents on the other hand pointed to integrative motivations for enrolling their children such as keeping a bicultural identity or being able to integrate with other Spanish speakers. These results are not surprising, keeping in mind the background of these two parent groups. Giacchino-Baker and Piller reported on English-first and Spanish-first speaking parents in their survey study of a two-way immersion elementary school in southern California. English-first parents’ motivations for enrolling their children were instrumental in nature, similar to the reasons of parents with Euro-American heritage in Cava’s study. English-first parents argued that the two-way immersion program“would allow their children to function in a bilingual society and multilingual world”. Their Spanish-speaking counterparts stressed “economic, academic, and linguistic integration, AND preservation of home language” . According to Giacchino-Baker and Piller’s survey, aside from expected 27

integrative motivations, today’s Spanish-speaking parents see the need for their children to be “completely bilingual with excellent literacy skills in both languages” . Other recent studies have focused solely on minorities in two-way immersion programs. Flynn surveyed Hispanic and African-American parents in a two-way immersion program in the Los Angeles area. These predominantly low-income and working class families gave the following top three reasons for enrolling their children at a two-way immersion school: (a) Academic advantage (b) Stronger identity as bilingual-bicultural/multicultural individual (c) Ability to communicate with family, friends or other Spanish-speaking people Boone found similar instrumental and integrative motivations in her research study on successful African American students in a two-way immersion program in Texas. Parents of these students provided a range of motives for enrolling their child in a two-way immersion school, “from the desire to be bilingual to economic reasons to educational to living alongside other ethnicities” . In a study of 724 families whose children attended Spanish two-way or one-way immersion programs in the Southwest, Parkes examined why parents chose these programs for their children. He found that 93.6% of all survey respondents desired true bilingualism for their children, i.e. being able to read, write, and speak in English and Spanish. The second most frequently selected response by participants was for their child to be successful in a global society. Even though Parkes found that enrollment motivations varied among parents, he could establish that their primary goals were the eventual benefits of bilingualism and greater cultural awareness. The research studies reviewed in this section provide an insight into the beliefs of diverse parent groups and their motivations for choosing to send their children to twoway immersion programs. These studies cover a period of close to ten years of educational research in bilingualism and parental attitudes and perspectives, yet results have only slightly changed. Parents strongly support well-implemented bilingual education programs. They see these programs as academically sound, as 28

effective in maintaining the L1, teaching the L2 and cultural sensitivity, and as valuable and advantageous in today’s society. Some of these parental motivations likely also apply to one-way immersion and FLES programs, which the next section will explore. One-Way Immersion/FLES Programs One-way immersion and FLES programs are two types of early language program models. They are not the same as they have different goals and expected student outcomes. However, since research on parents and one-way immersion programs is rather limited, I drew on both program models for this literature review. FLES programs are non- immersion language programs at the elementary school level that have less contact hours with the target language and serve as language enrichment opportunities for predominantly language majority English speakers. The goal of FLES programs is “for students to acquire listening and speaking skills, gain an understanding of and appreciation for other cultures, and acquire limited amounts of reading and writing skills” One-way foreign language immersion programs in the United States are typically modeled after Canadian French immersion schools . In the U.S. context, the student population in these programs is usually composed of English native speakers who are “in the process of acquiring the same second language” . The goals of one-way immersion programs are similar to those of two-way immersion programs. In addition to aiming for academic achievement and literacy in at least two languages, these programs want to produce bi- or multilingual speakers who have a great awareness and appreciation of cultural diversity .Research involving one-way immersion or FLES programs has explored aspects such as student language learning attitudes and motivation student achievements or the language practitioner’s view . Parental attitudes and perspectives have mainly been investigated in two-way immersion settings. However, a number of researchers in the field have undertaken the task of investigating why language majority parents choose to have their child learn a second language in either a FLES or one-way immersion setting .Research studies have found that parents support language learning opportunities, such as one-way immersion and FLES, for their children and that they do not consider thestudy of a 29

foreign language to interfere with other subjects . In addition, parents often choose to send their child to a language program based on the excellent reputation of such schools and their teaching staff . Choy’s participatory research study had six parents critically reflect on a Japanese language program their children attended in California . For this group of parents, The collective impression was that learning another language is an effective way to begin learning about that culture. Parents felt that skills acquired while learning about a specific language and culture could be applied to other situations and that children who possessed these skills would be better able to live successfully in a diverse societty. These six parents had mainly integrative motivations for enrolling their children in this particular language program. Language learning to them was clearly more an enrichment experience for their children. This was also supported by “the repeated number of times ‘fun’ and ‘enjoyment’ surfaced in the dialogues” . Parents sent their children to this program in hopes that they would have a fun, motivating, and enriching experience. Another interesting finding was the concern that parents expressed about the lack of continuity for their children’s language learning in their specific district and throughout the United States. Language learning continuity and choice has been a reported worry of many parents regardless of the language program they choose . An additional noteworthy result of research was that five of the six parents interviewed in this study did not expect their children to become fluent inJapanese as a result of attending the program. In a report on the third year of this program, not a single parent “reported that they hoped their children became fluent in Japanese, nor did they rank fluency as a program priority” . These parents desired an enjoyable language learning experience for their children, facilitated by a talented and enthusiastic teacher, as well as for the students to gain cultural knowledge. The same results were again reported in the sixth year of this Japanese FLES program . These findings stand in contrast to the motivations of many one-way and two-way immersion parents who voiced their desire or the need for their child to attain fluency in both languages . In Wesely and Baig’s qualitative study, parents’ reasons for enrolling their 30

children in French or Spanish one-way immersion programs were explored. The research team found that the majority of parents chose an immersion program because they wanted their child to learn a second language and become bilingual. Finally, parents in several studies voiced another interesting finding: parents who send their child to a one-way immersion or FLES program have acknowledged a certain level of anxiety about their decision. Because these programs are rather unique and provide an alternative form of education, many parents have “a heightened desire for information about curricular content, student progress and, above all, a need for reassurance about achievement” also found this to be true about parents they surveyed in a Japanese FLES program. In addition, some immersion teachers have shared their perceptions of parents’ anxiety about their child’s immersion experience. Mandy Fleming a former immersion teacher, said: I wish I had known that parents would be excited and nervous about educating their children through a language they may or may not know. They do not necessarily know what to expect, what is normal and what is not; communication with them about what immersion is, what learning through a second language looks like, and about individual student progress is essential. It can make both the student’s education and your life easier! Maslowski observed in his case study of immersion teachers that parental anxiety can be a cause of additional stress for teachers, something regular school teachers do no thave to deal with. It reiterates immersion parents’ need for increased and continuous information in order to have a successful home-school relationship. Even one of the parents of the St. Lambert experiment, the first immersion program in North America, admitted “it took a certain amount ofcourage for parents to put their children in the program” . This anxiety appears to persist today. Since parents in these programs are predominantly native English speakers, they are at times unable to help their children with schoolwork. This worries many parents as their children are most often in elementary school where parents’ help is still needed and expected. Yet, this is not 31

a challenge of one-way immersion or FLES programs alone; English-first parents in two-way immersion programs face similar dilemmas . Motivations and anxieties have a marked influence on parents’ decision to send their children to an immersion school underscoring the complex relationship that takes place between parents and these schools in particular. In order to have an effective partnership between schools and parents, it is worth exploring what parents think in regards to these programs, what factors influence their decisions to send their child to a language program, and what factors encourage and discourage them from continuing with programs. In this last segment of the literature review, I highlighted current research on parents’ motivations for enrolling their child in two-way immersion, one-way immersion, or FLES programs. I have found that the majority of recent studies has centered on twoway immersion programs, due to their large numbers and heightened public attention. The studies I have reviewed show that there is some degree of overlap in the motivations immersion parents have for their decision-making such as a desire for their children to gain functional proficiency in two languages and an increased cultural sensitivity. Nonetheless, there are also program-specific motivations. Parents who choose two-way immersion programs are often influenced by their family language backgrounds since these programs usually serve English speaking as well as Spanish speaking students. There are, however, also two-way immersion programs which do not target the traditional English/Spanish speaking population usually associated with these programs. In this study, I hope to shed some light on particularly those families. The immersion concept of teaching a language is not a new phenomenon in North America as many might assume . Today immersion schools in various languages continue to open across the U.S. For all schools but especially programs like these, parents are vital as advertisers, helpers, and sometimes even financiers. Parents also impact their children’s academic performances 32

by being involved and they influence their children with their educational decisions. As some of the studies in the first part of this chapter illustrated, students are motivated to learn a language and about other cultures especially if their parents show interest and thereby foster the children’s enthusiasm. Parents’ motivations for sending their child to an immersion program naturally vary from family to family. However, as the second part of this literature review indicated, parents want their children to maintain their home language and culture as is the case for especially bilingual families, become fluent in two languages for better educational and job prospects, or have an enriching learning experience that regular schools do not provide. Much of the current research on parental perspectives and attitudes focuses on families in two-way immersion programs that use English and Spanish as the immersion languages. Most studies have used survey data to investigate why parents today choose a type of immersion program for their child; few open-ended and qualitative inquiries have been undertaken – particularly in a seemingly less-popular immersion language such as German. With this study, I intend to let a group of parents speak for themselves and provide insights into their decision-making processes about their school choice, the factors that influence them, and the expectations they have of the immersion experience. It is the parents who make these early educational decisions for their children and therefore it is the parents who can supply the profession with crucial information on how we can improve language learning and teaching and continue to see programs grow. A review of the literature reveals that parents have a tremendous impact on a child’s education and that their decision-making is often influenced by attitudes and beliefs. Parents who enroll their children in immersion programs have various reasons for doing so. Families who choose bilingual schools most often desire for their children to maintain their home language and culture or to have better educational and job prospects by being fluent in two languages . Even though not many studies have examined the motivations parents have for choosing one-way immersion programs, the few studies that have delved into this topic found reasons such as acquiring a second language, increased cultural awareness 33

and educational enrichment as well as future benefits . The present study was designed to explore in more detail why parents selected a newly established German immersion program as the school of their choice for their child. By learning more about the motivations and thought-processes behind such decision- making and understanding the factors that influence these decisions, I will add to the knowledge base of particularly parents and immersion schooling which in turn can assist the profession in program development and improved language learning and teaching. In this chapter, I describe the research design used in this study. I will provide a detailed description of the context, the participating schools and parents, and I will offer a rationale for my data collection and analysis procedures. This study was designed to explore the motivations of sixteen parents who chose to send their children to newly established German immersion schools focu 34

These schools cannot survive without parental involvement, their support and patronage, and the enthusiasm they bring. Parents want these kinds of educational experiences for their children and are needed to guarantee immersion programs flourish and grow. As this study has attempted to highlight, parents can truly make or break a program. 36

BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Adams K. S., & Christenson, S. L. (2000). Trust and the family–school relationship Examination of parent–teacher differences in elementary and secondary grades. Journal of School Psychology, 38 (5), 477-497. 2. Amaral, O. M. (2001). Parents’ decisions about bilingual program models. Bilingual Research Journal, 25 (1&2), 1-23.Anderson, K. J., & Minke, K. M. (2007). Parent involvement in education: Toward anunderstanding of parents’ decision making. The Journal of Educational Research,100 (5), 311-323. 3. Baranick, W. A., & Markham, P. L. (1986). Attitudes of elementary school principles toward foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 19 (6), 481-489.Bartram, B. (2006). An examination of perceptions of parental influence on attitudes to language learning. Educational Research, 48 (2), 211-221. bilingual education. (2009). In Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary . Retrieved August 20, 2009, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bilingual education 4. Boone, S. K. (2007). Successful African American students in two-way immersion programs: Parent and student perceptions. Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station. 5. Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice . London: Continuum. 6. Catsambis, S. (1998). Expanding knowledge of parental involvement in secondary education – Effects on high school academic success (CRESPAR Report 27). 7. Baltimore, MD. Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved February, 26, 2011, from http://www.csos.jhu.edu/crespar/techReports/Report27.pdf Cava, G. F. (1998). Parent attitudes, involvement, and satisfaction with two-wayimmersion programs. Master’s thesis, San José Sate University, San José. 8. Cech, S. J. (2007). With world growing smaller, IB gets big. Education Week, 27 (10), 22- 24 Center for Applied Linguistics. (2006). Directory of foreign language immersion programs in U.S. schools. Retrieved May 14, 2009, from http://www.cal.org/ resources/immersion/ Center for Applied Linguistics. (2009). Directory of two-way bilingual immersion programs in the U.S. Retrieved May 14, 2009, from http://www.cal.org/ twi/directory 37

9. Choy, V. K. S. (1993). Parents’ critical reflections on an elementary Japanese bilingual bicultural public school program: A participatory research study. Doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco, San Francisco. 134 10. Cloud, N., Genesee, F., & Hamayan, E. (2000). Dual language instruction: A handbook for enriched education . Boston: Heinle & Heinle. Cunningham, A.F., Erisman, W., & Looney, S.M. (2007). From aspirations to action: The role of middle school parents in making the dream of college a reality . Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy. 11. Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (2009). Invisible and visible language planning: Ideological factors in the family language policy of Chinese immigrant families in Quebec. Language Policy, 8 (4), 351-375. 12. Curtain, H., & Dahlberg, C. A. (2004). Languages and children: Making the match . Third Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 13. Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19 (2), 294-304. 14. Draper, J. B., & Hicks, J. H. (2002). Foreign language enrollments in public secondary schools, Fall 2000 Summary Report. ACTFL. Retrieved August 20, 2009, from http://www.actfl.org/files/public/Enroll2000.pdf 15. Drummond, K. V., & Stipek, D. (2004). Low-income parents’ beliefs about their role in children’s academic learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104 (3), 197- 213. 16. Dubow, E. F., Boxer, P., & Huesmann, L. R. (2009). Long-term effects of parents’ education on children’s educational and occupational success: Mediation by family interactions, child aggression, and teenage aspirations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55 (3), 224-249. 38

O'xshashlar

Teaching English to children at a primary school applying new methods

Designing vocabulary tasks for beginners of English as a second language

Language activities for teenagers

Civic education topics at the English lessons

Creating English Environment in teaching ESP learners