Инглиз ва Ўзбек тилларида инфинитив конструкцияларининг ишлатилиши - Ingliz tili - Diplom ishlar

Инглиз ва Ўзбек тилларида инфинитив конструкцияларининг ишлатилиши

Yuklangan vaqt:

26.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

72.369140625 KB

Ko'chirib olish

ЎЗБЕКИСТОН РЕСПУБЛИКАСИ ОЛИЙ ВА ЎРТА МАХСУС ТАЪЛИМ ВАЗИРЛИГИ МИРЗО УЛУҒБЕК НОМИДАГИ ЎЗБЕКИСТОН МИЛЛИЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТИ ХОРИЖИЙ ФИЛОЛОГИЯ ФАКУЛТЕТИ Инглиз филологияси кафедраси Мавзу: Инглиз ва Ў збек тилларида инфинитив конструкцияларининг ишлатилиши БИТИРУВ МАЛАКАВИЙ ИШИ

Department of English philology Theme: THE USAGE OF INFINITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGE GRADUATION PAPER Тема: Употребление инфинитивных конструкций в английском и узбекском языках КЛАССИФИКАЦИОННАЯ РАБОТА

MUNDARIJA KIRISH …………………………………………………………………………3 BOB I. INGLIZ TILIDA INFINITIV KONSTRUKSIYASINING FE’L SHAXSSIZ SHAKLLARI SIFATIDA QO’LLANISHI 1.1. Infinitiv va gerundiyning matnlarda qo’llanishi bo’yicha o’xshash va farqli xususiyatlari…………………………………………………….6 1.2. Harakat nomi fe’li konstruksiyalarining o’zbek va ingliz tillarida qiyosiy tahlili………………………………………………………………..…17 BOB II. INGLIZ VA O’ZBEK TILLARIDA INFINITIV KONSTRUKSIYALARINING ISHLATILISHI 2.1. Infinitiv munosabatlarining sintaktik maydoni ……………………...21 2.2. Infinitiv konstruksiyalarning ingliz va o’zbek badiiy matnlarida qo’llanilishi va ularning kontekstual mazmunlari …………………..40 XULOSA…………………………………………………………………………43 SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………….46 FOYDALANILGAN ADABIYOTLAR RO’YXATI………………………..48

KIRISH Ma'lumki, O'zbekistonimizning mustaqil davlatga aylanishi natijasida vatanimiz dunyoga yuz tutdi. Xorijiy mamlakatlar bilan savdo, iqtisodiy, siyosiy va madaniy aloqalar yo'lga qo'yildi. Diplomatik aloqalar ham o'rnatildi, BMT a'zosi bo'ldik, qadriyatlarimiz tiklandi va tiklanmoqda, jahon integratsiyasi jarayonlarida faol qatnashayapmiz. Buning natijasida yurtimizda xorijiy tillarga bo'lgan qiziqish mislsiz oshdi. Shu munosabat bilan prezidentimiz I. A. Karimov bunday deydi: “Tabiiy savol tug’iladi: bunday mafkuraviy ta’sirlar salbiy oqibatlarga olib kelmasligi uchun nima qiish kerak? Buning yo’li- odamlarimiz, avvalambor, yoshlarimizning iymon-e’tiqodini musathkamlash , irodasini baquvvatlash, ularni o’z mustaqil fikriga ega bo’lgan barkamol insonlar qilib tarbiyalash . Ularning tafakkurida o’zligini unutmaslik, ota-bobolarmizning muqaddas qadriyatlarini asrab avaylash va hurmat qilish fazilatlarini qaror toptirish. Ularning, men o’zbek farzandiman, deya g’urur bilan yashashga erishshdir’’ 1 . Shu sababdan bugungi kunda mamlakatimiz uchun malakali kadrlar, shu jumladan malakali tarjimonlar, malakali chet tili o'qituvchilari havodek zarur bo'lib qoldi. Shuning uchun maktab, litsey, kolledj va oliy o'quv yurtlari uchun yangi dasturlar, darsliklar, uslubiy qo'llanmalar yaratildi va yaratilmoqda. Ayrim oliy o'quv yurtlarida tarjimonlik fakultetlari ochildi, til o'rganish markazlari barpo etildi. Bularning hammasi qabul qilingan "Kadrlar tayyorlash milliy dasturi" asosida olib borilmoqda. Dunyodagi voqealar, narsalar o'rtasidagi ifinitivlik munosabatlarini bilish, fikrlarni asoslash insonning kundalik hayotida va ilmiy izlanishida uchraydigan eng muhim jarayonlardan biridir. Shu jihatdan qaraganda, tildagi infinitivlik munosabatlarini ifodalash vositalarini aniqlash va ularni tahlil kilish tilshunoslik uchun juda ahamiyatlidir. Mavzuning dolzarbligi bir tomondan xorijiy tillarga qiziqishning o'sishi bo'lsa, ikkinchi tomondan ingliz tilidagi infinitivlik munosabatini ifodalovchi 1 Karimov I.A. Yuksak ma’naviyat – yengilmas kuch. - T.: Ma’naviyat, 2008. 24 b .

barcha vositalarni aniqlashga va ularni o'rganishga, umumlashtirishga bag'ishlangan alohida ilmiy ishning yo'qligidadir. Tadqiqot obyekti: Ingliz va o’zbek tillaridagi yoki ingliz tilidan o’zbek tiliga tarjima qilingan yoki aksincha badiiy asarlardagi mikromatnlar; Tadqiqot predmeti: Infinitiv konstruksiyalarining leksik va Grammatik xususiyatlari hamda Ingliz va o’zbek tillaridagi yoki ingliz tilidan o’zbek tiliga tarjima qilingan yoki aksincha badiiy asarlardagi mikromatnlarda qo’llanilgan infinitiv konstruksiyalari; Tadqiqotning maqsadi va vazifalari: 1. Infinitiv konstruksiyasining ingliz tilidagi leksik va grammatik xususiyatlari va funksiyalarining aniqlanishi; 2. O’zbek va ingliz tilida infinitiv konstuksiyalarining qo’llanilishini qiyoslab tahlil qilish; 3. Ingliz va o’zbek tillaridagi yoki ingliz tilidan o’zbek tiliga tarjima qilingan yoki aksincha badiiy asarlardagi mikromatnlarda qo’llanilgan infinitiv konstruksiyalarini tahlil qilish natijasida aniq tasniflarni ishlab chiqish; 4. O’zbek va ingliz tilidagi infinitive konstruksiyalarining o’xshash va farqli jihatlarini aniqlash; Ilmiy ishda qo’llanilgan metodlar. Ushbu bitiruv malakaviy ishida infinitiv konstruksiyalari, ularning gerundiyga o’xshash va farq qiluvchi tomonlarini yoritib berishda qiyosiy-tahlil, analiz va sintez, distributiv va komponent tahlil metodlaridan foydalanildi. Ilmiy ishning nazariy va amaliy ahamiyati shundaki, ushbu ishning materiali infinitiv va infinitiv konstrukturalarining qo’llanishi va xususiyatlarini o’rganish jarayonlarida qo’llanilishi mumkin. Shuningdek, fe’lning shaxssiz formalarini o’rganishga bag’ishlangan turli tadqiqot ishlari uchun umumiy o’quv qo’llanma sifatida ham samarali natija beradi.

Ilmiy ishning tuzilishi. Ushbu bitiruv malakaviy ishi kirish, ikki bob (I bob. Ingliz tilida infinitiv konstruksiyasining fe’l shaxssiz shakllari sifatida qo’llanishi , II bob. Ingliz va o’zbek tillarida infinitiv konstruksiyalarining ishlatilishi), xulosa, summary va foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro’yxatidan tashkil topgan. Kirish qismida mavzuning dolzarbligi yangiligi, obyekti va predmeti, maqsad va vazifalari o’rin egallagan. Birinchi bobda fe’lning shaxssiz formalari hisoblangan infinitiv va gerundiy ya’ni harakat nomining turli xususiyatlari, o’xshashlik va farqli tomonlari ifodalangan. Ikkinchi bobda esa, infinitivning sintaktik maydoni, infinitiv konstruksiyalari va uning matnlarda qo’llanishi amaliy jihatdan tadqiq etilgan.

BOB I. INGLIZ TILIDA INFINITIV KONSTRUKSIYASINING FE’L SHAXSSIZ SHAKLLARI SIFATIDA QO’LLANISHI 1.1 Infinitiv va gerundiyning matnlarda qo’llanishi bo’yicha o’xshash va farqli xususiyatlari Infinitiv va gerundiyning matnlarda qo’llanishi bo’yicha o’xshash va farqli xususiyatlari. H ar bir tildagi so’zlar nutq bo’laklari deb atalgan sinflarga ajratiladi. Har bir nutq bo’lagi o’z xususiyatlariga ega hisoblanadi. Nutq bo’laklari bir- biridan anglatadigan ma’nosiga, yasalish shakliga va bajaradigan vazifasiga ko’ra farq qiladi. Nutq bo’laklaridan biri fe’ldir. Mazmuniga ko’ra fe’l ish-harakatni ifodalovchi so’z sifatida tasvirlanishi mumkin. “Ish-harakat” so’zi bu yerda faoliyatni (yurmoq, gapirmoq, o’ynamoq, o’qimoq), jarayonni (uxlamoq, kutmoq, yashamoq), holatni (bo’lmoq, yoqtirmoq, bilmoq), aloqa-munosabatni (tashkil topmoq, o’xshamoq, yetishmaslik) va shu kabilarni o’z ichiga qamrab oladi. Shakliga ko’ra u boshqa nutq bo’laklarida yo’q bo’lgan ma’lum bir gramatik xususiyatlarga ya’ni zamon, aspect va nisbat kategoriyalariga ega bo’lgan so’z sifatida tushuniladi. Bajaradigan vazifasiga ko’ra esa, fe’l gapning kesimini yasovchi so’z sifatida tushuniladi. Ingliz tilidagi fe’llar gapda bajaradigan vazifasiga ko’ra ikki asosiy guruhga, fe’lning aniq shakllari (aniq fe’llar) va fe’lning noaniq shakllari (fe’lning shaxssiz shakllari)ga bo’linadi. Fe’lning shaxsi noma’lum shakllari 1. Fe’lning shaxsi noma’lum shakllari shaxsni, sonni va maylni ifodalamaydi, shuning uchun ham ular gapda kesim bo’lib kela olmaydi. 2. Fe’lning shaxsi noma’lum shakllarining ikkita xususiyati bor; otlik va fe’llik. Sifatdoshda fe’llik va sifatlik xususiyatlari mavjud. Gerundiy va infinitivda fe’llik va otlik xususiyatlari mavjud. Fe’lning aniq shakllari gapda kesim vazifasida keladi va kesim shakllari yoki formalari deb ham atalishi mumkin.

Fe’lning noaniq shakllari esa boshqa turli xil vazifalarga ega. Bu fe’llar shuningdek yuqorida aytib o’tilganidek fe’lning shaxssiz shakllari deb ham ataladi. Fe’lning noaniq yoki shaxssiz shakllari fe’lning aniq shakllaridan farq qilib shaxsni, sonni yoki maylni ifodalamaydi. Shuning uchun ham ular gapda kesim bo’lib kela olmaydi. Ular fe’lning aniq shakllari singari zamon va nisbat tafovutlariga ega, ammo ularning zamon tafovutlari fe’lning aniq shakllaridagi zamon tafovutlaridan farq qiladi. Ingliz tilida fe’lning uchta shaxssiz shakllari bor. Ular: sifatdosh, gerundiy(harakat nomi) va infinitivdir. Rus tilida ham fe’lning uch noaniq shakli mavjud, ammo ular ingliz tilidagi fe’lning noaniq shakllariga to’liq o’xshamaydi. Ingliz tilidagi fe’lning shaxssiz shakllari quyidagi xususiyatlarga ega: 1. Ular ikki xil xususiyatga, otlik va fe’llik xususiyatlariga ega. Sifatdosh fe’lning xususiyatlarini sifat xususiyatlari orqali ifodalaydi; gerundiy hamda infinitiv esa fe’lning xususiyatlarini otnig xususiyatlari yordamida ifodalaydi. 2. Fe’lning shaxssiz shakllaridagi zamon tafovuti fe’lning aniq shakllarinikiga o’xshab aniq emas, balki nisbiydir. Fe’lning noaniq shakli ish-harakatning hozirgi, o’tgan yoki kelasi zamonga tegishliligini ko’rsatmaydi. U faqatgina fe’lning noaniq shakli ifodalagan ish-harakat aniq fe’l tomonidan ifolangan ish- harakat bilan bir xil vaqtda yoki oldin sodir bo’lganini ko’rsatadi xolos. Infinitiv fe’lning shaxsi noma’lum shakli bo’lib, harakatning nomini bildiradi; shaxsini ham, sonini ham ko’rsatmaydi. Infinitivning ko’rsatkichi tarjima qilinmaydigan va urg’u olmaydigan to yuklamasidir. Infinitiv otning ko’pgina xususiyatlarini saqlab qolgan va otga o’xshab gapda ega, to’ldiruvchi, aniqlovchi, hol bo’lib keladi va shuningdek, ot-kesim tarkibida yoki fe’l kesim tarkibida kelishi mumkin. Gerund bilan bir qatorda ega vazifasida in ﬁ nitiv ham kelishi mumkin: a) Skating is pleasant. = To skate is pleasant.

b) It’s no use talking about it. = It is no use to talk about it. c) It isn’t worth while going there. = It isn’t worth while to go there. Gerund ot-kesim tarkibida keladi: Her greatest pleasure was travelling. Uning eng yoqtirgan narsasi sayohat qilish edi. Ot-kesim tarkibida gerund bilan bir qatorda in ﬁ nitiv ham ishlatilishi mumkin: Her greatest pleasure was to travel. Quyidagi fe’llardan keyin gerund ham, inﬁnitiv ham ishlatilishi mumkin: to begin, to start - boshlamoq to prefer - afzal bilmoq to continue - davom ettirmoq to hate - yoqtirmaslik to like - yoqtirmoq to intend - qasd qilmoq to dislike - yoqtirmaslik I can (can’t) afford - qila olmayman I like bathing (= to bathe) in a river better than in the sea . Men dengizda cho‘milishdan ko‘ra daryoda cho‘milishni yaxshi ko‘raman. We began talking (=to talk ) about the position of the rubber market. Biz rezina bozoridagi ahvol haqida suhbatlasha boshladik.

It continued raining (=to rain) . Yomg‘ir yog‘ishni davom ettirdi. We do not intend placing (=to place ) orders for such machines. Biz bunday mashinalarga buyurtma bermoqchi emasmiz Inﬁnitive otning ko‘pgina xususiyatlarini saqlab qolgan va otga o‘xshab gapda quyidagi vazifalarda keladi: 1. Ega bo‘lib keladi: To skate is pleasant. 2. Ot-kesim tarkibida keladi: Your duty was to inform me about it immediately. 3. Fe’l kesim tarkibida keladi: She began to translate the article . 4. To‘ldiruvchi bo‘lib keladi: I asked him to help me . 5. Aniqlovchi bo‘lib keladi: He expressed a desire to help me. Infinitivning otlik xususiyatlari u bajargan sintaktik funksiyalarda ifodalanadi: 2 a) Infinitiv gapda ot kabi ega vazifasida kelishi mumkin: To go on like this was dangerous (Galsworthy). To change intention changes fortune (V. Malamud). b) Infinitiv predikativ ya’ni tarkibli qismning ot qismi bo’lib kela oladi: 2 Ж.Бўронов, Ў.Ҳошимов, Ҳ.Исматуллаев. Инглиз тили грамматикаси Т.: Фан, 1993.в-127.

His ambition was some day to build a house on them (Th. Drei ser). It was rediculous at his age to put on student's uniform (I. Turgenev). His first impulse was to write but four words in reply «Go to the devil!» (Th. Dreiser). Her plan was now to drive to Bath during the night (Hardy). v) Infinitiv to’ldiruvchi vazifasini bajarib kela oladi: I have never learnt to read or write (Collins). I hate to be late (V. Malamud) And you should have seen, how the two gentlemen leaned forward and looked at each other, and forgot to smoke in their surprise and interest (L. S. Stevenson). He had asked to be buried beside Anna Pavlovna and «Malaska» (Nest). Infinitivning fe'llik xususiyati quyidagilar: 1) O’timli fe'llarning infinitiv formasi vositasiz to’ldi ruvchi olishi mumkin 3 : He had faith fully promised to marry her , and this was the way he fulfilled his promise (Th. Dreiser). All the young girls will be here to night to examine you (P. Abrahams). «My mother will be glad to see you» Liza said (Turgenev). He … began to feel some curiosity … (Eliot) 2) Infinitiv ravish tomonidan izohlanib kelinishi mumkin: Pray and Hunter were the first to come forward. (R. L. Ste venson). Carrie began to move quickly to the door (Th. Dreiser). Quyida biz shuningdek, aynan o’zbek va ingliz adabiyoti namunalarida qo’llanilgan infinitive va gerund ga misollar keltirdik: A.Qodiriyning “O’tkan kunlar” romanida foydalanilgan fe’lning shaxssiz shakllariga oid misollar 4 - 1. Hasanali palovga urnash uchun tashqariga chiqdi. 3 Haspelmath M. Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold, 2002.p-65 . 4 Abdulla Qodiriy. O’tgan kunlar.Toshkent.2008. 5-150 bet.

2. Bu ta'qib Otabekdagi haligi o'zgarishni payqabmi yoki tasodifiymi edi, bu to'g’rida bir mulohaza aytish , albatta mumkin emas. 3. Otam sizlardek yaqin do'stlariga salom aytishni menga omonat topshirgan edilar. 4. Homidning zaruratsiz ayb tekshirishi majliska yotroq tuyilgan bo'lsa kerak bir- birlariga qarashib oldilar. 5. Bu o'rinsiz tekshirish majlisni bir oz sukutga yubordi-da, so'ngra Akram xoji savolida davom etti. 6. Ehtimolki, uning topgan davlati o'g’rilik orqasidadir, kishining davlatiga qarab hukm yurutish qiyin. 7. Hatni o'qub sizning dahshatlanishingiz emas, quvonishingiz , dushmaningizni yuz tuban qilgani uchun haq taologa shukur aytishingiz kerakdir! 8. Kumushning bu daqiqadag’i holini qalam bilan chizib ko'rsatish albatta mumkin emas edi. 9. Uchchavi ham yurakni to'htatib olish uchun anchagacha jim qoldilar. 10. … mehmonhonaning yuqori darichasi ostiga Oftob oyim bilan Kumush hat keltirguchining so'zini eshitish uchun kelib to'htag’an edilar. 11. …hatto hotinini qoziga chaqirish to'g’risida fikri bo'lsa ham, siz bilan uchrashishdan qochib bu fikridan ham qaytgan, ya'ni sizning qizingiz bo'lg’ani uchun suygan hotinidan ham kechmakka qaror bergan. 12. - Uning hamma harakati dushmanidan o'chini olish uchun ekan. 13. Chunki siz manim shar'iy rafiqamsiz— yahshiliq bilan-da va yomonliq bilan- da men buni isbot qilishg'a hozirman! 14. Men o'shal kuni kechasi dushmanlardan birini o'ldirdim-da, so'ng darajada zaiflandim, ikkinchi dushmandan yengilishni va ko'yingizda jon berishni aniq bilib rohatlanib ketdim.. 15. Shuning uchun yaqinrog'ingizda o'lmak uchun, o'lar ekanman, so'ng daqiqamda yana bir martaba bo'yingizni olib o'lish uchun dushman tomonidan uyingizga ochilg'an tuynukchaga kirdim.

O’tkan kunlar romanida infinitive konstruksiyalarining qo’llanilishini tahlil qilish natijasida quyidagi xulosalarga kelindi: O’tkan kunlar asarida uchraydigan infinitive konstruksiyalari uchun ko’makchisi, tushum kelishigida, jo’nalish kelishigida va boshqa barcha kelishiklarda turlanib keladi. Wilkie Collins ning “The Woman in White” asarida foydalanilgan fe’lning shaxssiz shakllariga oid misollar 5 - 1. It was one of the two evenings in every week which I was accustomed to spend with my mother and my sister. 2. Events which I have yet to relate make it necessary to mention in this place that my father had been dead some years at the period… 3. I succeeded to his connection, and had every reason to feel grateful for the prospect that awaited me at my starting in life. 4. I did my best to stop the torrent of his tears and protestations by persisting in treating the whole adventure as a good subject for a joke. 5. Without attempting to answer those questions decisively, I may at least record that I never saw my mother and my sister together in Pesca's society. 6. He has cruelly refused to give us the smallest hint of it till his friend Walter appeared. 7. It may be necessary to explain here that Pesca prided himself on being a perfect Englishman in his language. 8. To set them going again, recite, explain , and blow myself up red-hot with useless enthusiasm, when a creak of boots in the passage outside, and in comes the golden Papa, the mighty merchant with the naked head and the two chins. 9. I asked to be allowed to look at the note of terms which his respectable patron had drawn up for my inspection. 10. That the duties which the master was expected to perform would be of a twofold kind. 5 www.gramotey.com. collins_ the_ woman_ in_ white.

Infinitiv hamma fe'llar qatori daraja, zamon va as pekt kategoriyalariga ega; o’timli fe’llarning infinitive formalari shuningdek nisbat kategoriyasiga ham ega hisoblanadi. Zamonaviy ingliz tilida infinitive quyidagi shakllarga ega : Zamon Aniq nisbat Majhul nisbat Noaniq(indefinite) To write To be written Davom(continuous) To be writing - Tugallangan(perfect) To have written To have been written Tugallangan davom (perfect continuous) To have been writing - Infinitivlar boshqa hamma fe’llarning zamon tafovutlari singari aniq bo’lmay, nisbiyligi bilan ajralib turadi. 1. Noaniq infinitiv fe’lning aniq shakli tomonidan ifodalangan ish-harakatni bir vaqtning o’zida u bilan birgalikda ifodalab keladi. Shuning uchun u hozirgi, o’tgan yoki kelasi zamon ga tegishli bo’lishi mumkin: I am glad to meet you. (Dreiser) I was glad to see you. (Ch. Bronte) Mr. Forsyte will be very glad to see you. (Galsorthy) 2. Davom zamondagi infinitiv ham aniq fe’lning shakli tomonidan ifodalangan ish-harakatni u bilan birgalikda ifodalaydi, ammo bu ish-harakat davom etayotgan bo’ladi. Shuning uchun davomiy infinitive faqatgina zamon shakli bo’libgina qolmasdan, ish harakat ifodalangan usul va vaqt munosabatlarini ifodalovchi aspect shakli ham hisoblanadi: They happened, at the moment, to be standing near a small conservatory at the end of the garden. (Collins)

3. Tugallangan infinitiv. Infinitivdagi tugallangallik shakli uning boshqa tugallanmagan shakllari bilan qarama - qarshi qo’yishga asoslangan. Masalan: to read - to have read; to write - to have written Infinitivning tugallanganlikka ega bo’lmagan shakllari ifodalagan ish-harakat shaxsli fe'l ifodalagan ish-harakat bilan bir paytda sodir bo’ladi. Ma salan: At the last moment ail Celia said good-bye. It was hard to leave her (P. Abrahams). «I suppose Monsier Lemm», Marya Dmitrievna said, «you have come to give Liza her music lesson»? (I. Turgenev). Who is it you wish to see ? he asked. (Th. Dreiser) «He wants to be picked up», Pauline said (B. Malamud). Infinitivning tugallangallik shakli ifodalagan ish-harakat aniq fe'l ifodalagan ish-harakatdan avval sodir bo’ladi. Masalan: “I’m glad to have seen you,” he said (Dreiser). “Men sizni ko’rganimdan xursandman,” – dedi u. The secretary seems to have stepped out a minute. (B. Malamud). Kotiba bir daqiqaga tashqariga chiqqan ko’rinadi. Several shots were fired but such was the hurry of the marksmen that not one appears to have taken effect (E. L. Stevenson). Merganlar shoshilinch bir necha bor o’q uzishdi, ammo ularning birortasi ham samara bermagan ko’rinadi. Ingliz tilida o’tgan va tugallangan zamonda qo’llanilgan to mean, to expect, to intend, to hope kabi fe’llardan keyin infinitiv bu umid yoki maqsadning tugallanmaganligini bajarilmaganligini bildiradi: I meant to have gone there. I hoped to have given you five shillings this morning for a Christmas-box, Sam. (Ch. Dickens) Bunday ma’no o’tgan tugallangan zamondagi aniq fe’l bilan qo’llanilgan noaniq infinitiv yordamida ham ifodalanilishi mumkin:

I had meant to go there. He had meant to marry me . (Eliot) Bir qancha ingliz garamatikasini o’rganuvchi olimlar ikkinchi konstruksiyadan foydalanishni afzal deb bilishadi. Biroq, bu yerda eng muhim e’tibor qaratilishi lozim bo’lgan narsa g’oyaning bajarilmaganligi hisoblanadi ya’ni bildirilgan g’oya yoki fikr bajarilmaydi: I meant to go there , but never did . 4. Tugallangan davom zamon infinitivi aniq fe’l tomonidan ifodalangan ish- harakatdan oldin ma’lum bir vaqt davomida davom etgan ish-harakatni ifodalaydi. Bu shakl faqatgina zamon shakli bo’libgina qolmay balki, aspekt shakli ham hisoblanadi: For about ten days we seemed to have been living on nothing but cold meat, cake and bread and jam. (Jerome) Infinitivda nisbat kategoriyasi. “O’timli fe'llarning infinitiv shakllari aniq, va majhul nisbatni ko’rsatuvchi alohida shakllarga ega bo’ladi.” 6 It is so glorious to love and to be loved. .. (Stone). “There is” konstruksiyali gaplarda keluvchi bir qancha fe’llarning infinitiv shakllari ma’noda hech qanday o’zgarishsiz aniq yoki majhul nisbatni bildirishi mumkin. Bunday gaplarda aniq nisbatdagi infinitiv majhul nisbat dagi infinitivning ma'nosini anglatadi: There is no time to lose. (Dreiser) There is no time to be lost . (Eliot) There is nothing to fear (to be feared). «There's so much to do (to be done) (B. Malamud). There was nothing more to do (to be done) (P. Abrahams). Demak, nisbat kategoriyasi infinitivdagi aniq formalar ni majhul nisbatdagi formalarga qarama-qarshi qo’yishga asoslangandir. Masalan: to read - to be read 6 Ж.Бўронов, Ў.Ҳошимов, Ҳ.Исматуллаев. Инглиз тили грамматикаси Т.: Фан, 1993.в-142.

to "have read - to have been read He loved the changing panorama of the street - to see and to be seen as he dined (Th. Dreiser). ... he could not keep from de siring her- to consume and to be consumed (V. Malamud). Infinitivda aspekt kategoriyasi Ingliz tilidagi infinitiv umumiy va davomli aspektdagi formalarga ega. Masalan: to read- to be reading, to have read-to have been reading. Umumiy aspektdagi infinitiv shaxsli fe'l bilan bir vaqtda bo’lgan ish-harakatni ko’rsatadi. Shaxsli fe'l hozirgi, o’tgan va kelasi zamonga tegishli ish-xarakatni ifodalashi mumkin. Ma salan: Let's go up here and have something to eat (Th. Dreiser). The best thing he could do was to get out of here (P. Abrahams). Davomli aspektdagi infinitiv ifodalagan ish-harakat ham shaxsli fe'l ifodalangan ish-harakat bilan bir vaqtda sodir bo’ladi, lekin u davom etayotgan bo’ladi. Masalan: Ne seemed to be realizing for the first time what it was that made life worth living (I.Turgenev). Pauline seemed to be liste ning to something going on in an other part of the house (B. Malamud). Shunday qilib, Infinitiv fe'lning shaxssiz formasi bo’lib, ma’lum bir rivojlanish jarayonida o’zining otlik xususiyatlarini saqlab fe’ldan hosil bo’lgan otdan shakllangan. Shuning uchun ham zamonaviy ingliz tilida infinitiv sifatdosh (participle) va harakat nomi (gerund) kabi ikki xil xususiyatga ya’ni fe'llik hamda otlik xususiyatlari mavjud.

1 . 2 HARAKAT NOMI FE’LI KONSTRUKSIYALARINING O’ZBEK VA INGLIZ TILLARIDA QIYOSIY TAHLILI Gerund fe’lning fe’llik va otlik xususiyatiga ega bo‘lgan shaklidir.Gerund da inﬁnitiv ga qaraganda otlik xususiyati ko‘proq. O‘zbek tilida gerund ga harakat nomi to‘g‘ri keladi. Gerundning vazifalari 1. Gerund ko‘pincha predloglar bilan kelib, gapda vositali to‘ldiruvchi, aniqlovchi va ot-kesim tarkibida keladi. Predloglar faqat ot oldida ishlatilganligi sababli, har qanday predlogdan keyin fe’l otga yaqin bo‘lgan shakl — gerundga aylanadi. 2. Gerund predlogsiz ega, vositasiz to‘ldiruvchi, fe’l kesim va ot-kesim tarkibida kelishi mumkin. Gerund otlik xususiyatiga ega bo‘lganligi uchun gapda otga o‘xshab quyidagi vazifalarda keladi: 1) ega bo‘lib keladi: Reading is her favouraite occupation. O‘qish — uning sevimli mashg‘u loti. 2) ot-kesim tarkibida keladi: Her greatest pleasure is reading . Uning eng sevimli mashg‘uloti— o‘qish. 3) fe’l kesim tarkibida keladi: He ﬁ nished reading the newspaper. U gazetani o‘qishni tugatdi. 4) vositasiz to‘ldiruvchi bo‘lib keladi: I remember reading the book. Men kitobni o‘qiganimni eslayman. 5) predlogli vositali to‘ldiruvchi bo‘lib keladi: I am fond of reading. Men o‘qishni yaxshi ko‘raman. 6) aniqlovchi bo‘lib keladi: I had the pleasure of reading in the newspaper of your success. Men sizning muvaffaqiyatingiz haqida gazetada o‘qib rohatlandim. 7) hol bo‘lib keladi: After reading the letter I put it into the drawer . Men xatni o‘qiganimdan keyin uni g‘aladonga solib qo‘ydim.

Gerund otga o‘xshab o‘zidan oldin predlog olishi mumkin, egalik olmoshi yoki qaratqich kelishigidagi ot bilan kelishi mumkin: Tom left without ﬁ nishing his dinner . Tom ovqatini yeb bo‘lmasdan chiqib ketdi. We insisted on their chartering a vessel at once. Biz ulardan zudlik bilan kema yollashlarini talab qildik. We objected to the buyer’s paying only part of the invoice amount. Biz xaridorlarning yuk haqining faqat bir qismini to‘lashiga e’tiroz bildirdik. 3. Gerund fe’li quyidagi xususiyatlarga ega: a) gerund vositasiz to‘ldiruvchi olishi mumkin: I remember reading this book. Men bu kitobni o‘qiganimni eslayman. b) gerund ravish bilan aniqlanishi mumkin: He likes reading aloud. U ovoz chiqarib o‘qishni yoqtiradi. ODDIY NISBATDAGI GERUND (ACTIVE GERUND) VA MAJHUL NISBATDAGI GERUND (PASSIVE GERUND ) 1. Gerund ma’lum shaxs yoki buyumga qarashli bo‘lmagan ish-harakatni ifodalashi mumkin: Swimmimg is a good exercise . Suzish – yaxshi mashq.

Lekin ko‘pincha gerund ifodalagan ish-harakat ma’lum shaxs yoki buyumga qarashli bo‘ladi: Tom left without ﬁ nishing his dinner. ( ﬁ nishing Tomga – egaga qarashli ). Tom ovqatini yeb bo‘lmasdan chiqib ketdi. Thank you for coming ( coming to‘ldiruvchi you ga qarashli ). Kelganingiz uchun rahmat. 2. Gerund ifodalagan ish-harakat u qarashli bo‘lgan shaxs yoki buyum tomonidan bajarilsa, Active Gerund ishlatiladi: He likes inviting his friends to his house. U do‘stlarini uyiga taklif qilishni yoqtiradi. I remember having shown her the letter. Men unga xatni ko‘rsatganimni eslayman. He entered the room without noticing Kate. U xonaga Keytni payqamay kirib keldi. Gerundiy ifodalayotgan ish-harakat u qarashli bo‘lgan shaxs yoki buyumga qarashli bo‘lmasdan, boshqa shaxs yoki buyum tomonidan sodir etilayotgan bo‘lsa, Passive Gerund ishlatiladi: “He likes being invited by his friends. ” 7 U do‘stlari uni taklif qilishlariniyoqtiradi. I remember having been shown the letter . Menga xatni ko‘rsatganlarini eslayman. He entered the room without being noticed . 7 James Joyce. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Dublin, 1904.p-54.

U o‘zini payqatmasdan xonaga kirdi. (Uning xonaga kirganini payqashmadi.) 4. Ba’zan to need, to want, to require kerak ma’nosida kelgan fe’llardan keyin va worth arziydigan sifatidan keyin Active Gerund Passive Gerund ma’nosida ishlatiladi: My shoes need repairing (being repaired emas ). Men tu ﬂ igimni ta’mirlatishim kerak. This dress wants washing (being washed emas) . Bu kuylakni yuvish kerak. These bags require drying ( being dried emas ). Bu xaltalarni quritish kerak. The book is worth reading (being read emas ). Bu kitobni o‘qisa arziydi. Gerund bilan bir qatorda in ﬁ nitiv ham oldidan kelgan otga aniqlovchi bo‘lib kelishi mumkin: The charterers have the right of loading (= the right to load ) the steamer at night time. Yollovchilar paroxodga tungi paytda mol yuklash huquqiga egadirlar. I have no intention of doing it (= no intention to do it). Men buni qilmoqchi emasman.

BOB II. INGLIZ VA O’ZBEK TILLARIDA INFINITIV KONSTRUKSIYALARINING ISHLATILISHI 2.1 Infinitiv munosabatlari sintaktik maydoni Tilshunos ma'no ifodalovchi til birliklari bilan ish ko'rar ekan, u albatta "kategoriya" tushunchasi bilan ish ko'radi. Kategoriya atamasi aslida grekcha so'z bo'lib (Kategoriya) fikr, gap ma'nolarini anglatgan. Hozir esa «guruh» 8 yoki dunyoni bilishdagi va dunyoni aks ettirishdagi mavhum tushuncha tushuniladi. Tilshunoslikda esa kategoriya atamasi til elementlarini (birliklarini) biror ma'no asosida tuzilgan guruhchasi deb tushuniladi. Agar tildagi barcha elementlarni (birliklarni) biror umumiy ma'no yoki tushuncha asosida guruhlarga bo'linsa, makrokategoriya 9 hosil bo'ladi. Agar tildagi ma'lum elementlarnigina biror umumiy ma'no asosida guruhlarga bo'linsa, mikrokategoriyalar hosil bo'ldi. Hozirgi paytda tilshunoslikda bir qancha yaruslararo (sathlararo) va biryarusli (bir sathli) maydonlar nazariyalari mavjud. Yaruslararo maydonlarning asosiylari quyidagilar: tushuncha kategoriya nazariyasi, grammatik-leksik maydon nazariyasi, funksional semantik kategoriya (maydon) nazariyasi, tipologik kategoriya nazariyasi. Tushuncha kategoriya nazariyasi mashhur rus tilshunosi I.I.Meshchaninov tomonidan yaratilgan. Tushuncha kategoriyasi ma'lum tushunchani leksik, morfologik yoki sintaktik yaruslar birliklari yordamida ifodalashdir. I.I. Meshchaninov fikriga ko'ra, sub'ekt va predikat tushuncha kategoriyalaridir. 8 . Hornby The Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Lnd.1999.p-523. 9 А.В. Бондарко. Структура простого предложения в совремённом английском языке. М., 1966.в- 201.

Ammo ular gapning sintaktik qurilmasida ifodalanib, tilda ega va kesim grammatik tushunchalariga aylanadi. Daniyalik mashhur tilshunos O. Yespersen tushuncha kategoriyasi deganda mavjud tillardagi tasodifiy dalillarga bog'liq bo'lmagan tildan tashqari tushunchalarni ko'zda tutadi. Yespersen tushuncha kategoriyalari va tal kategoriyalari (grammatik kategoriyalari) o'rtasidagi farqni nemischa "das Weib"(ayol) so'zi misolida yaqqol ko'rsatadi. Bu so'z ayol, xotin jinsini ko'rsatsada, sredniy rodga taalluqlidir. Tushuncha kategoriyasi tafakkur doirasiga taalluqli bo'lganligi va uning strukturasi mutlaqo o'rganilmaganligi uchun, tilshunoslar tushuncha kategoriyasi nazariyasi asosida yangi nazariyalar yaratdilar. Bularga yuqorida ko'rsatilgan grammatik-leksik maydon, funksional - semantik kategoriya va tipologik kategoriya nazariyalarini kiritish mumkin. Grammatik-leksik maydon nazariyasi rus tilshunoslari Ye.V. Gulga, Ye.I. Shendels tomonidan ishlab chiqilgan. Grammatik-leksik maydon deganda bu olimlar quyidagi narsani tushundilar Ye.V. Gulga va Ye.I. Shendelslarning fikriga ko'pa, grammatik-leksik maydon quyidagi belgilar bilan xarakterlanadi: 1. Bir-birlari bilan sistemik munosabatda bo'lgan turli xil yaruslardagi vositalar yig'indisi. Maydon ichiga, kirib bu vositalar maydonning qismi bo'lib qoladilar. 2. Maydon qismlariga u yoki bu darajada taalluqli bo'lgan umumiy ma'no. 3. Umumiy ma'noni ikkita qarama-qarshi yoki polyar ma'nolarga bo'linib ketishi va ularning mikromaydon hosil qilishi. 4. Maydonning bir xil emasligi, murakkabligi va uni gorizontal va vertikal kesiklar sifatida faraz kilish mumkinligi. Gorizontal holatda semantik maydonlar bo'lmish mikromaydonlar yotadi. Masalan: «Zamon grammatik maydoni» uch qismdan iborat:

 hozirgi zamon maydoni;  o’tgan zamon maydoni;  kelasi zamon maydoni. Vertikal holatda mikromaydonlarning qismlari (bo'limlari) yotadi. Ular xam makromaydonning, xam mikromaydonning qismlaridir. Maydonning vertikal tuzilishi qismlarning xususiyati, maydonchalar soni va ularning bir-birlariga nisbatan joylashishiga bog'liq. Ko'pchilik grammatik-leksik maydonlarda dominanta bo'ladi. Dominanta maydonning shunday qismiki, u o'sha ma'noni ifodalash uchun maxsus forma. U o'sha ma'noni boshqa formalarga nisbatan aniqroq ifodalaydi va izchil ravishda ishlatiladi. Dominanta morfologiyaga, sintaksisga yoki leksikaga tegishli bo'lishi mumkin. Har bir mikromaydonda dominanta bo'lishi mumkin, hatto dominantasiz maydon ham bo'lishi mumkin. Dominanta atrofida u bilan eng yaqin munosabatda bo'lgan elementlar (qismlar) bo'lishi mumkin. Ular birgalikda yadroni tashkil qiladi. Yadrodan uzoq bo'lgan elementlar (qismlar) maydonning chetiga (periferiya) joylashadi. “Maydon hosil qiluvchi vositalar birga ishlatilishi mumkin, yoki birga ishlatila olmasligi mumkin. Birga ishlatilganda ularning biri ikkinchisining ma'nosini kuchaytirishi, konkretlashtirishi, kuchsizlantirishi, o'zlashtirib yuborishi, yangi ma'noga aylantirishi mumkin.” 10 Qismlarini ma'nosini tahlil qilishda komponent tahlil metodidan foydalaniladi. Funksional-semantik kategoriya (maydon) nazariyasi rus tilshunosi A.V. Bondarko tomonidan yaratilgan. A.V. Bondarko makrokategoriyani avvalgi ishlarida "funksional semantik kategoriya" 11 deb atasa keyingi ishlarida uni "funksional semantik maydon" deb ham ataydi. 10 Бурлакова В.В. Синтаксические структуры современного английского языка. М.: Просвещение, 1984.с-126. 11 Бондарко. А.В. Структура простого предложения в совремённом английском языке. М., 1966. c - 36

Funksional-semantik kategoriya (maydon) nazariyasi rus tilshunosi A.V. Bondarko tomonidan yaratilgan. A.V. Bondarko makrokategoriyani avvalgi ishlarida "funksional semantik kategoriya" 12 deb atasa keyingi ishlarida uni "funksional semantik maydon" deb ham ataydi. 1. Guruhni xarakterlovchi maxsus belgilarning to'planishi (markazda) - siyraklashishi (periferiyada). 2. Aloqalar va munosabatlarning jamlashuvi, o'sha lingvistik elementning guruh elementlarini bog'layotgan chiziqlarning kesib o'tish nuqtasida joylashishi, eng ko'p oppozitsiyalarda qatnashishi (markazda) - aloqalar to'rini siyraklashishi, kuchsizlanishi, ozmi-ko'pmi izolyatsiyaga tushib qolishi (periferiyada). Funksional yukning maksimal darajada yuqori bo'lishi (markazda) - bunday yukning kamayishi (periferiyada). O'sha til vositalarining ma'lum semantik funksiyani ifodalashi uchun eng yukori darajada spetsializatsiyalanishi (markazda) - past darajada spetsializatsiyalanishi, o'sha semantik - funksiyani amalga oshirishda qo'shimcha rol o'ynashi (periferiyada). 5. O'sha til elementining doimiy va yuqori darajada takroriy ishlatilishi (markazda) - doimiy bo'lmay, onda-sonda ishlatilishi (periferiyada) A.V. Bondarko fikricha, agar maydon ichiga kiruvchi til vositalari ichida morfologik kategoriya bo'lsa, u maydonning markazini hosil qiladi. Morfologik kategoriyaning ma'nosi shunchalik kuchliki, u o'sha maydonning yadrosini aniqlab beradi. Lekin shuni ham aytib o'tish kerakki, bunday vazifani bajaruvchi morfologik kategoriyaning hamma ma'nolari emas, faqat kategorial ma'nosi bajaradi. Tilda yadrosi yo'q funksional-semantik maydonlar ham bo'lishi mumkin. Funksional-semantik maydon ichidagi mikromaydon funksional-semantik maydonning minimal elementi hisoblanadi. U ham o'zining ifoda va mazmun planlariga ega bo'lishi mumkin. Tipologik kategoriya nazariyasi respublikamiz olimi J.B.Bo'ronov tomonidan ishlab chiqilgan. J.B.Bo'ronov fikriga ko'ra, tipologik kategoriya nazariyasi asosan 12 А.В. Бондарко. Структура простого предложения в совремённом английском языке. М., 1966.в- 242.

tillarni qiyoslash uchun yaratilgan, ammo u bir tilni o'rganishda ham ishlatilishi mumkin. J. Bo'ronov goho bu atama o'rnida "tipologik maydon" atamasini ham ishlatadi. “Tipologik kategoriya tipologik ma'no va tipologik formaga ega. Tipologik ma'no - bu morfologik, leksik va sintaktik birliklarning o'zaro munosabati natijasida hosil kilingan umumiy abstrakt lingvistik ma'nodir.” 13 Tipologik ma'no turli yarusli bo'lib, uni ifoda etishda tilning turli yaruslari bevosita ishtirok etadi. U ikki yoki bir necha tillar sistemasi asosida tuziladi. Tipologik ma'no grammatik va leksik ma'nolarni o'z ichiga oladi va qiyoslanayotgan tillar uchun umumiy ma'no hisoblanadi. Tipologik forma tipologik ma'noni ifodalovchi turli yarus birliklaridir. Tipologik formaning invariantlari turlicha bo'lib, ular morfologik, leksik va sintaktik birliklar bilan ifodalanadi. Tipologik formani hosil qiluvchi vositalar morfologik yarusda segment va suprasegment morfemalaridan, leksik yarusda so'z yasovchi affikslardan va mustaqil leksik birliklardan, sintaktik yarusda esa so'z birikmalari va gaplardan tashkil topadi 14 . Tipologik formalar bir-birlari bilan birga kelishi ham, kelmasligi ham mumkin. Tipologik kategoriya quyidagi belgilar asosida aniqlanadi: tillararolik (ya'ni, tipologik kategoriya qiyoslanayotgan tillarda bor), yaruslararolik (ya'ni, tipologik kategoriyani hosil qiluvchi vositalar tilning har xil yarusida joylashgan), vositalarning razryadlar aroligi (masalan, ko'plikni ot, son, olmosh, fe'l, sifatlar xam ifodalay olishi), yaruslar aro sinonimiya va tillar aro ekvivalentlik bo'lishi mumkinligi. Tipologik formalar markaziy va markazdan chetda turuvchi turlarga bo'linadi. Markaziy tipologik formalarga tipologik ma'noni ifodalash uchun ixtisoslashgan formalar kiradi. Markazdan chetda turuvchi tipologik formalar tipologik ma'noni ifodalovchi ikkinchi darajali formalar bo'lib, ular markaziy tipologik formalarga sinonimdir. 13 Ғ уломов А., Ас қ арова М. Ҳ озирги ў збек адабий тили. Синтаксис. Т., 1961. 14 Б ў р о нов Ж.Б. Инглиз ва ў збек тиллари қ иёсий грамматикаси. Т.: Ўқи тувчи, 1973.в-231.

Grammatik-leksik maydon, funksional-semantik maydon, tipologik kategoriya nazariyalari bir-birlariga juda o'xshash bo'lgan bir-birini to'ldiruvchi nazariyalardir. Ularni bir ob'ektni har xil tomondan olingan rasmlarga o'xshatish mumkin. “Ingliz va o'zbek tillaridagi infinitiv munosabatlari sintaktik maydoning qismlarini sodda gaplar, qo'shma gaplar, va murakkab sintaktik butunliklar hosil qiladi.” 15 Infinitiv munosabatlari sintaktik maydonini yadro (markaz) va prefireyaga ega. Qolgan sintaktik vositalar preferiyani tashkil qiladi. Maydon yadrosini aniqlashda sintaktik birliklar qurilmasining quydagi belgilardan kelib chiqildi. Yadroni hosil qiluvchi sintaktik birlik infinitiv munosabatini tiniq, ya'ni boshqa sintaktik munosabatlardan xoli bo'lgan xolda ifodalashi kerak, nutqda eng ko'p ishlatilishi kerak, stilistik jihatdan neytral bo'lishi kerak, ko'pincha boshqa sintaktik birliklarni o'rniga ham ishlatishi mumkin. Mana shunday ko’pgina talablarga infinitiv javob beradi. Infinitivning gapdagi sintaktik vazifasi. Infinitiv gapda turli sintaktik vazifalarni bajaradi. U bu funksiyalarda yolg’iz holda va oborot sostavli keladi. Oxirgi holat ayniqsa ko’proq uchraydi: 1) Infinitiv gapda ega vazifasida: To have a number of notes here was for suspicion (P. Abra hams). To see him leap and run and persue me over hedge and ditoh was the first of night mares. To pay her would soon become a distressing thing (Th. Dreiser). To discover him at Ralliver's, to sit there for an hour or two by his side and dismiss all thought and care of the children during the interval, made her happy (T.Hardy). It olmoshi bilan boshlangan gaplarda, infinitiv orqali ifodalangan ega, kesimdan keyin turadi: 15 Бархударов Л.С. Структура простого предложения в совремённом английском языке. М., 1966.с- 53

It was difficult to know what to do (Stevenson). It's not very hard to get now, put in Hanson, «If you look right? (Dreiser). 2) Infinitiv qo’shma ot kesimning ot kesmi vazifasida: All they would do was to give me a loaded pistol lest we were attacked (Stevenson). The first duty of a good leader is to carry out orders. (B. Malamud). 3) Infinitiv qo’shma modal fe'l kesimning qismi vazifasida: I think I can find something for you to do (Th. Dreiser). I am told I am not to prosecute you (Stevenson). 4) Infinitiv to’ldiruvchi vazifasida: ...And Grey took his pipe out of his mouth and fairly forgot to put it back again. I hate to be late (B. Malamud). Don't forget to post the letter. 5) Infinitiv qo’shma to’ldiruvchining qismi vazifasida: I saw him come. «Not at all» said Hurst wood «I would want your husband to do as much for me (Th. Dreiser). Hurstwcod wis hed her to go on (Ibid). . 6) Infinitiv aniqlovchi vazifasida: Her decision to hunt for work was moderately strong. (Dreiser). I have not the slightest desire to talk to you (Stevenson). 7) Infinitiv hol vazifasida qo’llanadi: a) maqsad xoli: All the young girls will be here tonight to examine you (P. Abrahams). Lanny reached down to pick up his cases (P. Abra hams). On Monday she rose early and prepared to go to work (Th. Dreiser). Carrie started at the name, but recovered quickly enough to avoid notice (Th.Dreiser). If I could only get enough to let her out easy Sibid) «You're too young to put on air with your mother (Th. Dreiser). b) Infinitiv o’xshatish holi vazifasida kelganda as if va as though bog’lovchilari bilan birga ishlatiladi:

His head was close to his mother's bosom, and while he blew she raised her hand, moved it as though to lay it on his head then pulled it away again (P.Abrahams). . ..And the doctor as if to hear the better had taken off his powdered wig and sat there (Steven son). The remaining individual took up a paper as if to read (Th. Dreiser). v) Infinitiv ketma-ket kelayotgan ish-harakatni ifodalovchi hol vazifasida: Hunter lay beside his loophole stunned: Joyce by his shot though his head never move again (Stevenson). He went never to return. 8) Infinitiv kirish so’zi vazifasida: Well, to make a long story short, we got a few hand on board made a gold cruise home ... (Stevenson). In fact sir I believe 1 ha ve the thing in my breast and, to tell you the truth. I should like to get it put in sefety (Ibid). I got the rum, to be sure, and tried to put it down his throat (Ibid). Infinitiv shakllarining yasalishi 1. Simple Infinitive Active- to ask - infinitivning oddiy shaklidir. Lug’atda shu shakl to yuklamasiz beriladi. Qolgan hamma shakllar murakkab shakllardir. 2. Continuous Infinitive Active to be fe’li va asosiy fe’lning Present Participle shakli yordamida yasaladi: to be asking. 3. Perfect Infinitive Active to have fe’li va asosiy fe’lning Past Participle shakli yordamida yasaladi: to have asked . 4. Perfect Continuous Infinitive Active to be fe’lining Perfect Infinitive shakli – to have been – va asosiy fe’lning Present Participle shakli yordamida yasaladi: to have been asking . 5. Simple Infinitive Passive to be fe’lining shakli va asosiy fe’lning Past Participle shakli yordamida yasaladi: to be asked. 6. Perfect Infinitive Passive to be fe’lining Perfect Infinitive shakli – to have been – va asosiy fe’lning Past Participle shakli yordamida yasaladi: to have been asked.

7. Infinitive oldiga not yuklamasini qo’yish bilan infinitivning bo’lishsiz shakli yasaladi: not to ask, not to be asked. Mustaqil infinitivli birikma “Ingliz tilida bosh kelishikdagi ot va infinitivdan iborat birikma uchraydi. Bunday birikmalar mustaqil infinitivli birikma deyiladi.” 16 Bu birikmadagi ot infinitiv ifodalagan ish harakatning bajaruvchisi yoki shu ish harakat ta’siridagi shaxs yoki buyumdir. Bunday birikmalar odatda, gapning oxirida keladi va vergul bilan ajratiladi. Mustaqil infinitivli birikmalar yuridik matnlarda va tijorat hujjatlarida uchraydi: The sellers offered the buyers 5000 tons of gas oil, delivery to be made in October. The buyers requested the sellers to keep them informed of the position of the vessel, the communications to be addressed to their agents. Sotuvchilar xaridorlarga 5000 tonna gazoyl taklif qildilar, yetkazib berish oktabrda amalga oshiriladi. Xaridorlar sotuvchilardan kemaning joyini bildirib turishni so’radilar, a’loqa o’zlarining agentlari orqali yetkaziladi. Infinitivli nominativ Ega + kesim + to + V It is said aytishlaricha, it is reported xabar berishlaricha, it seems o’xshaydi, it is likely ehtimol deb boshlanuvchi ergashgan qo’shma gaplarni tarkibida infinitivli nominativ bo’lgan sodda gaplar bilan almashtirish mumkin: Ergashgan qo’shma gap Sodda gap It is said that they know Chinese very well. They are said to know Chinese very well. 16 Качалова К.Н., Израилович Е.Е. Практическая грамматика английского языка. Бишкек : Туркистан , 2007.c-146.

Aytishlaricha ular xitoy tilini juda yaxshi biladilar. Aytishlaricha ular xitoy tilini juda yaxshi biladilar. Infinitivli nominativlarda infinitivning har xil turlari ishlatilishi mumkin. 1. Gapning kesimdagi ish-harakat bilan bir paytda sodir bo’ladigan ish- harakatni ifodalash uchun simple infinitive ishlatiladi: He is said to live in London. (Aytishlaricha u Londonda yashaydi) He was said to know several oriental languages. (Aytishlaricha u bir nechta sharq tillarini bilgan) 2. Gapning kesimdagi ish-harakat bilan bir paytda uzoq davom etadigan ish-harakatni ifodalash uchun continuous infinitive ishlatiladi: He is said to be writing a new play . (Aytishlaricha u yangi pyesa yozayotgan ekan) The water seems to be boiling. (Suv qaynayotganga o’xshaydi) 3. Gapning kesimidagi ish-harakatdan oldin sodir bo’lgan ish-harakatni ifodalash uchun perfect infinitive ishlatiladi: He is said to have lived in Brighton. (Uni Braytonda yashagan deyishadi) He is said to have been appointed director of a big plant. (Aytishlaricha u katta bir zavodning direktori etib tayinlangan) The steamer was known to have left port on the 15 th May . (Aytishlaricha paroxod portni 15- mayda tark etgan) 4. Gapning kesimidagi ish-harakatdan oldin ma’lum vaqt davbomida davom etgan ish-harakatni ifodalash uchun perfect continuous infinitive ishlatiladi: The goods are reported to have been awaiting shipment for several days . (Xabar berilishicha mollar yuklashni bir necha kutib qolgan) He was said to have been travelling about the country a good deal. (Aytishlaricha u mamlakat bo’ylab ancha vaqt sayohat qilayotgan edi) Infinitivli nominativning ishlatilish holatlari

1. Gapning kesimi to say gapirmoq, to state aytib o’tmoq, to report xabar bermoq, announce e’lon qilmoq, to believe hisoblamoq, to expect umid qilmoq, to know ma’lum qilmoq, bilmoq, to understand bilmoq ma’nosida, to concider hisoblamoq, to see ko’rmoq, to hear eshitmoq va boshqa fe’llarning majhul nisbatdagi shakli bilan ifodalanganda infinitivli nominativ ishlatiladi: - He is said to live in Boston. (= It is said that he lives in Boston.) - Aytishlaricha u Bostonda yashaydi. - This plant is known to produce tractors.(= It is known that they are on their way to Samarkand) - Ularni Samarqandga ketayaptilar deb hisoblaydilar. 2. Gapning kesimi to seem, to appear o’xshamoq,ko’rinmoq, to prove ma’lum bo’lmoq, to happen, to chance voqe’ (sodir) bo’lmoq fe’llarining oddiy nisbatdagi shakli bilan ifodalanganda infinitivli nominativ ishlatiladi: Infinitivli obyektiv konstruktsiya (The Objective with the In finitive Construction). Infinitivli obyektiv konstruktsiyaning birinchi elementi obyektiv kelishikdagi kishilik olmoshi yoki umumiy kelishikdagi ot bilan, ikkinchi elementi infinitiv bilan ifodalanib, birinchi elementga nisbatan predikativ munosabatda bo’ladi. Infinitivli obyektiv konstruktsiya gapda qo’shma to’ldiruvchi vazifasini bajaradi. Masalan: From my place of ambush, I could hear him pant aloud as he struck the blows (Stevenson). «You see, I really don't want you to go Lanny (P. Abrahams). Infinitivli obyektiv konstruktsiya quyidagi fe'llardan keyin ishlatiladi: 1) to hear, to see, to watch, to feel, to observe, to notice kabi sezish va xis etish ma'nosini bildiradigan fe'llardan keyin: A few times she had seen her at the piano in the parlour, and not infrequently had heard her play (Dreiser).

My eyes tuned in stinctively in that directions and I saw a figure leap with great ra - pidity, behind the trunk of a pine. (Stevenson) «I notice the papers praise it», said Ames. (Ibid) Florence felt the satire to be both un generous and unfair. (Voynich) At the same time, observing Gray to be unarmed, 1 handed him my cutlass (Stevenson). 2) to want, to like, to wish, to desire, to intend, to choose, to prefer, to mean kabi istak-xoxish ma'nosini ifodalovchi fe'llar dan keyin: Carrie wants us to go to the theatre, she said, looking upon her husband (Th. Dreiser). You wish us to keep this matter dark (Ste venson). Would you like us to drink through the carnpas?» (B. Malamud). 3) to know, to think, to consider, to believe, to imagine, to find, to trust kabi aqliy faoliyatni bildiruvchi fe'llardan keyin. I think it to be most probable,-though of course its only in opinion-that you'll all have the deuce to pay before you get that malaria out of your Systems (R. L Stevenson). From her position he knew it to be the pretty maiden with whom he had not danced (T. Hardy) I believe it to be true. ...He said that he considered you to be one of those supporting his candidacy for department head (S. Malamud). 4) to order, to ask, to say, to mention, to allow, to permit, to let kabi buyruq va ruxsat ma'nolarini ifodalovchi fe'llardan keyin: ... and I order you to follow your Captain (Stevenson). Marya Dmitriyavna asked Panshin to sing his song again (I. Turgenev). Mr. Dance told me to jump down and knock (R. h. Stevenson). Ah, permit me to kiss your snow-white little hand». (I. Turgenev). Nor would he allow any one to leave the in till he had drunk himself sleepy and reeled off to bed. (R. h. Stevenson). 5) to make, to force, to cause, to get, to have kabi kauzativ fe'llardan keyin:

What made you go there (Th. Dreiser) ... but sometimes he would call for glasses round, and force all the trembling company to listen to his stories or bear a chorus to his singing (R. L. Ste venson). «The man has come home-where would you have him go?» (I. Turgenev). Infinitivli subjanktiv konstruktsiya (The Subjective with the Infinitive Construction). Infinitivli subyektiv konstruktsiyaning birinchi elementi nominativ kelishikdagi kishilik olmoshi yoki umumiy kelishikdagi ot bilan, ikkinchi elementi esa infinitiv bilan ifodalanadi. Gapning kesimi infinitivli subyektiv konstruktsiyaning elementlarini bir- biridan ajratib turadi va bu elementlar turli funksiyani bajarib keladilar. Konstruktsiyaning birinchi ele menti gapda ega funksiyasini, ikkinchi elementi esa qo’shma fe'l bo’lgan kesimning qismi vazifasini bajaradi. Masalan: The general managed somehow to extricate himself from it, but bis carrier was ruined and he was advised to retire (I. Turgenev). Infinitivli subyektiv konstruktsiya quyidagi fe'llardan keyin ishlatilishi mumkin: 1) to see, to hear kabi sezgi ma'nosini ifodalovchi fe'llardan keyin: He was seen to enter the room. Mr. Bod Sowyer was heard to laugh heartily (Dickens). 2) to think, to consider, to know, to expect, to believe, to suppose kabi aqliy faoliyatni bildiruvchi fe'llardan keyin: Why, you were born in my hands, you rogue. Well, never mind that: how could you be expected to think of me! (I. Turgenev). The men who were executed in Bologna are known to have been nothing but common malefactors.. .(Voynich). 3) to advise, to allow, to order, to permit, to make, to tell, to issue kabi buyruq, iltimos, maslaxat, va ruxsat ma'nolarini ifodalovchi fe'llardan keyin: Lemm was advised to leave Russia (I. Turgenev). I we had been allowed to sit idle, we should all have fallen in the blues, but Captain Smollet was never the man for that (Stevenson).

An order was also issued not to receive former guests. (I. Turgenev). 4) to seem, to appear, to happen, to prove, to turn out kabi aniq nisbatdagi fe'llardan keyin: « I seem to be getting very bad » (Th. Dreiser). The ship proved to be a good ship (Stevenson). «What I want to know», she said, is why have you come so far? Was it some special reason, or just the job happened to be here?» (B.Malamud). 5) to be likely, to be sure, to be certain kabi so’z birikmalaridan keyin: ... before the week was out he was sure to think better of it (R. L. Stevenson). If we keep near to the bridge we shall be sure to see him well (Voynich). «Oh, I'm not likly to get killed (Vo ynich). 6) to say, to report fe'llaridan keyin: Tile clergy man explained that, as for as he was aware, it had quite died out of knowledge, and could hardly be said to be known at all (T. Hardy). After a short investigation Abu-salmon and seve ral of his men ran to that part of the city which was reported to have been seized by an English Company (Moscow News). «First, then you are said to have been smuggling firearms into this district» (Voynich ). For predlogli infinitiv konstruktsiya. “Bu qurilma murakkab gap bo’lagi sifatida namoyon bo’ladi (qo’shma ega, qo’shma kesim, qo’shma aniqlovchi, qo’shma hol). Bu qurilmada oddiy va majhul nisbatdagi infinitive ishlatilishi mumkin.” 17 For predlogli infini tiv konstruktsiya infinitivli ob'ektiv va subyektiv konstruktsiyalar kabi ikki elementdan iborat bo’lib, birinchi element for predlogini olgan umumiy kelishikdagi ot yoki ob'ektiv kelishikdagi olmosh bilan, ikkinchi element infinitiv bilan ifodalanadi. For predlogli infinitiv konstruktsiya gapda quyidagi vazifada keladi: 1) Ega vazifasida: 17 Хошимов У., Б ў ронов Ж. Инглиз тили грамматикасиниг норматив курси. Т.: Ўқ итувчи, 1995.в- 145.

For you to go there just now would be to walk into a trap with your eyes open. (E. L. Voynich). It would be impossible for her to live with him (Th. Dreiser). 2) Qo’shma ot kesimning ot qismi vazifasida: « I is for you to speak», says Mr. Trelawney grandly. (R. b. Stevenson). It was for him to brush the doubt away and clear the path if he could. (Th. Dreiser). 3) Qo’shma to’ldiruvchi vazifasida: He pictured both of them in the hall waiting for his class to let out before the bell rang. (B. Malamud). But lie waited (or her to come to grips with him. (B. Malamud). I could see it was in vain for me to contend in speed with such an adversary. (R. b. Ste venson). 4) Qo’shma aniqlovchi vazifasida: There was no time left for him to answer in. (Stevenson) I think 1 can find something for you to do. (Th. Dreiser) ...you, just ask old John, and he'll cut a snack for you to take along . (Ste venson). 5) Hol vazifasida: a) Maqsad holi: Allow me, signora! He rang the bell, and, limping to the door, opened it for her to pass out (Voynich). He opened the study door and held it for her to pass in. (Voynich). I have brought this book for you to read. b) natija holi: It seemed as if it was all closed to her, that the struggle was too fierce for her to hope to do anything at all (Th. Dreiser). Eve ry Hall was too far away for him to look back and shapely remem ber. (Th. Dreiser).

Infinitivning to yuklamasisiz qo’llanishi. Ingliz tilida to yuklamasi infinitivning belgisi hisoblanadi, biroq u ko’pincha to yuklamasisiz ham qo’llanilishi mumkin. Masalan: 1) ought fe'lidan boshqa modal fe'llardan keyin: «Speak up: we can't hear!» (Voynich). ...but he must have been watching me closely. (Stevenson). 2) yordamchi fe'llardan keyin: «Do you know how to stick cups?» he returned . (Th. Dreiser). «I am glad of that. Will it do us any good, mother? » (T. Hardy). What time do you get up to get breakfast?» asked Carrie. (Dreiser). 3) to see, to hear, to feel, to notice, to watch kabi sezish va his etishni ifodalovchi fe'llardan keyin: 4) to make, to have kauzativ fe'llardan keyin: And they made me sit down at table beside them, poured me out a glass of wine... (Stevenson). I won't have you talk so loudly. He made her take it. (Th. Dreiser), 5) to let fe'lidan keyin: He had taken me aside one day and promised me a silver four penny on the first of every month if I would only keep my «wea ther eye for a seafaring man with one leg» and let him know the moment he appeared. (R. L. Stevenson). I would ask you to met me resign. (R. L. Stevenson). b) had better, would rather, would sooner, cannot but, rannot dioose but, nothing but kabi iboralardan keyin: «I don't think you'd better try more this fall», said Minnue (Th.Dreiser). «You don't say», said Levin, «Maybe I'd better not disturb to him» . (R. Malamud). I'd rather not tell you why. mother: indeed I don't quite know why» . (Ibid). 7) Why not so’zlari bilan boshlanadigan gaplarda: «Why not get yourself a nice little jacket? ». (Th. Dreiser). «Why not come to the Fair», he suggested», next Tuesday?» . (Th. Dreiser).

Fikrning voqelikka munosabatini aniq tasdiq va taxmin yo’li bilan bildirib, kirish so’z vazifasida keluvchi so’zlar modal so’z lar deyiladi. a) kirish so’z: Probably «The young man exclimed, laughing. (H. James). b) bir so’zdan tashkil topgan gap: ... Well, then, what's he doing with an echo to him, I should like to know? That ain't in nature, surely? (R. L. Stevenson). Modal so’zlarning semantik klassifikatsiya. Modal so’zlar anglatadigan ma'nolariga kura bir-biridan ma'lum ottenkalari bilan farq qiladi. Shu sababli ularni quyidagi uchta semantik gruppaga bo’linadi: 1) fikr ning realligini tasdiqlovchi modal so’zlar; 2) taxmin, gumon, shubhalanishni bildiruvchi modal so’zlar. -infinitiv munosabatini ifodalovchi vositalar infinitiv maydonini hosil qilishini asoslab berish; -infinitiv maydonining tarkibini tasvirlash; -infinitiv maydonini hosil qiluvchi komponentlar o'rtasidagi sinonimik munosabatlarni ochib berish. Ifinitivning to yuklamasi bilan kelishi. 1. Odatda infinitivdan oldin to yuklamasi keladi: to speak, to buy. Agar gapda ikkita infinitive bo’lib, ular and yoki or bog’lovchisi bilan bog’langan bo’lsa, ikkinchisi infinitivdan oldin to yuklamasi qo’yilmaydi: I intend to call on him and discuss this question . - Men unikiga borib bu masalani muhokama qilmoqchiman. I asked him to telephone to me on Monday or wire . – Men undan dushanba kuni telefon qilishini yoki telegramma berishini so’radim. 2. Quyidagi fe’llardan keyin har doim infinitiv to yuklamasi bilan ishlatiladi: Afford – qurbi yetmoq decide - qaror qabul qilmoq Agree - rozi bo’lmoq demand – talab qilmoq Appear – ko’rinmoq deserve – arzimoq Arrange – uyushtirmoq desire – qattiq istamoq Ask – so’ramoq expect – kutmoq

Attempt – urinmoq fail – muvaffaqiyatsizlika uchramoq Beg – yalinmoq forget – unutmoq Care – qiziqmoq hesitate – ikkilanmoq Claim – da’vo qilmoq hope – umid qilmoq Consent – rozi bo’lmoq intend – niyat qilmoq Learn – o’rganmoq threaten – qo’rqitmoq Seem – bo’lib ko’rinmoq try – urinmoq Strive – harakat qilmoq volunteer – yordamini taklif qilmoq Struggle – kurashmoq wait – kutmoq Swear – ont ichmoq want – istamoq Tend – intilmoq wish – istamoq, xohlamoq 3. Quyidagi orqasidan ot yok olmosh kelgan fe’llardan keyin har doim infinitiv to yuklamasi bilan keladi: advise, allow, ask, beg, cause, challenge, convince, dare, encourage, expect, forbid, force, hire, instruct, invite, need, order, permit, persuade, remind, require, teach, tell, urge, want, warn. She allowed me to use her car. – U menga mashinasini ishlatishga ruxsat berdi. I asked John to help us . - Men Jondan bizga yordam berishini so’radim. They begged us to come. - Ular bizning kelishimizni iltimos qilishdi. 4. Quyidagi sifatlardan keyin infinitiv to yuklamasi bilan keladi: anxious, able, boring, common, dangerous, difficult, eager, easy, good, hard, pleased, prepared, ready, strange, usual. David is anxious to see his family. - Devid oilasini ko’rishni qattiq istaydi.

We are ready to leave now . - Biz hozir jo’nashga tayyormiz. It is difficult to pass this test . - Bu testdan o’tish qiyin. 5. To stop, to remember, to forget, to try fe’llaridan keyin infinitive ham, gerundiy ham ishlatilishi mumkin, faqat ma’no ozroq o’zgaradi: John stopped studying. - Jon o’qishni to’xtadi. John stopped to study. - Jon o’qish uchun to’xtadi. I remembered to lock the door before I left but I forgot to shut the windows. – Men uydan chiqayotganimda eshikni qulflash esimga keldi, lekin derazani yopishni unutibman. I clearly remember locking the door before I left. – Uydan chiqqanimda eshikni qulflaganim aniq esimda. 6. begin, continue, hate, like, love, start, can’t stand fe’llardan keyin infinitiv ham, gerundiy ham ishlatilishi mumkin, lekin ma’noda o’zgarish bo’lmaydi: I like to go (going) to movies . - Men kinoga borishni yoqtiraman. I love to play (playing) chess . - Men shaxmat o’ynashni sevaman. It started to snow (snowing) . - Qor yog’a boshladi. 7. to want, to wish, to mean, to try, to allow, to be going to, ought to, to have to, should (would) like, used fe’llaridan keyin gapda oldin ishlatilgan infinitive qayta takrorlaganda o’sha infinitivning o’rnida faqat to yuklamasi kelishi mumkin: He wants me to go there tonight but I don’t want to ( go tushuniladi) . - Bu oqshom u mening u yerga borishimni istaydi, lekin men borishni istamayman. I didn’t want to stay there, but I had to ( stay tushuniladi). - Men u yerda qolishni istamagandim, lekin qolishimga to’g’ri keldi. 2.2 Infinitiv konstruksiyalarning ingliz va o’zbek badiiy matnlarida qo’llanilishi va ularning kontekstual mazmunlari

The Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction ning ingliz badiiy asarlarida qo’llanilishiga doir misollar ushbu ilmiy izlanishning mazmunini yana chuqurroq anglashga yordam beradi. Uilyam Tekkereyning “Behudalik dunyosi” (Vanity Fair) asaridan olingan parchada The Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction qo’llanilishini ko’rishimiz mumkin. “He (little Rawdon, Rebecca’s son) was a fine open – faced boy, with blue eyes and waving flaxen hair, sturdy in limb, but generous and soft in heart : fondly attaching himself to all who were good to him – to the pony – to Lord Southdown, who gave him the horse (he used to blush and glow all over when he saw that kind young nobleman) – to the groom who had charge of the pony – to Molly, the cook, who crammed him with ghost stories at night, and with good things from the dinner– to Briggs (an old spinster who lived with Rebecca as a companion), whom he plagued and laughed at – and to his father especially , whose attachment toward the lad was curious too to witness. Here, as he grew to be about eight years old, his attachments may be said to have ended’’. 18 “Bu yerda u sakkiz yoshiga qarab ulg’ayib borar ekan uning sodiqligi aytish mumkin ediki o’z nihoyasiga yetib borar edi”. O’timli fe'llardan yasalgan infinitiv aniq, va majhul nisbatni ko’rsatuvchi formalarga ega bo’ladi. Demak, nisbat kategoriyasi infinitivdagi aniq formalar ni majhul nisbatdagi formalarga qarama-qarshi qo’yishga asoslangandir. Mark Tvenning “Muhbir bilan uchrashuv” hikoyasida ham yuqoridagi birlikning qo’llanilishiga doir misolni ko’rishimiz mumkin. «Oh, don’t mention it! It has often been said, and by people who would not flatter 18 William Makepeace Thackeray .Vanity Fair.London Press,.1984.p-24.(tarjima o’zimizniki).

and who could have no inducement to flatter, that I am quite remarkable in that way. Yes, -yes; they always speak of it with rapture». «I can easily imagine it. But about this interview. You know it is the custom, now, to interview any man who has become notorious». «Indeed! I had not heard of it before. It must be very interesting. He must have been dead ....>> Since being a non-in_ectional language, English resorts to other linguistic solutions in order to convey the subjunctive character of the information. It is encoded in periphrastic forms, mainly in modal verbs. May + infnitive This construction resembles optative subjunctive and expresses a wish encoded in present time : may angels protect you; may he say the truth. Purpose, possibility or concession are also expressed with may + infinitive: this I thought _ t to premise that the reader may not judge too hastily…; my reader may remember that he has seen in one of my papers a complaint… Past form might is used similarly in the contexts concerning past. It may refer to present or future when it describes more remote possibility or concession: …so that in some cases it might be proper to say… 19 “Each one fled at once-the moment the house committed what was for him the one insult not to be borne or witnessed a second time . Within two months, in the dead of winter, leaving their grandmother, Baby Suggs; Sethe, their mother; and their little sister, Denver, all by themselves in the gray and white house on Bluestone Road. It didn't have a number then, because Cincinnati didn't stretch that far. In fact, Ohio had been calling itself a state only seventy years when first one brother and then the next stuffed quilt packing into his hat, snatched up his shoes, and crept away from the lively spite the house felt for them.’’ 19 Charleston, B. 1941. Studies on the Syntax of English Verb . Bern.p-23.

Infinitivning passiv shakli qo’llanilgan va unda muallif o’zining fikrini shu konstruksiya orqali qo’llagan. “ I pivoted again and scored from a distance of twenty feet. 'See, Jenny, you can dish it out, but you can't take it!'I would like to have seen the expression on her face, but strategy forbade my looking back’’. “Men yana qaytdim va oramizdagi yigirma metrlar masofani bosib o’tdim. -Qara Jenni sen ularni tarqatishing mumkin, lekin uni ololmaysan! Men uning yuzida ifodani korishni xohlagandim, lekin strategiya orqaga qaytishimni ta’qiqlar edi” 20 Ushbu o’rinda infinitivdagi perfekt ka tegoriyasi perfekt bo’lmagan formalar bilan perfekt formalarni qarama - qarshi qo’yishga asoslangan. “A fellow asked him to give it one last: but he walked on without even answering the fellow. ” O’rtog’i oxirgi marta berishini so’radi: lekin hech qanday javob bermasdan yurishda davom etdi. Ushbu o’rinda infinitive konstruksiya to’ldiruvchi vazifasini bajarib kelgan. 21 XULOSA Infinitiv fe’lning shaxsi noma’lum shakli bo’lib, harakatning nomini bildiradi; shaxsini ham, sonini ham ko’rsatmaydi. Infinitivning ko’rsatkichi tarjima qilinmaydigan va urg’u olmaydigan to yuklamasidir. Infinitiv otning ko’pgina xususiyatlarini saqlab qolgan va otga o’xshab gapda ega, to’ldiruvchi, aniqlovchi, hol bo’lib keladi va shuningdek, ot-kesim tarkibida yoki fe’l kesim tarkibida kelishi mumkin. Ingliz va o'zbek tillarida infinitiv munosabatini ifodalovchi barcha vositalarni aniqlash bizga bu tillarda infinitiv munosabatlari maydoni mavjud degan fikrga olib keladi. 20 Erich Segal Love Story..Macmillan publisher.London.p-265. (tarjima o’zimizniki). 21 James Joyce. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Dublin, 1904 .p-28. (tarjima o’zimizniki).

Ko’p jihatdan olib qaralganda, infinitiv va gerundiy bir qator o’xshashliklarga ega bo’lib, ma’lum bir so’zlar doirasi bilan birikib keladi. Infinitiv konstrukturalarini tahlil etish orqali quyidagilar aniqlandi: For predlogli infini tiv konstruktsiya infinitivli obyektiv va subyektiv konstruktsiyalar kabi ikki elementdan iborat bo’lib, birinchi element for predlogini olgan umumiy kelishikdagi ot yoki obyektiv kelishikdagi olmosh bilan, ikkinchi element infinitiv bilan ifodalanadi. Ingliz tilida bosh kelishikdagi ot va infinitivdan iborat birikma uchraydi. Bunday birikmalar mustaqil infinitivli birikma deyiladi. Bu birikmadagi ot infinitiv ifodalagan ish harakatning bajaruvchisi yoki shu ish harakat ta’siridagi shaxs yoki buyumdir. Bunday birikmalar odatda, gapning oxirida keladi va vergul bilan ajratiladi. Mustaqil infinitivli birikmalar yuridik matnlarda va tijorat hujjatlarida uchraydi. O’timli fe'llardan yasalgan infinitiv aniq, va majhul nisbatni ko’rsatuvchi formalarga ega bo’ladi. Demak, nisbat kategoriyasi infinitivdagi aniq formalar ni majhul nisbatdagi formalarga qarama-qarshi qo’yishga asoslangandir. Ingliz tilida to yuklamasi infinitivning belgisi hisoblanadi, biroq u ko’pincha to yuklamasisiz ham qo’llanilishi mumkin. Infinitivli obyektiv konstruktsiyaning birinchi elementi obyektiv kelishikdagi kishilik olmoshi yoki umumiy kelishikdagi ot bilan, ikkinchi elementi infinitiv bilan ifodalanib, birinchi elementga nisbatan predikativ munosabatda bo’ladi. Infinitivli obyektiv konstruktsiya gapda qo’shma to’ldiruvchi vazifasini bajaradi. Infinitivli subyektiv konstruktsiyaning birinchi elementi nominativ kelishikdagi kishilik olmoshi yoki umumiy kelishikdagi ot bilan, ikkinchi elementi esa infinitiv bilan ifodalanadi.Sintaktik aloqa bog'lanayotgan birliklar o'rtasidagi tobelik va tenglik munosabatini aks ettiruvchi, ma'no bilan bog'lanmagan sintaktik hodisadir. Biz infinitive konstruksiyalarining tilda qo’llanishini chuqurroq tadqiq etish maqsadida o’zbek va ingliz tilidagi ikki badiiy asar A. Qodiriyning “O’tkan kunlar” va Wilkie Collins ning “The Woman in White” asarlari tanlab olindi. O’tkan kunlar romanida infinitive konstruksiyalarining qo’llanilishini tahlil qilish natijasida quyidagi xulosalarga kelindi: O’tkan kunlar asarida uchraydigan

infinitive konstruksiyalari uchun ko’makchisi, tushum kelishigida, jo’nalish kelishigida va boshqa barcha kelishiklarda turlanib keladi. “The Woman in White” asaridagi infinitive konstruktuksiyalarini tahlil qilganimizda, obyektiv infinitive konstruksiyaning ingliz tilida ko’p uchrashini kuzatdik va bu ko’pincha to yuklamasi bilan qo’llanilgan. Kommunikativ birliklar hisoblanadigan gaplar va matnlar til birliklarining birikishi yordamida hosil bo'ladi. Bu birliklar bir-birlari bilan birikkanda, ikki xil munosabat hosil bo'ladi: sintaktik aloqa va sintaktik munosabat. Sintaktik munosabat bog'lanayotgan til birliklari o'rtasida hosil bo'luvchi mavhum sintaktik ma'nodir. Ingliz tilida qirqqa yaqin sintaktik munosabatlar borligi aniqlangan. Tilda bir sintaktik qurilmada birdan ortiq sintaktik munosabatlar ifodalanishi mumkin. Bunday hodisa sintaktik sinkretizm deb ataladi. Infinitiv munosabati sintaktik munosabatlarning eng asosiy turlaridan biridir. U kognitiv tilshunoslik nuqtai nazaridan obyektiv dunyodagi sodir bo'layotgan voqealar o'rtasidagi munosabatlarning bir turi bo'lib, tilda aks etadi va inson bilimlarining bir bo'lagi bo'lib qoladi. Tilga yaruslararo maydoniy yondoshuv til elementlarining ham global, ham lokal aloqalarini ochib beradi. Keyingi yillarda paydo bo'lgan tilga oid maydoniy yondashuv tildagi mana shunday aloqalarni ilmiy o'rganishga asos bo'ladi. Dunyodagi voqealar, narsalar o'rtasidagi ifinitivlik munosabatlarini bilish, fikrlarni asoslash insonning kundalik hayotida va ilmiy izlanishida uchraydigan eng muhim jarayonlardan biridir. Shu jihatdan qaraganda, tildagi infinitivlik munosabatlarini ifodalash vositalarini aniqlash va ularni tahlil qilish tilshunoslik uchun juda ahamiyatlidir.

SUMMARY In conclusion it should be noted that the Predicative Constructions are the constructions consisting of two elements: a nominal (noun or pronoun) and verbal (Participle, Gerund or Infinitive). The verbal element stands in predicate relation to the nominate element, that is to say in a relation similar to that between the subject and the predicate of the sentence. In most cases predicative constructions form syntactic units, serving as one part of the sentence.

In English there are three groups of predicative constructions. These are the constructions with Participle, Gerund, and Infinitive. Participial, Gerundial and Infinitive constructions are highly varied. The structure of some of them is foreign to the Uzbek language, although their meaning can be fully conveyed in Uzbek with the help of forms, characteristic of Uzbek. The constructions are translated into Uzbek by objective, attributive, adverbial or other subordinate clauses. The Predicative Constructions with the Infinitive are divided into four types: 1. The Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction; 2. The Subjective-with-the-Infinitive Construction; 3. The For-to-Infinitive Construction; 4. The Absolute Infinitive. 1. The Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction is a construction in which the Infinitive is in predicate relation to a noun in the common case or a pronoun in the objective case. In the sentence this construction has the function of a Complex Object. 2. The Subjective-with-the-Infinitive Construction traditionally called the Nominative-with-the-Infinitive Construction is a construction in which the Infinitive is in predicate relation to a noun in the common case or pronoun in the nominative case. The peculiarity of this construction is that it does not serve as one part of the sentence. One of its component parts has the function of the subject, the other forms part of a compound verbal predicate. 3. The For-to-Infinitive Construction is a construction in which the Infinitive is in predicate relation to a noun or pronoun preceded by the preposition “for”. In translating this construction into Uzbek a subordinate clause or an infinitive is used. The construction can have different functions in the sentence. It can be:

subject, predicative, attribute, complex, object, adverbial modifier (of result, purpose). 4. The Absolute Construction with the Infinitive is formed by the subject of the Infinitive which in all adverbial functions is the same person or thing as denoted by the subject of the sentence. The Absolute Construction with the Infinitive is introduced by the preposition “with”. The Infinitive is used with the particle “to”. The Absolute Construction with the Infinitive has the function of adverbial modifier of attending circumstances in the sentence. The Infinitive Absolute Construction is infrequent and found only in literary style. That’s why it is considered that in Modern English there are only three Predicative Constructions. It should be noted that the Predicative Constructions with the Infinitive are translated into Uzbek by subordinate clause, but sometimes they can be translated by simple sentence. FOYDALANILGAN ADABIYOTLAR RO’YXATI 1. Karimov I. A.O’zbekiston buyuk kelajak sari. -T.: O’zbekiston,1998 . 2. Karimov I.A. Yuksak ma’naviyat- yengilmas kuch. - T.: Ma’naviyat, 2008. 3. Баскаков Н.А., Содиков А.С., Абдуазизов А.А. Умумий тилшунослик. Т.: Ўқ итувчи, 1979. 4. Б ў р о нов Ж.Б. Инглиз ва ў збек тиллари қ иёсий грамматикаси. Т.: Ўқи тувчи, 1973

5. Ғ уломов А., Ас қ арова М. Ҳ озирги ў збек адабий тили. Синтаксис. Т., 1961. 6. Ғаппоров М., Қосимова Р. Инглиз тили грамматикаси.Т.:2008. 7. Хошимов У.Б ў ронов Ж. Инглиз тили грамматикасиниг норматив курси. Т.: Ўқ итувчи, 1995 8. Ахмонова О.С. Словарь л ингвистических терминов. М ., 2000 9. Бархударов Л.С. Структура простого предложения в совремённом английском языке. М., 1966 10. Бархударов Л.С., Штелинг Д.А. Грамматика английского языка. М.: Высшая школа, 1965. 11. Беловопьская Л.А. Синтаксис словосочетания и простого предложения. Тогангрог, 2001. 12. Бондарко. А.В. Структура простого предложения в совремённом английском языке. М., 1966 13. Б ў ранов Дж. . Сравнительная типология английского и тюрских языков. М.: Высшая школа, 1983. 14. Бурлакова В.В. Синтаксические структуры современного английского языка. М.: Просвещение, 1984. 15. Гак В.Г. Сравнительная типология французского и русского языков. Л., 1977. 16. Иванова И.П., Бурлакова В.В., Почепцов Г.Г. Теоретическая грамматика современного английского языка. М.: Высшая школа, 1982. 17. Качалова К.Н., Израилович Е.Е. Практическая грамматика английского языка. Бишкек : Туркистан , 2007 18. Bill Mascull. The Syntax of English. Macmillan publisher.London.2006. 19. Charleston, B. 1941. Studies on the Syntax of English Verb. Bern 20. Erich Segal Love Story.Macmillan publisher.London. 21. Haspelmath M. Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold, 2002. 22. James Joyce. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Dublin, 1904.

23. Radford A.Syntax. A Minimalist Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2002. 24. Robert B. English Morphology. Cambridge University Press, 2002. 25. William Makepeace Thackeray .Vanity Fair.London Press, 2003. FOYDALANILGAN LUG’ATLAR RO’YXATI 1. Hornby The Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Lnd.1999. 2. Hornby, Albert, Sydney. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. New York: Cambridge University Press.2005. 3. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Harlow: Pearson/Longman. 2009. 4. Proctor, Paul (Ed) 1995. Cambridge International Dictionary of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. FOYDALANILGAN WEB-SAYTLAR 1. http://www.wikipedia.com/English/infinitive and functions.htm. 2. http://english language.com 3. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Infinitive&oldid=601245198 4. www .collinsdictionary .com /dictionary /english /hyponymy 5. http://grammar.about.com/od/fh/g/infinitive.htm 6. http :// en . wiktionary . org / w / index . php ? title = infinitive & oldid =26756180

O'xshashlar

Инглиз ва ўзбек тилларида қўшма сўзлар

Ҳозирги замон инглиз ва ўзбек тилларида фразеологик бирликларининг бадиий таҳлили ва уларнинг ифодаланиши

Инглиз ва ўзбек тилида юкламалар пресуппозицияси

Инглиз ва ўзбек тилида ФОНЕТИК СТИЛИСТИК методларнинг услубий қулланилиши

Инглиз тилидаги эганинг функционал-семантик характеристикаси ва унинг ўзбек тилига таржима қилиш методикаси