Efficient ways in teaching writing in esl classesfor b1 level students - Ingliz tili - Diplom ishlar

Efficient ways in teaching writing in esl classesfor b1 level students

Yuklangan vaqt:

26.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

101.544921875 KB

Ko'chirib olish

GRADUATION PAPER “Efficient ways in teaching writing in esl classes for b1 level students ” . 1

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………..3 CHAPTER I. THEORETICAL ASSUMPTION OF THE THESIS ON TEACHING WRITING IN ESL CLASSROOMS 1.1 CEFR requirements for B1 level in writing…………………….7 1.2 Scientific approach to methods of teaching writing…………..14 1.3 The main teaching techniques of writing in ESL(B1 level) classes…………………………………………………………….24 CHAPTER II. IMPLEMENTATION OF TECHNIQUES IN IMPROVING WRITING SKILLS 2.1 I nteraction patterns in writing classes………………………..40 2.2Lesson plan sand activities on the topic……………………….44 2.3Questionnaires and tables………………………………………59 CONCLUSION……………………………………………………….73 THE LIST OF USED LITERATURE……………………………...77 INTRODUCTION 2

XXI century in Uzbekistan started as a century of culture, economy, scientific and technical innovations. Innovation factor is one of the peculiarities of modern educational system. Starting from the first years of independence, legal bases of preparing youth as harmonious persons were elaborated. On May 8, 2013 Cabinet of Ministers issued Resolution “On approving state educational standard on foreign languages of continuous educational system”. 1 In compliance with the implementation of complex of activities on enhancement and development of new teaching methods in higher educational establishments, a number of researches have been carried out. The actuality of the theme of the course project paper. One of the most important spheres of teaching English is developing writing skills. In recent years language researchers and practitioners have shifted their focus from developing individual linguistic skills to the use of language to achieve the speaker's objectives. This new area of focus, known as communicative competence, leads language teachers to seek task-oriented activities that engage their students in creative language use. As the first President of the Republic of Uzbekistan stated, “Today we will not stop satisfied with those significant works we achieved in such a short time on our way to goals. We need to learn to precisely fore see problems that will last for a long time”. 2 In the process of learning English as a foreign language, writing is considered as one of the most essential skills. In addition to being a communicative skill of vital importance, it is a skill which enables learners to plan and rethink the communication process. Thus there are many gaps in teaching writing and basic methodology of conducing this skill is being insufficiently investigated. Therefore, teaching writing skills should be taught gradually starting from instrumental skill to content-based writing. Teaching writing should be started from beginning level. The significance of our work can 1 O’zbekiston Respublikasi qonun hujjatlari to’plami, 2013 y., 20-son, 251-modda. 2 Karimov I. A. O’ zbekiston XXI asr bo’sag’asida: xavfsizlikka tahdid, barqarorlik shartlari va taraqqiyot kafolatlari , Т oshkent: O’zbekiston.-10b 3

be proved that we tried to find optional methods of improving writing skills from the beginning level and we applied them in practice. The aim and tasks of the theme. Having based upon the actuality of the theme, we are able to formulate the general goals of our qualification work. a) To study, analyze, and sum up the modern methods of teaching writing; b) To analyze the major results achieved in the studied field; c) To prove the idea of importance of improving B1 students’ writing skills; d) To work out a series of activities for improving B1 students’ writing skills. Problem of development. Teaching writing is a common theme among most researchers who worked in the sphere of language learning and methodology. Many scientists such as S.D. Krashen, R. Spack, G. L. Rico, Tannen, Cowan have been conducting researches on this theme. J. Hughey and B.Wormuth have carried out researches on principles and techniques of writing essays, Wilga Rivers worked on the skill based techniques of writing. The subject matter of the research work is teaching writing by a “content- based” and “process approach” techniques in ESL classroom . The object matter of the research work is writing shoping lists,e-mails, personal letters and stories based on above mentioned techniques. The scientific novelty of the theme. The novelty of this research work can be defined under the following: - to find information about how to improve students’ writing skills - to analyze some approaches and methods by applying them in writing classes. -to approbate new writing materials on English language lessons during our writing lessons for B1 level students The present work might find a good way of implying in the following spheres: 1. In Higher Educational Establishments and scientific circles of language teaching methodology it can be successfully used by teachers and philologists as modern material for writing research works dealing with improving writing skills. 4

2. It can be used by teachers of schools, lyceums and vocational schools as a practical manual for teaching writing. 3. It can be useful for everyone who wants to enlarge his/her knowledge in English. The structure and description of the research. The present qualification work consists of four parts: introduction, the main part, conclusion and bibliography. Within the introduction part, there is given a brief description of our qualification work where we described its actuality, practical significance, and fields of amplification, and described the role of writing skills in learning English. The main part of the qualification work includes several items. There we discussed issues such as skill building and the process approach to writing, main techniques for getting started writing process and teaching writing techniques. In the second chapter (practice part) of main part we described different types writing activities and included worksheets for B1 level students. In the conclusion part our qualification work we tried to draw some results from the scientific investigations made within the main part of the qualification work. In bibliography part we mentioned more than 20 sources which were used while compiling the present work. It includes linguistic books and articles dealing with the theme, a number of used encyclopedias, textbooks and some internet sources. CHAPTER 1 THEORETICAL ASSUMPTION OF THE THESIS ON TEACHING WRITING IN ESL CLASSROOMS 1.1 CEFR requirements for B1 level in writingIt is known that The Common European Framework (CEFR) provides a common basis for the elaboration of language syllabuses, curriculum 5

guidelines, examinations, textbooks, etc. across Europe. It describes in a comprehensive way what language learners have to learn to do in order to use a language for communication and what knowledge and skills they have to develop so as to be able to act effectively. Thedescriptionalso covers theculturalcontextinwhich language is set. The Framework also de ﬁnes levels of pro ﬁciency which allow learners’ progress to be measured at each stage of learning and on a life- longbasis. CEFR is intended to overcome the barriers to communication among professionals working in the ﬁeld of modern languages arising from the different educational systems in Europe. It provides the means for educational administrators, course designers, teachers, teacher trainers, examining bodies, etc., to re ﬂect on their current practice, with a view to situating and coordinating their efforts and to ensuring that they meet the real needs of the learners for whom they are responsible. Byprovidingacommonbasisfortheexplicitdescriptionofobjectives, contentand methods,the Framework willenhancethetransparencyofcourses,syllabuse sandquali ﬁcations,thuspromotinginternationalco- operationinthe ﬁeldofmodernlanguages. Theprovisionofobjectivecriteriafordescribinglanguagepro ﬁciencywillfa cilitatethe mutualrecognitionofquali ﬁcationsgainedindifferentlearningcontexts,an daccordinglywillaidEuropean mobility. Oneoftheaimsofthe Framework is to helppartners to describethelevelsofpro ﬁ ciency required by existing standards, tests and examinations in order to facilitatecomparisons between different system sofquali ﬁcations.ForthispurposetheDescriptiveSchemeand the Common Reference Levels have been developed. Between them they provide a con- 6

ceptual grid which users can exploit to describe their system. Ideally a scale ofreference levels in a common framework should meet the following four criteria. Two relate to description issues, and two relate to measurement issues: DescriptionIssues Acommon framework scaleshouldbecontext- freeinorder to accommodategeneral results from different speci ﬁc contexts. That is to say that a common scale should not be produced specifically for, let us say, the school context and then applied to adults, or vice-versa. Yet at the same time the descriptors in a common Framework scaleneedtobecontext- relevant,relatable to ortranslatableintoeachand every relevant context – and appropriate for the function they are used for in that context. This means that the categories used to describe what learners can do in different contexts of use must be relatable to the target contexts of use of the different groups of learners within the overall target population. Thedescriptionalsoneeds to bebasedontheoriesoflanguagecompetence.Thisis dif ﬁcult to achievebecausetheavailabletheoryandresearchisinadequate to p rovide abasisforsuchadescription.Nevertheless,thecategorizationanddescriptio nneeds to betheoreticallygrounded.Inaddition,whilstrelating to theory,thedescript ion mustalsoremainuser-friendly– accessible to practitioners.Itshouldencouragethem to thinkfurtheraboutwhatcompetencemeansintheircontext. MeasurementIssues Thepointsonthescaleatwhichparticularactivitiesandcompetencesaresitua ted7

inacommon framework scaleshouldbeobjectivelydeterminedinthattheyar ebased onatheoryofmeasurement.Thisisinorder toavoid systematisingerrorthroug h adoptingunfoundedconventionsand‘rulesofthumb’fromtheauthors,partic ular groupsofpractitionersorexistingscalesthatareconsulted. Thenumberoflevelsadoptedshouldbeadequate to showprogressionindiffer ent sectors, but, in any particular context, should not exceed the number of levels betweenwhichpeoplearecapableofmakingreasonablyconsistentdistinctio ns.This maymeanadoptingdifferentsizesofscale step fordifferentdimensions,ora two-tier approach between broader (common, conventional) and narrower (local, pedagogic)levels. Level B1 re ﬂects on the Threshold Level speci ﬁcation for a visitor to a foreign country and is perhaps most categorized by two features. The ﬁrst feature is the ability to maintain interaction and get across what you want to, in a range of contexts, for example:generallyfollowthemainpointsofextendeddiscussionaroundhim/ her,provided speechisclearlyarticulatedinstandarddialect;giveorseekpersonalviewsandopini onsin aninformaldiscussionwithfriends;expressthemainpoin the/ shewantstomakecomprehensibly;exploitawiderangeofsimplelanguage ﬂexiblyt oexpressmuchofwhatheorshewants to;maintainaconversationordiscussionbutmaysometimesbedif ﬁculttofollowwh entrying tosayexactlywhathe/shewouldliketo;keepgoingcomprehensibly,eventhoughpau8

singfor grammaticalandlexicalplanningandrepairisveryevident,especiallyinlongerstret chesof free production. The second feature is the ability to cope ﬂexibly with problems in everydaylife,forexamplecopewithlessroutinesituationsonpublictransport;dealw ith mostsituationslikelytoarisewhenmaking travel arrangementsthroughanagentorw henactuallytravelling;enterunpreparedintoconversationsonfamiliartopics;makeacompl aint; takesomeinitiativesinaninterview/consultation(e.g.tobringupanewsubject)butis very dependentoninterviewerintheinteraction;asksomeonetoclarifyorelaboratewhatthey have justsaid.The subsequent band seems to be a Strong Threshold (B1+). The same two main features continue to be present, with the addition of a number of descriptors which focus on the exchange of quantities of information, for example: take messages communicatingenquiries,explainingproblems;provideconcreteinformationrequ iredinaninter view/ consultation(e.g.describesymptomstoadoctor)butdoessowithlimitedprecision;expla in whysomethingisaproblem;summariseandgivehisorheropinionaboutashortstory,arti cle, talk,discussion,interview,ordocumentaryandanswerfurtherquestionsofdetail;carryo uta preparedinterview,checkingandcon ﬁ rminginformation,thoughhe/shemayoccasiona llyhave toaskforrepetitioniftheotherperson’sresponseisrapidorextended;describehowtodos 9

omething, giving detailed instructions; exchange accumulated factual information on familiar routineandnon-routinematterswithinhis/her ﬁ eldwithsomecon ﬁ dence.In written production (writing)activitiesthelanguageuseraswriterproducesa written text which is received by a readership of one or morereaders. Examples of writing activitiesinclude: completingformsandquestionnaires; writing articles for magazines, newspapers, newsletters,etc.; producing posters fordisplay; writingreports,memoranda,etc.; makingnotesforfuturereference; takingdownmessagesfromdictation,etc.; creativeandimaginativewriting; writingpersonalorbusinessletters,etc. Illustrative scales are providedfor: Overall writtenproduction; Creativewriting; Reportsandessays. OVERALL WRITTENPRODUCTION C 2 Canwriteclear,smoothlyﬂowing,complextextsinanappropriatean deffectivestyleandalogical structurewhichhelpsthereadertoﬁndsigniﬁcantpoints. C 1 Can write clear, well-structured texts of complex subjects, underlining the relevant salient issues, expanding and supporting points of view at some length with subsidiary points, reasons andrelevant B 2 Canwriteclear,detailedtextsonavarietyofsubjectsrelatedtohis/ herﬁeldofinterest,synthesisingand evaluating information and arguments from a number ofsources. 10

B 1 Canwritestraightforwardconnectedtextsonarangeoffamiliarsubje ctswithinhisﬁeldofinterest,by linkingaseriesofshorterdiscreteelementsintoalinearsequence. A 2 Canwriteaseriesofsimplephrasesandsentenceslinkedwithsimplec onnectorslike‘and’,‘but’and ‘because’. A 1 Canwritesimpleisolatedphrasesandsentences.CREATIVEWRITING C 2 Canwriteclear,smoothlyﬂowing,andfullyengrossingstoriesanddescri ptionsofexperienceinastyle appropriatetothegenreadopted. C 1 Canwriteclear,detailed,well- structuredanddevelopeddescriptionsandimaginativetextsinan assured,personal,naturalstyleappropriatetothereaderinmind. B 2 Canwriteclear,detaileddescriptionsofrealorimaginaryeventsandexperi ences,markingtherelationship betweenideasinclearconnectedtext,andfollowingestablishedconventionso Canwriteclear,detaileddescriptionsonavarietyofsubjectsrelated tohis/herﬁeldofinterest. Canwriteareviewofaﬁlm,bookor play. B 1 Canwritestraightforward,detaileddescriptionsonarangeoffamiliarsu bjectswithinhis/herﬁeldof interest. Canwriteaccountsofexperiences,describingfeelingsandreactio A 2 Canwriteabouteverydayaspectsofhis/ herenvironment,e.g.people,places,ajoborstudyexperiencein linkedsentences. Canwriteaseriesofsimplephrasesandsentencesabouttheir family, liv ingconditions,educational background,presentormostrecentjob.Canwriteshort,simpleimagin arybiographiesandsimplepoemsaboutpeople. 11

A 1 Canwritesimplephrasesandsentencesaboutthemselvesandimaginar ypeople,wheretheyliveand what theydo.REPORTS ANDESSAYS C Canproduceclear,smoothlyﬂowing,complexreports,articlesoressays whichpresentacase,orgive criticalappreciationofproposalsorliteraryworks.Canprovideanapprop riateandeffectivelogicalstructurewhichhelpsthereadertoﬁndsigniﬁca C 1Canwriteclear,well- structuredexpositionsofcomplexsubjects,underliningtherelevantsalie ntissues. Can expand and support points of view at some length with subsidiary points, reasons and relevant examples. B 2 Canwriteanessayorreportwhichdevelopsanargumentsystematicallyw ithappropriatehighlighting of signiﬁcant points and relevant supportingdetail. Canevaluatedifferentideasorsolutionstoaproblem. Canwriteanessayorreportwhichdevelopsanargument,givingreason sinsupportoforagainsta particularpointofviewandexplainingtheadvantagesanddisadvantag esofvariousoptions. B Canwriteshort,simpleessaysontopicsofinterest. Cansummarise,reportandgivehis/ heropinionaboutaccumulatedfactualinformationonfamiliar routineandnon-routinematterswithinhis/herﬁeldwithsomeconﬁdence 12

1 Canwriteverybriefreportstoastandardconventionalisedformat,which passonroutinefactual informationandstatereasonsforactions.A 2 No descriptoravailable A 1 No descriptoravailable 1.2. Scientific approach to methods of teaching writing Within the communicative framework of language teaching, the skill of writing has special status - it is through writing that a person can communicate a variety of messages to a close or distant, known or unknown reader or readers. Such communication is extremely important in the modern world, whether the interaction takes the form of traditional paper-and-pencil writing or the most advanced electronic mail. Writing as a communicative activity needs to be encouraged and taught during the language learner's course of study, and this work will attempt to deal the early stages of EFL writing. The view of writing as an act 13

of com munication suggests an interactive process, which takes place between the writer and the reader via the text. 1 Such an approach places value on the goal of writing as well as on the perceived reader audience. Even if we are concerned with writing at the beginning level, these two aspects of the act of writing are vital importance; in setting writing tasks the teacher should encourage students to de - fine, for themselves, the message they want to send and the audience who will receive it. 3 The writing process, in comparison to spoken interaction, imposes greater demands on the text, since written interaction lacks immediate feedback as a guide. The writer has to anticipate the reader's reactions and produce a text that will adhere to Grice's cooperative principle. According to this principle, the writer is obligated (by cooperation) to try to write a clear, rele vant, truthful, informative, interesting, and memorable text. The reader, on the other hand, will interpret the text with due regard to the writer's presumed intention if the neces sary clues are available in the text. Linguistic accuracy, clarity of presentation, organiza tion of ideas are all crucial in the efficacy of the communicative act, since they supply the clues for interpretation. Accordingly, while the global perspective of content organiza tion needs to be focused on and given appro priate attention, it is also most important to present a product that does not suffer from illegible writing. Writing is, in a very sense, a mirror image of reading. Both are interactive. Readers decode what writers encode. Both draw upon schemata. The reader brings prior knowledge to the comprehension of a text; the writer draws upon similar knowledge in composing a text. 3 Abbott G., D. McKeating, J. Greenwood, and P. Wingard. 1981. The teaching of English as an international language.P.29-30 14

Wilga Rivers 4 makes the distinction between notation, or writing practice, and expressive writing, or composition. Notation ranges from mere copying to the construction of simple sentences describing facts or representing typical, uncomplicated speech. Expressive writing or composition involves the development of ideas of either a practical or a creative nature. Pedagogically, there is considerably more control in the development of notational skills than in more expressive types of writing. The expectation is that the EFL student will progress through several stages of writing practice to the early stages of creative composi - tion. This development from control to creativity continues a line drawn throughout this manual in the chapters on dialogues, oral exercises, and reading comprehension. The first stage is beginning or skill building stage containing activities that take the learners from the very beginning to the mid-intermediate proficiency level. Here the focus is on structural detail and accuracy in the use of the written language. Learners are presented with textual segments, clues, and models of typical prose to assist them as they attempt to rearrange words or sentences, complete partially written texts, and imitate or modify entire paragraphs. In skill building exercises the progression is from simple to more complex structures, a so called bottom up approach. The second stage shifts the focus from the mechanical manipulation of structure to the more creative activities of process writing. The process approach to writing is based upon a set of principles dif ferent from those underlying skill building. Where skill building exercises move from simple to complex structures, process writing, which is a top down model, starts with a concept or theme and works down to the grammatical and semantic units. In the process approach, each learner completes a writing assignment in a group, 4 Wilga Rivers. Teaching foreign language skills. 2nd ed. Chicago, Il. University of Chicago Press. P.40-46 15

exchanging ideas with other members of the group and receiving editorial help at various stages of composition. When conducted properly, process writing is a prime example of cooperative learning. The process approach, with its stress on group interaction, is a direct offshoot of communicative language learning, just as pattern practice was a product of the audio-lingual method. For many years preoccupation with structural accuracy allowed little room for the development of cognitive strategies in creative writing. Students, left to their own resources, were often at a loss as to how to formulate ideas on a topic or theme. Process writing provides for the formulation of ideas and plans through learner cooperation, Rivers eliminating much of the isolation, frustration, and uncertainty encountered in writing programs of the past. Recent studies have attempted to redirect the process approach with its stress on the general mechanics of creative composition to training in writing for specific content areas. The reason for this is a fear that process writing does not prepare students adequately for an academic career. In a content-based approach, students develop writing skills with in specific academic disciplines so that they will be able to compose essays and reports using the specialized vocabulary and structures peculiar to these disciplines. Usually offered at the university level, such coursesare often adjuncts to academic courses, such as economics, his tory, or physics. Skill building exercises have been divided into three categories as follows: 5 I. Constructing Sentences from Words and Phrases; II. Constructing Paragraphs from Words, Phrases, and Sentences; III. Constructing Paragraphs from Original Material. 5 Tannen. D. Coherence in spoken and written discourse. Norwood, N. J. Alex Publishing house. 1984. P. 35-38 16

The purpose is to train the learners to think in logical sequences and to draw upon what they know of the target language in producing lim ited but meaningful prose. I.Constructing Sentences from Words and Phrases. At this stage, the learner is engaged in the rudiments of writing practice as a means of reinforcing the command of basic syntactic structures. Intended for use with beginning level students, such exercises are strictly controlled. In some cases, the components of the structures are provided in ran dom sequence, which the student is to arrange correctly. In others, essential elements of the sentence are omitted, and the student is to supply them. Both types of exercises involve copying, since the student should write out all completed sentences II. Constructing paragraphs from words, phrases, and sentences. People do not normally speak in paragraphs. The spontaneous give and take of conservations is composed of elements that are seldom longer than sentences or sentence fragments. A short series of logically connected sentences may be uttered in a conversation, but carefully structured paragraph belongs to writing. This type of writing exercises are meant to train learners first, to think logically in arranging words, phrases, and sentences in their proper order and second, to use limited amount of imagination and creativity in completing or composing sentences as part of paragraphs which have already been defined or described in some way. The tasks in section A do not require original contributions in the target language by the students. The tasks in section B do. Section A. Constructing paragraphs from material provided in full. Rearranging Full Sentences. Arrange the six sentences below in correct logical order to form a unified paragraph by placing a number in the blank to indicate the correct sequence. ____ After that they walked over to see the animals. ____ They told some funny jokes and did lots of tricks. 17

____ Last week, Harry took Mary to the circus. ____ Harry said there would be many different kinds, both fierce and friendly. ____ First, they went to see the clowns. ____ Mary thought they were interesting, but she preferred the clowns. Section B. Constructing paragraphs from incomplete text. Here, as in the section above, Constructing Paragraphs from Material Provided in Full, learners are asked to draw upon their vocabulary resources. Yet, at this point, they are required to supply mainly lexical rather than grammatical forms as well as longer, more complicated structures. In the two exercises below learners fill in the blanks with words or larger constructions to form a logical and consistent paragraph. There is more than one possible solution to these exercises. Supplying Missing Words or phrases. Harry was carrying a large ________ in his with a lot of fruit in it. His _______, Tom, was carrying _________ too, but there wasn't any in it. There was just ________ . Harry took a look at Tom's _________ and started to laugh. "I couldn't find any _______ this year," he ________ . "So I had to buy________ instead. But you were clever, Tom. Where did you find that _______?" III. Constructing paragraphs from models. The activities presented here are based upon specimens of writing which serve as models for the it. The exercises have two facets. First, they require that the learners understand the structure as well the content of the model paragraphs. Second, they direct the learners to imitate certain aspects of the structure and content of the model while making changes in others. In this way, both reinforcement and activity are brought into play. The changes called for by these exercises may be purely grammatical, or they may involve vocabulary items of varying length and complexity. The goal, in all cases, is to achieve a certain degree of flexibility in the usage of individual elements while retaining a clear picture of the message and purpose of the paragraph as a whole. The models used in this section are restricted to narratives. Learners rewrite the 18

model paragraph below according to the instructions given in each exercise. As many altered compositions as time allows are read to the class, at which time corrections or improvements will be suggested. Model It is a typical winter day, and Mr. Preston is taking a walk downtown. Even though the sun is shining brightly, it is bitterly cold, with a sharp wind. As he is walking along a side street, the wind suddenly blows his hat off his head and onto the roof of a nearby house. Mr. Preston is at first surprised and then quite angry. He fears that he has lost the hat for ever because he is simply too old to climb houses. Since he is a reasonable man, how ever, he decides to forget the entire affair. Just as he is starting off again, another gust of wind blows the hat off the roof, and it lands at his feet. As he is bending over to pick it up, Mr. Preston thinks to himself, "I wish I were as lucky with things in general as I have been today with the wind." A. Grammatical changes. 1. Gender. The model paragraph is written about Mr. Preston. Change Mr. to Mrs. and make all other necessary alterations throughout the paragraph. 2. Tense. The model paragraph is written as if the author were describing an event that is taking place at this moment. Rewrite the paragraph as if the action took place yesterday. B. Vocabulary changes. 1. Substitution from a list. All of the items in the following list can be used as substitutes for items in the model paragraph. Take each item in the list and use it as a substitute for an item in the original. Make any other changes in the paragraph that are necessitated by the substitutes. The substitutes will be given in the list. 2. Free substitution. Learners rewrite the paragraph making any changes they wish. These may be in the nouns, verbs, adjectives, prepositional phrases, or any other constructions. Substantial additions or deletions should not be attempted; the general frame of the original should be maintained. 19

IV. Constructing paragraphs from cues. At this stage, the students are expected to compose structured prose either with the direct aid of notes or with the indirect assistance of partial paragraphs that they are to complete. The first group of exercises under A below offers the students either a portion of completed prose as a guideline or a set of notes as an additional aid. The second group under В consists of completed sen tences or short paragraphs upon which the students are expected to build. Students compose paragraphs using the cues and following the instructions provided for each exercise in sections A and В below. Completed work will be submitted to the entire class for evaluation and possible improvement. A. Models and notes as cues. In this kind of exercise the first paragraph is given in its entirety as a major cue. Write a second paragraph, using the notes provided. Friday morning Bill Brown walked over to the university library to pick up some books. His father, who was a professor of English literature, needed them for a seminar he was giving that afternoon. On his way home Bill decided to stop and visit his good friends, Phil and Alice Cooper, whom he had not seen in a long time. The three of them sat down to talk, and after a while, Alice asked Bill if would like to join them for lunch. Naturally, Bill was delighted. Once students have been through skill building exercises, they are ready to start composing original essays, using process-writing procedures. Working in small groups, they can complete a writing assignment by cooperation and assistance in giving expression to their thoughts, getting them down on paper, and molding them into a final product. They do not produce a single group essay, but each student com poses his or her own composition, with the group serving as a resource for suggestions, criticisms, and evaluation. In process writing the teacher guides the students through all phases of an assignment by providing directions for the work sessions, monitoring the sessions, and evaluating the finished essays. Both documents are models and may be photocopied and used as they are or modified to suit individuals and groups, especially as the writing proficiency of the 20

class develops. As learners develop facility in generating ideas and engaging in group dynamics, the role of the teacher may be reduced. However, instruc tors should always be ready to offer suggestions for developing ideas in the group ses - sions and notes for editing and correcting errors. The active participation of the teacher in each assignment is crucial to success. Three levels of writing activity are presented in this stage. At the first level teacher presents parts of an essay or article as guidelines for further development. In this way, students are not only given a topic, but also some information and details contained in the piece. At the second level, the teacher gives the class a definite theme to write on. It is up to the students to develop information on this topic in their group sessions. At the third level, students must select and develop their own topics in group sessions. At this level each group may very well generate a different topic. Level 1. Completing a partial composition. This level is close to free composition. In this case only minimum directions are provided in the form of initial and concluding sentences. Students are to complete each composition based on the information provided in the sentences. Level 2. Reviewing an essay or article. In this level no linguistic clues are provided. However, the theme is determined by the material under review. Level 3. The theme provided by the teacher. Again, although the composition is composed solely by the teacher, the teacher exerts some control by providing the topic. Level 4. The theme developed by the students. In this level, each student writes down a few ideas for a topic and ideas he or she might have concerning the topic. To sum everything up, we can say that the process approach and skill building approaches are very important in teaching writing. Yet, skill building exercises move from simple to complex structures, process writing, which is a top down model whereas, in the process approach, each learner completes a writing 21

assignment in a group, exchanging ideas with other members of the group and receiving editorial help at various stages of composition. Overall, both approaches are prime examples of cooperative learning. 1.3. The main teaching techniques of writing in ESL(B1 level) classes Regardless of the type of writing tasks the teacher might favor assigning, a good place to begin classwork is to explore the prewriting stage, the stage prior to actual production of a working text. Because there isn't one com posing process, the goal of the teacher should be to expose students to a variety of strategies for getting started with a writing task and to encourage each student to try to discover which strategies (in which circumstances) work best for him or her. Several heuristic devices 1 (or invention strategies) which can be explored in class for pro - viding students with a repertoire of tech niques for generating ideas are the following: 1. Brainstorming: This is often a group exercise in which all of the students in the class are encouraged to participate by sharing their collective knowledge about subject. One way to structure teacher to suggest a broad topic, such as for choosing a particular academic major, and have students call out as many associations as possible which the teacher can then write on the board. The result would be far more material generated than any student is likely to think of on his/her and then all students can utilize any or all of the information when turning to the preparation of their first drafts. 22

2. Listing: Unlike brainstorming, as described above, listing can be a quiet essentially individual activity. Again, as a first step in finding an approach to a particular subject area (such as the use and abuse of power, to cite an example), the students are encouraged to produce as lengthy a list as possible of all the subcategories that come to mind as they think about the topic at hand. This is an especially useful activity for students who might be constrained by undue concern for expressing their thoughts grammatically correct sentences, because lists do not require complete sentence 3. Free writing: Suggested by Elbow 1 for helping native speakers break through the difficulty of getting started, free writing is also known by various other terms, such as "wet ink" writing and "quick-writing." The main idea of this technique for students to write for a specified period (usually about 5 minutes) without taking their pen from the page. As Elbow puts it, "Don't stop for anything. . . . Never stop to look back, to cross something out,. . . to wonder what word or thought to use ... If you get stuck it's fine to write 'I can’t think what to say. . . as many times as у ou like." 6 Freed from the necessity of worrying about grammar and format, students can often generate a great deal of prose which provides useful raw material to use in addressing the writing assignment at hand. For EFL students, this technique often works best if the teacher provides an opening clause or sentence for the students to start with. So, for example, if the next assignment is to write a paper about one's personal philosophy of life, a short free writing session can begin with the words "Life is difficult but it is also worth while." The free writing generated after the students copy this sentence and continue to write down whatever comes into their heads can be kept private or shared with other students. It can also be used as the basis for one or more subsequent 5- to 10-minute free writing "loops" 1 which 6 Elbow, P. Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press. P. 67-69. 23

are additional free writing sessions starting with whatever key idea derives from material discovered through the process of the previous quick-writing step. 4. Clustering: Another technique for get ting many ideas down quickly, clustering be gins with a key word or central idea placed in the center of a page (or on the blackboard) around which the student (or teacher using student-generated suggestions) jots down in a few minutes all of the free associations trig gered by the subject matter—using simply words or short phrases. Unlike listing, the words or phrases generated are put on the page or board in a pattern which takes shape from the connections the writer sees as each new thought emerges. Completed clusters can look like spokes on a wheel or any other pattern of connected lines, depending on how the individual associations are drawn to relate to each other. By having students share their cluster patterns with other students in the class, teachers allow students to be ex posed to a wide variety of approaches to the subject matter, which might further generate material for writing. Rico notes that clustering allows students to get in touch with the right-hemisphere part of the brain to which she attributes "holistic, image-making, and synthetic capabilities." She further notes that clustering makes "silent, invisible mental jesses visible and manipulable” 7 It is very important that students experiment with each of these techniques in order to see how each one works to help generate text and shape a possible approach to a topic. The purpose, after all, of acquiring invention strategies is for students to feel that they have a variety of ways to begin an assigned writing task and that they do not always have to begin at the beginning and work through an evolv ing draft sequentially until they reach the end. Speck underscores the importance of having students practice a variety of strategies since she observed that none of her EFL students utilized invention strategies pre sented in the course textbook which they 7 Rico, G.L. Clustering: Pre-writing process. Sacramento. California State Department of Education. 1986, p. 17-20. 24

had read about but not practiced. 8 She further notes that students may also devise their own invention strategies once they have learned the value of systematic exploration of a topic. But we must keep in mind the fact, as Reid asserts, that for some students, the strategy of choice may be to produce a text in a linear fashion, possibly generated by an outline prepared prior to writing a full first draft. For some people, she points out, brain storming can be more difficult than, and not as successful as, outlining. Using Readings in the Writing Class. The use of readings in the writing class is another topic that has generated a great deal of debate among those searching for meth odologies which promote improvement in writing proficiency. Before awareness of how to address the writing process in class and of the importance to students of actually doing writing in class, the primary activity of so- called writing classes was actually reading. As mentioned earlier, the traditional para digm for L1 writing classes was rooted in hav ing students read and discuss texts which they would then go on to write about. When the process approach was first introduced, many writing instructors eliminated the use of read ers, and used only texts written by the students themselves as the reading material for the course. The dominant philosophy seemed to be that one learns to write by writing, and that perhaps reading had very little to do with the acquisition of writing. ESL teachersfollowing the developments in L1 writing classrooms also went through a period in which reading played almost no role in the writing classroom. But the pendulum has be - gun to swing in the opposite direction, and while readings have been reintroduced into the so-called modern process writing class— both LI and L2—the nature of the readings and their function is viewed quite differently. On one level, readings serve some very practical purposes in the writing class, partic ularly for ESL writers who have less fluency in the language. At the 8 Krashen. S. D. Writing: Research, theory, and applications. New York. Pergamon. 1984, p. 20 25

very least, readings pro vide models of what English texts look like, and even if not used for the purpose of imita tion where students are asked to produce an English text to match the style of the model text, readings provide input which helps students develop awareness of English prose style. Krashen makes the case even stronger by claiming, "It is reading that gives the writer the 'feel' for the look and texture of reader-based prose." 9 In class, close reading exercises can be done to draw students' attention to particu - lar stylistic choices, grammatical features, methods of development, and so on. Such exercises help to raise student awareness of the choices writers make and the conse quences of those choices for the achievement of their communicative goals. Spack points out, "An active exploration of the writer/reader interaction can lead students to realize and internalize the idea that what they write becomes another per son's reading and must therefore anticipate a reader's needs and meet a reader's expecta tions." 10 On another level, writing tasks assigned by many professors require students to do a great deal of reading in order to synthesize and analyze academic material in particular content areas. Thus, the EFL writing class can incorporate lessons which assist students in preparing academic writing assignments by using readings as a basis to practice such skills as summarizing, para phrasing, interpreting, and synthesizing con cepts. Finally, many ESL students are not highly skilled readers, having had limited opportunities to read extensively in English; it is highly unlikely that anyone who is a non-proficient reader can develop into a highly proficient writer. For that reason alone, EFL teachers are advised to include a reading component of one nature or another in their classes. 9 Krashen. S. D. Writing: Research, theory, and applications. New York. Pergamon. 1984, p. 20 10 Spack.R. Invention strategies and the ESL composition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), P. 703-725 26

Writing Assignments. As the object of any writing class is to have students work on their writing, the topics students write about must be carefully designed, sequenced, and structured so that the teacher knows exactly what the learning goal of each paper is and so that the student gains something by working on the assign - ment. There are many factors to consider in selecting topics for student writing, but even if not consciously aware of it, the teacher will be primarily influenced by a particular phi losophy about teaching writing which he or she (or the textbook being followed) adheres to and which significantly shapes the approach to topic design. In fact, even when topics are chosen in a random and ad hoc fashion, the teacher will probably select an assignment which seems appropriate on the basis of a felt inner sense of appropriateness, reflecting perhaps unconsciously how the teacher views the goals of the course, the ways in which writers learn, and what he or she values as good writing. For example, if the teacher wants the students to focus on standard organizational patterns common to English writing, it is usually because the teacher values essays that follow discern ible patterns and/or believes that training students to recognize and produce those pat terns is an important goal of the course. If the teacher believes that writers learn best by writing about topics of their own choosing and that text to be valued is that which reveals the most about the persona of the writer, then the assignments in that teacher's writing class will be presented to achieve those goals. One very common approach to topic generation may be referred to as the "rhetori cal patterns" approach, in which ESL students are exposed to a variety of types of discourse structure common to English prose. This is done by presenting examples of professional writing or samples of prose written by text book writers for the purposes of illustrating a particular pattern that forms the focus of a lesson or sequence of lessons. Some text books also offer edited or unedited essays written by EFL students as samples of the vari ous prose patterns. Then, typical writing as - signments, which derive from this philosophy, ask students to imitate the structural 27

pattern of the prose model—be it a genuine piece of professional or student writing or an artifi cially constructed one—using different con tent. These sorts of assignments will usually be presented so that the student has to either create or plug in particular content according toaspecified manner of presentation. Exam ples of the "create" assignments are those, which specify an organizational structure, such as comparison and contrast, but do not specify any content. Examples of the "plug in" assignments are those, which specify an organizational structure, such as "cause and effect," and specify the content area, such as "drugs and crime." The student's task in the former case is to identify two items which can be compared and contrasted and which lend themselves to presentation in that manner. The student's task in the latter case is to write about drugs and crime in such a way as to show the cause-and-effect relationship. Other patterns commonly included in the or ganizational approach to specifying writing assignments are chronological order, exem plification or illustration, classification, anal ysis, problem solution, and definition—all commonly referred to as patterns of exposi tion. Regardless of what else takes place in the class that shows concern for the process of writing, the "products" which result from this philosophy of assigning topics will invari ably be judged primarily on how closely they follow discernible and traditional formats of the specified rhetorical pattern. There is ample evidence that "real- world" writing does not get produced in this fashion, which is one of the major criticisms leveled at textbooks which encourage these approaches. Not only do real writing tasks not begin from a particular form which merely lacks content to be complete, but content it self usually does not get generated without the writer's first having a purpose for writing. Taylor also points out that “a major result of a writing program which focuses pri marily on form is an insufficient emphasis on content which would create the opportunity for students to expe rience the process of discovering meaning and then of struggling to give form through revision.” 1 28

A completely different philosophy of teaching leads to viewing writing as a vehicle of self-revelation and self-discovery, and as signments are presented to students in which they must reflect on and analyze their own personal experiences. Some examples would be asking students to write about their experi ences as second language learners or to re flect on a lesson learned in childhood. The content in either case would arise from their own personal biographies. This type of as - signment has the potential of allowing the writer to feel invested in his or her work, not usually the case with the rhetorical pattern approach. Perhaps more centrally, the value of writing is seen in its role as a tool of discov ery of both meaning and purpose. Proponents of the discovery approach claim that the writing skills learned in practicing personal writing will transfer to the skills required to produce academic papers. Regardless of the underlying philosophy of teaching which motivates the types of as signments presented to students, teachers must also make a number of other decisions about assignments. They must decide where the writing is to be produced: in class or at home. When students are writing in class, teachers are often uncertain of what they themselves should be doing while the students are writing. Students also generally feel pressured by the limited amount of time available. When students write at home, teachers may be concerned that the student might receive outside input from another writer or from textual material, rendering the student's text unrepresentative of his/her own writing. For some students, writing at home will be completed in even less time than writing produced in class. One way to resolve this is that some assignments should be considered "timed" writing, written in a given time framework, submitted, and responded to as final products, while other writing assignments can be prepared over a span of several class periods (either in class or at home) and feedback provided to assist in the revision process. 11 11 Taylor, B.P. Content and written form: A two-way street. TESOL Quarterly.15(1) 1981, p.5 29

In fact, another decision teacher must make concerns the number of drafts for any given text that they want students to produce. Given the immense value to the student writer of learning to revise text and to work through a series of drafts before considering a paper "finished," new writing topics should not be assigned before the student has had a chance to work through a cycle of drafts on a prior assignment. If the teacher's goal is to foster student improvement, then providing a multiplicity of writing assignments on differ ent topics (whether they be of the rhetorical pattern type or prompted by a more open-ended approach) will not allow students suf ficient time to devote to working on writing in progress. That is, students working on a sec ond or third draft of a given topic, which is scheduled to be submitted the following week, should not simultaneously be working on a first draft of yet another topic. But as Reid cautions us against dogmatism in pre senting approaches to how students generate texts, Harris cautions us against dogmatism in applying an inflexible call for revision. In her research, Harris finds that writers range along a continuum from what she calls "one- to multi-drafters," and not everyone benefits from being asked to pro duce multiple revisions since the preferred strategy for some successful writers is to pro duce a single, polished draft. She notes, in fact, that "studies of revision do not provide the conclusive picture that we need in order to assert that we should continue coaxing our students into writing multiple drafts” 12 because both efficient and inef ficient writers are to be found who favor one or the other of these approaches to writing. A final consideration regarding topic de sign is one of essay length, for in cases where teachers do not specify length; students often want to know how long their papers should be. Many EFL students are concerned with doing the bare minimum and will invariably submit very short papers; others may produce too much text for the teacher to find time to respond to, or for the student to be able to process and 12 Harris,M. Composing behaviors of one and multi draft writers.College English.1989.51(2)p174 30

benefit from the extensive feed back that the teacher might need to provide on a lengthy but highly problematic text. One must bear in mind the need for a relationship between what the topic calls for and the length of paper produced. For example, to ask students to write 250 words on an encyclope dic topic is to ensure superficiality of treat ment; conversely, to ask them to produce a lengthy paper on a narrowly focused topic is to invite padding and digressions. Also, what a teacher believes a student will learn from preparing a particular assignment should not be out of proportion to the amount of time the student will need to invest in prepar ing it. Finally, if one believes that students best learn to write by writing, then the design of writing tasks is perhaps the key component of curriculum design. It is in the engagement with, and the completion of, writing tasks that students will be most directly immersed in the development of their writing skills; thus, a great deal of thought must go into choosing such tasks. Goal Setting. "Responding to student writing has the general goal of fostering student improvement. While this may seem to be stating the obvious, teachers need to develop/adopt responding methodologies, which can foster improvement; they need to know how to measure or recognize improvement when it occurs. Although the teaching of first language writing has come a long way since most response took the form of written criticism by the teacher detailing what the student had done wrong on a paper, and teaching EFL has ceased to be seen as a vehicle for monitoring student acquisition of grammar, remains no easy answer to the question of what type of response will facilitate improved student mastery of writing. In reviewing dozens of research studies investigating various methodologies of responding, Hillocks concluded, "The results of all these studies strongly suggest that teacher comment has little impact on student writing.” 13 Therefore, in setting 13 Hillocks.G., Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. ERIC. 1986. p165 31

goals, teachers should focus on implementing a variety of response types and on training students to maximize the insights of prior feedback on writing occasions. Another approach of teaching writing effectively is “content-based” approach. It has been previously used in a variety of language learning context for the last few decades. Content-based instruction implies an integration of language learning and content learning while the language is learned within the context of a specific academic subject. In a content-based approach, language class activities are specific to the subject matter being taught and they stimulate students to learn through the use of the target language. According to Stryker and Leaver, content- based approaches enhance students’ motivation and accelerate their acquisition of language proficiency. 14 The four major principles underlying content-based instruction are: automaticity, meaningful learning, intrinsic motivation and communicative competence. Brown also suggests “content-based classrooms may yield an increase in intrinsic motivation and empowerment, since the students are focused on subject matter that is important to their lives” 15 . By generating content instruction and materials, content-based instruction keeps students interested and motivated. Content-based classroom is learner centered where students actively engage in the learning process. Content-based instruction introduces students to the discourses of their future professions and motivates them to work with authentic language resources. The teaching of writing to non-native speakers of English has matured since 1966. Raimes discussed this development under four approaches: A 1 Burkland & Grimm, Motivating through responding. Journal of Teaching writing.5(2),1986.p5 2 Hayes & Daiker, Using protocol analysis in evaluating responses to student writing. 1984. P.13 14 Wilga Rivers. Teaching foreign language skills. 2nd ed. Chicago, Il. University of Chicago Press 15 Brown, Douglas. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching . White Plains, NY: Longman. 2002. P. 49-50 32

form-dominated approach, a process approach, a content-based approach and an English for specific purposes approach. In content-based writing instruction, writing is connected to an academic subject matter and it is considered as a means of teaching the content. Using mind maps to develop writing . Mind maps can be used for a multitude of purposes. This article outlines how they can effectively be used to help support and develop students' writing skills. A mind map, or spider gram, is a strategy for making notes on a topic, prior to writing. It is a structured strategy, which shows the (hierarchical) relationship of ideas, as opposed to an unstructured strategy, such as brainstorming, in which students produce notes at random on paper. Having an organised display of information from the outset of the writing process may help some students, as it is more easily converted into a draft, whereas in brainstorming, the random recording of ideas might lead to problems with the structure of students' texts. Making a mind map should be a spontaneous pre-writing activity. Students start with a topic at the centre and then generate a web of ideas from that, developing and relating these ideas as their mind makes associations. Mind maps work well as their visual design enables students to see the relationship between ideas, and encourages them to group certain ideas together as they proceed. Mind maps work especially well when created in groups, since the discussion this engenders aids the production of ideas, and makes the task livelier and more enjoyable. Traditionally, students are given a topic to write on by the teacher. However, with certain classes, students may prefer to nominate the topic themselves. This can lead to greater interest in the task on the part of the student, as well as, perhaps, greater knowledge of the topic under study. 33

The mind map strategy can be used to explore almost any topic, though discursive essays and narrative work particularly well as they front students' ideas and lend themselves to discussing ideas in groups. We may start by writing the topic on the board. "Why do people start smoking?" The discursive text is useful in highlighting this feature of English, and in raising awareness of the noun phrase, a particularly tricky area for intermediate students. Once the topic has been introduced, we encourage students to close their eyes and think about it for a minute or two, in silence. They then have two minutes in which to note down their ideas. If they do not know a word in English, they can write it in L1 at this stage, as dictionaries or too much teacher intervention tend to halt and inhibit the creative flow. Then, working in groups, they can compare and discuss their ideas, perhaps adding to their mind maps as they go. This stage also provides the opportunity for peer teaching, as other students may be available to provide the English word for the idea that was noted down in L1. Feedback The next stage, in which the teacher makes a collective mind map on the board, is optional, but is useful for students who are new to the idea of mind maps, or for weak classes. It is also in this feedback stage that any remaining language problems can be ironed out. As the teacher elicits students' ideas, and reformulates expressions or corrects, students will learn how to express their ideas in English. Such personalization is said to aid vocabulary learning.The map is fluid and changeable, and new connections or subgroups can be made, or branches added, as the students make suggestions. The end result should be an organized display of information, showing the central topic, and a number of subtopics and further pointthat stem fromit. In the next stage the students organize their mind maps into a linear format to decide the best way in which to present their points. They should first think about 34

the overall structure, i.e. the order in which to relay the information, and then focus on the precise function each paragraph will have in their final text, as this helps to clarify their writing. This can be done in groups, or as a class with the teacher leading the discussion. However it is carried out, it is important to provide a context and audience. Having an audience in mind helps students to decide which ideas are most important, and also helps students to choose the appropriate style. Students should then begin to write their compositions, working in pairs if they wish. After two paragraphs, they should exchange their compositions, so they become readers of each other's work. This allows for feedback, and possible re- writing. Once they have finished, they should again exchange their texts. This gives their texts a communicative purpose, as well as developing an awareness of the fact that a writer is always producing something to be read by someone else, rather than for the display of writing alone. Once students are familiar with the idea of making mind maps, they can be encouraged to use this skill for further writing activities. It is a useful technique and often improves the clarity and organization of student texts. Forms of Feedback. Up to now we have been discussing feed back that is provided in writing by the teacher on various drafts of a student paper, a fairly traditional and undoubtedly time-consuming method, even for those teachers who do not respond to every draft as a finished product. But there are other ways for students to re ceive feedback on their writing which can and should be considered in structuring a writing course. Writing teachers who view themselves as judges or repositories of certain truths about effectiveness in writing will want, of course, to be in charge of providing feedback to their students, believing that such feedback can play a vital role in the improve ment of student writing. Those who view themselves as coaches or editorial advisors will also want to provide feedback, though not necessarily in the same way. Teachers should bear in mind that feedback can be oral as well as written, and they should consider the value of 35

individual conferences on student papers and/or the use of tape cas settes as two additional ways to structure teacher feedback. From another point of view, most writing teachers realize that they have many students in one class and they might also be teaching two or more writing classes, so the teacher has a very limited amount of time to provide feedback to any one student. Teachers whose philosophies embrace the value of collaborative learning1 therefore turn to the other students in the class to assist in the feedback process. Other students in the writing class can be taught to provide valuable feedback in the form of peer response, which serves to sharpen their criti cal skills in analyzing written work as well as to increase their ability to analyze their own drafts critically. Oral Teacher Feedback . Because of potential communication problems, ESL students in a writing class need to have indi vidual conferences with their teacher even more than native-speaking students do. Con ferences of about 15 minutes seem to work best, and can provide the teacher an opportu nity to directly question the student about intended messages which are often difficult to decipher by simply reading a working draft. Further, conferences allow the teacher to uncover potential misunderstandings the student might have about prior written feed back or issues in writing that have been dis cussed in class. Another benefit is that students can usually learn more in the one-to- one exchange than they can when attempting to decipher teacher-written commentary on their own. Some teachers provide all their feedback orally by asking students to submit a cassette tape with each draft. This method probably works best when the teacher silently reads a student's paper and makes comments directly into the tape recorder while marking some accompanying numbers or symbols on the student's text. For EFL students, this method has the advantage of providing more exten sive feedback than that likely to be made in writing, as well as allowing the student to replay the tape as many times as necessary to understand and benefit from the teacher's comments. Once the teacher has learned to use this technique, it probably takes 36

less time to complete taped remarks about a paper than it would to put them in writing. All in all, preliminary writing activities such as brainstorming, listing, clustering can be a good facilitators when starting writing. Giving feedback is also one of the necessary post activity task which can help students to understand their mistakes. CHAPTER II. IMPLEMENTATION OF TECHNIQUES IN IMPROVING WRITING SKILLS 2.1. I nteraction patterns in writing classes All classes are mixed ability to one extent or another. Extreme cases, when you have near active level speakers with beginners, can be very challenging for the teacher. In these cases it is important to remember that all students will get something out of the class, but not necessarily the same things, and not necessarily 37

what you aim to teach them. For example, the beginners may begin to get a grasp of your classroom language whilst the stronger students may begin to be able to put a new tense into use. Adapting materials for mixed ability classes can take different forms. One way to adapt materials is to rewrite reading texts and grade the language accordingly for different levels. In an ideal world where a teacher has all the time in the world to prepare their classes this may be the perfect solution. However, the reality is that this sort of adaptation is extremely time consuming and not many teachers can actually go to this length to adapt materials for mixed level groups. Another problem that can arise with this sort of adaptation is that it can be awkward to give out different texts to different students. There is a danger that they will instantly realise that they have been labelled as a weak or strong student and, in the case of the weaker students, this will no doubt effect their motivation. I would like to offer some ideas of how you can support your weaker students and offer extension activities for your stronger students whilst using the same materials as the starting point for the class. This way the preparation time involved for the teacher is not drastically higher, and the group can still work together for most of the class. Here may be given suggestions as: Extension activities for stronger students by g iving creative tasks that students can do at their own level; indicating mistakes using correction code to give students a chance to self-correct (Sp = spelling, Gr = grammar etc.); i ncreasing the word limit; indicate where they could use more interesting way of saying something, etc Support for weaker students by correcting the draft together before students copy up in neat; reduce the word limit, encourage use of dictionaries or vocabulary books; give an example piece of writing as a model before they begin writing; pair or group weaker students with stronger students. As previously mentioned you may often be teaching a class which has students who are clearly of different levels. They may have different starting levels 38

of English or they may learn at very different speeds - for any number of reasons. These are several strategies that a teacher can use to deal with this situation. It is easy for students to get frustrated in a class of mixed ability. Stronger students may feel held back, weaker students may feel pressured. The teacher may feel stressed. The best solution to this is to have an open-class discussion about the classroom situation - to ensure the best for everyone it is better to acknowledge the situation and for everyone to agree how to deal with it. It is probably best to stage and structure the discussion. Needs Analysis. Use a needs analysis to prompt the students to reflect upon their learning style, learning strategies, language needs, learning enjoyment, motivation, language strengths and weaknesses. Questions that might be included are:  What kinds of class activities do you enjoy from?  Which language skill do you most wish to develop?  Do you prefer working individually or with a partner?  Would you rather sit and listen to the teacher all lesson or participate in group work? Students compare their answers in pairs or small groups. You should collect the information and prepare a statistical representation of the key questions and answers. This will help to develop the sense of shared community in the class. Explain and discuss . Explain the mixed-level situation to the students and give a list of possible approaches to the teaching and learning. In pairs, the students rank the approaches/ideas according to their suitability for the situation. Following feedback, you should highlight the strategies you plan to use. 39

A student contract. Developing with the students, or perhaps writing it yourself, a contract of behaviour for activities is a useful device. 'I will help and support my activity partner.' 'I will participate in group work.' Tell them what you are going to do. If you think your students are not mature enough to carry out this kind of reflection, explain the situation to the class and tell them what strategies you will be using. If students know what to expect, you can hope that they will cooperate. All of the above work could be done in the mother tongue, although I feel it is best done primarily in the target language as it draws attention to the fact that this is a learning language issue. Encourage students to develop an awareness of their own language abilities and learning needs. What are their strengths and weaknesses, and how can they focus on these? How can they measure their own progress. This may take the form of a learner's diary, regular self-assessment, keeping records of mistakes, keeping a record of things learnt. Work groupings. Varying the way students work in the class will help meet the variety of levels in the class. Pair work. You can pair strong with strong, weak with weak, or strong with weak. Perhaps in a very controlled activity, the strong with weak will work well. In a freer activity, perhaps strong with strong will be of benefit. Variety in the pairings is the key here - and you should also be sensitive to the general relationships between different students, and learn to note who works well with whom. Group work. These groups could be of mixed levels or similar ones. The hope is that in a smaller group, the weaker student will feel more able to contribute. Also, if the group is working with a set of information, divide the information between the students, forcing them to work together. You may consider dividing your class into groups by level for the whole lesson, enabling you to give a different level or number of tasks to each group. Discussion of this strategy with the class should help prevent stigmatisation. 40

2.2. Lesson plan sand activities on the topic Lesson One Topic: People and personality (Personal descriptions) Writing focus: Listing Language focus: Order of adjectives Lesson aims: to break the ice and help students to know each other better; to introduce the way of making a list; Materials: 1. Littlejohn, A., Writing 1, Cambridge University Press 2. Stephens, M., Practice Writing, Longman 41

Lesson duration: 80 min Students’ level: B1 Activit y Objective Procedure Dura tion Mode of interaction Materi als Person al descrip tions to let students to introduce themselves in descriptive way Students should write a few words about themselves on a piece of paper. Teacher gathers everybody’s descriptions and put them together in a pile or envelope. Then teacher chooses one and read it aloud. Students should guess who is described. 15 min Individual , whole class Ex 2, p. 9., Writin g 1 Likes and dislikes to be aware of the right way of making lists Teacher distributes handout 1 and asks students to do the task. Then she asks some students to share their list with the whole class and puts some of the examples on the board. On the way teacher explains the right way of listing things: keeping the same form as nouns or gerund, etc., using small letters in the list order, etc. 30 min. Individual , Pair work Whole class Hando ut 1 (adapt ed from Ex 2, p 3, Writin g 1) True and false to use facts to describe a person Teacher reads some sentences about the author of the book Writing 1. Students 20 min Whole class, Pair work Hando ut 2 (Writi 42

facts should guess which sentences are true and which are untrue. Then students will write some sentences about themselves using factual examples. Some of the facts should be untrue. Students give their sentences to each other to read. They should guess which are true and which are untrue. ng 1, Ex. 4, p.10) Writing course content to introduce the content of the course and to let students to reflect on their likes and dislikes about writing Teacher gives the list of topics which students will cover in this course. Students divide their notebook into two columns and write examples for each column. I like (writing letters, using complex sentences..) I don’t like (using punctuation marks, making plan…) Teacher puts students in groups of three and students share their list with each other in the group. She elicits from each group 20 min Hando ut 3, Studen ts’ notebo ok, flipcha rt paper 43

some examples about what they like and what they don’t like in writing and puts these examples on the poster. Teacher tells students that they will refer to this poster (list) at the end of the course to check whether their opinions have been changed. Activity Objective Procedure Durati on Mode of interaction Mate rials Personal description to let students to introduce themselves in descriptive way Students should write a few words about themselves on a piece of paper. Teacher gathers everybody’s descriptions and put them together in a pile or envelope. Then teacher chooses one and read it aloud. Students should guess who is described. 15 min Individual, whole class Ex 2, p. 9., Writ ing 1 Likes and dislikes to be aware of the right way of making lists Teacher distributes handout 1 and asks students to do the task. Then she asks some students to share their 30 min. Individual, Pair work Whole class Han dout 1 (ada pted 44

list with the whole class and puts some of the examples on the board. On the way teacher explains the right way of listing things: keeping the same form as nouns or gerund, etc., using small letters in the list order, etc. from Ex 2, p 3, Writ ing 1) True and false facts to use facts to describe a person Teacher reads some sentences about the author of the book Writing 1. Students should guess which sentences are true and which are untrue. Then students will write some sentences about themselves using factual examples. Some of the facts should be untrue. Students give their sentences to each other to read. They should guess which are true. 20 min Whole class, Pair work Han dout 2 (Wri ting 1, Ex. 4, p.10) 45

Lesson plan 2 Activity Objective Procedure Duratio n Mode of interac tion Materia s Warming up To lead students to a new topic T elicits a list of festivals that are celebrated in his/her students’ country/countries and complete the exercises as a whole class. If students come from the same country, T gets them to discuss the most popular festival. 10 min Whole class p. 34., Writing 2 Writng a personal letter to let students to get to know how to write a personal letter T asks students to do exercises 1-2 in pairs. As a follow up, T briefly y elicits how Leszek uses friendly and informal Engllish which is similar to spoken English (i.e. it uses contractions, ellipsis and everyday English e.g. catch up 20 min. Indivi dual, Pair work Whole class Hando ut 1 (adapte d from Ex 1-2, p 34- 35, Writing 2) 46

with things. ) Focus on apostrophe s 1 To review apostrophes T highlights the addition of an o when contracting will not : won’t (Not willn’t) and writes this text onto the board. T asks students to come up one at a time and add an apostrophe in the correct place. As they do this, T elicits the long form of the contracted words. Sundays my birthday, I dont know what my wifes going to buy me for a present. She wont tell me! It was the same last year … she wouldnt tell me then. Shes going shopping tomorrow. I cant wait to look in her bag whn she isn’t looking. 40 min Whole class, Pair work Hando ut 2 (Writin g 2, p.35) 47

Home task To write a personal letter T e asks Ss to write a personal letter to each other. 10 min Indivi dual Lesson Plan 3 Writing e-mail messages Students: Freshman students learning English as a foreign language Course : English Level: B 1 Topic: Summer Vacation Duration: 80 minutes Approach: Content-based Instruction/Brainstorming Materials : Teacher-created slides: a visual resource for clarifying content and developing writing skills Lesson Objectives: -learning about holiday resorts -picking up necessary language from the slides -writing to a tour agent an e-mail asking detailed information about the Maldives Pre-writing stage: Classroom Discussion: The students talk about their favorite holiday resorts. Introducing relevant vocabulary and idioms before writing Note Taking: Students take notes during the slide show (teacher-produced slides). While writing stage: The students are asked to write an e-mail to a tour agent asking for advice about a nice summer holiday resort for his/her summer vacation. They will write a detailed e-mail asking for further information about the place they want to go by introducing the name of the holiday resort they have chosen. They will write in 48

groups of 3 students (Group work). For the task, the students use their notes taken from the slide show. Post- writing stage: The students were placed in pairs and assigned to play the roles of a tourist and a tourist guide. Student A: A tourist wants to learn about it as much as possible, asks whatever he wants to learn from the tourist guide. Student B: A tourist guide answers the guest’s questions as much as he can. Peer editing and giving feedback Rewarding the best writer Homework: The students write a package tour program to a holiday resort they have chosen individually. Instruction: You are a tour operator and required to write a package tour program to a holiday resort in detail (250-300 words). Write about tour dates, the cost of the tour, transportation and accommodation, the planned daily activities on the island, etc. The procedure of the lesson. First, the teacher held a warm up session, motivating the students and focusing their attention to the topic. Later, she conducted the pre-writing stage consisting of a class discussion activity, during which the students discussed their favorite holiday resorts. After the class discussion, the informative slides about the holiday resorts were presented and the students took notes from the slides in order to use them in their writing. Finally, they were asked to do the writing task (writing an e-mail). The students were given ample time to write the task. They did the task in groups of three students. Having completed the task, they read it aloud and received feedback from the teacher and from the whole class. After the task was over, a role-play activity was conducted by pairs of students as a post-writing activity playing the role of a tourist and a 49

tourist guide. With the post-writing activity, writing was integrated with speaking and the subject matter was reinforced. The students were assigned homework at the end of the class. If we analyze the class, we should point out firstly the students’ motivation during the class. They were highly motivated during the lesson. They spent considerable energy on taking notes, participating in pairs and group works, and writing dialogues, giving additional signs of motivation. The students enjoyed the lesson and participated successfully by taking notes, writing the task and interacting with one another. They did not show any signs of boredom during the lesson. On the contrary, they were very much interested in the topic and undertook the task successfully. They seemed to enjoy the group-work and pair-work activities. They also showed positive attitudes in working with classmates. Their written products also confirmed that they were motivated and performed well during the lesson. When the written products were evaluated, they were found to be complete in form and meaning. Composed of syntactically and semantically appropriate sentences, the written products included the necessary vocabulary items to describe the intended facts and opinions. Furthermore, the written products were found to be cohesive, coherent and relevant with all ideas supporting one central theme using suitable linking devices. The written texts were also successful in terms of function; the e-mails written to a tour-guide asking additional information about a package tour to a holiday resort were extremely effective as the students wrote all the questions they were interested in. 50

ACTIVITIES IN- CLASS WRITING TASKS I. In-class writing task Task: Spend 30 minutes on writing a letter to yourself/ pen-friend describing (up to the teacher to choose who to) your life as a freshman. Write approximately 100 words. Assessment criteria:  Task response (audience, level of formality, number of words)  Organisation (layout, cohesion)  Mechanics (spelling, punctuation)  Variety of vocabulary/structure II. Writing Test – (choose 4 or 5 of the following) 1. Break the text into paragraphs 2. Combine two simple sentences using appropriate conjunctions 3. Distinguish complete sentences from fragments 4. Correct run-on sentences 5. Choose the best linking word 6. Punctuating paragraphs 7. Other Example writing test Example task 1: Each list below contains one general idea and four specific ideas. For each list, underline the general idea. The first one has been done for you. 1. a. reading b. going to movies c. bowling d. weekend entertainment e. watching television 2. a. crime 51

b. pollution c. crowds d. disadvantages of cities e. the high cost of housing 3. a. an excellent salary b. a great new job c. health insurance d. flexible hours e. company products for lower prices 4. a. marriage b. children c. good job d. goals for the future e. college degree 5. a. fresh air b. advantages of camping c. beautiful mountains d. away from city crowds e. cheap Example task 2: Read the following paragraph and insert the correct capitalization and marks of punctuation wherever they needed. Valentines day is celebrated on February 14 as a festival of romance and affection. People send their sweethearts greetings cards that ask won’t you be my valentine? Children like to make their own valentines from paper doilies red construction paper bright foils and wallpaper samples. These customs probably came from the ancient roman festival of lupercalia which took place every February 15. the festival honored juno the roman goddess of women and 52

marriage and pan the god of nature. Young men and women choose partners for the festival by drawing names by chance from a box. After exchanging gifts they often continued to enjoy each others company long after the festival and many were eventually married. In the year 496 the church changed the lupercalia festival of February 15 to saint valentines day on February 14 but the sentimental meaning of the old festival has remained to the present time. According to the book popular antiquities which were written in 1877 people observing this holiday in England as early as 1446. One account tells of young men wearing the names of their ladies on their sleeves for several days. The expression he wears his heart on his sleeve probably came from this custom. In the united states valentines of that period were hand painted and today their beautiful decorative qualities make them collectors items. I. In-class writing task Task: Write a critical report on the given reading extract. (200-250 words) Assessment criteria:  Task response (audience, level of formality, number of words)  Organization (layout, cohesion)  Extended emphasis on decisive points by referencing to the examples from the text.  Variety of vocabulary/structure  Mechanics (spelling, punctuation) II. Writing Test (choose 3 of the followings) 1. Break the text into paragraphs 2. Identify the topic sentence in the given paragraph. 3. Identify types of paragraph (descriptive/narrative) 53

4. Edit the given paragraph. 5. Identify odd sentence out in the given text that breaks the unity of the paragraph. 7. Other Example task 1: Rearrange the sentences in each set to create a coherent paragraph. Write the letters of the sentences in their new order on the lines given. Then write out the paragraph. 1. a. Second, compare fees for special services, such as stopping checks. b. Always compare several banks before you open a checking account. c. Finally, make sure the bank’s hours are convenient for you. d. First, find out the monthly fee each bank charges. e. Next, see if you will be earning interest on your account. _______ _______ 2. a. Early humans imitated these “natural bridges” by chopping down tall trees and placing them across water. b. It was built of many logs tied together with rope. c. The first bridges were simply trees that had, by chance, fallen across streams. d. The bridge over the Euphrates River lasted for decades. e. The first genuine bridge was laid across the Euphrates River at Babylon about 700 b.c. ______ ______ Example task 2: Circle the letters of the supporting ideas in each list. The first one is done for you. 1. a. One thing I like to do is work in my garden. b. I enjoy several activities on my days off. 54

c. Another activity I enjoy is going to movies. d. My favorite activity is going on picnics with my family. 2. a. It is close to the border so I can visit Mexico often. b. San Diego is a great place to live. c. The weather is great. CONCLUSION. Teaching students to produce a successful written text is a complex task which requires simultaneous control over a number of language systems as well as an ability to factor in considerations of the ways the discourse must be shaped for a particular audience and a particular purpose. Teaching students to become 55

successful writers is no less a complex task. But it can be a tremendously rewarding one as well. In this research work we have presented some of the issues involved in applying writing activities in teaching the writing class B1 level. As the ability to write well in English language is no doubt even more difficult to achieve than the ability to read, speak, or understand the language, it is not surprising that many students take several years to achieve even a modicum of success. What must be emphasized to teachers in training is the importance of designing activities and shaping classes with a clear understanding of how the acquisition of written skills can be fostered. Our real goal is to gradually wean our students away from us, providing them with strategies and tools for their continued growth as writers and for the successful ful fillment of future writing tasks they might face once they have completed their last writing course with us. Earlier hopes to find the best method "were based on the faulty assump tions that there was a best method and one just had to find it, that teaching writing was a matter of prescribing a logically ordered set of written tasks and exercises, and that good writing conformed to a predetermined and ideal model" (Zamel, 1987, p. 697). There can be no "best" method when students' learning styles are so different; our hope now is rather to find methodologies which em power students rather than restrict them, and to create courses which arise from principled decisions derived from thorough research in - vestigations. The growth of composition studies as a discipline with its own independent body of research (apart from, say, literary studies or linguistic studies) has enormously influenced the formal training of English. For EFL teachers to be able to provide courses which assist their students in learning to produce academic prose, their training should be no less than other skills. It has been the major aim of our research work to emphasize the fact that teaching writing skills is particularly important at the initial stage of language 56

learning since it helps students establish a good basis in learning other skills such as reading, speaking and listening. We worked out a series of activities for improving students’ writing skills based on “content-based” and “process- oriented” approaches. The activities which we applied teach students mostly writing through process and content based making them be more motivated in writing. We tried to vary writing tasks, make them more creative and we came to a conclusion that students love writing because of interesting tasks. We both benefit : students because learning to write is enjoyable for them , teachers benefit because they feel the need to improvise , to make writing more attractive to students and think of and look for more creative tasks. We came to a conclusion that in order to be able to select and use appropriate procedures and materials, as well as assess their learners needs and progress, teachers need to be clear regarding the desirable outcomes of a writing program and the processes involved in good writing. Moreover, in concluding our research results we must point out that in order to help ESL learners become more skillfull in writing, we need to make a crucial distinction between language accuracy and writing skills. That is, a learner may be able to write sentences, which are satisfactory for his/her, level in terms of grammar, syntax and vocabulary and still be unable to produce an effective text. Surely, in most cases learners will have problems in both areas (language and writing skills). Therefore, it is crucial for us to be able to look beneath the layer of language problems to discover writing problems. This leads us to another important distinction, the one between grammar/vocabulary development and writing skills development. We need to remember that language input/practice alone cannot result in the development of writing skills. Special activities in writing lessons are necessary, in which learners are guided to become aware of all the elements of good writing, supported with information and examples, provided 57

with opportunities for practice, and given focused feedback on their performance. We can also plan lessons which integrate work on language with work on writing skills. In such cases, it is important for us to be clear about the aims/focus of different stages in the lesson.In order to be able to select and use appropriate procedures and materials, as well as assess their learners needs and progress, teachers need to be clear regarding the desirable outcomes of a writing program and the processes involved in good writing. To sum up our ideas, if teachers are eager to be more creative and innovative, they can find various activities to improve writing skills but they should take into consideration the following facts: 1) to create tasks in accordance with students level of English (B1) and interest 2) to teach writing starting from skill building exercises to process based 3) to get started form pre-writing techniques to proof reading 4) to combine reading and writing tasks 5) to use techniques mentioned above 6) to design classes based on process-oriented rather than product. Concludingly, asking for the students’ opinion in a short questionnaire one of the effective ways in teaching ESL classes. The students confirmed that the new approach was successful and they would like to continue in it. Finally, while researching I came to the main point of view that adaptation this new way of teaching in my future teaching. However, it is necessary to point that each class is very specific and therefore, it may happened that other classes could not find this way of teaching so successful as it was in the other class. 58

THE LIST OF USED LITERATURE 1) Karimov I. A. O’ zbekiston XXI asr bo’sag’asida: xavfsizlikka tahdid, barqarorlik shartlari va taraqqiyot kafolatlari , Т oshkent: O’zbekiston. -10 b. 2) O’zbekiston Respublikasi qonun hujjatlari to’plami, 2013 y., 20-son, 251- modda. 3) Abbott G. D. McKeating. J. Greenwood, and P. Wingard. The teaching of English as an international language.1981. P.29-30 4) Arnold Jane. Affect in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1999. - P.56. P. 234 59

5) Boden. M.The Creative Mind. London: Abacus, 1998 6) Burkland and Grimm, Motivating through responding. Journal of Teaching writing.5(2), 1986. P.5 7) CarterRonald. Language and Creativity: the art of common talk. London: Routledge. 2004. P.58-60 8) Cook, Guy. Language Play: Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000. P.39 9) Day, Richard and Julian Bamford. Extensive reading in the Second Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998 10) Dornyei, Zoltan. Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2001 11) ElbowP. Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 67-69. 12) Gardner, Howard. Frames of Mind. London: Paladin Books. 1985 13) Graham.S. Approaches to process writing. British Council Teaching. 2003 14) Hedge, T. Writing. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 2005 15) Hillocks.G., Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. ERIC. 1986. p165 16) Hughey, J. B., Wormuth, D. R. Teaching ESL Composition: Principals and techniques. New York; Newbury House. Pp23-26 17) Krashen. S. D. Writing: Research, theory, and applications. New York. Pergamon. 1984, p. 20 18) Mukundan, Jayakaran. (ed) Creative Writing in EFL/ESL Classrooms II. Petaling Jaya: Pearson Longman Malaysia. 2006 19) Rico, G.L. Clustering: Pre-writing process. Sacramento. California State Department of Education. 1986, p. 17-20. 20) Rubdy, Rani and Mario Saraceni. English in the World: Global Rules, Global Roles. London/New York: Continuum. 2006 60

21) Spack.R. Invention strategies and the ESL composition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 703-725 22) Tomlinson, Brian. Seeing what they mean: helping L2 learners to visualise. Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1998. 265-78.. 23) Tannen Deborah.Talking Voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1989 24) 24) Ron White and Valerie Arndt. “Process Writing”. Cambridge Press. 2006. 25) Wilga Rivers. Teaching foreign language skills. 2nd ed. Chicago, Il. University of Chicago Press. 2008. P. 40 26) www.learnenglish.com 27) www.teachenglish.com 61

O'xshashlar

The selection and evaluation of words in teaching vocabulary to ESP students on the material of scale up

Designing vocabulary tasks for beginners of English as a second language

Developing reading comprehencion through defferent classroom technics for B1 level learners

Implementing effective techniques for developing efl learners’ listening skills

Motivational Teaching Strategies in Teaching Foreign