Recognizing the importance of l1 in vocabulary (kurs ishi) - Английский язык - Рефераты

Recognizing the importance of l1 in vocabulary (kurs ishi)

Загружено в:

20.09.2019

Скачано:

0

Размер:

43.111328125 KB

Recognizing the importance of l1 in vocabulary CONTENT Introduction Chapter I. A factor of difficulty in vocabulary learning: deceptive transparency 1.1 Categories of Deceptively Transparent Words 1.2 ‘Conforms' (Similar Lexical Forms) Chapter II VOCABULARY LEARNING THROUGH READING 2.1 A case study on vocabulary learning through reading picture books 2.2 Individual differences in a variety of tasks concerning vocabulary learning and reading 2.3 Measuring vocabulary Conclusion Used literature

Introduction An examination of a recent bibliography on vocabulary studies reveals that vocabulary is no longer a 'victim of discrimination' among language acquisition researchers. Actuality of the work: Among the growing number of research questions addressing vocabulary learning, some are of a predominantly psychological nature e.g. the arrangement of L1 words in the mental lexicon; some - of a quantitative nature e.g. the number of words the learner knows at a particular stage of learning; others have dealt with pedagogical issues, e.g. the best methods of teaching particular types of words. Aim of the work: Two questions which are relevant to the present study are: What makes words easy or difficult to learn and the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. Some factors which have been claimed to affect vocabulary difficulty are: word pronounce, length, part of speech, specificity, idiomaticity, multiplicity of meaning and others, different coding of LI, interaction with already familiar words, and others. Task of the work: As for the relationship between vocabulary and reading, some questions that have been asked are how successful learners can be at guessing unknown words, under what circumstances guessing improves, how many words in a particular text the learner should know to comprehend the contents, and others. Subject of the work: This paper will deal with yet another factor of difficulty in vocabulary learning which will be referred to as 'deceptive transparency'. Though de-ceptively transparent words can be problematic both in comprehension and in production, this paper will focus on deceptive transparency as a factor of dif-ficulty in reading comprehension only. In section two of the paper, deceptively transparent words will be defined and classified; in section three, an experiment will de described which tested several hypotheses about

deceptively transparent words. Chapter I. A factor of difficulty in vocabulary learning: deceptive transparency Ullman discusses three types of transparent words 1 . The most frequent ones are morphologically transparent words (or morphologically motivated) those words whose meaning can be determined from the meanings of their parts, e.g. 'doorman', 'unavoidable'. The second type includes words whose sense can be understood from the sound form e.g 'bang', 'snore', 'crack'. These are the onomatopoeic words, the ones that are phonologically motivated. The third type of transparent words are the semantically motivated ones, whose figurative meaning can be understood from their relation to the literal meaning, e.g. 'coat of paint', 'jacket potato'. If the above definitions of transparent words are considered from the point of view of understanding words in non-native languages, they are in-complete, since the clues of interpretation in Ullman are intralingual only. In the attempt to detect the meaning of a word in a foreign language, readers/listeners will often use inter- lingual clues, or a combination of intra- and inter-lingual clues Thus, a word can be transparent because of its resemblance to its translation equivalent in another language familiar to reader/listener (whether it is his/her LI, or not), e.g. 'liberte'is transparent to anyone who is familiar with the english 'liberty'. A word can also be transparent if a part of it resembles a familiar word in an-other language and another part is meaningful in the language of the new word, e.g. 'appeltje' in Dutch is transparent if you know 'apple' in English and the diminutive meaning of the suffix -tje in Dutch. Because of the different clues used in interpreting words in foreign lan-guages, I suggest that in the context of foreign language learning, words should be considered transparent if they can be interpreted on the basis of intra" and/or inter-lingual clues in the word itself. Deceptive Transparency While some new words in a foreign language may be genuinely trans-parent and may therefore be easy to understand and remember, 1 Ulman

others, on the other hand, only LOOK transparent but are not. For example, 'infallible' looks as though it were composed of in+fall+ible and meant 'something that cannot fall'; 'shortcomings' looks like a compound of 'short' and 'comings', meaning 'short visits'. 4 These words are therefore 'deceptively transparent'. We could define a deceptively transparent word as a word which seems to provide clues to its meaning but does not. Put differently, deceptively transparent words are words which learners think they know but they do not. 1.1 Categories of Deceptively Transparent Words The following classification is based on a corpus of errors collected over several years of teaching English as a Foreign Language to first year university students of Humanities and Social Sciences. They were all high school graduates, whose level of English was more or less equivalent to the Cambridge First Certificate of English. Since most of the course was devoted to reading comprehension, most of the collected errors were errors of misinterpretation. The deceptively transparent words (hence DT words) which induced errors seemed to fall into one of five distinct categories which will be described below. Words With A Deceptively Morphological Structure. These are words that look as if they were combined of meaningful morphemes. Thus, 'outline' was misinterpreted as 'out of the line', 'nevertheless' as 'never less', 'discourse' as 'without direction'. The learner's assumption here was that the meaning of a word equalled the sum of meanings of its components. This assumption is correct in the case of genuinely transparent words, but not when the 'components' are not real morphemes. Idioms. 'Hit and miss', 'sit on the fence', 'a shot in the dark', 'miss the boat' were translated literally, word by word. The learner's assumption in the case of idioms was similar to that in the meaning of the whole was the sum of meanings of its parts.

False Friends. 'Sympathetic' was interpreted as 'nice' (Hebrew - 'simpati'); 'tramp' as lift (Hebrew - 'tremp'); 'novel' as 'short story' (Hebrew - 'novela'). The mistaken assumption of the learner in this case was that if the form of the word in L2 resembled that in LI, the meaning did so too. Words With Multiple Meanings If often happens that students know one meaning of a polyseme, or a homonym and are reluctant to abandon it even when, in a particular context, its meaning is different. For example, 'since' was interpreted as 'from the time when' though it meant 'because'; 'abstract' as 'not concrete' instead of 'summary'; 'state' as 'country' instead of 'situation'. The mistaken assumption of the learner in this case was that the familiar meaning was the ONLY meaning. 1.2 'Synforms' (Similar Lexical Forms) The largest category of DT words is that of 'synforms' pairs/groups of words similar in form. (For criteria of synform similarity, classification of synforms and discussion of the problems they raise) 2 Generally speaking, some synforms are similar in sound (cute/acute; available/valuable; conceal/cancel; price/prize; some are morphologically similar (economic/economical; industrious/industrial; reduce/ deduce/induce). Synformic confusions may have two sources: the learner might have learnt one word of the pair/group, but since its representation in the memory id insecure or defective, a similar word which shares most of its formal features, might look identical to it. Or, the learner might have studied both synforms but since his knowledge of both is insecure, he is not sure which word form is associated with which meaning. Whatever the reason, the result is misinterpreting one synform as its counterpart. Checking deceptive transparency. In section two it was suggested that, in the framework of second language learning, a modified definition of transparency could be adopted, which would account for both inter- and intralingual clues in 2 Laufer

detecting the meaning of words. The notion of deceptive transparency was then introduced. Deceptively transparent words were defined as words which seemed to provide clues to their meaning but in fact did not. DT words were found to belong to one of five categories: words with a morphologically deceptive structure, idioms, false friends, words with multiple meanings and synforms. The empirical verification of deceptive transparency as a factor of difficulty id the subject of the next section. One could argue against DT as a factor of difficulty by claiming that: (a) learners misinterpret all kinds of words, not necessarily the DT ones; therefore the number of errors induced by DT words would not be significantly higher than the number of errors induced by non-DT words; (b) when the learner thinks he knows a word, but does not, this is not due to specific word characteristics (those of DT words); therefore if tested for lack of awareness of ignorance, there would be no significant difference between DT and non-DT words. The study was designed with the above arguments in mind. It addressed the following research questions: (a) Is the frequency of errors induced by DT words different from the error frequency induced by non-DT words? b) Is the learners' awareness of their ignorance of DT words different from the awareness of their ignorance of non-DT words? Question (b) was subdivided into two questions: (i) when faced with unknown DT words, will the learners recognise them as unfamiliar more often than not recognise them as such? (ii) when learners are unaware of their ignorance of words, is it in the case of DT words more often than with non-DT words? Procedure The subjects were 100 first year university students taking a course in English for Academic Purposes. They were all high school graduates 5 , native speakers of Hebrew and Arabic. The study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, learners were given an unseen text on a subject of general nature

with comprehension questions 6 , to ensure that they were reading for comprehension. The tasks were (a) to answer the questions; (b) to underline unknown words in the text. 'Unknown' meant a word that could not be understood from text context. The answer sheets with comprehension questions and the texts with the underlined words were collected. Stage two followed immediately. The learners were given a clean copy of the same text and a list of 40 words from it (20 Dt, 20 non-DT) and were asked to translate them in text context. The translations were collected and compared with the underlined words in the texts. In other words, for each student, a comparison was made between the words students CLAIMED they did not know (out of the 40 selected ones) and the words they ACTUALLY did not know. The comparison between translation lists and underlined words yielded three possible results: (a) The learners translated some words correctly and did not underline them in the text. (b) The learners did not know the translation of some and underlined them, i.e. they were sometimes aware of their ignorance. (c) The learners misinterpreted some words and did not underline them in the text, i.e. they were sometimes unaware of their ignorance. Three scores were given to each student: (a) Error score: the number of errors on the translations list: for DT words and non- DT words. (b) Awareness score: the total number of instances in which the learner was aware of his ignorance: in the case of DT words; and non-DT words. (c) Reading comprehension score on the basis of his answers to comprehension questions. The following grid illustrates how the information about the two first scores was coded. Results Error scores in DT and non-DT words were compared by a matched t-test. The number of errors in DT words was significantly higher than in non-DT words

(1=1.67 p<0.05). The number of +aware instances was compared with the number of -awareinstances for DT words. The latter was significantly higher than the former (t=8.46 p<0.0005). This means that DT words are not recognised as unfamiliar more often than they are recognised as such. The number of -aware instances was compared for DT and non-DT words. The frequency of -aware for DT words was significantly higher than that for the non- DT words (t=10.31 p<0.0005). This means that unawareness of ignorance is more frequent with DT words than with other words. The relationship between awareness of unknown DT words and reading comprehension was measured by correlating the 'awareness' scores with reading comprehension scores. Pearson product moment correlation was .65, significant at .0001 level. Discussion The study compared DT and non-DT words with regard to: (a) number of errors induces by each group of words. (b) the extent to which learners were conscious of their ignorance of words in each group (the DT and non-DT). (c) the relationship between awareness of unknown DT words and success in reading comprehension. The results showed that (a) Errors were more frequent with DT words. Students were less aware of their ignorance with DT words than with non-DT ones. There was a significant correlation between reading comprehension and learners' awareness of unknown DT words. It can be argued, therefore, that deceptive transparency is indeed a factor which has an effect on comprehension. DT Words And Reading Comprehension As mentioned before, the correlation between awareness of DT words and reading scores was .65, significant at .0001 level, though correlations do not show cause- effect relationships between the variables, they do indicate the degree of common variance. In our case, it seems that about .4 of variance in reading could be

accounted for by the degree of awareness of DT words. However, I will try to argue for a possible cause-effect relationship between the two. When a foreign learner does not understand a word in the text, he has the following options: ignore it (if he considers it unimportant), look it up in a dictionary, ask someone who knows its meaning, or try to guess it from con-text. Many researchers of reading and pedagogues have emphasized the importance of guessing as a strategy of successful reading presupposes awareness, on the part of the learner, that he is facing an unknown word. If such awareness is not there, no attempt is made to infer the missing meaning. This is precisely the case with deceptively transparent words. The learner thinks he knows then and assigns the wrong meaning to them, distorting the immediate context on this way. But this may not be the end of the distortion process. The misinterpreted words will sometimes serve as clues for guessing words which the learner recognises as unknown, which may lead to larger distortions. Graphically, the process can be represented in the following manner: awareness of ignorance of DT words -> misinterpretation of DT words -> distortion of immediate context -> using distorted context for further inter- pretation -> distortion of larger context. Here is an example of a distorted sentence resulting from misinterpretation of three words. The original sen-tence was: 'This nurturing behaviour, this fending for females instead of leaving them to fend for themselves may take many different forms.' 'nurturing' was confused with 'natural', 'fending' with 'finding', 'leaving' with 'living'. The result was the following: 'Instead of living natural life, natural behaviour, females and children find many different forms of life.' One might wonder about the lack of syntactic resemblance between the original and the misinterpreted sentences. Such incongruencies in sentence structure show that students are willing to rely on lexical clues more than on syntactic ones; they are even prepared to impose a sentence structure on the idea they have already arrived at via lexis. If the learner had recognised 'nurture,

fend, leave' as unknown words in the given example, he might have looked up or guessed their meaning and arrived at a different interpretation. The suggested cause-effect relationship between awareness of DT words and reading comprehension can therefore be explained as follows. A better awareness of DT words is necessary for attempting to find their meaning. Such an attempt will result in a larger number of correctly interpreted words. These will in turn reduce the density of unknown words. Such reduction will result in an increase in contextual clues which are necessary for outstanding additional new words. This understanding will increase the total number of correctly interpreted words. A larger number of known words will be an asset to global comprehension of the text. DT Words And Vocabulary Testing. One way of checking the vocabulary size of a learner is by giving him a list of words (real and non-existing) and asking him to reply 'yes' to every known word and 'no' to every unknown one. (E.g. Meara and Buxton, 1987). The calculation of the score takes into account the number of real words identified as familiar and the number of 'identifications' of the nonsense words. The more nonsense words are claimed to be known, the lower is the credibility of the subject. However, if the text includes many DT words among its items, the learner may be making 'yes' responses to unknown words not be-cause of low acceptance threshold, but due to genuine unawareness of his ignorance. How this might affect the test score is not clear. It could be simpler to exclude such words from the test than to find a suitable correction formula. Errors In DT Words And The Mental Lexicon The study did not attempt to investigate the characteristics of the mental lexicon. However, some of me errors caused by DT words can provide some information about the organisation of L2 words in the memory. Investigations have indicated that while in the native speaker's mental lexicon there are strong semantic links between the words, the connections between words in additional languages are primarily phonological.

Synformic errors, particularly confusion of phonologically similar words (cute/acute, valuable/available), provide additional evidence for such organisation. In searching for the right word, the learner selects its neighbour in the lexicon which sounds similar, but is erroneous. Another interesting issue that has been debated is whether words com-posed of root and affixes are stored as single units or whether the stems and affixes are stored separately. Errors in the words with a deceptively morphological structure seem to support the latter (lexical decompositions hypothesis). The learner might store the prefix 'dis-' separately and therefore interpret 'discourse' as 'without direction', combining what looks like two separate units if meaning. Also the confusions of morphological synforms (industrial/industrious, economic/economical) might result from storing the suffixes separately and substituting one by an-other. CHAPTER II. VOCABULARY LEARNING THROUGH READING The first experiment was meant to gain insight into the nature of the psychological processes involved in vocabulary learning through reading. It was organized as follows. Ten Dutch-speaking adults of whom it was known or could be assumed that they were able in introspecting (which is crucial in this type of explorative research) were asked to read foreign language texts which contained a substantial amount of unknown words. In order to gain as much information as possible the texts used were of different types, different levels and in different languages (English, French, German and Italian). The subjects were encouraged to guess the meaning of the unknown words before looking them up in a dictionary. The subjects knew that some of these words would be tested, but were requested not to memorize them explicitly. The words were tested twice: after an interval of one week and after an interval of two months. While recalling the meaning of the words, the subjects had to think aloud.

The recall protocols were analyzed with respect to a) the ways in which presenting words in texts contributes to a better embedding of new words in memory and b) textual and psychological conditions that should be met when presenting new words in texts. The results of this experiment shed light on the many opportunities which text reading offers to embed words in meaningful memory systems. Indeed, the subjects could and did use many different access roads to retrieve the required word meaning. So in some cases a new word and its meaning proved to be connected with recollections of the situation in which it had occurred in the text or with recollections of images which were formed of those situations during the reading process. For instance, one of the subjects remembered the meaning of the word "dusk", because the image of evening falling on a salt plain (from the story she read) suddenly occurred to her. Besides, the new word and its meaning sometimes appeared to be connected with recollections of the literal word group or sentence in the text, with recollections of the fact that the word had occurred more than once, with recollections of the fact that a word with the same root had also occurred or with recollections concerning the position of the word in the text. Finally the new word and its meaning were often connected with recollections of emotions or experiences which the words, the text or the actions of the subjects themselves had evoked. The subjects reported, for instance, having experienced some word forms as funny or strange, having felt proud about a correct guess or having felt stupid when looking up the same word twice. In order to track down the so-called textual conditions the recall protocols were analyzed for factors in the meaning and the structure of the words and the text as a whole which could have hampered the retention of the new words. Occurrence in inconspicuous or ambiguous contexts proved to be an unfavourable condition as did the occurrence of two or more words in one text which were similar in form and/or in meaning but not related. In order to find the so-called psychological conditions which should be met when presenting words in texts the protocol records were analysed to trace the

actions on the language material which enhance retention of the new words. In general, a three phase action- sequence proved to be most effective, i.e. guessing the meaning of the unknown word, verifying the guess (e.g. in a dictionary) and analyzing the word form. By and large the more different ways the words were dealt with, the better they were learned as could, indeed, be predicted by the theory of trace systems in memory (more information about this experiment and examples from the protocol records may be found in a Dutch publication. 2.1 A case study on vocabulary learning through reading picture books One of the aims of the second study was to gain more information on the textual and psychological conditions in quite different circumstances. It consisted of a long-term rather loosely organised case study with three Dutch children learning English (and some French and German) by reading and listening. The greater part of the data was collected in a period of two months in which two of the children (a 13-year old girl and a 10-year old boy) read some thirty English books: picture books, early readers written for young (native) children who are learning to read, non-fiction books and graded readers especially written for foreign language learners. A follow-up study over two years involved a third child starting with English, whereas the two older children started with French and some German. The following procedure concerning the selection of the books and the new vocabulary was used. The children could each time choose a book which they would like to read from some 5 to 10 books (from a large and varied stock). They could inspect the books at leisure and ask questions about them; they were also encouraged to put the books in order of interest and to comment on this grading. In most cases the books were read aloud to the children. In some cases no notice was taken of unfamiliar words (if possible); in other cases attention was paid to these words in a variety of ways, such as translating the words, helping the

children in guessing their meaning from the context and the word form or helping the children to memorize the words (by quickly going through them once or twice after reading - when necessary showing the context - or by using vocabulary cards). The results of this study will now be discussed in so far as they throw new light on the embedding of the words in meaningful memory systems and on the textual and psychological conditions for vocabulary learning through reading. As the results of the follow-up study did not add new results with regard to the theme of this paper, I will focus here on the results of the first part of the study. Although this study centred on the textual and psychological conditions some information on the embedding of the words in memory was gained as well. In a number of cases the children appeared to remember words through recalling the situation described in the text. Often recollections of an illustration mediated recall. Again recollections of their own emotions or experiences which the words, the text or the actions of the children had evoked, influenced recognition of words. In this study, in particular, the emotions connected with funny, surprising or exciting illustrations and texts exerted an important influence on recognizing words. To illustrate this with an example: the word "handsome" was first seen in the ironic "Jake beckoned to the rest of his ugly crew. "Right, me handsomes (...)" 3 which was said to a funnily drawn couple of nasty scoundrels. Although "handsome" had been seen only once, it proved to be remembered when it turned up in a totally different context two weeks later (limitations of space prevent me from including illustrations and more examples; they may be found in Dutch publications. As to the "textual conditions" the results of the first experiment were confirmed, but also extended, because in this study some insight - at least for this age group – was gained into the significance of text genres for vocabulary acquisition. In particular, reading picture books and to some degree reading early readers and non- fiction books appeared to have a number of advantages compared with reading foreign language readers. The children, for instance, liked to experience that they 3 Smuggler London 1976

could read the same books which are read by children from countries where the target language is used, at a rather early stage. They even proved to be able to read some German picture books without any help, before their first lesson in German. More generally speaking, I found the following favourable features which some of the picture books do possess and which some of the foreign language readers do not or only to a smaller degree. Early readers and non-fiction books mostly occupy an intermediate position. 1. Authenticity. The language is more lively, more natural, because it is not hamperedby limits of vocabulary and structure. 2. Redundancy. Some readers for foreign language learners suffer from lack of redundancy, especially concerning the structure of the text, when compared with authentic texts. This means that an apparently easy, adapted text may be more difficult to understand than its authentic counterpart. 3. Mutual support of illustrations and text. In picture books and in some of the early readers and non-fiction books close cooperation between author and illustrator is usual (sometimes it is even the same person). 4. Artistic value. Picture books possess an obviously artistic value. This is probably precisely what makes them attractive for different age groups (they have to be attractive for adults - parents - as well as for children). These factors proved to contribute to a better comprehension and retention of the text and the new words, partly because they brought about a greater emotional involvement in the children. As to the psychological conditions more information was gained about some of the characteristics of guessing and analyzing the word form, which proved to be important for comprehension and retention. Earlier research which focused on the guessing skill, revealed some of the characteristics of guessing and analysing. In this study a great variety of illustrated texts was used. Guessing the meaning of unknown words appeared to occur very often and mostly Successfully, especially in the picture books, where, as I pointed out before, text and illustration are closely connected. Even rather difficult words like "except" and

"Suddenly" were guessed (and remembered) easily in this way. One of the other strategies (also found in the earlier studies) which at this stage often led to success, consisted in making use of one's knowledge of the world. However, more often than in the case of guessing the meaning of a new word from pictures the children needed some help in the form of questions like: "What would you do in such a situation?" or "How would you feel in such a situation?" A third strategy which in this study led to good results, consisted in translating the sentence while leaving out the unknown word. This strategy is probably especially relevant for this category of young foreign-language learners, because it helps them to grasp the structure of the sentence as well as the position of the unknown word in it. Other strategies such as using context clues like synonyms, antonyms and descriptions, which are often mentioned in the literature, were used as well, but only rarely, probably mainly because of the nature of the texts used in this study. The strategy of analyzing the word form led sometimes to correct guesses, but more often to failures. Analyzing the word form after the meaning of a new word had been given, did, however, have a positive effect on retention of the word. In particular, systematically pointing out the most frequent "sound correspondences" between in this case English and Dutch proved to be very effective (e.g. th-d: thing=ding, thief=dief, sh-sch: ship=schip, sharp=scherp, ch-k: church=kerk, chance=kans). Finally, the case study suggested an additional psychological condition for learning words through reading: the importance of a wide and free choice of books. The procedure of choosing and "grading" books mentioned before contributed considerably to the motivation of the children to read the selected book and probably as well to their retention of the content (cf. Ausubel, 1968, who found already that orienting before reading leads to an enhanced retention of the text). The case study indicated that this also brought about a good retention of a number of words occurring in important passages of the books. Finally, it was remarkable that the amount of interest in the subject appeared to prevail over the degree of

difficulty of the language. This phenomenon and the importance of a free and wide choice was also found in a study concerning the relations between leisure reading in the mother tongue and reading French books by Toussaint-Dekker. 2.2 Individual differences in a variety of tasks concerning vocabulary learning and reading The third experiment was carried out in the larger framework of a project on Mixed Ability Teaching which is still in progress. One of the aims of this experiment was to explore the psychological conditions in greater depth through involving pupils of the first phase of secondary education (12-15 year) of the lowest ability range. The research focused on the differences between (Dutch) pupils of very different ability ranges being educated together when learning French. In order to gain more insight into the nature of the differences with regard to vocabulary learning and reading, I presented 60 pupils with a variety of tasks in this field. In some cases the pupils worked individually and were requested to think aloud. However, if the task allowed it, the pupils worked in pairs of more or less the same ability level in order to create a more natural situation for thinking aloud. The ability level was determined in agreement with the French teachers and in most cases on the basis of a vocabulary test. The following tasks were used: while reading a story guessing the meaning of unknown words from the context, after having read a story memorizing the meaning of unknown words by means of vocabulary cards, reading a relatively difficult illustrated story, recalling the meaning of new words incidentally acquired (or not) while reading a story and doing a reading strategy exercise involving strategies such as: orienting and mobilizing advance knowledge before starting to read, scanning and skimming, and guessing the meaning of unknown words. The main results of the analysis of the protocol records concerning the embedding of the words in meaningful memory systems and concerning the textual and psychological conditions for vocabulary learning through reading are the

following. With respect to the nature of the "embedding" no differences between the pupils were found. Even weak pupils remembered, for instance, the context of a notoriously difficult word like "encore", which they had seen only once (5 months before), because they had very much enjoyed the particular book in which the word had occurred. In other words, when the textual and psychological conditions are favorable, the possibilities of embedding seem, in principle, to be the same for pupils of all ability ranges. With respect to the textual conditions the findings of the first experiment were confirmed. The results of the second experiment could not be confirmed, because only one type of text (graded readers) was used. With respect to the psychological conditions more insight was gained into the nature of these conditions for pupils of the lowest ability range. In general, these pupils proved to be weak both in guessing and in analysing. In the protocol records a variety of causes for this result could be traced. They can be indicated here only briefly. As to guessing weak pupils (as compared with their strong counterparts) tended to focus on the unknown word while neglecting the context. Weak pupils often did not take into account, for instance, the structure of the sentence. Characteristically a cue like translating the sentence while leaving the unknown word out (cf. experiment 2) helped these pupils far more than cues concerning the pictures, the wider context or the situation involved. Weak pupils also experienced difficulties because of their more restricted knowledge of the world (partly socially determined), which in some cases hampered guessing. More generally, weak pupils experienced serious difficulties in integrating information from different sources. In some cases, for instance, the pupils had four sources of information at their disposal: the knowledge they already possess, the text, the illustrations and the cues given in the exercises on the text. Weak pupils were by no means able to systematically explore these four sources and to integrate the information gained. Instead, they tended to be drawn by the source which happened to attract their attention and to cling to it. For instance, two pupils who associated French "Ville" with "villa" did not change their hypothesis in spite of

the verbal context ("Les villas principles du Maroc sont Rabat, Casablanca et Fes"), in spite of the picture (a small map of Maroc with these three towns indicated, and in spite of the given cue. With respect to analyzing the word form also some differences between weak and strong pupils may be mentioned. Weak pupils (again partly socially determined) have a more restricted vocabulary knowledge in their mother tongue, which reduces the number of possible cognates. For instance, French "arriver" is for these pupils no cognate, whereas for strong pupils it is (Dutch, like English, has two more or less synonymous verbs "komen" (to come) and "arriveren" (to arrive). Weak pupils also experience considerably more difficulties in generalizing from already learned words or word groups to slightly different new words or word groups (e.g. from a bientot to bientot, from tres bon to tres beau, from preferer to prefere). Pupils of the lowest ability level appeared to need much more time and trials to memorize 15 French words which were presented on vocabulary cards alternately isolated and in a sentence. So this way of memorizing words is for weak pupils certainly no solution. Instead, it seems more appropriate to make a distinction between relevant differences concerning vocabulary learning and reading which may or may not be reduced in the French lessons. It seems, for instance, unlikely that French lessons reduce differences in vocabulary knowledge in the mother tongue and general knowledge of the world. Other differences like integrating information from different sources and guessing the meaning of words from the context, might, however, be tackled more successfully in these lessons. Foreign language teaching should, in other words, capitalize on helping weak pupils to master relevant vocabulary learning and reading strategies. This may even have a positive effect on the learning results of these pupils in other subjects as well. Finally, the case study suggested an additional psychological condition for learning words through reading: the importance of a wide and free

choice of books. The procedure of choosing and "grading" books mentioned before contributed considerably to the motivation of the children to read the selected book and probably as well to their retention of the content (cf. Ausubel, 1968, who found already that orienting before reading leads to an enhanced retention of the text). The case study indicated that this also brought about a good retention of a number of words occurring in important passages of the books. Finally, it was remarkable that the amount of interest in the subject appeared to prevail over the degree of difficulty of the language. This phenomenon and the importance of a free and wide choice was also found in a study concerning the relations between leisure reading in the mother tongue and reading French books by Toussaint-Dekker. 2.3 Measuring vocabulary A quantitative approach of lexical richness and variety can offer a macro- picture on the learner's lexicon. In the lexicometric and stylostatistical literature a variety of measures has been proposed for spelling out the lexical characteristics of a written and spoken text. The lexical variety or richness of a text is usually defined as a function of the number of types (V) in relation to the number of tokens (N). The number of tokens constitutes the text length. For the words used by our informants, a set of 11 lexical measures has been selected originally, mainly based on Menard. The type/token ratio is by far the most widely used measure. Surveying the literature on child language, Richards concludes that in spite of their popularity type/token ratios have frequently failed to discriminate between children at widely different stages of language development. Type/token ratios yield especially biased results if the texts investigated differ considerably in the number of tokens. As we showed in Breeder, Extra & Van Hout 3 measures of lexical richness turned out to be most promising: (b) Guiraud's index (V/√N, which in fact is comparable to Carroll's diversity measure V/√2N),

(c) The number of types, provided the texts do not differ too much in the number of tokens, and (d) the Theoretical Vocabulary. This is the expected number of types for a specified number of tokens and it is calculated on the basis of the number of types and tokens found in a concrete text. For a more thorough discussion of this lexical measure see Breeder et al. In any lexical study on richness and variety information should be provided about the operationalisation of basic categories such as word tokens, word forms, lemmas or other basic counting units. Operationalisation problems will be not discussed here. More information can be found in Breeder et al. The steps taken in the operationalisation of the lexical data base can be summarized as follows: First, concordance lists are made which give the word forms used by the learner in alphabetical order, together with the contexts and the frequency of the word forms. Next the list of word forms is 'cleaned up' by excluding, for instance, false word starts, and is converted into a list of word tokens; a word form is defined as a class of identical word tokens. Finally the word forms are coded and stored in the form of records in which a fixed number of fields specifies the word form, the word class, the hypothesized learner meaning, the lemma, the frequency, and the place of occurrence (informant, cycle, encounter, activity). The lemma field contains dictionary entries of the target language. Excluded from the data base are false word starts, but included are word repeats. They are included because repeats can be viewed as a determining property of spontaneous speech in general and of the spontaneous speech of language learners in particular. These repeats contain self-repeats as well as otherrepeats (e.g., imitations of the native speaker/interlocutor). Every transcript of an activity has a specific number of different word types. The

frequency of a word type is the sum of the frequencies of the word forms belonging to that word type. The total frequency of the word types in a text or the number of tokens is the sum of the frequencies of all word types together. A word type is defined as the combination of the entry in the lemma field and the grammatical word class code. Any mismatch between these elements implies that the records in question contain different word types. For instance, 'werk' (work) coded as a noun is not the same word type as 'werk' (work) coded as a verb. As a consequence, one word type may enclose different word forms.

Conclusion Although in some cases I briefly hinted at implications of these experiments for school practice, limitations of space prevent me from dealing with this subject more thoroughly. In this paper I hope to have shown in the first place how much relevant information on presenting words in texts- one of the main topics in vocabulary study - may be gained by starting from a psychological point of view and using the method of thinking aloud In this framework I analyzed three rather diverse experimental studies - involving adults, young children, pupils of the lowest ability range and different types of texts and tasks - focusing on the possibilities to embed words in meaningful memory systems and on textual and psychological conditions which should be met when presenting words in texts. Words, capitalize on helping weak pupils to master relevant vocabulary learning and reading strategies. This may even have a positive effect on the learning results of these pupils in other subjects as well. Pupils of the lowest ability level appeared to need much more time and trials to memorize 15 French words which were presented on vocabulary cards alternately isolated and in a sentence. So this way of memorizing words is for weak pupils certainly no solution. Instead, it seems more appropriate to make a distinction between relevant differences concerning vocabulary learning and reading which may or may not be reduced in the French lessons. It seems, for instance, unlikely that French lessons reduce differences in vocabulary knowledge in the mother tongue and general knowledge of the world. Other differences like integrating information from different sources and guessing the meaning of words from the context, might, however, be tackled more successfully in these lessons. Foreign language teaching should, in other words, capitalize on helping weak

pupils to master relevant vocabulary learning and reading strategies. This may even have a positive effect on the learning results of these pupils in other subjects as well. Used literature 1. Asher, J.J. (1986) Learning another language through actions Los Gatos, California, Sky 2. Oaks Productions. 3. Ausubel, D.P. (1968) Educational psychology: a cognitive view New York, Holt, Rinehart 4. and Winston. 5. Banta, F.G. (1981) Teaching German vocabulary: The use of English cognates and common 6. loan words, Modern Language Journal, 65, pp. 129-136. 7. Beheydt, L. (1987) The semantization of vocabulary in foreign language learning. System, 8. 15, pp. 55-67. 9. Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (1988) Vocabulary and Language Teaching London, Longman. 10. Clarke, D.F. & Nation, I.S.P. (1980) Guessing the meanings of words from context: strategy 11. and techniques, System, 8, pp. 211-220. 12. Laufer, B. (1988) The concept of "synforms" (similar lexical forms) in vocabulary 13. acquisition, Language and Education, 2, pp. 113-132. 14. Leontjew, A.N. (1979) Tatigkeit, Bewu.tsein, Personlichkeit Berlin, Volk und Wissen. 15. Mooren, P. & Schouten-van Parreren, M.C. (1988) Could be worse. Boeken bij Engels in het 16. basisonderwijs Tilburg: Zwijsen.

17. Palmberg, R. (1987) On lexical inferencing and the young foreign-language learner, 18. System, 15, pp. 69-76. 19. , C.F. van & Schouten-van Parreren, M.C. (1981) Contextual guessing: a trainable 20. reader strategy, System, 9, pp. 235-241. 21. Schouten-van Parreren, M.C. (1985) Woorden leren in het vreemde-talenon- derwijs (Ph.D. 22. thesis with English summary, Apeldoom, Van Walraven). 23. Schoutn-van Parreren, M.C. (1988a) Action Psychology and Vocabulary Learning, in: M. 24. Hildebrand-NihIson & G. Ruckriem (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International

Похожие

Vocabulary learning is incremental in nature (kurs ishi)

Issues of vocabulary acquisition and learning (kurs ishi)

The role of authentic materials (kurs ishi)

Literature in the Southern and Middle Colonies (kurs ishi)

Types of learner error (kurs ishi)