Главная страница
Курсовые работы
Английский язык
Stylistic modifications of speech sounds
Stylistic modifications of speech sounds
Загружено в:
30.09.2019
Скачано:
0
Размер:
47.8193359375 KB
Скачать
Похожие
Using direct method in teaching English
Advantages and disadvantages of early language learning
Development of creative abilities in teaching
Strategies for assessing the reading and listening skills of a2 level students
Methods and ways of teaching grammar to the second language learners at English lessons
![The factors that determine the phonostylistic varieties of intonation in spoken discourse. Extralinguistic situations purpose participants setting the aim of communication (the style-forming factor) Style- modifying factors: - speaker’s attitude - the form of communication - the degree of formality - the degree of spontaneity The factors are interdependent and interconnected. The aim of communication is the main strategy of the speaker. We may want: to inform, to instruct, to convince, to entertain, to advertise. [9] In each case we choose intonation which will serve our purpose and make our speech effective. It basically determines the choice of intonation means, thus it forms the style (style-forming). Speaker’s attitude Any oral communication reflects a variety of attitudes and emotions, concerning the listener, the subject matter and etc. Intonation varieties are as numerous as varieties of attitudes and emotions are. The speaker can be involved/ indifferent, friendly/ hostile and so on. It’s both emotions and attitudes we should take into consideration. The form of communication - monologuing - dialoguing Monologuing is speaking of 1 individual, dialoguing presupposes the participance of the speaker. 9](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-9.png)
![2. STYLISTIC MODIFICATION OF SPEECH SOUNDS The first thing that counts in the stylistic modifications of sounds is the character of relationship between the participants of discourse, which is manifested in the degree of formality. In formal situations the participants tend to monitor their linguistic behavior, their pronunciation tends to be careful. In informal situations where speakers are more relaxed speech is generally faster and less careful. Informal speech used in everyday conversation is often referred to as fast (rapid) colloquial speech. The most frequent modification of consonants in fast colloquial speech is assimilation, both complete and incomplete. - alveolar stops [t], [d] and in some cases [n] are modified under the influence of the following velar or labial consonant, e.g. that place [‘thæp’pleis] good morning [g ʋ g’m ɔ :ni ɳ ] hard problem [‘ha:b ‘pr ɒ bl ǝ m] -[s], [z] assimilate more often than in formal speech, they are modified under the influence of the following palatal [j] and become palate-alveolar: miss you [‘mi ʆ ju:] this year [‘thi ʆ ji ǝ ] as you [ ǝ ʒ ju:] -[t], [d] are affected by the following [j] in a similar way: and turn into palatealveolar affricates. In this case both the place and the manner of articulation are involved in assimilation: would you [‘w ʋ d ʒ u.] can’t you [‘ka:nt ʆ u.] about you [ ǝ ’ba ʋ t ʆ ju.] -in informal casual speech complete assimilation of consonants often takes place: let me [‘lemmu.] ten minutes [‘tem’minits] -[t] tends to be reduced to a glottal stop before a plosive consonant: didn’t go [‘did ɳ ’kg3 ʋ ] 14](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-14.png)
![Great Britain [‘rei’pbrtn] In fast colloquial speech we can also observe elision of consonants. It is a complete loss of a speech sound, usually due to the increased rate of speech. What has he done; always, alright; next day; mashed potatoes, second term; and the reason for this. In fast colloquial speech reduction may also result in vowel elision, the complete loss of the unstressed vowel within one word or at word boundaries: History [`histri], phonetics [f`netiks], correct [krekt], get another, come along, after all. We have viewed the sound modifications mostly within the norm of English sound system, but without any special attention to their stylistic distinctions. However the number and degree of sound modifications depend not only on linguistic factors (such as the neighbouring sounds and distribution of sounds in connected speech) but on extra linguistic ones as well. Stylistic oppositions are usually observed in the two large marginal types of pronunciation - formal and informal. Formal speech suggests unemotional information on the part of the speaker. It is characterised by careful articulation and relatively slow speed. Informal speech implies everyday conversation; it is relaxed and rather rapid and is characterized by the use of simplified sound forms. The character of sound modifications in relation to situational factors of speech communication is only beginning to be the object of thorough instrumental analysis. [10] One of the most important factors that results in the increased number of sound modifications is the character of relationship between the speaker and the listener and the degree of formality in their discourse. The other extra linguistic factors that determine the degree of sound modifications are the degree of preparedness, the form of communication (a monologue or a dialogue), the number of participants, etc. Native speakers usually don’t have any difficulties in understanding rapid casual speech though sounds simplifications are not registered 15](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-15.png)
![in the listener’s mind and he/she is not usually aware of the changes since they do not affect the meaning. Here are some examples of sound simplifications typical of relaxed casual speech: · most vowels in unstressed positions are neutralized, especially in grammatical words: because [b ɪ kəz], according to [əˈkəd ɪ η ], have [əv]; · the diphthongoids [i:] and [u:] become diphthongs and then monophthongs: believe [bəˈl ɪ v], few [fi ʊ ]; · diphthongs are monophthongized and then might undergo qualitative reduction as well: where [w ɛ ], really [ˈr ɛ l ɪ ], now they [ˈna ðe] – [ˈn ʌ ðə]; · vowel elision is very frequent: it’s [ts], different [ˈd ɪ fr(ə)nt], phonetics [ˈfnet ɪ ks]; · the degree of voicing or devoicing of consonants increases and ends with the elision of the sound: must be [m ʌ st bi - m ʌ st bpi - m ʌ st pi - m ʌ s pi]; · the glottal stop is often observed before the modified plosive consonant: Great Britain [ˈgre ɪʔ ˈpbr ɪ tn], couldn’t come [ˈk ʊ d η ʔ ˈk ʌ m]; · the palatal [j] affects the manner of articulation of the preceding [t-d] and [s-z]: as you like [ə ʒ u ˈla ɪ k], last year [ˈla:s ʧˈ j ɪ ə], student [ˈs ʧ u:dnt]; · there is a strong tendency for elision of consonants: and the [ən ðə], a box of matches [əˈb ɒ ks əˈmæ ʧ əz]. It is clear that there is a great variety in the way sounds are pronounced in a speech chain. Most phoneticians agree that it would not be practical or useful to teach all learners of English to produce these extreme cases of sound modifications, but it is important that learners of English are made aware of the problems that they will meet in listening to colloquial casual speech. Tasks and questions: Read on the topic “Modifications of Sounds in Connected Speech” and answer the questions: 1. Classify these words and word combinations according to the type of assimilation (complete/partial, progressive/regressive): 16](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-16.png)
![3. MODIFICATION OF SPEECH SOUNDS The sound variations in words, their derivatives and grammatical form words, are known as sound alternations. For example: the dark [l] in spell alternate with the clear [l] in spelling; combine (n) [‘k σ mbain], combine [kəm’bain] where [n] in the stressed syllable of the noun alternates with the neutral sound. It is perfectly obvious that sound alternations of this type are caused by assimilation, accommodation and reduction in speech. To approach the matter from the phonological viewpoint, it is important to differentiate phonemic and allophone alternations. Some sound alternations are traced to the phonemic changes in earlier periods of the language development and are known as historical. Historical alternations mark both vowels and consonants, though the alternating sounds are not affected by the phonemic position or context. The sounds changes, which occurred in the process of historical development of the language, are reflected in present-day English as alternations of phonemes differentiating words, their derivatives and grammatical forms. The following list of examples presents the types of alternations: 1. Vowel alternations. 1.1 Distinction of irregular verbal forms [i:-e-e] mean - meant - meant; [i-æ- A] sing - sang - sung; [i-ei-i] give - gave - given; 1.2 Distinction of causal verbal forms: [i-e] sit - set; [ai-ei] rise - raise; [o - e] fall-fell 1.3 Distinction of parts of speech in etymologically correlated words [a: - æ] class - classify, [o: - e] long - length; [ei - æ] nation - national 2. Consonants alternations 2.1 Distinction of irregular verbal forms [d - t] send - sent 2.2 distinction of parts of speech [s - z] advice - advise; [k - t∫] speak - speech; 3. Vowel and consonant alternations [i - ai] + [v - f] live - life; [a: - ae] + [ θ - ð] bath - bathe. 18](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-18.png)
![Alternations are also widely spread on the synchronic level in the presentday English and are known as contextual. In connection with contextual sound alternations there arises a problem of phonemic identification of alternated sounds. The study of the relationship between phonemes and morphemes is called morphophonemics. The interrelation of phonology and morphology is also known as morphophonology о r m о r р h о n о logy which is actually the phonology of morphemes. Morphonology studies the way in which sounds can alternate in different realizations of one and the same morpheme.[5] We are interested in the sound in its weak position. Scholars of different trends are not unanimous in solving the problem. The so-called morphological (Moscow phonological) school supports the theory of neutralization of phonemes. The concept of neutralization derives originally from the Prague School of phonology. Neutralization occurs when two or more closely related sounds, which are in contrast with each other in most positions, are found to be non-contrastive in certain other positions. That means that there are environment where the two sounds do not contrast with each other, even though they normally do. When this happens, the opposition between the two sounds is said to be neutralized. The loss of one or more distinctive feature(s) of a phoneme in the weak position is called phonemic neutralization. The Moscow philologists claim that interchange of sounds manifests close connection between phonetics and morphology. Alternations are observed in one and the same morpheme and actualize the phonemic structure of the morpheme. Thus, phonemic content of the morpheme/is constant. It should be noted here that alternations of morphemes cannot be mistaken for the oppositions of minimal pairs in different stems of words. Lets us compare some examples: postman [ə] < [æ], sixpence [ə] < [e]. Thus, one and the same sound may belong to different phonemes The supporters of the morphological trend define the phoneme as follows «Это функциональная единица, представленная рядом позиционно чередующихся звуков» (М.В. Панов). The notion of « фонетический ряд », 19](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-19.png)
![suggested by R.I. Avanesov, demonstrates positionally determined realizations of the phoneme. Positionally alternating sounds are grouped into one phoneme whether they are similar or have common features (that is common allophones) with other phonemes. The Russian preposition с + noun may have the following realizations: с Колей — [c], с Тимошей — [c'], с Галей — [з], с Димой — [з'], с Шypoй — [ш]. с Женей — [ж], с Щукарём — [ш']. In the morphological conception the alternations of the phonemes are not analyzed apart from the morpheme, as form and content make dialectical unity. The phonetic system is not isolated from the grammatical and lexical structure of the language, and the unity between the form and the content cannot be destroyed. Yet as an answer to the problem is not entirely satisfactory since ordinary speakers are in no doubt that the sound which occurs in a word like гриб is [ п ] not [ б ], and in English word speak [ph] is nothing but [p]. The perception of the listeners makes us find the morphological conception too discrepant and confiding. The so-called Leningrad (Petersburg) school asserts that the phoneme is independent of the morpheme. The supporters of this conception claim that the phoneme cannot lose any of its distinctive features. In the line of words of the same root morpheme ( гриб - грибы ) the sound [ п ] is an allophone of the phoneme / п / and the sound [ б ] manifests the phoneme / б /. Consequently, the consonants [6] and [ п ] do not lose any their distinctive features and represent different phonemes. It seems that according to this point of view the unity between the form and the content is destroyed, thus phonology is isolated from morphology. According to N.S. Trubetzkoy, an archiphoneme is defined as a combination of distinctive features common to two phonemes. It consists of the shared features of two or more closely related phonemes but excludes the feature which distinguishes them. For example: archiphoneme [ П ] consists of the features: bilabial, plosive, but excludes voicing which separates them. One of the disadvantages in extending the notion of an archiphoneme is that the Prague School phonologists limited neutralization to closely related phonemes. 20](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-20.png)
![A neutralization can be said to occur only if there is uncertainty about the identity of the sound in the position of neutralization. Before two phonemes can be neutralized, they must have common qualities which do not occur in other phonemes. Thus [p], [b] can neutralize because they are the only labial plosives in the language, they share these two features, but no other sounds share them. However, [n] and [ŋ] cannot neutralize, so any neutralization of nasals must involve all the three of them - [n], [ŋ], [m]. Modifications of sounds in English Sounds in actual speech are seldom pronounced by themselves. To pronounce a word consisting of more than one sound, it is necessary to join the sounds together in the proper way. There exist several types of junction, some of which are common to all or many languages, while others are characteristic of individual languages. In order to master these specific types of junction it is necessary to understand the mechanism of joining sounds together. This mechanism can only be understood after analyzing the stages in the articulation of a speech-sound pronounced in isolation. Every speech-sound pronounced in isolation has three stages of articulation. They are (1) the on-glide, or the initial stage, (2) the retention-stage, or the medial stage, and (3) the off-glide (release), or the final stage. The on-glide, or the beginning of a sound, is the stage during which the organs of speech move away from a neutral position to lake up the position necessary for the pronunciation of a consonant or a vowel. The on-glide produces no audible sound. The retention-stage or the middle of a sound is the stage during which the organs of speech are kept for some time either in the same position necessary to pronounce the sound (in the case of non-complex sounds) or move from one position to another (within complex sounds, such as diphthongoids, diphthongs and affricates). For the retention-stage of a stop consonant the term stop-stage may also be used. The off-glide, or the end of a sound, is the stage during which the organs of speech move away to a neutral position. The off-glide of most sounds is not audible, the exception being plosives whose off-glide 21](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-21.png)
![produces the sound of plosion before a vowel and in a word-final position before a pause. In English there are two principal ways of linking two adjacent speech sounds: I. Merging of stages. II. Interpenetration of stages. The type of junction depends on the nature of the sounds that are joined together. As all English sounds come under the classification of consonants and vowels we may speak of joining: (a) a consonant to a following vowel (C + V), as in the word [mi:] me; (b) a vowel to a following consonant (V + C), as in the word [ σ n] on; (c) two consonants (C + C), as in the word [blə υ ] blow: (d) two vowels (V + V), as in the word [riæləti] reality. Merging of stages, as compared with interpenetration of stages, is a simpler and looser way of joining sounds together. It usually takes place if two adjacent sounds of a different nature are joined together. In this case the end of the preceding sound penetrates into the beginning of the following sound. In other words, the end of the first sound and the beginning of the second are articulated almost simultaneously. Interpenetration of stages usually takes place when consonants of a similar or identical nature are joined. In this case the end of the first sound penetrates not only into the beginning but also into the middle part of the second sound, as in [ækt] act, [begd] begged. The modifications are observed both within words and word boundaries. There are the following types of modification: assimilation, accommodation, reduction, elision, and inserting. The adaptive modification of a consonant by a neighbouring consonant in a speech chain is assimilation. Accommodation is used to denote the interchanges of VC or CV types. Reduction is actually qualitative or quantitative weakening of vowels in unstressed positions. Elision is a complete loss of sounds, both vowels and consonants. Inserting is a process of sound addition. MODIFICATIONS OF CONSONANTS 1. Assimilation 1.1. Place of articulation • t, d > dental before [ð, θ ]: eighth, at the, said that 22](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-22.png)
![• t, d > post-alveolar before [r]: tree, true, dream, the third room • s, z > post-alveolar before [∫]: this shop, does she • t, d > affricates before [j]: graduate, could you • m > labio-dental before [f]: symphony • n > dental before [θ]: seventh • n > velar before [k]: thank 1.2. Manner of articulation • loss of plosion: glad to see you, great trouble • nasal plosion: sudden, at night, let me see • lateral plosion: settle, at last 1.3. Work of the vocal cords • voiced > voiceless: newspaper, gooseberry (and in grammatical …) has, is, does > [s]; of, have > [f] Notice: In English typical assimilation is voiced > voiceless; voiceless > voiced is not typical. 1.4. Degree of noise • sonorants > are partially devoiced after [p, t, k, s] 2. Accommodation 2.1. Lip position • consonant + back vowel: pool, rude, who (rounded) • consonant + front vowel: tea, sit, keep (spread) 3. Elision 3.1. Loss of [h] in personal and possessive pronouns and the forms of the auxiliary verb have. 3.2. [l] lends to be lost when preceded by [o:]: always, already, all right 3.3. In cluster of consonants: next day, just one. mashed potatoes 4. Inserting of sounds 4.1. Linking [r] (potential pronunciation of [r]): car owner 4.2. Intrusive [r]: [r] is pronounced where no r is seen in the spelling china and glass: it is not recommended to foreign learners. 23](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-23.png)
![MODIFICATION OF VOWELS 1. Reduction 1.1. Quantitative 1.2. Qualitative 2. Accommodation 2.2 Positional length of vowels: knee - need - neat 2.3 Nasalization of vowels: preceded or followed by [n, m]: never, then, men ASSIMILATION There are some remarkable differences between the pronunciation of a word in isolation and of the same word in a block of connected speech. These changes are mostly quite regular and predictable. The modification of a consonant under the influence of the adjoining consonant in the flow of speech is known as assimilation. The term accommodation is often used to denote the interchanges of “vowel + consonant” type or “consonant + vowel” type. Assimilation may affect the work of the lips, tongue, soft palate walls of the pharynx. Consonants may be modified according to the place of obstruction, to the manner of articulation, to the lip position, the position of the soft palate. According to the direction of assimilation, it may be regressive and progressive. Regressive a. is most common in both languages: English and Russian. According to the degree a. may be complete, incomplete. Assimilation may be also historical, in cases when its process is already fixed in present-day English and living, when it acts in living speech of speakers of to-day. Some cases of a. are considered to be obligatory, functioning according to the accepted norm of the language, used by the educated people, while the other are met only in the speech of the illiterate part of the population of the country. Assimilation is the likening of two adjoining sounds. The adaptive modification of a consonant by a neighbouring consonant in the speech chain is known as assimilation. Assimilation may affect all the features of the articulation of a consonant phoneme or only some of them. Assimilation may affect: 1) the 24](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-24.png)
![CONCLUSION Concluding our course paper we can make some conclusions as: The phonetic units are used in various social situation. It’s the extra linguistic situation that influences our choice of language means. There’s a special branch of linguistics that studies the way language means function in different situation. It’s called functional stylistics. It’s primary concern is functional style – a set of language means used in a particular situation. Phonostylistics is the study of the way phonetic units, both segmental (sounds) and suprasegmental (intonation), are used in a particular extralinguistic situation. The first thing that counts in the stylistic modifications of sounds is the character of relationship between the participants of discourse, which is manifested in the degree of formality. In formal situations the participants tend to monitor their linguistic behavior, their pronunciation tends to be careful. In informal situations where speakers are more relaxed speech is generally faster and less careful. Informal speech used in everyday conversation is often referred to as fast (rapid) colloquial speech. The most frequent modification of consonants in fast colloquial speech is assimilation, both complete and incomplete. - alveolar stops [t], [d] and in some cases [n] are modified under the influence of the following velar or labial consonant, e.g. that place [‘thæp’pleis] good morning [g ʋ g’m ɔ :ni ɳ ] In fast colloquial speech we can also observe elision of consonants. It is a complete loss of a speech sound, usually due to the increased rate of speech. 26](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-26.png)
![What has he done; always, alright; next day; mashed potatoes, second term; and the reason for this. In fast colloquial speech reduction may also result in vowel elision, the complete loss of the unstressed vowel within one word or at word boundaries: History [`histri], phonetics [f`netiks], correct [krekt], get another, come along, after all. The number and degree of sound modifications depend not only on linguistic factors (such as the neighbouring sounds and distribution of sounds in connected speech) but on extra linguistic ones as well. Stylistic oppositions are usually observed in the two large marginal types of pronunciation - formal and informal. Formal speech suggests unemotional information on the part of the speaker. It is characterised by careful articulation and relatively slow speed. Informal speech implies everyday conversation; it is relaxed and rather rapid and is characterized by the use of simplified sound forms. The character of sound modifications in relation to situational factors of speech communication is only beginning to be the object of thorough instrumental analysis. One of the most important factors that results in the increased number of sound modifications is the character of relationship between the speaker and the listener and the degree of formality in their discourse. The other extra linguistic factors that determine the degree of sound modifications are the degree of preparedness, the form of communication (a monologue or a dialogue), the number of participants, etc. Native speakers usually don’t have any difficulties in understanding rapid casual speech though sounds simplifications are not registered in the listener’s mind and he/she is not usually aware of the changes since they do not affect the meaning. 27](/data/documents/c659ea24-acd4-4fff-8625-d5699510b7f3/page-27.png)
