Typological category of person - Ingliz tili - Referatlar

Typological category of person

Yuklangan vaqt:

20.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

78 KB

Ko'chirib olish

Typological category of person The category of person should be dealt with in close connection with the category of number (plurality). Because in the languages of Indo-European family these categories are expressed by one and the same morpheme simultaneously, i.e. a morpheme denoting number at the same time expresses person as well. For instance, in Latin the morpheme -nt in such forms as amant, habent, legunt, amabant, habebunt , etc. expresses simultaneously the third person and the plural number. In the comparing languages the category of person is a characteristic feature of pronouns and verbs. They (languages) make distinction between the three classes of personal pronouns denoting respectively the person(s) speaking (the first person), the person(s) spoken to (the second person) and the person(s) (or things) spoken about ( the third person). person singular plural 1-person the speaker the speaker and some other people 2-person a person spoken to more than one person spoken to 3-person a person or a thing spoken about some people or things spoken about The category of person in verbs is represented by the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd person and it expresses the relations between the speaker, the person or people spoken to and other person or people spoken about. However this system doesn’t hold good for the modern English verb and this is for two reasons: 1) there is no distinction of persons in the plural number. Thus the form ‘live’ may within the plural number be connected with a subject of any person. e.g.: I

you live we live they live 2) there is no distinction of numbers in the 1- and 2-person. Thus the form ‘live’ in these persons may refer to both one and more than one subject. Thus the opposition 3p. s. -all other persons expresses relation of the 3p.s. with any person of both numbers, i.e. stem-s | stem# The marked member of the opposition differs greatly from that of unmarked one both in form and in meaning. It should be kept in mind that in the Subjunctive mood the form ‘live’ denotes any person of both numbers. The ending ‘-s’ having four meanings to express simultaneously is of course a synthetic feature, standing rather by itself in the general structure of Modern English. There a special subclass of the English verbs which do not fit into the system of person and number described above and they must be treated separately both in a practical study of the language and in theoretical analysis. They are called ‘modal verbs ‘ can, may, must’ , etc. Being ‘defective verbs’ they do not admit any suffix to their stem and do not denote any person or number and usually accompany the notional verbs in speech giving them additional meanings of notions as ‘ ability, permission, necessity or obligation’ etc. The verb ‘ be ’ has a system of its own both in the present indicative and in the past:

I am- was He is was she is was it is was You are were They are were There is one more special class of the English verbs called impersonal verbs. H aving the suffix ‘ -s’ in the third person, singular of the present simple they do not denote any person or thing as the doer of the action. Such verbs usually denote natural phenomena such as to rain, to hail, to snow, to drizzle, to thunder, to lighten, to warm up; e.g.: It often rains in autumn. It is thundering and lightening. The personal system of the Uzbek verbs is as follows: Indic. Mood pers on singular plural Past I бор-дим бор-дик II бор-динг борди-нгиз(лар) III бор-ди бор-ди-лар бор-иш-ди Present I бор-а-ман бор-а-миз II бор-а-сан бор-а-сиз(лар) III бор-а-ди бор-а-дилар (бор-иш-ади) Future I бора-ман, бор-моқчи-ман бор-а-миз, бор-моқ-чи-миз II бор-а-сан, бор-моқчи-сан бор-а-миз, бор-моқчи-миз III бор-а-ди, бор-моқ-чи бор-а-ди-лар, бор-иш-моқчи

Imperat. mood I бор-ай бор-ай-лик II бор-гин бор-инг-лар, бор-инг- из III бор-иш-син, бор-син-лар бор-инг-(из)-лар In Uzbek we have no the so called modal verbs and impersonal verbs as it is understood in English or Russian ( дождит , смеркается , темнеет , похолодало ). The functions of the modal verbs are performed in Uzbek by means of the adjectives such as зарур , керак , даркор , лозим , etc. As to the problem of impersonal verbs in Uzbek we use the so called unipersonal verbs which are combined only with one and the same nouns denoting the names of natural phenomena, such as қ ор , ём ғ ир , дўл , ча қ мо қ, etc. e.g.: Ём ғ ир ё ғ ади , Ча қ мо қ ча қ ди . Dealing with the category of person attention must be drawn to the use of the pronominal forms in transposition. The affective value of such ‘metaphors’ may be traced in many modern languages. The first to be mentioned in English is the use of the personal pronouns ’we, you, they’ in patterns where they are synonymous with the formal generic ‘one’ which denotes anyone who occurs in a definite situation. Semantically it corresponds to the Uzbek generic words as ‘ одам , киши , инсон . e.g.: You (we) don’t know what to do in such a situation. One doesn’t know what to do in such a situation. Бундай щолатда нима қилишингни щам билмайсан киши . Инсон зоти борки яратганни унутиб, фарзанди томон интилади.

The so called ‘ editorial ’ ‘we’ (Lat. plural is modestial) is well known, for instance, as used in many modern languages by authors of scientific papers, monographs or articles in newspapers, etc. The pronoun ‘we’ is commonly used in proverbs. e.g.: We shall see what we shall see. Та қ дирда борини кўрамиз We never know the value of the water till the well is dry. Қ удуқ қуримагунча ( Ариқдан оққан ) сувнинг қадрини билмаймиз Compare the Uzbek proverbs which are also addressed to anyone who appears in a situation. e.g. Нима эк санг шуни ўра сан . Зар қадрини заргар бил ади . Билиб туриб билмасликка ола миз . Expressive affect of great subtlety will be found in the use of the pronoun ‘we’ in such examples: ‘I say’ said Hurstwood, as they came up the theatre lobby, we are exceedingly charming this evening. ‘How do we feel today?’ said the doctor facing the patient. Typological categories of tense and aspect

Tense is the form of the verb which indicates time of the action from the point of view of the moment of speech. In English we distinguish three tenses ; past, present and past. Past tense denotes an action which has taken place at a definite time before the moment of speech. Present tense denotes a regular or recurrent action happening around the moment of speech. Future tense denotes an action which will or going to happen after the moment of speech. The English verbs also distinguish the category of aspect. Aspect is a particular form of the verb which shows whether the action that is described is a continuing action or an action that happens always, repeatedly or for a moment. In other words it is a form of the verb which serves to express the manner in which the action is performed, i.e. it shows whether it is a single accomplished action (or point), a recurrent action or a continuous process. The notion of aspect can also be described as a form of the verb that shows habituality, continuance or completion of the action or state expressed by the root of the verb. In Uzbek grammars aspect is not studied as a separate category of the verb as it is not always expressed distinctly as it seems because of the lack of the analytical forms. In the comparing languages the categories of tense and aspect are so closely merged together that it is impossible to treat them separately. One and the same form of the verb serves to express tense and aspect at the same time and therefore they should be regarded as a ‘ tense-aspect forms ‘of the verb. In the comparing languages we distinguish three aspects of the verb forms; Simple ( Common or Indefinite ), Continuous and Perfect aspects. Combining with

all the tense forms of the verb they form the so called ‘tense aspect forms of the verb’. Present simple expresses a usual, recurrent or habitual action that takes place in our everyday life. e.g. The sun rises in the East. We love our mothers. Children go to school at the age of 6. ‘They call me Nancy’ , said the girl. I know him well. ( Stative action ) The verbs in the present simple may often be accompanied by adverbs of frequency such as often, sometimes, usually, seldom, never, etc. indicating habitual action. The main indicator of the English verb forms in the present simple is the opposeme ‘live | live-s’. (See the preceding chapter.) As has been mentioned above Past simple denotes an action which happened at a definite time before the moment of speech. Definite time of the action may be clarified by means of such time expressions as ‘yesterday, last week, two years ago, when I was a child, etc. The main indicator of the verb form in the past simple of the English verbs is the formant ‘-ed’ (for the regular verbs) and the change of the root vowels (or consonants) for the irregular verbs. e.g.: live- d , help- ed , g i ve-g a ve, sen d -sen t. ( As to the verb forms in Uzbek see the table in the chapter dealing with the category of person.) The verbs in the Future Simple, as has been mentioned above, indicate the action which will or going to happen after the moment of speech. The main indicators of the future action is the auxiliaries ‘ will (shall), and going to’ which usually precede the infinitive . e.g.: Give me your suitcase, please. I will carry it for you. I’m going to visit my grandfather on Sunday.

Present Continuous denotes an action happening now, i.e. at the moment of speech. In English the predicate verb is formed by means of the auxiliary verb ‘ be-Participle 1’ of the notional verb which correspond to the Uzbek verb forms in the example of the verb ‘ бор -’: 1 person singular -аяпман, -моқдаман plural -аяпмиз, -моқдамиз 2 person singular -япсан, -моқдасан plural -aяпсиз, -моқдасиз 3 person singular -аяпти, -моқда plural -аяптилар, -ишаяпти; -моқдалар, -ишмоқда The Present Continuous expresses three ideas: 1) an activity happening now, i.e. at the moment of speech. С f.: It is raining . The child is crying. They are looking at you. Ём ғ ир ё ғ аяпти . Чақалоқ йи ғ лаяпти . Улар сизга қ арашаяпти . 2) an activity happening around now, but perhaps not at the moment of speech. Cf.: I’m reading a very interesting book on astrology these days. Шу кунларда мунажжимлик ща қ ида жуда қ изи қ бир китоб ў қ ияпман , 3) a planned future arrangement.

Cf.: I’m leaving for London next week. Келаси щафтада Лондонга жўнаяпман . Past Continuous of the English verb is formed by means of the combination of ‘was (were) -P1’ of the notional verb and denotes an action happening (in progress) at a definite time in the past. Definite time may be expressed by means of time expressions or by a clause of time connected to the principle one with the conjunctions while and when. In Uzbek in the past continuous the verbs may take the suffixes - аётган эди , - мо қ да эди , e.g.: I was having a shower when you rang me up ( at seven o’clock ). - C из менга қ ўн ғ иро қ қ илганингизда ( соат еттида ) мен чўмилаётган эдим . Compare: a) I was doing my homework at 7.00 last night. ( Past Continuous - I was in the middle of the action.) b) I did my homework last night. ( Past Simple - I started and finished) Future Continuous is formed by means of the auxiliary ‘will (or shall) be - P1’ of the notional verb and expresses an action taking place in progress at a definite time after the moment of speech. Cf.: I shall be waiting for you at the arrival hall at 5 o’clock (when you plane arrive at the the airport). - C амолётингиз соат 5 да ( аэропортга қ ўнган пайтда ) мен сизни кутиш залида кутаётган ( кутиб турган ) бўламан . As is seen from this example Uzbek future continuous is expressed with the help of the suffix ‘- ётган ’ and auxiliary verb ‘ бўл - мо қ‘.

Perfect aspect denotes an action that has happened before now. Present Perfect relates past actions and states to the present. In a sense Present Perfect is a present tense. It looks back from the present into the past and expresses a completed action up to the present moment. e.g: I’ve travelled a lot in Africa. -Африка бўйлаб кўп саёхат қилганман, It can also express an action or state which began in the past and continues to the present. С f.: I’ve known Alice for six years. - Мен Алисани олти йилдан буён биламан . Look at the use of the Past Simple and Present Perfect: I’ve lived in Rome for six months.(I still do). -Present Perfect. I lived in London for a year. (Now I live somewhere else, not in London). - Past Simple). Present Perfect Continuous is used to express a)an activity which continues to the present. e.g.: I’ve been waiting here for hours. b) to refer to an activity with a result in the present. e.g.: I’m hot because I’ve been running . Sometimes there is little or no difference in meaning between the Present Perfect Simple and Continuous. e.g.: How long have you worked here? How long have you been working here?

It should be kept in mind that there is a special class of verbs that have the idea of a long time, such as wait, work, play, travel, etc. These verbs are usually used in the Present Perfect Continuous. e.g.: I’ve been playing tennis since I was a boy. The verbs that don’t have the idea of a long time such as find, start, buy, die, lose, break, stop , etc. and also verbs that express state such as like, love, know, have (possess ) are not found in the Present Perfect Continuous. Past Perfect denotes an action in the past which happened before another action in the past. e.g.: When I arrived at the station the train had already gone. - Мен вокзалга етиб келганимда поезд аллақачон жўнаб кетган экан. Where (When I arrived at the station - Мен вокзалга етиб келганимда ) denotes a definite time in the past . Compare the use of the Past Perfect and Past Simple in the following sentences: When I got home, John cooked a meal. (First I got home, then John cooked). -Мен уйга етиб келганимда(н кейин) Жон овқат пиширди. When I got home, John had cooked a meal.( John cooked a meal before I got home) - Мен уйга етиб келганимда Жон ов қ ат пишириб қ ўйган экан . Future Perfect expresses an activity that will be completed before a definite time in future. In English this notion is expressed by means of the combination ‘ will (shall) have -PII’ of the notional verb. In Uzbek it is rendered with the help of ‘suffixes ‘- б , - иб ’ & the auxiliary verb ‘- бўл ( мо қ).’ Cf.: I shall have finished my homework by 4 o’clock.

- Мен уй ишларимни соат 4 гача тугаллаб бўламан.

Bibliography 1. Modern English in Action, Henry I. Christ, DC Heath and company, Boston 2001. 2. Mountains are climbing, study book, Boston 2003y. 3. English phonetic, A.A. Abduazizov издательство « Укитувчи » Т . 1972 г . 4. Reference guide to English, Alice Maclin, USA Washington 1994 5. Improve your sentence, Ann M. Sala, McCraw-Hill, USA. 1999y 6. Language for daily use Mildred A Dawson New York, 2001y 7. New English voyages in English, Francis B. Connors, Loyola University. Press, Chicago 1991y 8. Writing skills, Suzanne Chance, Clencoe, McCraw-Hill. New York 9. Reading and writing, Natasha Haugnes 10. Contemporary English, Mechella Perrott, contemporary publisher group, Illinois USA. 11. Beginning English writing skills, Mone Scherago, National textbook company, Illinois USA. 12. Lectures of comparative typology, C. Satimov, M. Просвещениею 1991 г . 13. Comparative typology V.D. Arakin, M. «Prosveshenie» 1991 14. Comparative grammar, J.I.

O'xshashlar

Typological category of gender

Typological category of voice

Typological category of comparison

The comparative typology of English, Russian and Uzbek languages

Typological categories of English and Uzbek words