The syllabus design - Ingliz tili - Referatlar

The syllabus design

Yuklangan vaqt:

16.12.2023

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

18.236328125 KB

Ko'chirib olish

The syllabus design Plan: 1. Types of language teaching syllabus 2. Choosing and Integrating Syllabi

Types of language teaching syllabus Key words: syllabus design, English courses "Syllabus Design for English Language Teaching". It mainly provides detailed elucidation of the process of designing a syllabus as one of systematic steps of curriculum development in language teaching. Curriculum development in language teaching should be done since it implies an effort carried out by the language teachers to improve the quality of language teaching through some stages of systematic planning such as a needs analysis, formulation of learning objectives, development of syllabus and teaching materials, teaching materials’ implementation as well as evaluation to find out the effectiveness of the curriculum by taking into account the achievement of learning goals in language teaching program. Curriculum and syllabus are two major documents necessarily prepared in a course design task. Where a curriculum describes the broadest contexts in which planning for language instruction takes place, a syllabus is a more circumscribed document, usually one which has been prepared for a particular group of learners (Dubin and Olshtain, 1986). In other words, a syllabus is more specific and more concrete than a curriculum, and a curriculum may contain a number of syllabi. A curriculum may specify only the goals ± what the learners will be able to do at the end of the instruction ± while the syllabus specifies the content of the lessons used to lead the learners to achieve the goals (Krahnke, 23 1987). Content or what is taught is the single aspect of syllabus design to be considered. It includes behavioral or learning objectives for students, specifications of how the content will be taught and how it will be evaluated. The aspects of language teaching method which are closely related to syllabus are the theory of language, theory of learning and the learner type. The choice of syllabus should take those three aspects into consideration. Furthermore, to design a syllabus is to decide what gets taught and in what order. For this reason, the theory of language explicitly or implicitly underlying the method will play

a major role in determining what syllabus is adopted. In addition, a theory of learning will also play an important part in determining the syllabus choice. For example, a teacher may accept a structural theory of language, but not accept that learners can acquire language materials according to a strict grammatical sequence of presentation. While the basic view of language may be structural, the syllabus, in that case, may be more situational or even content-based. Learner type is another variable in the choice of syllabus of syllabus. Learner types can be seen in practical and observable terms, such as type of cognitive activity, life style, aspirations, employment, educational and social backgrounds and so on ((Krahnke, 1987). The choice of a syllabus is a major decision in language teaching, and it should be made as consciously and with as much information as possible. According to Krahnke (1987), there are six types of language teaching syllabus including: 1. A structural (or formal) syllabus. It is one in which the content of language teaching is a collection of the forms and structures, usually grammatical, of the language being taught. Examples of structure include: nouns, verbs, adjectives, statements, questions, complex sentences, subordinate clauses, past tense, and so on, although formal syllabi may include other aspects of language form such as pronunciation or morphology. 2. A notional/functional syllabus. It is one in which the content of language teaching is a collection of the functions that are performed when language is used, or of the notions that language is used to express. Examples of 24 functions include: informing, agreeing, apologizing, requesting, promising, and so on. Examples of notions include size, age, color, comparison, time, and so on. 3. A situational syllabus. It is one in which the content of language teaching is a collection of real or imaginary situations in which language occurs or is used. A situation usually involves several participants who are engaged in some activity in a specific setting.

Choosing and Integrating Syllabi The language occurring in the situation involves a number of functions, combined into a plausible segment of discourse. The primary purpose of situational language teaching syllabus is to teach the language that occurs in the situations. Sometimes the situations are purposely relevant to the present or future needs of the language learners, preparing them to use the new language in the kinds of situations that make up the syllabus. Examples of situations include: seeing then dentist, complaining to the landlord, buying a book at the bookstore, meeting a new student, asking directions in a new town, and so on. 4. A skill-based syllabus. It is one in which the content of language teaching is a collection of specific abilities that may play a part in using language. Skills are things that people must be able to do to be competent in a language, relatively independently of the situation or setting in which the language use can occur. While situational syllabi group functions together into specific settings of language use, skill-based syllabi group linguistic competencies (pronunciation, vocabulary, grammar, sociolinguistic, and discourse) together into generalized types of behavior, such as listening to spoken language for the main idea, writing well-formed paragraphs, giving effective oral presentations, taking language tests, reading texts for main ideas or supporting details, and so on. The primary purpose of skill-based instruction is to learn a specific language skill. A possible secondary purpose is to develop more general competence in the language, learning only incidentally any information that may be available while applying the language skills. A task-based syllabus. It is similar to content-based syllabus in that both the teaching is not organized around linguistic features of the language being learned but according to some other organizing principle. In taskbased instruction the content of the teaching is a series of complex and purposeful tasks that the students want or need to perform with the language they are learning. The tasks are defined as activities with a purpose other than language learning, but, as in a content-based syllabus, the performance of the tasks is approached in a way that is intended to develop second/foreign language ability. Language learning is subordinated to task

performance, and language teaching occurs only as the need arises during the performance of a given task. Tasks integrate language (and other) skills in specific settings of language use. They differ from situations in that while situational teaching has the goal of teaching the specific language content that occurs in the situation ± a predefined product ± task-based teaching has the goal of teaching students to draw on resources to complete some piece of work ± a process. The language students draw on a variety of language forms, functions, and skills, often in an individual and unpredictable way, in completing the tasks. Tasks that can be used for language learning are, generally, tasks that the learners actually have to perform in any case. Examples are applying for a job, talking with a social worker, getting housing information over the telephone, completing bureaucratic forms, collecting information about preschools to decide which to send a child to, preparing a paper for another course, reading a textbook for another course, and so on. 6. A content-based syllabus. It is not really a language teaching syllabus at all. In contentbased language teaching, the primary purpose of the instruction is to teach some content or information using the language that the students are also learning. The students are simultaneously language students and students of whatever content is being taught. The subject matter is primary, and language learning occurs incidentally to the content learning. The content teaching is not organized around the language 26 teaching, but vice versa. Content-based language teaching is concerned with information, while task-based language teaching is concerned with communicative and cognitive processes. An example of content- based language teaching is a science class taught in the language that the students need or want to learn, possibly with linguistic adjustments to make the science more comprehensible. In practice, of course, these different types rarely occur independently of each other. Almost all actual language teaching syllabi are combinations of two or more of the types of syllabus described here. Types of English Syllabus

1. The Structural Syllabus The structural or grammatical syllabus is doubtless the most familiar of syllabus types. It has a long history, and a major portion of language teaching has been carried out using some form of it. The structural syllabus is based on a theory of language that assumes that the grammatical or structural aspects of language form are the most basic or useful. When functional ability, or ability to use or communicate in the new language, is a goal of instruction, the structural syllabus can be said to embrace a theory of learning that holds that functional ability arises from structural knowledge or ability. The content of the structural syllabus is language form, primarily grammatical form, and the teaching is defined in terms of form. Although the definition of language form and the most appropriate "grammar " to use in pedagogy have long been disputed, most existing structural syllabi use some form of traditional, Latin -based, descriptive/prescriptive grammatical classification and terminology. The usual grammatical categories are the familiar ones of noun, verb, pronoun, adjective, singular, plural, present tense, past tense, and so on. The domain of structural syllabi has tended to be limited to the 27 sentence. That is, the sentence is the largest unit of discourse that is regularly treated. A classification of sentence types usually includes semantically defined types such as statements or declaratives, questions or interrogatives, exclamations, and conditionals, and grammatically defined types such as simple, compound, and complex sentences. A good deal of morphology can also be found in structural syllabi, such as s in gul a r and plural marking, the forms marking the tense system of the language, and special morphology such as det erm iners and articles, prepositions and postpositions, gender markers, and so on. Morphology also deals with vocabular y, specifically formal aspects such as prefixes and suffixes. A key feature of the structural syllabus is that it is "synthetic" (Wilkins, 1976; Yalden, 1983). Synthetic syllabi require analyses of the language (content), such word frequency counts, grammatical analysis, and d i s course ana l ysis. The s yllabus designer uses the elements isolated as a result of the analyses to make up the content of the syllabus. In most cases there are rules, p atter ns and g r am m ati c al elements, u s u a l l y

Independent work: 1. http :// waucondastore . com / methods - teaching - english / 2. www.Content-English.org 3. http://www.onestopenglish.com/

O'xshashlar

Teaching the text the goals

Mastering the sounds of the language

Planning the lesson

Word meaning the semantic structure of the word

The subject matter of the theory of translation