The place of English in morphological and genetic typology of languages - Ingliz tili - Referatlar

The place of English in morphological and genetic typology of languages

Yuklangan vaqt:

20.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

45.5 KB

Ko'chirib olish

The place of English in morphological and genetic typology of languages Problems to be discussed: 1. Definitions to the term “grammar”. Two types of grammar. 2. Language families and groups 3. Germanic group of languages 4. The typology of non-related languages 5. Language and speech.

The term "grammar" goes back to a Greek word that may be translated as the "art of writing". But later this word acquired a much wider sense and came to embrace the whole study of language. Now it is often used as the synonym of linguistics . A question comes immediately to mind: what does this study involve? Grammar may be practical and theoretical. The aim of practical grammar is the description of grammar rules that are necessary to understand and formulate sentences. The aim of theoretical grammar is to offer explanation for these rules. Generally speaking, theoretical grammar deals with the language as a functional system. Most of the world’s languages belong to language families. A language family is a group of languages related by descent from a common ancestor, called the proto-language of that family. The major of that is Indo-European family. It is divided into several groups, which are also united genetically. One of them is Germanic group. English belongs to Germanic branch of Indo-European family. Indo-European languages are classified into two structural types –synthetic and analytic. Synthetic languages are defined as ones of “internal” grammar of the word. Here most of grammatical meanings and grammatical relations of words are expressed with the help of inflexions. Analytical languages are those of “external” grammar because most grammatical meanings and grammatical forms are expressed with the help of words ( will do ). However, we cannot speak of languages as purely synthetic or analytical –the English language (Modern English) possesses analytical forms as prevailing. The morphemic structure of the English language Problems to be discussed - What operation is called "Morphemic analysis"? - Morpheme-morph-allomorph - Types of morphemes from the point of view of their: a) function b) number correlation between form and meaning

There are many approaches to the questions mentioned above. According to Zellig Harris "The morphemic analysis is the operation by which the analyst isolates minimum meaningful elements in the utterances of a language, and decides which occur rences of such elements shall be regarded as occurrences of "the same" element". The general procedure of isolating the minimum meaningful elements is as follows: Step 1 . The utterances of a language are examined (obviously) not all of them, but a sampling which we hope will be statistically valid. Recurrent par tials with constant meaning (ran away in John ran away and Bill ran away) are discovered; recurrent partials not composed of smaller ones (way) are alternants or morphs. So are any partials not recurrent but left over when all recurrent ones are counted for. Every utterance is composed entirely of morphs. The division of a stretch of speech between one morph and another, we shall call a cut. Step 2 . Two or more morphs are grouped into a single morpheme if they: have the same meaning; never occur in identical environments and have combined environments no greater than the environments of some single alternant in the language. Step 3. The difference in the phonemic shape of alternants of morphemes are organized and stated; this constitutes morphophonemics Compare the above said with the conception of Ch. Hockett. Ch. Hockett : Step 1 . All the utterances of the language before (us) the analyst recorded in some phonemic notation. Step 2 . The notations are now examined, recurrent partials with constant meaning are discovered; those not composed of smaller ones are morphs. So are any partials not recurrent but left over when all recurrent ones are accounted for: therefore every bit of phonemic material belongs to one morphs or another. By definition, a morph has the same phonemic shape in all its occurrences; and (at this

stage) every morph has an overt phonemic shape, but a morph is not necessarily composed of a continuous uninterrupted stretch of phonemes. The line between two continuous morphs is a cut. Step 3 . Omitting doubtful cases, morphs are classed on the basis of shape and canonical forms are tentatively determined. Step 4 . Two or more morphs are grouped into a single morpheme if they fit the following grouping - requirements: they have the same meaning; they are in non-contrastive distribution; the range of resultant morpheme is not unique. Step 5 . It is very important to remember that if in this procedure one comes across to alternative possibilities, choice must be based upon the following order of priority: tactical simplicity morphophonemic simplicity conformity to canonical forms. Thus the first cut of utterance into the smallest meaningful units is called morph. The morphs that have identical meanings are grouped into one morpheme. It means the morphs and morphemes are speech and language units that have both form (or shape) and meanings. The smallest meaningful unit of language is called a morpheme while the smallest meaningful unit of speech is called a morph. There’s a notion of allomorph in linguistics. By allomorphs the linguists understand the morphs that have identical meanings and that are grouped into one morpheme. There may be another definition of the allomorphs: the variants (or options, or alternants) of a morpheme are called allomorphs. Compare the above said with Harris’s opinion. Some morphs, however, and some may be assigned simultaneously to two (or more) morphemes. An empty morph, assigned to no morpheme. (All the empty morphs in a language are in complementary distribution and have the same meaning (none). They could if there were any advantages in it, be grouped into a

single empty morpheme (but one which had the unique characteristic of being tactically irrelevant), must have no meaning and must be predicable in terms of non-empty morphs. A portmanteau morphs must have the meanings of two or more morphemes simultaneously, and must be in non-contrastive distribution with the combination of any alternant of one of the member morphemes and any alternant of the other (usually because no such combination occur). The difference in the phonemic shape of morphs as alternants of morphemes are organized and stated; this (in some cases already partly accomplished in Step 1) constitutes morphophonemics. In particular, portmanteaus are compared with the other alternants of the morphemes involved, and if resemblances in phonemic shape and the number of cases warrant, morphs of other than overt phonemic content are recognized, some of the portmanteaus being thus eliminated. The Types of Morphemes Morphemes can be classified from different view-points: functional number correlation between form and content From the point of view of function they may be lexical and grammatical. The lexical morphemes are those that express full lexical meaning of their own and are associated with some object, quality, action, number of reality, like: lip, red, go, one and so on. The lexical morphemes can be subdivided into lexical - free and lexical - bound morphemes. The examples given above are free ones; they are used in speech independently. The lexical-bound ones are never used independently; they are usually added to some lexical-free morphemes to build new words like- friend-ship, free-dom, teach-er, spoon-ful and so on. Taking into account that in form they resemble the grammati cal inflections they may be also called lexical - grammatical morphemes. Thus lexical - bound morphemes are those that determine lexical meanings of words but resemble grammatical morphemes in their dependence on lexical - free morphemes. The lexical - bound morphemes are means to build new words.

The grammatical morphemes are those that are used either to connect words in sentences or to form new grammatical forms of words. The content of such morphemes are connected with the world of reality only indirectly therefore they are also called structural morphemes, e.g., shall, will, be, have, is, - (e)s, -(e)d and so on. As it is seen from the examples the grammatical morphemes have also two subtypes: grammatical - free and grammatical - bound. The grammatical - free ones are used in sentences independently (I shall go) while grammatical - bound ones are usually attached to some lexical - free morphemes to express new grammatical form, like: girl's bag, bigger room, asked. From the point of view of number correlation between form and content there may be overt, zero, empty and discontinuous morphemes. By overt morpheme the linguists understand morphemes that are represented by both form and content like: eye, bell, big and so on. Zero morphemes are those that have (meaning) content but do not have explicitly expressed forms. These morphemes are revealed by means of comparison: ask – asks high -higher In these words the second forms are marked: "asks" is a verb in the third person singular which is expressed by the inflection "s". In its counterpart there's no marker like "s" but the absence of the marker also has grammatical meaning: it means that the verb "ask" is not in the third person, singular number. Such morphemes are called "zero". In the second example the adjective "higher" is in the comparative degree, because of the "- er" while its counterpart "high" is in the positive degree, the absence of the marker expresses a grammatical meaning, i.e. a zero marker is also meaningful, therefore it's a zero morpheme. There are cases when there's a marker which has not a concrete meaning, i.e. there's neither lexical nor grammatical meaning like: statesman. The word consists of three morphemes: state - s - man. The first and third morphemes have certain meanings. But "s" has no meaning though serve as a connector: it links the first

morpheme with the third one. Such morphemes are called empty. Thus empty morphemes are those that have form but no content. In contemporary English there are cases when two forms express one meaning like: He is writing a letter Two morphemes in this sentence "is" and " - ing" express one meaning: a continuous action. Such morphemes are called discontinuous. Thus there are two approaches to classify morphemes: functional and number correlation between form and content. The first one can be shown in the following scheme: Morphemes lexical grammatical free bound free bound The second one can also be shown in the same way: Morphemes overt Zero empty discontin uous form + - + +- meaning + + - + Who can tell me the difference between language and speech? Language is a collective body of knowledge, it is a set of basic elements, but these elements can form a great variety of combinations. In fact the number of these combinations is endless. Speech is closely connected with language, as it is the result of using the language, the result of a definite act of speaking. Speech is individual, personal while language is common for all individuals. To illustrate the difference between language and speech let us compare a definite game of chess and a set of rules how to play chess. Language is opposed to speech and accordingly language units are opposed to

speech units. The language unit phoneme is opposed to the speech unit - sound: phoneme /s/ can sound differently in speech - /s/ and /z/). The sentence is opposed to the utterance; the text is opposed to the discourse.

Literature 1. Ирискулов М., Кулдашев A. A course in theoiretical English Grammar. T., 2008 2. Л. Бархударов. Структура простого предложения современного английского языка. М., 1966 3. Л. Бархударов, Д. Штелинг. Грамматика английского языка. М. , 1994 4. М. Блох. Теоретическая грамматика английского языка. М. , 1994 5. М. Блох. Теоретические основы грамматики. М. , 2002 6. M. Blokh. A Course in Theoretical English Grammar. M., 1983

O'xshashlar

The comparative typology of English, Russian and Uzbek languages

Comparative analysis of the morphological systems of English and Uzbek

The Subject-matter of Comparative Typology

Major Parameters identifying the Branches of Linguistic typology

Comparative typology and its major distinctive features