Lexical equivalents of translation - Ingliz tili - Referatlar

Lexical equivalents of translation

Yuklangan vaqt:

20.09.2019

Ko'chirishlar soni:

0

Hajmi:

52.5 KB

Ko'chirib olish

Lexical equivalents of translation Plan: 1. Lexical substitution. 2. Supplementation. 3. Adequate translation.

One of the most difficult problems is how to find lexical equivalents for objects and events which are 'not known in receptor culture. A translator has to consider not only the two languages but also the two cultures. Because of the difference in culture there will be some concepts in the sorrel language which do not have lexical equivalents in the receptor language; this may be because of difference of geography of customs, of beliefs, of worldview and others. There are 3 basic ways in which a translator can find an equivalent expression in the receptor language: 1) a generic word with a descriptive phrase, 2) a loan word, 3) cultural substitute. The distinction of the tiling or event or form and its function is very important in looking for lexical equivalents. -Ex: "pencil" has the form of being long, pointed at one end, made of wood will graphite in the middle and usually having an eraser at one end. But the function of the "pencils” to write In describing the form of the "dog" we would talk about its size, shape, color, location of eyes, ears etc. The functions of a dog in some cultures would be hunting and guarding. In other cultures, the function might be simply a pet to keep one company. The meaning components of a word may be since in a description phrase. Ex: "island might be translated" land surrounded by water". In Philippines, the natural expression for "island" is "small place is the sea". The phrase they weighed anchor might be translated into one of the languages as "they lifted the heavy iron weights they used to keep the boat still "so the translator should study the contact to sec whether the form or the function of the lexical item is the forms in the passage. The form may be the same but the function may be different. Ex: "bread" in one culture may be translated as "the main food "but in other culture as a food for parties or dessert? Equivalents may be modified by a genetic word (Ex; animal in dog, wolf, cat etc.).

Equivalence may be modified by a comparison. Ex: "rubber" - thing like an oar; wolf-animal like a fierce dog. Equivalence may be modified be a loan word. A loan word refers to a word which is from another language and is unknown to most- of the speakers of the receptor language. Loan words are commonly used for the names of people, places, and geographical areas. John may be translated as "a man named John”. Equivalents may be modified by a classifier Ex: dove-a bird called dove. - lion - animal called lion - Amazon - river called Amazon Equivalence may be modified with a description of form, function or birth. Priest- the person who deals with that given to Sven anchors-irons called anchors tied ropes so the boat could not go any further, Equivalence may be by cultural substitute. If the story is about someone who was eating banana. It would be much better to say that he was eating a fruit called banana. It would be inappropriate to say that he was eating-an orange. Some .cultural substitutes which have been used in translation: Lamp - 'bamboo torch Corner stone- main pole (of house) Recline at table - sit down to eat Foxes - buch rats Fox - hyena. Almost any text which one might wish to translate will have some key words. Key words are words which are used over in the text and are crucial to the theme or topic under discussion. Key words are most often words which represent an essential or basic concept of the text. The translator should note the key words and give special attention to finding adequate lexica equivalents before beginning. There will be a number of terms used repeatedly in the source text for which

lexical equivalences should be determined before: beginning the translation the whole. If the words are not translated in such a may -as to communicate the meaning clearly, the point of the whole text may be last. Ex: church - used by Christians; mosque-used by Muslims synagogue-used by Tems. We must distinguish generic and specific – words. The same meaning components may occur in several lexical items of a language. Ex: the meaning "sheep" is also found in the words lamp, ram, and ewe. These are true because the word sheep is generic word which includes the specific words ram, ewe and Iamb. sleep house chicken dog deer male Ram stallion waster dog buck adult female Ewe mare hen bitch dole young, lamb colt chick puppy fawn Animal Sheep horse chicken dog ram ewe lamb stallion mare cold waster hen chick dog bitch puppy Equivalence modified with features of form: Treasure- lots of valuable things ". Sea - flat water Wine - fermented grape juice Flour - ground dry grain. Equivalence modified a statement of function Centurion - man that commands Ship – that with which we can walk on water It should be remembered that languages differ: 1) as to the number and selection of meaning components combined in word 2) as to the semantic interrelations that may exist between words. The translator should not expect concepts to be as they are in the source language -text being translated since the lexical structures of the two languages are different they may the concepts are expressed will be different.

Many words in any text are semantically complex. It will be expected that many times a single word will be translated by several words that is a descriptive phrase in the target language. Ex: " glutton " in English might need to be translated "one who eats too much". Finding equivalent translations for many terms is often difficult. For example "nicker” is "a can worth five cents. » Sometimes it is possible to give the equivalent in an amount in the other system. Ex: "five dollars" could be translated as one hundred pesos if those amounts were equivalent. Antonymic translation is the way of finds equivalent and is transformation of the affirmative construction in to negative or vice verse. Ann didn't say anything. . Аня промолчала. I am not kidding . Я вам серьёзно говорю. They gave me the wrong book and I didn't notice it till I got bag to my room. Я ровно дома заметил, что мне дали не ту книгу. I didn't thing of it till we went half way through the park. Вспомнил я об этом, когда мы уже проехали почти весь парк. Keep the child out of the sun. Не держите ребенка на солнце. Keep off the gross. He ходи по траве While translating one should remember he may use the words not included in the dictionary because if impossible to include in the dictionary all the correct meanings of the word, which it may acquire in the context. "He was developing grammatical nerves" - У него развивалось грамматическое чутьё

We can find a lot of meanings of the word "nerves", "нервы, сила, мужество, хладнокровье, дерзость, нахальство" but in our text it is rendered as «чутьё» The student are to make out that thoughts, reflection should be translated not by separate words. So it's quite possible and natural either to introduce some words and even: - I lit my candle at the watchman's/ Dickens/ - Я зажег свою свечу от фонаря ночного сторожа. Sentences or omit them if one can manage without them. The words which have similar form and meaning in different languages are called international words. Some of them completely coincide in their meaning/ such as football, diplomacy, artillery/ some of them partially. They may be, different in their stylistic coloring e.g. "businessman", "cosmopolitan" are neutral in Russian they have negative meaning. Some of them have entirely different meaning: Compositor - наборщик Conductor - дережер, кондуктор These words are called pseudo international words: решительный- dramatic pathetic - 1) трогательный 2) политический Наука и техника - science and technology The English language is very rich in neologisms- the word has been created recently and perhaps will not live in the language for a long time. It is very seldom that we find equivalent for the translation of neologisms and for the most part we use descriptive translation and word- for- word translation /people of good will, top level talks.

Levels of equivalence and concept of adequate translation Levels of equivalence: This problem was briefly discussed in the previous lecture in connection with the distinction between semantic and programmatic equivalence. In the theory of translation, for instance: V.G. Gark and I.N. Levin distinguish the following types of equivalents: formal semantic and situational. Formal equivalence may be illustrated by speech cases as: The sun disappeared behind a cloud – солнце скрылось за тучей. Here we find similarity of words and forms in addition to the similarity. The difference in the plain of expression is in fact, those determined by overall structural differences between Russian and English. . The use of articles in English, the use of perfective aspect, gender, forms, etc., in Russian. Semantic equivalence - exists when the same meaning are expressed in two" languages in a way. Example:-Troops were airlifted to the battlefield-войска были переброшены по воздуху на поле. The English word "airfield" contains the same' meaning as the Russian phrase-перебросить по воздуху. Although different linguistic devices are used in Russian and in English/ a word group and a compound word / the sum of semantic components is the same situation equivalence is established between that both linguistic devices but, nevertheless, describe the same extra linguistic situation: to let someone pass – уступить дорогу. It should be noted that formal equivalence alone insufficient. In fact the above examples pertain to two types of semantic equivalence. Each word affects the meaning of the object it designates. Not infrequently languages "select" different properties and signs to describe the same denotations The way, each language" creates it's own "picture" of the word" is known as "various principles of dividing reality into parts". Despite the difference of signs, both language reflect one and the same phenomenon adequately and to the same

extent, which must be taken into account when translating words of this kinds, as equivalence is not identical to having the same meaning /e.g. compare: hot milk skin on it – каймок тутган иссик сут – горячее молоко с пенкой. The differences of semantic content of the equivalent words in two languages. These words can be divided into three sub - groups: a), words with a differentiated / undifferentiated/ meaning: e.g. in English: to swim / of a human being /, to sail /, of a ship/, to float/, of an inanimate object/; in Uzbek: сузмок/ кема хакида/ сув юзида калкиб юрмок/ предмет тугрисида/; in Russian: плавать, плыть. b) words with a "broad" sense; verbs of state / to be /, perception and brainwork / to see , to understand /, verbs of action and speech / to go, to stay /, partially desemantisized words / thing, case /. c). "adverbial verbs" with a composite structure, which have a semantic content, expressing action and nature at the same time: e.g. The train whistled out of the - station. Поезд хуштак чалиб станциядан жунаб кетди. – Дав свисток, поезд отошел со станции. Most difficulties are encountered when translating the so called pseudo - international words i.e. words which arc similar in both languages, but differ in meaning or use. The regular correspondence of such words, in spelling and - sometimes in articulation / in compliance with the regularities of each language, Coupled with the structure of word-building in both languages may lead to a false identification / e.g. English moment, in Uzbek - лахза; in Russian – момент, важность, значительность. Each language has its own typical rules of combinability. The latter is limited1 by the system of the language. A language has generally established traditional combinations which do not concur with corresponding ones in another language. . Adjectives offer considerable difficulties in the process of translation that is explained by the specific ability of English adjectives to combine. It does- no' always coincide with their combinability in Uzbek or Russian languages or

account of-differences in their semantic structure and valence. Frequently one am the same adjective in English combines with a number of nouns, while in Uzbek and in Russian different adjectives are used in combinations of this kind. For this reason it is not easy to translate English adjectives which are more capable of combining than their Uzbek and Russian equivalents / A bad headache , a bad mistake... /каттик бош огртиги, купол хато..; сильная головная боль, грубая ошибка. A specific feature' of the combinability of English nouns Is. that some of them can function as the subject of sentence , indicating one who acts , though they do not belong to a lexico - semantic category Nominal/ Agents. This tends to the "predicate - adverbial modifier» construction being replaced by that of the "subject - predicate". - The strike closed most of the school in New - York. - Иш ташлаш натижасида Нью-Йоркдаги мактабларнинг купчилиги ёпилди. - В результате забастовки большинство школ Нью-Йорка было закрыто. Of no less significance is the habitual use of a word, which is bound up with the history of the language and the formation and the development of its lexical system. This gave shapes to clinches peculiar to each language , which are used for describing particular situation/ e.g. in English "Wet point", in Uzbek "Эхтиёт булинг, буялган», Russian "Осторожно окрашено". Types of lexical transformations In order to equivalence, despite the differences in formal and semantic system of two languages, the translator is obliged" to do various linguistic transformation. Their aims are to ensure that the text imparts all the knowledge inferred in the original text, the rules of the language it is translated into the following 3 elementary types are seemed most suitable for describing all kinds of lexical transformations: 1 .Lexical substitution; 2. Supplementation;

3. omissions/dropping/. Lexical substitution. 1 . In substitutions of lexical units words and-stable word combinations are replaced by others which are not their equivalents. More often 3 cases are met with a). A concrete definition - replacing a word with, a broad sense by one of a narrower meaning: He is at school- он учится в школе; у мактабда укииди. He is in the army – он служит в армии; у армияда хизмат килади. b). Generalization - replacing a word's narrow meaning by one with a broad sense: A Navai blanket – жун адёл, индийское одеяло. c) An integral transformation: How do you do- салом; здравствуйте. 2. Antonymous translation is a complex lexico - grammatical substitution of a positive construction for the negative one / and vice -versa/, which is coupled with a replacement of a word by its antonym when translated / keep off grass – маиса устида юрманг – не ходите по траве. 3. Compensation is used when certain elements in the original text cannot be expressed in terms of the language it is translated into. In cases of this kind the same information is communication by other or another place to as to make up the semantic deficiency.

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yxati: 1. Karimov I. A. “Yuksak ma’naviyat – yengilmas kuch“ Toshkent “ Ma’naviyat” 2008-yil 2. Karimov I. A. “Asosiy vazifamiz- vatanimiz taraqqiyoti va xalqimiz farovonligini yanada yuksaltirish”. Toshkent “O‘zbekiston” 2010 yil 3. Karimov I. A. “ 2010- yil Barkamol avlod yili” Davlat dasturi. Toshkent ”O‘zbekiston” 2010 yil 4. Karimov I. A. “ Yangicha fikrlash va ishlash davr talabi”. Toshkent – 1997 yil 5. Karimov I. A. “ Bu muqaddas vatanda azizdir inson”. Toshkent – 2010 yil 6.G’aybulla Salomov “Til va tarjimon” “Fan”nashriyoti, Toshkent-1966 yil

O'xshashlar

Grammatical problems of translation

Phraseological problems of translation

The subject matter of the theory of translation

Some Basic Problems of Dictionary Compiling

Sight translation