Linguistic Typology as a subject - Английский язык - Рефераты

Linguistic Typology as a subject

Загружено в:

20.09.2019

Скачано:

0

Размер:

58.5 KB

Linguistic Typology as a subject Plan:  Types of scientific comparison;  Branches of General Typology;  Types of non-linguistic Typology;  Subject-matter of Linguistic Typology;  Various approaches toward definition of Linguistic typology.

Linguistic typology Typolog y as a method of scientific study is characteristic to many fields of sci entific knowledge because the taxonomic description, classification and systemic comparison of various objects are universal methods of cognition and apply to both non-linguistic and linguistic sciences. Taxonomy is a science studying theory of clas sification and systemizing. Basic types of scientific comparison There are 2 types of scientific comparison: a) substantial, and b) non- substantial. a) Substantial comparison deals with comparison of real objects materializing substances, e.g. sounds, digits, numbers, etc. b) Non-substantial comparison deals with comparison of systems and their ele ments (e.g. phonemes, morphemes). At the early stages of development of typology as a science the major role be - longed to substantial comparison which is considered primary. Yuri Rojdenstvenskiy' wrote that "...in General linguistics the relations between language systems base on substantial features. The languages were considered cognate because the linguists found principal similarity in their substance: sound and content". Non-substantial comparison played a significant role in shaping typology as an independent science. Branches of General typology As a method of scientific cognition General typology binds Non-linguistic and Lin guistic typologies. Both of them have general strategies, objectives and principles of identifying isomorphic and allomorphic features of substances, phenomena, facts, etc. Non-linguistic typology

As a method typology is used in law, math, history, botany, economy, psychol ogy, etc. General and solitary differences and similarities are typical to all sciences. Some branches isolate systemic comparison into an independent sub- branch within the frames of a more general science: e.g. comparative psychology first mentioned in the works of Aristotle who described psychological similarities between animals and human beings. One the most well-known representatives of Comparative Psycho logy was Charles Darwin. Comparative Pedagogy deals with general and distinctive features, development trends and prospective of theory, applied instruction and upbringing methods, re veals their economic, social political and philosophic backgrounds. Historical typology analyses historic facts and produces comparative inventory based on the history of each nation/ethnicity to reveal general trends, differences and similarities. E.g. based on French revolution of 1848 the major signs of revolution ary situation were revealed. Literary criticism ( сравнителъное литературоведение ) got rapid development in the second half of XIX century simultaneously with development of comparative linguistics. In Russia the representatives of comparative linguistics were P.M. Samarin, V.M. Jirmunskiy, M.P. Alekseev, N.I. Conrad, I.G. Neupokoeva, etc. The two sciences — Linguistic typology and Literary criticism have a number of similarities: a) linguistic comparison deals with identifying universal principles of comparative description of the systems of national languages while Literary criti cism establishes general principles of typological description of national literatures; b) both sciences deal with identifying systemic signs ( системние празники ) and discover typological isomorphism which can be conditioned structurally, genetically and geographically, etc.

The subject-matter of Linguistic Typology Linguistic typology is a branch of general linguistics. There is no unanimity in defining the subject matter of linguistic typology. There are broad and narrow inter pretations of its subject matter. James Ellis 2 The subject-matter theory of translation, dialec tology and borrowings to the bulk of Linguistic typology. These branches do have relations to Linguistic typology but also constitute the subject-matter of other special fields of knowledge. There is a great variety of terms: areal linguistics, structural linguistics, characterology, language universals, translational grammar, comparative philology, con trastive linguistics, confrontational linguistics, etc. With further development of linguistic science scholars start differentiating the terms "comparison" and "confrontation". While comparative method implied com - parison of cognate /related languages, confrontational method was derived to denote comparison of genetically non-related languages. Roman Jacobson contributed to the definition of subject-matter of Linguistic ty - pology stating that "Genetic method deals with relationship of languages, areal meth - od deals with similarities while typological method deals with isomorphism" 3 . Isomorphism can unite various statuses of languages, both synchronically and diachronically or statuses of 2 different languages, areally close or distant; geneti - cally related and non-related. Definition of the subject-matter of Linguistic Typology The most popular definition of the subject matter seems to be "Linguistic typol - ogy is a branch of general linguistics, field of study aiming at identifying such simi - larities and distinctive features of languages that do not depend on genetic origin or influence of languages to one another. Typology strives to identify and look at the most significant features that affect other spheres of language systems, e.g. the way of junction of meaningful parts of the word or the so-called structure of the sentence in the language". Typological studies base on materials of representative sampling ( репрезентативная в ы борка ) from many world languages, so that the findings and

conclusions made on the results of such analysis can be applied to the entire majority of languages (in cases of linguistic universals). Linguistic typology shows special interest to the so-called exotic or non-studied languages, e.g. languages of ethnicities of South-East Asia, Africa, Ocean side or American Indian tribes. Still the data of well-known, expanded and well-studied lan - guages may to the similar extent become the subject matter of a typological study. Linguistic typology not only systemizes, generalizes and classifies the facts of language isomorphism and allomorphism but also explains them. The majority of prestigious linguistic theories have their own typological agenda aimed at theoretical analysis of structurally different languages, their location and genetic origin. As we talk of the different standpoints in defining Linguistic typology as a sci - ence we distinguish two major approaches: a) Linguistic typology is an independent science covering all types of comparison of language systems. In this sense Linguistic typology fully coincides with Com - parative Linguistics; b) Linguistic typology is a part of Comparative Linguistics. It is opposed to tra ditional Comparative Historical Linguistics, Charachterology and Areal linguistics. In that sense it coincides with Structural typology. Quantitative limitation of the number of compared languages is of primary signif icance while defining the subject matter of Linguistic typology. There is no unanim ity on that issue. Some scholars support unlimited number of compared languages aiming at identifying linguistic universals. They consider that the results of compara tive study should tend for universality. Other scholars assume that a limited number of genetically related languages should be compared. Finally the last group of scholars argue that the number can be as minimum as 2 languages. The reason of all this ambiguity is in an unclear ap - proach to the principles of classifying Linguistic typology into branches. Yu.Rojdestvenskiy, V.Ghak, B.Uspenskiy contributed a lot to elaboration of sub ject matter of Linguistic typology.

The basis of Linguistic Typology is constituted by Structural Typology which has the following parts: 1) Typological Classification; 2) Linguistic Universals; 3) Etalon Language; 4) Typological Theory. The general definition of Linguistic typology implies that it unites various types of comparison of language systems. Genetic, Areal and Typological comparisons built into 3 aspects of general comparison process. These methods do not contradict but complement each other. The types of linguistic comparison can thus be illustrated as follows; 1) genetic/genealogical or historic comparison/reconstruction of common archi/ pra- forms of genetically related languages. Special attention should 2) to pay closely and distantly related languages. 3) typological comparison of systems and sub-systems of languages: a) related; b) non-related; c) structurally similar; d) structurally non-similar. 3) Areal Linguistics: comparison of neighboring languages; 3) Dominant classification by Melnikov defining language types based on domi - nant features. 5 The different classifications do not match each other and are not expected to, but the correlation between them is an important point for many linguistic research works. (There is a parallel to the classification of species in biological phylogenetics). The task of genetic classification belongs to the field of istorical- Comparative linguistics or linguistic typology. The systems of vowel phonemes of English and Uzbek From the acoustic point of view vowels are speech sounds of pure musical tone. From the point of view of articulation vowels are speech sounds in the production of which there are no noise producing obstructions. The obstructions by means of which vowels are formed may be of two kinds: 1) The fourth obstruction without which neither vowels nor voiced consonants are formed. 2) The third obstruction characteristic of both: English and Uzbek vowels.

The channels formed in the-mouth cavity for vowel production by moving a cer tain part of the tongue and keeping the lips in a certain position cannot be regarded as obstructions. They change the shape and volume of the resonance chamber, and in this way, help to achieve the tembre (or quality) of voice, characteristic of the vowel in question. In modern English we distinguish 21 vowel phonemes: 10 monophthongs 9 diphthongs 2 diphthongized vowels The main principles of classifying the vowel phonemes are as follows: a) ac - cording to the part (place of articulation or horizontal movement) of the tongue; b) according to the height (vertical movement) of the lungs; c) according to the posi - tion of lips; d) according to quality (length) of vowels. 1. according to the part (horizontal movement) of the tongue a vowel may be divided into; central [a: a], front [i:, i, e, a] and back [a, u, ] vowels. 2. according to the height of the tongue into: close (high) [i:], [u:] medial [e, a: a] and open [je, a:, x: y x] vowels In the languages, in which not only the quality but also quantity of vowels is of a certain phonemic or positional value, one more subdivision appears. 3. according to vowel length the vowels may be divided into short; [i, a, u, ] and long [i: a: u: a; a:] vowels. (In this case it belongs only to the English vowels as far as in Uzbek the length of the vowel is of no importance). 4. according to the position of lips vowels may be; rounded (or labialized) [u:, u:] and un-rounded (non-labialized) [e, a: ] vowels. 5. we may also subdivide vowels according to their tensity or laxity into: lax:[i, e] and tense [i: u: a:] vowels. The Systems of Consonant' phonemes in the English and Uzbek languages

Consonants are speech sounds in the pronunciation of which noise is heard. The degrees of noise are different There are consonants in the production of which only noise is heard, there are consonants in the production of which noise and voice are heard and there are consonants in the production of which voice prevails over noise, but the fact is that noise in different degrees and forms is always present Consonants do not give periodic voice waves. The consonants should be classified by the following principles; 1. The manner of production 2. The active organs employed in the production 3. The place of production The last division is very important as in accordance with it the parricidal differ ence in the formation of consonants in English and of consonants in Uzbek may be clearly shown. The system of English consonants consists of 24 consonants. The system of Uzbek consonant phonemes consists of 25 phonemes. Some of the English consonants like [ ] have no counterparts in Uzbek. There are also some Uzbek consonants which do not exist in the system of the English consonant phonemes. They: are [ K , X , F ]. Many consonants have their counterparts in the languages compared, but they differ in their articulation. Parts of Speech in the English and Uzbek languages The word is known as the smallest naming unit of the language. According to Leonard Bloomfield 8 , the word is a minimum free form. Close observation and com parison of words clearly shows that a great number of words have a composite nature and are made up of smaller units, each possessing sound-form and meaning. In other words, the term "word" denotes the basic unit of a given language resulting from the association of a particular meaning with a particular group of sounds capable of a grammatical employment and is therefore simultaneously a semantic, grammatical and phonological unit.

The words of every language fall into classes which are called parts of speech. The problem of parts of speech is one of the most controversial problems of modern linguistics. The theoretical side of this problem is the subject matter of the theoreti cal grammar therefore we should base our comparison of system of parts of speech on the generally acknowledged opinions of grammarians.In order to make it easier to learn the language the grammarians usually divide the word- stock of the language into some subclasses called in linguistics "the parts of speech" or in other terminology "the lexico-grammatical classes of words ". The main principles of classifying words into parts of speech are: their meaning, form and function, that is to say the words of any language differ from each other in meaning, in form and in function. Different parts of speech have different lexical and grammatical meanings, e.g. verbs denote process or state; nouns express the names of objects, adjectives their properties, etc. 1.What is typology as a method of scientific study? a) it is a characteristic to many fields of scientific knowledge b) it is a characteristic only to taxonomy c) it is a characteristic only to linguistics d) it is a characteristic only to phraseology 2. What are the two types of scientific comparison? a) substantial, non-substantial b) real, unreal c) specific,non-specific d) natural,unnatural 3. What does Comparative Pedagogy deal with? a) general and distinctive features, development trends and prospective of theory, applied instruction and upbringing methods, re veals their economic, social political and philosophic backgrounds.

b) specific and distinctive features, development trends and prospective of theory, applied instruction and upbringing methods, re veals their economic, social political and philosophic backgrounds. c) common and distinctive features, development trends and prospective of theory, applied instruction and upbringing methods, re veals their economic, social political and philosophic backgrounds. d) special and distinctive features, development trends and prospective of theory, applied instruction and upbringing methods, re veals their economic, social political and philosophic backgrounds. 4.What does historical typology deal with? a) analyses historic facts and produces comparative inventory based on the history of each nation/ethnicity to reveal general trends, differences and similarities. b) analyses historic facts and produces comparative resolution based on the history of each nation/ethnicity to reveal general trends, differences and similarities. c) analyses historic facts and produces comparative consequence based on the history of each nation/ethnicity to reveal general trends, differences and similarities. d) realizes historic facts and produces comparative inventory based on the history of each nation/ethnicity to reveal general trends, differences and similarities. 5. What is the subject-matter of Linguistic Typology? a) Linguistic Typology is a branch of general linguistics .There is no unanimity in defining the subject-matter of linguistic typology b) Linguistic Typology is a branch of general statistics .There is no unanimity in defining the subject-matter of linguistic typology c) Linguistic Typology is a branch of general sociology .There is no unanimity in defining the subject-matter of linguistic typology

d) Linguistic Typology is a branch of general phraseology .There is no unanimity in defining the subject-matter of linguistic typology 6. What was the contribution of Roman Jacobson to the definition of subject- matter of Linguistic Typology? a) Roman Jacobson contributed to the definition of subject-matter of Linguistic ty pology stating that "Genetic method deals with relationship of languages, areal meth od deals with similarities while typological method deals with isomorphism". b) Roman Jacobson contributed to the definition of subject-matter of Linguistic ty pology stating that "Linguistic method deals with relationship of languages, areal meth od deals with similarities while typological method deals with isomorphism" 3 . c) Roman Jacobson contributed to the definition of subject-matter of Linguistic ty pology stating that "Specific method deals with relationship of languages, areal meth od deals with similarities while typological method deals with isomorphism" 3 . 7. What does The general definition of Linguistic typology imply? a) It implies that it unites various types of comparison of language systems. Genetic, Areal and Typological comparisons built into 5 aspects of general comparison process. b) It implies that it unites various types of comparison of language systems. Genetic, Areal and Typological comparisons built into 3 aspects of general comparison process. c) It implies that it unites various types of comparison of language systems. Genetic, Areal and Typological comparisons built into 4 aspects of general comparison process. d) It implies that it unites various types of comparison of language systems. Areal and Typological comparisons built into 3 aspects of general comparison process. 8. What are the main principles classifying words into parts of speech? a) form, meaning, function

b) function, meaning, form c) form, function, meaning d) none of them 9. What is the word according to Leonard Bloomfield? a) The word is known as the smallest naming unit of the language. b) The word is known as the biggest naming unit of the language. c) The word is known as the one of units of the language. 10 What does General Typology bind as a method of scientific cognition? a) it binds non-linguistic and linguistic typologies b) only linguistic typologies c) both verbal and linguistic typologies d) none of them

Bibliography 1. Modern English in Action, Henry I. Christ, DC Heath and company, Boston 2001. 2. Mountains are climbing, study book, Boston 2003y. 3. English phonetic, A.A. Abduazizov издательство « Укитувчи » Т . 1972 г . 4. Reference guide to English, Alice Maclin, USA Washington 1994 5. Improve your sentence, Ann M. Sala, McCraw-Hill, USA. 1999y 6. Language for daily use Mildred A Dawson New York, 2001y 7. New English voyages in English, Francis B. Connors, Loyola University. Press, Chicago 1991y 8. Writing skills, Suzanne Chance, Clencoe, McCraw-Hill. New York 9. Reading and writing, Natasha Haugnes 10. Contemporary English, Mechella Perrott, contemporary publisher group, Illinois USA. 11. Beginning English writing skills, Mone Scherago, National textbook company, Illinois USA. 12. Lectures of comparative typology, C. Satimov, M. Просвещениею 1991 г . 13. Comparative typology V.D. Arakin, M. «Prosveshenie» 1991 14. Comparative grammar, J.I.

Похожие

Stages of Development of Linguistic typology

The Subject-matter of Comparative Typology

Major Parameters identifying the Branches of Linguistic typology

English vocabulary as a system

The vocabulary of a language as a system