Grammatical problems of translation - Английский язык - Рефераты

Grammatical problems of translation

Загружено в:

20.09.2019

Скачано:

0

Размер:

54 KB

Grammatical problems of translation Plan: 1. Complete correspondence. 2. Partial correspondence. 3. The absence of correspondence. 4. Complete morphological correspondence. 5. Partial morphological correspondence. 6. Absence morphological correspondence.

Every language has a specific system which differs from that of any others. This is all the more so with respect to English, Uzbek and Russian. whose grammatical systems are typologically and genetically heterogeneous. English and Russian belong to the Germanic and Slavonic groups respectively in the Indo- European family-of language. The Uzbek language patronize to the Turkish group of the Altaic family. Conserning the morphological type both English and Russian are inflected, through the former is notable for its synthetic character in the main, Uzbek is an agglutinative language. As to translation the principle means of expression n languages possessing in analytical character / English / Js the order of words and use of function words though all the four basic grammatical means-'grammatical inflections function words, word order and intonation pattern are found in any languages. The other two means arc of secondary importance. The grammatical inflections are the principal means used in such languages as Russian and Uzbek, though the rest of grammatical inflection. The comparison of the following examples will help to illustrate the difference between the languages considered; The hunter killed the wolf Овчи бурини улдирди Охотник убил волка. This means that the subject /S/ is placed in the first position / V / - in the second position. If the predicate is expressed by a transitive verb when in the third position we find the object! 0 /that are: S-Vtr-0 Any violation of the order of the word brings about a change or distortion of the meaning. The corresponding Russian silence-' adheres to the patters S — V tr - 0. But it permits the transposition of the word i.e. Охотник убил волка Волка убил охотник

These patterns are not equivalent. The first allows transposition of words, which leads to stylistic marking / characteristic of poetry /. Besides, the ending "NI» expresses an additional meaning of definiteness. The second pattern doesn't tolerate transposition of words. The principal types of grammatical correspondences between: two languages are as follows: a. complete correspondence b. partial correspondence c. the absence of correspondence, Partial morphological correspondence. Partial morphological correspondence is observed when in the languages examined there are grammatical categories ways identical categorical meaning but with some differences in the particular meaning. In the languages considered there is a grammatical category of case in nouns. Thought the categorical meaning is identical in all three languages the particular meanings are different both from the point of view of their number and the meanings they express. English has 2-parlicular meanings while Uzbek and Russian have 6. Though latter two languages have the same quantity of particular cases, their meanings do not coincide. The differences in the case system or in any other grammatical categories are usually expressed by other means in languages. Absence of morphological correspondence. Absence of morphological correspondence is observed when there are corresponding grammatical categories in the language examined. As for instance in Uzbek there is a grammatical categories of possessiveness, which shows" the affixation of things to one of the three grammatical persons , e. g. Uzbek Китоб - им Китоб - инг Китоб - и

This grammatical category is neither found in English in Russian. These languages use pronouns for this purpose. English Russian My book моя книга Your book твоя книга His / her book его/её книга In English we use certain grammatical means to ".express a definite and indefinite meanings, that is articles. But there are no equivalent grammatical means in Uzbek and Russian. They use lexical or syntactic means to express those meanings. / see substitution / Complete syntactic correspondence. By complete syntactic correspondence is understood the conformity in structure and sequence of words in word - combinations and sentences. Complete syntactic correspondence is rarely to be found in the languages examined here. However, the pattern adj+ noun is used in word - combination: red flags – кизил байроклар. Красные знамёна. The same may be said of sentences in cases when the predicate of the simple sentences is expressed by an intransitive verb: he laughed – у кулди, он смеялся. Partial syntactic correspondence By partial syntactic correspondence in word - combinations is understood the conformity in meaning but discrepancy in the structure of phase. Partial syntactic correspondence in word — combinations are found in these following patterns. I. Attributes formed by the collocation of words. Owing to the fact that English is poor in grammatical-inflections. attributes are widely formed by means of more collocation of words in accordance with the pattern N (1) - (2 ) " which expressed the following type of relations. Attributive English Uzbek Russian glass- tube шиша - найча стеклянная трубочка

N (1) + N (2 ) N (1)+ N (2) ADJ + N In the example English and Uzbek translation is unmarked while Russian is marked. Possessive English Uzbek Russian Mouse - plan a) уй плани план домa N (1) + N (2) 6) уйнинг плани K (1) + N (2) (u) N(lнинг) + N(2)(n) The Uzbek and Russian versions are marked, while English is unmarked. Besides in Russian the transposition is observed. As it is seen in the examples cited, languages differ as to the way they express these relations, though they maintain identical relations between the components of word - combinations. 1. word - combination whose first component is expressed by a numeral . One book битта китоб одна книга. Two books иккита китоб две книги Three books учта китоб три книги Four books туртта китоб четыре книги Five books бешта китоб пять книг The order of words in these combinations is -the same in all the three languages, though the manner of expressing plurality differs in the second components. Compare: English Uzbek Russian Num + N (pi) Num + N sing from two to rive Num +-N (sin) rod. P From five on Num + N(pl)rod. P As is seen in English and Russian the second components are grammatically marked though the markers do not coincide. In Uzbek it is unmarked.

Partial syntactic correspondence is also observed in complete polycomponent prepositive attributes with inner predication as in the following examples: This is to be or not to be a struggle – Xaёт мамот кураши, борьба не на жизнь а на смерть. Go ~ to - hell voice – догал овоз, грубый голос. By partial syntactic correspondence in sentences is understood the divergence in the order of the words, omission or partial substitute of parts of sentences: It is forbidden to smoke here - 6y ерда чекиш манн килинган, курить здесь запрещено. With that blue out his candle - y шамни учирди, он задул свечи (P. Stevenson) Absence syntactic correspondence. By absence of syntactic correspondence we mean lack of certain syntactic construction in the target languages, which were used in the Source language. In English this concerns syntactic construction with non-finite forms of the verb, which compose the extended part of a sentence with incomplete or secondary predications. The semantic function of predicative construction can be formulated as intercommunication and inter conditionally of actions or states with different subjects. These constructions have no formal grammatical connection with the main parts of sentences though there is always conformity between them. The degree of attendance of action or condition in predicative construction determines the choice of complex, compound or simple in translation. Compare: I heard the door open.- “Эшик очилганини эшитдим, я услышал как открылась дверь. In the English sentences the predicative construction which functions as an object is composed of a noun in the common case and an infinitive. In Uzbek this construction corresponds to the word — combination "эшик очилнганини" which carries. Out the same function, though there is neither structural in morphological conformity: it is word combination expressed by a noun and participle. The translation experience shows that you can't give a word- for word translation. There is 4-5 grammatical translation:

1. Transpositions 2. Replacements 3. Additions 4. Omissions. Translations are connected with functional sentence perspectives. Transposition is a change in the order of linguistic elements such as words clauses & is connected with '"functional sentence perspectives" which is the division of the messages into main parts; 1. The theme 2. The topic In English where the theme is marked different by it is placed at the beginning & the theme at the end. Within a complex sentence a similar tendency is observed. Replacement arc the most common type of grammatical transposition & they effect all types of linguistic unites. The subdivision of replacement: 1) the replacement of the word forms struggles 2) replacement of parts of speech is" specially typical as to replacement of English nouns derived from the verbs-& demoting actions. Subject of the English sentence is often replaced in Russian by corresponding secondary part such as object, adverbial modifier of time. Types of grammatical transformations. In order to attain the fullest information from one language into another one is obliged to resort numerous inter linguistic lexical and grammatical transformations. Grammatical transformation is as follows; 1. Substitution; 2. Transposition; 3. Omission; 4. Supplementation.

The cited types of elementary transformations as such are rarely used in the process of translating. Usually they combine with each other, assuming the nature of "complex" inter-linguistic transformations. Substitution By substitution we understand the substitution of one part of speech by another or one form of a word by another. Consequently, there are two kinds of substitutions constituting a grammatical type of transformations; substitution of parts of speech and the grammatical form of a word. Transformation by substitution may be necessitated b}' several reasons: the absence of one or an other grammatical form or construction in the target language: lack of coincidence in the use of corresponding form and construction as well as lexical reasons- different combinability and use of words, lack of a part of speech with "the same meaning. An example of the substitution of a word- form may be the interpretation of die meaning of the grammatical category of postriority of the English verb, which is presented in two particular meanings: absolute posterity / he says he will come / and relative posterity / he said he would come /.Uzbek and Russian, verbs do not possess word form of this kind and communicate their meaning with use of other grammatical means: у келишини айтаяпти. Он говорит что придет. У келишини айтди. Он сказал, что придет. In Uzbek the meaning of this category is expressed by a substantives participle ending in- jak or by the infinitive ending in - (i) sh; in Russian the future tense form of a verb is used. There are two types of substitution of parts of speech; obligatory and nonobligatory the obligatory substitution is observed when in the target language there are no parts of speech corresponding to that used in the source language e.g. the English articles and may be used for emphasis. In cases of the kind it is necessary to substitute them with functionally – adequate means of expressions in Uzbek and Russian. E.g. When we were in Majorca, there was a Mr. Leech there and she was telling us most wonderful things about you. ( A . Christie ).

Биз Малоркада булганимиздан, у ерда кандайдир миссис Лич бор эди p . У бизга сиз тугрингизда жуда куп кизикарли нарсаларни айтиб берди. Когда мы были в Малорке, там была некая миссис Лич, которая рассказывала очень много интересного о вас. In Uzbek and .Russian an indefinite pronoun is used for translating the; indefinite article. Non obligatory substitution is a substitution undertaken .by the needs or demands or the context: The climb had been easier than he expected. Кутарилиш у кутгандан осонрок булди. Подняться оказалось легче, чем он ожидал. A noun in the English sentence is substitute by infinitives in the Uzbek and Russian languages. Omission As a type of grammatical transformation — omission is necessitated by grammatical redundancy of certain forms in two languages. He raised his hand. У кулини кутарди . Он поднял руку . Addition As a type of grammatical transformation can be met with in eases of formal inexpressiveness of grammatical or semantic components in the language of the original text. Also, there was an awkward hesitancy at times, as he essayed the new words he had learnt. Базида у якиндагина урганган Янги сузларни талаффуз килишди хозирланиб тухтаб коларди. Иногда он запинался, готовясь произнести слова, которые он только недавно выучил.

The meaning of the verbal form is expressed in Russian by the words "только недавно» and in Uzbek by the adverb '"якиндагина". It must be emphasized that the division into lexical and grammatical transformations is to a great extent", approximate and conditional. In some cases a transformation can be interpreted as one another type of elementary transformation. In practice the cited types of lexical and grammatical transformation are seldom met with in "pure form". Frequently they combine to form complex transformations. Function vаries to still greater extent. Take for instance much category as gender Russian distinguished 3 genders: Masculine, feminine & neutral which are formally expressed in the following ways: - by the in flexional forms of the noun itself - by means of pronominal substitution. In English the same 3 genders are also distinguished. However, -the only formal way to express ten distinction through pronominal substitution, there being no such things as agreement in gender or difference in inflexion endings. In Uzbek pronominal substitution doesn't exist. The translation task is: I. To find the correct meaning for this or that from. 2. To find an appropriate form in the Target language for this expression of the same meaning. On the whole this choice of grammatical equivalent in the Target language determined by the following factors: 1. The meaning invariant in the grammatical form itself. Ex: lives -Lived 2. The lexical character often word or word group used in this or that form. Ex: thus the use of the plural from in Russian is impossible with certain nouns while possible with others: Ex: workers of all industries Other philosophies

3. Factors of style. Ex: both English & Russian have the passive form of the verb. At the station John was net by his brother. 4. Frequency of use. Replacement of parts of speech; This transformation is especially typical as to replacement of English nouns derived from the denoting actions. Ex: It's our hope that. Ex: The abandonment by Irene of glittering he had given her.

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yxati: 1. Karimov I. A. “Yuksak ma’naviyat – yengilmas kuch“ Toshkent “ Ma’naviyat” 2008-yil 2. Karimov I. A. “Asosiy vazifamiz- vatanimiz taraqqiyoti va xalqimiz farovonligini yanada yuksaltirish”. Toshkent “O‘zbekiston” 2010 yil 3. Karimov I. A. “ 2010- yil Barkamol avlod yili” Davlat dasturi. Toshkent ”O‘zbekiston” 2010 yil 4. Karimov I. A. “ Yangicha fikrlash va ishlash davr talabi”. Toshkent – 1997 yil 5. Karimov I. A. “ Bu muqaddas vatanda azizdir inson”. Toshkent – 2010 yil 6.G’aybulla Salomov “Til va tarjimon” “Fan”nashriyoti, Toshkent-1966 yil

Похожие

Phraseological problems of translation

Lexical equivalents of translation

General principles of grammatical analisys

The problem of grammatical categories

Some Basic Problems of Dictionary Compiling