Free word combinations and phraseological units

Загружено в:

20.09.2019

Скачано:

0

Размер:

69 KB

Скачать

Free word combinations and phraseological units Plan: 1. The subject-matter of phraseology. 2. The classification of phraseological units. 3. The point of view about stability, idiomaticity and the equevalency of phraseological units to words. 4. The history of phraseological units 5. The synonymy, polysemy of phraseological units.

The subject-matter of phraseology. Functionally and semantically inseparable units are usually called phraseological units. Phraseological units cannot be freely made up in speech but are reproduced as ready made units. The lexical components in phraseological units are stable and they are non-motivated i. e. its meaning cannot be deduced from the meaning of its components and they do not allow their lexical components to be changed or substituted. •In phraseological units the individual components do not seem to possess any lexical meaning outside the word group. Ex. red tape (bureaucratic methods), to get rid of; to take place; to lead the dance; to take care. A. V. Koonin thinks that phraseology must be an independent linguistic science and not a part of lexicology. His -classification of phraseological units is based on the functions of them in speech. They are: nominating, interjectional and communicative. V. V. Vinogradov classified phraseological units into three groups taking into consideration their motivation. They are: 1) phraseological fusions; they are such units which are completely non motivated word groups; Ex. to kick the bucket to get one's goat, to show the white feather. In these word groups the meaning of the whole expressions is not derived from the meaning of components. 2) phraseological units: the meaning of such word-groups can be perceived through the metaphorical meaning of the whole phraseological unit or the meaning of which may be seen as a metaphorical transference of the meaning of the word group: ex. to show one's teeth, to know the way the wind blows, to stand to one's guns, to take care of; 3) phraseological collocations: They include motivated relatively stable word groups. They have a certain degree of stability; ex: to take an interest, to fall in love, to look •through one's fingers, meet the demand etc.

At present the term «phraseological unite is usually used not to all set expressions but only to those which are completely or partially nonmotivated 1 . Prof N. Amasova gives two categories of phraseological units depending on whether just one component or both are used in phraseologically bound meaning. If all the components .have idiomatic meaning such phraseological units are called «idioms», ex: to toe the line (to do exactly as one is told), a free lance (a person who acts independently). If one of the components has bound specialized meaning dependent on the second component she called «phrasemes». Ex. dutch courage (courage given by drink), to bring to book (to bring to justice), small years (in the childhood), small beers (weak beer). Stability of phraseological units is seen in its disallowance of the substitution of word groups. Ex: «to shrug one's-shoulders* does not allow to substitute either «shrug» or «shoulder». Idiomaticity of phraseological units is lack of word groups. If a word group does not allow word by word translation it is called idiomatic word groups. Ex: to kick the bucket in the soup, under a cloud . Prof. A. I. Smirnitsky states that a phraseological unit may be defined as specific word groups functioning as a word-equivalent. The phraseological units are single semantically inseparable units. They are used in one function in the sentence-and belong to one part of speech. According to their semantic and grammatical inseparability we may classify the phraseological units into: noun equivalents (heavy father), verb equivalents (take place, break the-news) adverb equivalents (in the long run, high and low). Prof. A. Koonin does not support Smirnitsky's point of view on the equivalence of phraseological units. A. Koonin points out that the components of phraseological units are mounted separately and therefore they can't be used in one function in the sentence. Ex. He gets rid of it. The problem of equivalency of phraseological units to words demands further investigation. Among the phraseological units there are the so-called imperative phraseological units 1 .

Ex. God Bless his soul!, Curse her! Damn him!, Stay well!, Go well!, Heaven forbid!, Lord love us! etc. These phraseological units mostly denote the emotional and expressive state of a person. Proverbs, sayings and quotations exist also as ready made units with a specialized meaning of their own which can not be deduced from the meaning of their components. Therefore they may be included in phraseological units. Ex. East or West home is best, a friend in need is a friend indeed. To be or not to be. The history of many phraseologisms is an interesting record of the nation's past, of its way of life, customs and' traditions. Many phraseological units are connected with commerce, Ex: to talk shop, to make the best of the bargain, to have all one's goods in the shop window, a drug on the market. Many phraseological units are associated with the sea (the waves). Ex; all at sea, to nail one's colours to the mast, to sail under false colours. Many phraseological units were borrowed from the Bible, Ex: the root of all evil. Daily bread . There is a subject of discussion among the linguists about the state of such combinations like «to give in», «to make up», «to take off», «to get up», «to give up», etc; what is the nature of the second element of such combinations? The second element of such units is not a word therefore they are not phraseological units. Phraseological units, as we know, consist of words. The second element is not a morpheme because it is not a part of the word, they are not adverbs because adverbs have definite lexical meanings and are used in a certain function in the sentence. But these units (get up, give up etc) have idiomatical meanings therefore. A. V. Koo-nin calls such units «set phrases* which have no phraseological character. There are synonyms among phraseological units,

Classification of phraseological units according to their semantic and grammatical inseparability Proverbs, sayings and quotations The history of phraseological units The discussion among the linguistics about the state of combinations, like “give up” The synonymy of phraseological units The polysemy of phraseological units English lexicography. main types of english dictionaries. W о rds can be classified in different ways. The classification of words may be based upon: similarity of meanings and polarity of meanings of words. The similarity of meanings is found in synonymic groups. Synonyms are words belonging to the same part of speech different in morphemic composition and phonemic shape but identical or similar in meaning and interchangeable at least in some contexts. Ex. jump, hop, leap, spring, defend, protect, guard shield; absence, privation, lack, want; error, mistake; go, leave, depart. Complete synonyms do not exist. Bloomfield says each linguistic form has a constant an 1 specific meaning. Polysemantic words can not be synonymous in all their meanings. Ex. The verb «look» is a synonym of see, watch, observe, in the meaning of «cMOTperb» but in another of its meaning it is synonymous with the verbs seem, appear (to look pale). Each synonymic group contains one word the meaning of which has no additional connotations (it can be used in different styles). This word is called a synonymic dominant. Ex. In the group: change, alter, very, modify the word «change» is the synonymic dominant. Synonyms may be divided into: 1) ideographic synonyms; 2) stylistic synonyms.

Synonyms which differ in their denotational meanings are called ideographic synonyms. If the difference lies in their stylistic difference the synonyms are said to be stylistic. Ex. beautiful (usually about girls) and handsome (usually about men). These are ideographic synonyms but «to die — to pass away», «to begin — to commence*, «to see — to behold», «to end —to complete)), «horse — steed» are stylistic synonyms. neutral words stylistically coloured words to see to behold (bookish) a girl a maiden (poetic) money dough (colloquial) food grub (coloquial) to live to hand out (coloquial) Prof. Aznaurova E. S. 1 points out that stylistic synonyms carry emotional evaluative information. Synonyms are distributionally different words. Ex. «too.» «also» «as well» are synonyms. They always occur in different surroundings. The synonyms differ in their collocability. Ex. We compare the collocability of synonyms «to book» and «to buy». possible impossible to book in advance to buy in advance to book somebody to buy somebody to book seats to buy seats to buy cheaply to book cheaply to buy from a person to book from a person to buy a house to book a house The main sourses of synonyms are: 1) borrowings: to ask—to question: (F)—to interrogate, (L) to begin (A, S) — to commence (F) — to initiate (L— rise (F) — ascend (L);

2) The formation of verb + adverb (V + adv) combinations like «have a smoke». to rest — to have a rest to swim — to have a swim, to smoke -— to have a smoke; 3) shortening: vacation — vac, doctor — doc, sister — sis; 4) conversion: laughter — laugh, 5) many set expressions con-sisting of a verb with a postpositive element form synonyms: ex. to choose — to pick out, to continue — to go on, to return — to bring back. 6) euphemisms, i. e. words which are used instead of unpleasant words: ex: drunk-merry, ledger-paying guest, to die — to go away, commandment — command. 7) slang, i. e. emotionally coloured words which are the secondary names of objects. Antonyms are words which belong to the same part of speech and have contrary meanings. Ex. kind — cruel, good — bad, big — small, little — much. Antonyms may be divided into: 1) root antonyms: ex. good —bad, beautiful — ugly, kind — cruel, old — young. 2) derivational antonyms. These antonyms are formed by affixes. Ex. kind — unkind, to like — dislike, possible — impossible, regular, irregular. Antonyms are not always interchangeable in certain contexts. Ex. «rich voice» can not be changed into «poor voice». The opposite of a short person is a tall person. A short thing — long thing, an old book — — a new book, an old man—a young man, a thin man—a fat man, a thin book — a thick book. Antonyms may be found among qualitative adjectives as: good — bad, deep — shallow, nouns as: light — darkness; verbs as «to give» and «to take»; adverbs as quickly — slowly, early — late. Many antonyms are explained by means of the negative particle «not». Ex. clean — not dirty, shallow—not deep. Antonyms form

pairs, not groups like synonyms: bad— good, big—little, alike — different, old — new. Polysemantic words may have antonyms in some of their meanings and none in the others. Ex. when the word «cri-ticism means «blame» its antonym is «praise», it has no antonym. 1 The majority of linguists nowdays agree that the vocabulary should be studied as a system. We must study interrelated systems. For different purposes of study different types of grouping of words may be effective. Words joined together by one common semantic component form semantic fields. Ex. the semantic field of time. The German linguist Jost Trier shows that the significance of each unit in the semantic field is determined by its neighbours. A. Shaikevitch says that semantically related words must occur near one another in the text. If the words often occur in the text together they must be semantically related and they form a semantic field. Ex. faint, feeble, weary, sick, tedious and healthy form one semantic field. Face, head, arm, hand, foot etc make up the semantic field with the notion of body. Neologism is any word which is formed according to the productive structural patterns or borrowed from another language and felt by the speakers as something new. So neologisms are newly coined words or phrase or a new meaning for an existing word or a word borrowed from another language. As a result of the development of science and industry many new words are appeared in the language. Ex. isotope, tape-recorder, supermarket, V-day (Victory day). The research of cosmic space by the scientists gave birth to new words: sputnik, lunik, space-rocket, space-ship. Neologisms are mainly formed by; 1) wordformation (mainly productive type).

Ex. -gen, -ogen: carinogen (biological term) -ics: psycholinguistics, electronics sputnik—to sputnik (conversion) —nik: filmnik, folknik. 2) semantic extension: heel — a tractor (old meaning: heel—the back part of foot); to screen—to classify, to select methodically (old meaning was — to separate coal into different sizes); 3) borrowing: telecast, telestar (Greek), sputnik, lunnik, udarnik (Russian). Words may drop out as a result of the disappearance oi the actual objects they denote. These words are called obsolete words. The disappearance of words may be caused as a result of influence of borrowings. Ex. the Scandinavian «take» and «die» ousted 0. E. ni-man and sweldan. The French «army» and «place» replaced the 0. E. here and steps. Words which are not used generally are called archaisms. Archaisms are used in poetic vocabulary. Ex. steed (horse), slay (kill), welkin (sky) Archaisms should be distinguished from historical terms or historisms which denote historical reality and commonly used in modern English. Ex. cannon- ball, chain mail, lance, archer, baldric (belt for a sword). Speech also expresses the speakers attitude to what he is talking about. The speaker may wish to warn, to influence people, to express his approval or disapproval. Words expressing emotion are called emotionally coloured words. Demi-nutive and derogatory affixes play an important role in forming emotionally coloured words. Ex. daddy, kiddykins, babykins, oldie, blackie. In Uzbek: дадажон , c ингилгинам , = изало = , бытало =, Interjections also express emotion without naming them: Ahl, Hush!, Hell!, Nonsense!, Pooh; In Uzbek: вой айланай , эщ . The derogatory suffixes may form emotionally coloured words. Ex. bastard — внебрачный weakling-слабое

$существо рeбенок hibster-хиппи drunkard — пьяница dullard—тупица In Uzbek: ойимча , ойимтилла, ўргилибгина кетай It is very interesting that many personal nouns formed by the composition from complete sentences or phrases in most cases are derogatory: Ex. also-run— н y и скакун , непосредственность never-say-die — несдающиеся , неприклонный , stick-in-the mud— отсталый человек , растяпа die-hard — крайний консерватор , живучий There are nouns formed by conversion which are used emotionally coloured' a bare — скучный человек a washout — пропавший человек There are some words which indicate the special importance of the thing expressed. They are called intensifiers. Ex . even, ever, all, so, awfully, tremendously, wonderfully, terribly. awfully glad, terribly important . . . The Uzbek words: o щ , фи \ он , a ф \ он , фарёд are used as the intensifiers. Neologisms may be divided into: 1) root words: Ex. jeep — a small light motor vehicle, zebra — street crossing place, sputnik, lunik etc; 2) derived words: Ex. collaborationist — one who in occupied territory works helpfully with the enemy, to accessorize — to provide with dress accessories; 3) compound; Ex. space — rocket, air — drop, microfilm-reader. New words are as a rule monosemantic. Terms, used in various fields of science and technique make the greater part of neologisms. New words belong only to the notional parts of speech: to nouns, verbs, adjectives etc. Neologisms are mainly formed by: 1) wordformation (mainly productive type). 2) semantic extension: heel — a. tractor (old meaning: heel — the back part of foot); to screen — to classify, to select methodically (old meaning was — to separate coal into different sizes);$

Free word combinations and phraseological units

20.09.2019

0

69 KB

Похожие