Главная страница
Рефераты
Английский язык
Divisions of the subject of lexicology
Divisions of the subject of lexicology
Загружено в:
20.09.2019
Скачано:
0
Размер:
50.5 KB
Скачать
Похожие
The subject matter of the theory of translation
The Subject-matter of Comparative Typology
The problem of parts of speech
Mastering the sounds of the language
The problem of grammatical categories
![are wordgroups consisting of two or more words whose combination is integrated as a unit with a specialised meaning of the whole. To illustrate, the lexical or to be more exact the vocabulary units tattle, wall, taxi are words denoting various objects of the outer world; the vocabulary units black frost, red tape, a skeleton in the cupboard are phraseological units: each is a word-group with a specialised meaning of the whole, namely black frost is ‘frost without snow or rime’, red tape denotes bureaucratic methods, a skeleton in the cupboard refers to a fact of which a family is ashamed and which it tries to hide. Varieties of Words Although the ordinary ’speaker is acutely word-conscious and usually finds no difficulty either in isolating words from an utterance or in identifying them in the process of communication, the precise linguistic definition of a word is far from easy to state; no exhaustive definition of the word has yet been given by linguists. The word as well as any linguistic sign is a two-facet unit possessing both form and content or, to be more exact, soundform and meaning. Neither can exist without the other. For example, [ θ imbl] is a word within the framework of the English language primarily because it has the lexical meaning — ‘a small cap of metal, plastic, etc. worn on the finger in sewing.. .' 1 (Russ. наперсток ) and the grammatical meaning of the Common case, singular. In other languages it is not a word, but a meaningless sound-cluster. When used in actual speech the word undergoes certain modification and functions in one of its forms. The system showing a word in all its word-forms is called its paradigm. 2 The lexical meaning о f а word is the same throughout the paradigm, i.e. all the word- forms of one and the same word are lexically identical. The grammatical meaning varies from one form to another (cf. to take, takes, took, taking or singer, singer’s, singers, singers’). Therefore, when we speak of the word singer or the word take as used in actual utterances (cf., His brother is a well-known singer or I wonder who has taken my umbrella) we use the term w o r d conventionally,](/data/documents/3401e95b-3b5c-4c72-844f-4f0bfbac98a3/page-5.png)
![because what is manifested in the speech event is not the word as a whole but one of its forms which is identified as belonging to one definite paradigm. There are two approaches to the paradigm: (a) as a system of forms of one word it reveals the differences and relationships between them; (b) in abstraction from concrete words it is treated as a pattern on which every word of one part of speech models its forms, thus serving to distin- guish one part of speech from another. Cf. the noun paradigm — ( ), -’s , -s, -s’ as distinct from that of the regular verb — ( ) , -s, -ed 1 , -ed 2 , -ing, etc. 1 Besides the grammatical forms of words, i.e. word-forms, some scholars distinguish lexical varieties which they term v a r i a n t s of w o r d s . Distinction is made between two basic groups of variants of words. In actual speech a word or to be more exact a polysemantic word is used in, one of its meanings. Such a word in one of its meanings is described as lexico- semantic variant. Thus Group One comprises lexico-semantic variants, i.e. polysemantic words in each of their meanings, as exemplified by the meaning of the verb to learn in word-groups like to learn at school, cf. to learn about (of) smth, etc. Group Two comprises phonetic and morphological variants. As examples of phonetic variants the pronouncing variants of the adverbs often and again can be given, cf. ['o:fn] and ['o:ft э n], [ э 'gein] and [ э 'gen]. The two variant forms of the past indefinite tense of verbs like to learn illustrate morphological variants, cf. learned [-d] and learnt [-t]. Parallel formations of the geologic — geological, phonetic — phonetical type also enter the group of morphological variants. 2 It may be easily observed that the most essential feature of variants of words of both groups is that a slight change in the morphemic or phonemic composition of a word is not connected with any modification of its meaning and, vice versa, a change in meaning is not followed by any structural changes, either morphemic or phonetic. Like word-forms variants of words are identified in the process of communication as making up one and the same word. Thus, within the language system the word exists as a system and unity of all its forms and variants.](/data/documents/3401e95b-3b5c-4c72-844f-4f0bfbac98a3/page-6.png)
