Comparatie-typological Analysis of the Phonological Systems of English and Uzbek - Английский язык - Рефераты

Comparatie-typological Analysis of the Phonological Systems of English and Uzbek

Загружено в:

20.09.2019

Скачано:

0

Размер:

42 KB

Comparatie-typological Analysis of the Phonological Systems of English and Uzbek Plan: The S ystem of Vowel Phonemes Comparative Vowel Table

In the linguistic literature phoneme is defined as the smallest distinctive unit. Unlike the other bigger units of language as morpheme and word it doesn’t have its meaning but helps us to distinct the meaning of words and morphemes. Comp: b oy- t oy, b etter- le tter-l a tter-l i tter-l a ter; б ола - х ола - т ола - о ла , н он - қ он - с он - о н , у н - у н ( товуш )- ў н - ў нг ( мо қ), б ў з ( ў злаштирилмаган )- б ў з ( материал ), б ў л - б ў л ( та қ симла ) etc. From the acoustic and articulatory points of view the phonemic system of any language may be divided into vowels and consonants The S ystem of Vowel Phonemes From the acoustic point of the view vowels are speech sounds of pure musical tone. Their oscillographic melody tracings are characterised by periodically. From the point of view of articulation vowels are speech sounds in the production of which there are no noise producing obstructions. The obstructions by means of which vowels are formed may be of two kinds: 1) the fourth obstruction without which neither vowels nor voiced consonants are formed; 2) the third obstruction characteristic of both: English and Uzbek vowels; The channels formed in the mouth cavity for vowel production by moving a certain part of the tongue and keeping the lips in a certain position cannot be regarded as obstructions. They change the shape and volume of the resonance chamber, and in this way, help to achieve the timbre (or quality) of voice, characteristic of the vowel in question.

In modern English we distinguish 20 vowel phonemes: 10 monophthongs [ e,i,u, ] 9 diphthongs [ ei, ai,au, ], 2 diphthongoids [ i:, u:] In modern Uzbek we find 6 vowel letters and corresponding ^ vowel phonemes [ a, o, у , е , э , и ] The main principles of classifying the vowel phonemes are as follows: a) according to the part (place of articulation or horizontal movement) of the tongue; b) according to the height (vertical movement) of the tong; c) according to the position of lips; d) according to quantity (length) of vowels. 1.according to the part (horizontal movement) of the tongue vowel may be divided into: central [ ], front[ ] and back [ ] vowels . 2.according to the height of the tongue into: close (high) [ medial [ ] and open [ ] vowels. In the languages, in which not only the quality but also quantity of vowels is of certain phonemic or positional value,-one more subdivision appears.

3. according to vowel length the vowels may be divided into short [ ] and long [ ] vowels. (In this case it belongs only to the English vowels as far as in Uzbek the length of the vowel is of no importance). 4. according to the position of the lips vowels may be : rounded (or labilialized) [ ] and unrounded (non-labialized) [ ] vowels. 5. we may also subdivide vowels according to their tensity or laxity into: lax [ ] and tense [ ] vowels. Vowel quality, vowel length and the position of the lips are denoted in the classification by transcription symbols of the phoneme itself. For instance is a long diphtongized vowel phoneme, pronounced with lips unrounded and is a rounded long diphtongized vowel, while and are an unrounded monophtongs. The first and the second principles constitute the basis of any vowel classification. They were first suggested by H. Sweet (1898). Front Mixed Back Close Mid. Open Vowel table of this kind can be also sufficient for the classification of Uzbek vowels.

Comparative Vowel Table The first comparative vowel tables appeared in the 19th century. Their aim was to prove the common origin of some two modern languages belonging to the same family. In the 1920s of the XX century Prof. D.Jones suggested a classification based on the principle of the so called “cardinal vowels”. But these cardinal vowels are abstract notion and have nothing to do with the comparison of two languages from the typological viewpoint. The aim of our comparison is pedagogical. Every phoneme of the English language should be compared with the Uzbek vowels as comparison of an unknown language phoneme with that of one’s mother tongue is of great use. The aim of our comparison (does not need any universal principle) and is to underline the specific features of vowel formation in the two languages in question. The tables of English vowels (accepted in our country) are based on the principles of acad. L.V.Sherba’s vowel classification, later on Prof. G.P Torsueva’s. and prof. V.A.Vasiljev’s classification. 1. According to the position of the tongue in the horizontal plane English vowels are divided into 3 groups: close, medial, and open. Each of them are subdivided into: narrow and broad. 2. According to the part of the tongue: front, front-retracted, mixed, back advanced and back. In comparing the English and Uzbek vowel systems one more principle should be accepted - central vowels must be divided into: 1)central proper and central retracted. Comparison shows, that:

1. the Uzbek [ ] should be classified as broad open central retracted vowel 2. the neutral vowel [ ] in English was pronounced by the English speakers examined as a broad medial, central retracted vowel. 3. the English [ ] was pronounced as an open narrow, central retracted vowel (evidently thanks to the new tendency to make it less back). As there is no subdivision of Uzbek vowels according to their quantity into long and short ones there is no perceptible, difference in their tensity or laxity. So the Uzbek vowel phonemes are differentiated by their qualitative features. The main philological relevant features of the Uzbek vowels phonemes are: front- central-back, according to which they may form phonological opposition: close- mid-open ( сил - сел - сал , кыр - кир , кыл - кел , тор - тер , etc.) It should be kept in mind that there is a difference between the phonetic and phonological classification of phonemes. In the phonetic classification articulation and acoustic features are taken into consideration. Every point of its difference is of pedagogical use. But philological classification is based on the abstract differential features of phonemes. They serve the purpose of their differentiating, and are called philologically relevant attributes of phonemes. They may be defined with the help of philological opposition in some pairs of words.

Bibliography 1. Modern English in Action, Henry I. Christ, DC Heath and company, Boston 2001. 2. Mountains are climbing, study book, Boston 2003y. 3. English phonetic, A.A. Abduazizov издательство « Укитувчи » Т . 1972 г . 4. Reference guide to English, Alice Maclin, USA Washington 1994 5. Improve your sentence, Ann M. Sala, McCraw-Hill, USA. 1999y 6. Language for daily use Mildred A Dawson New York, 2001y 7. New English voyages in English, Francis B. Connors, Loyola University. Press, Chicago 1991y 8. Writing skills, Suzanne Chance, Clencoe, McCraw-Hill. New York 9. Reading and writing, Natasha Haugnes 10. Contemporary English, Mechella Perrott, contemporary publisher group, Illinois USA. 11. Beginning English writing skills, Mone Scherago, National textbook company, Illinois USA. 12. Lectures of comparative typology, C. Satimov, M. Просвещениею 1991 г . 13. Comparative typology V.D. Arakin, M. «Prosveshenie» 1991 14. Comparative grammar, J.I.

Похожие

Comparative analysis of the morphological systems of English and Uzbek

Comparative Analysis of the English and Uzbek Vowels Systems

Typological categories of English and Uzbek words

The analysis of the grammatical features of English and Uzbek adjectives used in different discourse

The comparative typology of English, Russian and Uzbek languages