Adverbs statives pronouns - Английский язык - Рефераты

Adverbs statives pronouns

Загружено в:

20.09.2019

Скачано:

0

Размер:

45 KB

Adverbs statives pronouns Problems to be discussed: 1. What words are called adverbs 2. The types of adverbs 3. The grammatical category of degrees of comparison of adverbs 4. What words are called statives Why are they called sopronouns

The adverb is separated into a special part of speech because of the following facts: 1. Meaning: they express the degree of a property, property of an action, circumstances under which an action takes place. 2. Form: they have the degrees of comparison. 3. Stem-building elements: - ly, -ways, -wards, ... 4. Combinability: bilateral combinability with verbs, adjectives, adverbs, less regularly with adlinks: e.g. He was hard asleep. 5. Function: Adverbial modifiers. According to the meaning adverbs fall under three subclasses: 1. qualitative 2. quantitative 3. circumstantial Qualitative adverbs usually modify verbs. Adverbs like: badly, quickly, slowly, steadily, comparatively may be referred to this type of adverbs. They denote the quality of actions: Ex: Clay collapsed on the sand beside Cathie, a wet arm playfully snatch ing her towel away. I want to go home, she said determinedly. The Qualitative adverbs are derived from the adjectives by the help of productive adverb forming suffix – ly. Like adjectives the qualitative adverbs have distinctions of degree. These adverbs can both precede and follow the verbs. Quantitative adverbs show the degree, measure, quantity of an action and state. To this subclass adverbs like very, rather, too, nearly, greatly, fully, hardly, quite, utterly may be referred. Ex. She had told herself before that it would be foolish to fall in love with Rob. And she had finally done it. Her gaze trailed around the room again, stopping at the partially opened double doors that led into the parlour.

Some part of her was walking with him because of that strange, intimate look they had exchanged – a look that Cathie would rather forget, but warmth was too fresh. J. Daiby. If the combinability of the qualitative adverbs is bound with verbs only the combinability of the quantitative adverbs are more extensive: they can modify verbs, the words of category of state, adjectives, adverbs, numerals and nouns. Circumstantial adverbs serve to denote in most cases local and temporal circumstances attending an action. Accordingly they are divided into two groups: a) adverbs of time and frequency /today, tomorrow, often, again, twice .../. b) adverbs of place and direction: upstairs, behind, in front of, ... Ex. They stood outside the door, giving me directions. Now and then they deliberately refused to jump up and find himself something to do when the unpleasant sensations clutched at him. She waited in front of the window and when he came down he thrust a small dark blue box into her hands. L.Wright Thus, circumstancial adverbs denote the time and place the action took place. Therefore unlike the previous subclasses the circumstantial adverbs can occupy any position in the sentence. Some circumstantial adverbs can have the degrees of comparison: often, late, near and so on. Special attention should be given to the fact that some circumstancial ad verbs may be preceded by prepositions: from now on, up to now, from there and so on. The So-Called Phrasal Verbs One of the fundamental problems within the adverbs is the problem connected with such groups of verbs as: to give in, to get down, to dream about and so on. In most cases the meaning of such groups as above does not depend on the meaning of their components. The thing here is: are the second elements prepositions, adverbs or some other parts of speech? This problem has become acute in Modern English.

The prevailing view here is that they are adverbs. But there are other views like Palmer’s – “prepositions like adverbs”; Amosova’s “postpositives” (1), Ilyish’s “half-word, half-morphemes” (15) and so on. None of these suggestions can be accepted. They are not adverbs because other adverbs do not fulfill such func tions, i.e. they do not change the meaning of the preceding word; they are not postpositives, because postpositives in other languages do not serve to build new words, and at last they are not grammatical morphemes and consequently the whole group can not be a word since in English no dis continuous word is found as, for instance, bring them up. The word them breaks the unity. The problem remains unsolved. For the time being, the most accept able theory is the theory expressed by B.A. Ilyish in his latest grammar. He refers them very cautiously, with doubts, to phraseology and thus it should be the subject-matter of the lexicology. Some foreign Grammarians (28), (37) give different treatment to phrasal verbs. According to their opinion phrasal verb is an umbrella term for different kinds of multi – word verbs (including phrasal – prepositional and preposi tional verbs). Such verbs are of typical and frequent occurrence in all types of English, but most especially in every day spoken English. Phrasal verbs are often of particular difficulty experienced by learners of English. There are several reasons for this. One reason is that in many cases, even though students may be familiar with both the verb in phrasal verb and with the particle, they may not understand the meaning of the combination, since it can differ greatly from the meanings of the two words used indepen dently. The fact that phrasal verbs often have a number of different meanings adds to this complexity additional difficulty. There are some particular grammatical problems associated with phrasal verbs. For example, there are restrictions on the positions in which an adverb can be placed in relation to the object of a verb. Some particles, such as about, over, round and through can be used as both adverbs and prepositions in particular phrasal verbs combinations, although in other combinations they are used either as adverb

or preposition. Some phrasal verbs are not normally used with pronouns as objects, others are normally used with pronouns as objects. There are other difficulties such as the fact that there are frequently strong collocation associations between phrasal verbs and other words. Thus, in some cases a particular word or small set of words is the only one normally found as the subject or object of a particular verb. According to our classification all phrasal verbs fall under 3 main types (and 6 subtypes-from the viewpoint of verb transitivity): 1. free nonidiomatic constructions, where the individual meaning of the components are preserved as in look over (=inspect), set up (=organize). The individuality of the components appears in possible contrastive substitutions: bring in (out), take in (out) etc. 2. “Semi-idiomatic” constructions which are variable but in a more limited way. The relation between the verb and particle is similar to be tween a stem and an affix in form formation in that the substitution of one verb for another, or one particle for another, is constrained by limited productivity. In phrasal verbs like find over (“discover”), cut up “cut into pieces” the verb keeps its meaning, whereas the meaning of the particle is less easy to isolate. In contrast, it is the particle which establishes a family resemblance. 3. “Highly idiomatic” constructions such as bring up , come by , turn up . These are thoroughly idiomatic in that there is no possibility of contrastive substitution: bring/down, come by /past/through, turn up/ down, etc. In such combinations there is no possibility of contrastive 5 ubstation: there are no pairs such as bring up/down, put off/on, give up/down, give in/out, etc. for this subclass. The adverbial, lexical values of the particles have been lost, and the entire verbқparticle combination has acquired a new meaning. It is often said that phrasal verbs tend to be rather colloquial or informal and more appropriate to spoken English then written, and even that it is better to avoid them and choose single – word equivalents or synonyms instead. Yet in many cases phrasal verbs and their synonyms have different ranges of use, meaning, or

collocation, so that a single – word synonym cannot be substituted appropriately for a phrasal verb. Single – word synonyms are often much more formal in style than phrasal verbs, so that they seem out of place in many contexts, and students using them run the risk of sounding pompous or just unnatural. Besides, these are phrasal verbs, like get away with and run of, which do not have one word paraphrases. Second, these are nonidiomatic combinations, such as go across (= cross), go past (=pass), and sail around (=circumnavigate) which do have such paraphrases. The set of English phrasal verbs is constantly growing and changing. New combination appear and spread. Yet these new combinations are rarely made on a random basis, but from patterns which can to some extent be anticipated. Particles often have particular meanings which they contribute to a variety of combinations, and which are productive; that is these fixed meanings are used in order to new combinations. The Collins COBUILD Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs (45) list over three thou sand combinations of verbs with adverbs or prepositions, explaining over five and a half thousand different meanings. These are the combinations which are in common use in everyday modern English. Statives or The Words of Category of State In English there is a certain class of words which are still disputable. In works of foreign grammarians they are not considered to be a separate part of speech. Some dictionaries published in the United Kingdom and the USA refer them to predicatives. It is well-known that no grammarians mention this kind of part of speech. To this class of words we include aboard, alive, asleep, afraid, aghast, awake and so on. Some Russian scientists regard them as a separate part of speech. B. Khaimovich and Rogovskaya call them adlinks on the analogy of adverbs. These words can be viewed as a part of speech because of their following features: 1. meaning they denote: state

2. stem building morpheme: it is formed by the help of productive prefixal morpheme /a-/ 3. combinability: these words are exclusively combined with the link-verb to be and adverbs 4. Syntactic function: they are always used as predicatives. They do not have any grammatical category and this is the only feature of them which differ them from other parts of speech /notional parts are meant/: This part of speech can’t be mixed up with adjectives or adverbs as some linguists do, because they do not possess the degrees of comparison and their combinability is different. “A-“ component homonymically combines in itself the functions of prefix, prepo sition and article. 1. the prefix a- can express the meanings of prepositions: away, on, up, out. She is asleep – She is sleeping /on/. He has gone to the shore – He is ashore. This part of speech seems to be more economical as it is seen from the examples above. Therefore it may be one of the reasons of its wide usage in Modern English. The Pronouns Pronouns are grouped into one part of speech because of their meaning which is extreamly general. Pronouns are serving to denote substances, qualities, quantities, circumstances and so on not by naming or describing them, but by indicating them. We can`t apply the five grouping-requirements for classifying the pronouns as a separate part of speech. Despite of the meaning of pronouns we can`t of the unity of all the words as belonging to and the same part of speech. From the morphological view-point we can say that they have the case category , but even in this respect we`ll have to divide all the pronouns into three groups: pronouns which have nominative and objective case system, pronouns that have common and genitive case system and pronouns that have no case system at all.

Therefore Khaimovich and Rogovskaya do not treat pronouns as a separate part of speech. They treat them as a collection of words correlated with different parts of speech, which accounts for their not being as a separate part of speech. Now we`ll get down to some peculiar features of pronouns. Morphological features. 1)the case in pronouns. There two case systems in pronouns: a) the first case system, is opposition between nominative and objective forms: nominative: I, you, he, it, we, you, who…Objective: me, you, him, her, it, us, you, them, whom… As is seen no common marker is found to form the objective case form. Here we find three types of form-changing out of five possible in Modern English: 1) affixation: he-him, they-them, who-whom, 2) homonymous forms: you- you, it-it, 3) suppletion: I-me, she-her, we-us. b) the second case system, is opposition between common and genitive cases: each other- each other`s, one another- one another. In this case pronouns share the case system of nouns. The Number Only demonstrative pronouns have the grammatical category of number: this- these. It is difficult to state personal pronouns have such category, though it has distinct singular and plural opposition: sing. I, he, she, it, you, pl. we, they, you. Types of Possesive Pronouns Possessive pronouns have developed from the personal pronouns. There two types of possessive pronouns: conjoint: my, your, his, her, it, our, their, absolute: mine, yours, hers, his, its, ours, theirs. Modern English language do not make difference in gender. Only due to the 3th singular of personal pronouns: Masculine he Feminine she Neuter it

Classification of Pronouns On the problem of classification of pronouns opinions differ. In L. Barkhudarov`s grammar we find 9 types while Khaimovich and Rogovskaya`s book there 12 and so on. Among them personal, possessive, demonstrative, intensive, indefinite, relative, reflexive and so on.

Literature 1. Ирискулов М., Кулдашев A. A course in theoiretical English Grammar. T., 2008 2. Л. Бархударов. Структура простого предложения современного английского языка. М., 1966 3. Л. Бархударов, Д. Штелинг. Грамматика английского языка. М. , 1994 4. М. Блох. Теоретическая грамматика английского языка. М. , 1994 5. М. Блох. Теоретические основы грамматики. М. , 2002

Похожие

Survey of the linguistic literature on the problems of morphology in Present Day Linguistics

The problem of parts of speech

Adjectives

Comparative analysis of the morphological systems of English and Uzbek

Typological category of comparison