A historical perspective on ESP (kurs ishi) - Английский язык - Рефераты

A historical perspective on ESP (kurs ishi)

Загружено в:

20.09.2019

Скачано:

0

Размер:

41.5888671875 KB

A historical perspective on ESP Content Introduction Chapter I English for Specific Purposes in Historical Perspective 1.1 From register analysis to rhetorical devices 1.2 Introducing key ESP concepts Chapter II Genre and rhetorical moves 2.1 Recent developments 2.2 Future developments 2.3 Difficulties English Poses for EFL Learners, and How to Overcome Them Conclusion Used literature

Introduction The work is an attempt at summarizing the most important ESP developments that go back to the inception of the field in the 1960s. It first briefly refers to the emergence of the phenomenon of ESP and then goes on to discuss the most important phases of its evolution. A short description of the earliest phase referred to as register analysis is followed by a brief outline of the discourse analysis phase. Actuality of the work characterized by the emergence of key ESP concepts, such as needs analysis, genre and rhetorical moves. The following part of the course work deals with the most recent ESP phase. It not only focuses on the contribution of important international journals to the development of the field, but also gives an overview of recent investigations into genre theory and in the area of corpus linguistics. The final section summarizes the most significant achievements of ESP research practice and discusses its possible future developments. Aim of the work: English for Specific Purposes (ESP), register analysis, discourse analysis, needs analysis, genre studies, corpus linguistics English for Specific Purposes (ESP) is an umbrella term which covers a range of diverse teaching contexts. They are broadly defined as English for Academic Purposes (EAP), English for Occupational Purposes (EOP) and English for Professional Purposes (EPP). Since in each area of ESP teaching, it is customary to distinguish between general and specific purposes, its main branches are further subdivided. Accordingly, in EAP, it is possible to differentiate between English for General Academic Purposes (EGAP). Subject of the work: The emergence of ESP phenomenon is the result of a series of events and trends which operated in different ways around the world. First came the recognition of parity of English and French that was confirmed by the signing of the Versailles Treaty in both of these languages in 1919. Although at the peace conference that concluded World War I (1914-18), the French were adamantly against the upgrading of English, the presence of the Americans was

decisive and eventually led to “the end of the era of French linguistic pre- eminence. The years that followed World War II (1939-45) witnessed unprecedented worldwide expansion of science, technology and commerce, which generated a demand for an international language. Owing to the growing economic power of the USA, this role was granted to English. The post-war changes led to the emergence of a new generation of learners who needed to use English in specific settings, e.g. businessmen to run their businesses, doctors to keep up with recent developments in medicine, students to read their textbooks and international journals only available in English, to name but a few groups. Task of the work: Developments in linguistics, with the research focus on discovering the ways in which language is actually used in communication, paved the way for English courses tailored to learners’ specific needs. Another important factor which contributed to the emergence of ESP is studies in psychology. Underscoring the importance of learners and their attitudes to learning, they gave rise to a learner-centered approach and had their repercussions for the decades to come. The objective of the course work is to present an overview of major developments in ESP during the last 50 years. Although some researchers speak of five ESP generations, the perspective adopted by the author of the present article acknowledges a major impact of the genre concept on the development of ESP theory and practice, and thus comes close to A.M. Johns’ approach to the issue. Accordingly, the article consists of Introduction briefly referring to the emergence of the field, and five thematic sections. The first two describe the early stages of ESP evolution referred to as the register analysis and discourse analysis phases, respectively.

They are followed by a brief discussion on key ESP concepts, such as needs analysis, genre and rhetorical moves, which still predominate in the ESP theory and practice. The section devoted to recent developments focuses on the contribution of important international journals to the development of the field. It also gives an overview of recent investigations into genre theory and in the area of corpus linguistics. The final part of the article summarizes the most significant achievements of ESP research practice and discusses its possible future developments.

CHAPTER I English for Specific Purposes in Historical Perspective Early years (1962-1972) The study of languages for specific purposes has had a long and eventful history and – as some would say – dates back to the times of the Roman and Greek Empires. Its modern origins, however, can be traced back to the early 1960s and are associated with J. M. Swales’ Episodes in ESP and the book by M.A. Halliday, A. McIntosh and P. Strevens. During the early phase of ESP development, referred to as the register analysis phase, the central focus of research was English for Science and Technology (EST) in academic settings. The approach operated on the principle that language varies and its distinctive varieties depend on different users and their idiolects, as well as on language distinct uses, i.e. registers, the later being related to various purposes to which language is put. Thus the aim of analysis was to identify how the language system manifested itself in different registers, e.g. in English of Electrical Engineering as opposed to English of Biology. Early research involved statistical grammatical counts within written discourse. Its best illustration is the first example provided in Swales’ Episodes , by Barber, which was an attempt at counting grammatical features across genres, i.e. textbooks and journal articles, with a view to defining some general sentence-level characteristics of EST. As observed by Swales, this approach was purely descriptive and quantitative in nature and “had little explanatory force.” Despite its potential usefulness, it did not provide guidance as to when one grammatical form is more English for Specific Purposes World. Neither did it give any information on how a particular form fits into the structure of the text.

1.1 From register analysis to rhetorical devices (1972-1981) The early 1970s witnessed the coming of a new approach associated with a group of influential EST researchers, such as J. Lackstrom, L. Selinker and L.P. Trimble, from “the [University of] Washington School.” Their “Grammar and technical English”, republished and discussed in Swales’ Episodes , had a considerable impact on further development of ESP research and heralded the emerging field of rhetorical or discourse analysis. With it, the concern of research has shifted to “the relationships between EST grammar and lexicon and the authors’ rhetorical purposes”. In the late 1970s , R. Bley-Vroman defined the goals of ESP rhetorical theory, stating that it should attempt “to establish a correspondence of purpose with device,” with ‘device’ signifying linguistic means employed by the author to achieve the desired end. Another contribution came with the publication by E. Tarone et al, which appeared in the first issue of The ESP Journal ( ESPJ ) and was reprinted in Swales’ Episodes . As opposed to some of their predecessors, Tarone and her colleagues did not try to generalize about the features of scientific language across genres. Instead, they focused on – what they considered – one key characteristic of a narrow range of research articles in astrophysics, i.e. the passive voice. Having formulated their hypotheses about the functions of the selected grammatical feature and its impact on authors’ rhetorical decisions, they tested their conclusions by involving an expert, or a “specialist informant” in their research project. 1.2 Introducing key ESP concepts (1981-1990) The publication of J.M. Swales’ monograph Aspects of Article Introductions in the UK marks the beginning of a subsequent period. In it, the author presented an approach which also appeared in the expanded form in his Genre Analysis . Being widely recognized, it initiated “a research boom that has yet to end”.

on the target situation and not correlating grammatical findings with different text sections and their respective rhetorical purposes. As the concept of NA expanded over time, it included – in addition to target situation analysis – some extra components, such as subjective needs analysis, present situation analysis, learning needs analysis, discourse/genre analysis and means analysis. In the mid 1980s, NA looked at EST discourse and its focus shifted from register to rhetoric. The 1990s saw a more genre-analytic perspective of target discourses, which incorporated the concept of situated tasks. NA thus became ethnographically oriented, with needs being articulated in terms of genres produced and enacted within appropriate discourse communities. In keeping with the changes, research into learner needs has become more complex, increasingly empirical and triangulated. Multiple instruments and sources of data collection have been employed to ensure that a wide variety of data are gathered. The results of these findings have been triangulated to increase the credibility of research conducted. Also, recently it is also possible to observe a tendency to employ task-based NAs to collect quality data and the shift of NA focus from “the notions and functions supposedly required to satisfy various occupational language” to expert insider knowledge. Yet despite efforts to expand on NA research and incorporate the variety of needs, discourses and situations, NAs are still criticized on several grounds. Not only is it argued that that institutional mandates and practices identified in the process of triangulated NA are often in conflict with those recognized by the learners themselves. It is also contended that analyses of learner needs cannot be theoretically neutral since researchers often bring pre-conceived notions and theories to their investigations .

CHAPTER II. Genre and rhetorical moves With the publication of the first issue of The ESPJ and Aspects of Article Introductions in 1981 as well as the appearance of Genre Analysis , the terms like genre and rhetorical moves gained considerable importance in the ESP field. Swales’ Creating a Research Space model (the CARS model) (originally presented in a slightly different form) “has had a tremendous influence on genre analysis in ESP and on the teaching of academic writing, both to international or L1 students, or to professional writers wishing to publish in international journals”. This move- based approach is an attempt at capturing the ways in which academic writers justify and highlight their contribution to the ongoing research in the field. The three main moves proposed for the article introduction and a number of steps between them express how writers establish the research topic, outline the previous research and indicate a gap or possible extension of their work. The term genre continues to be “highly salient” in ESP research. At first it appeared in the subject literature to contrast various types of texts in terms of linguistic devices employed in them. Thus Morrow – following the example set by Barber – contrasted the use of conjuncts in business news stories and academic journal articles. Like Barber, he counted the number of conjuncts in two different genres under investigation. However, unlike Barber, he commented on communicative and pragmatic functions of linguistic means found within the researched texts. The approach proposed by Swales has been extensively used to conduct genre-based research of different article sections, e.g. the abstract, the methods section, the discussion section, to name but a few. Initially, it was suggested that the models like the CARS model were generalizable and applicable to all academic disciplines. The research that followed specified some differences between them. Accordingly, it was argued that the move-based models are prototypes and the actual article examples found in academic writing “will vary in the degree to which they conform with this prototype”.

2.1 Recent developments (1990-present) Since the first issue of what was then called The ESP Journal , established by Grace Burkhart from the American University of Washington, D.C., in 1981, there have also been founded other international ESP journals. All of them welcome submissions in English and publish articles which are important for our understanding of ESP research in the 21st century. In 1992, Ilona Leki from the University of Tennessee and Tony Silva from the Purdue University became the founding editors of The Journal of Second Language Writing ( JSLW ), which is published quarterly by Elsevier. Though the central focus of articles appearing in The JSLW is second/foreign language writing and writing instruction, the journal also publishes articles on academic argumentation, text analysis, ESP-related issues and genre-based studies 2011 “The future of genre in second language writing: A North American perspective”). It publishes ESPJ-like articles encompassing in scope aspects of needs analysis, teacher education, discourse analysis, corpus methodologies, acquisition studies in EAP contexts, research into writing and speaking at all academic levels, etc. In May 2002, there appeared the first issue of English for Specific Purposes World , an international online journal publishing papers on topics related to a wide range of ESP issues. At this writing, there are 45 issues of the journal available at www.esp-world.info and a special issue devoted to syllabus design and materials development in ESP. There is also Iberic a, the official journal of AELFE, the European Association of languages for Specific Purposes, which publishes articles relevant to the field, e.g. on genre analysis teacher education metadiscourse research also The Asian ESP Journal deals with key issues in the ESP field. Recently, many of these journals have experienced a rapid increase in international submissions. Academics are currently required to publish in international journals in order to be promoted in their institutions. In many cases,

this move is the result of efforts made by national educational organizations and individual institutions “to boost university rankings internationally”. 5.2.Genre studies Swales’ Genre Analysis launched a remarkably productive topic for the years to come. The research that followed its publication reflects developments in the theory of genre, both “in its move towards a more interdisciplinary perspective and diverse range of methods”. The influence that came from the work of North American scholars of rhetoric and composition studies encouraged ESP researchers to go beyond traditional text analysis and to relate form patterns to discourse communities, their goals, values and practices. Bhatia described practical methodological procedures for conducting genre analysis which – drawing on the selected corpus of texts – integrates textual and social context analyses. Adopting a corpus-based approach to the study of academic genres, Hyland compared lexico-grammatical features and move structures within eight academic disciplines, ranging from the so-called “hard sciences” to the “soft sciences”. Following the example set by Tarone et al. interviews with specialist informants have become central to this kind of research since they provide insights into why writers make choices that they do and help explain how these choices stem from underlying disciplinary values and practices. The analysis of discourse structures did not neglect professional genres, e.g. corporate disclosure documents, letters of application, newspaper law reports or popularized medical texts. Investigations into professional genres drew on Bhatia’s work . As suggested, there is no hard and fast rule for conducting such analysis. A researcher might either commence with a text-first approach, i.e. analyze typical discourse patterns in texts, or with a context-first approach, i.e. examine the context in which the texts and produced and enacted.

The work of Hyland, as well as other researchers has demonstrated that the use of language varies across disciplines and genres and that these differences have to be accounted for in genre studies. The use of corpora has been extremely useful to support conclusions reached in the studies about language use in specific settings and in specific genres, e.g. the British academic written English corpus , the British academic spoken English corpus, to name but a few. Swales’ Other Floors, Other Voices introduced the term “textography” into the ESP lexicon. As defined by Swales, textography refers to a method of text analysis that is “something more than a disembodied textual or discoursal analysis, but something less than a full ethnographic account.” Adopting this approach, Swales (1998) studied the interactions of texts and contexts in three different discourse communities. To build a picture of the impact of individuals and their texts on and from their workplaces and disciplinary communities, he employed interviews, observations, broad analysis of textual histories and close analysis of key texts. The broadening of analysis beyond form is also reflected in the studies that adopted an intertextual approach to genre analysis or integrated multiple modes into generic communication. Bhatia presented a framework for critical genre analysis , which combines analysis of text, genre, professional practice and culture. Studies in this vein investigate genre users and their engagement with texts through the use of interviews, surveys and/or ethnographic approaches. Apart from context-driven genre analysis, recent ESP research has also paid increased attention to exploring how individuals use and shape genre within larger communities. Adopting a corpus-based approach, Hyland conducted discourse analysis of Swales’ writing, placing particular emphasis on his strategies of self- representation. Concern with author identify has also led to adopting a multilingual research perspective and studying individual writer’s work within the same genre across contexts.

As outlined above, a variety of methodological approaches to genre analysis have been adopted to study complexity of texts. These methods not only contribute to our understanding of the social and multimodal nature of the language put to different purposes, but also enhance our comprehension on how genres are created, responded to and appropriated by individual users to best suit their specific purposes. Genre studies have had their pedagogical implications. Genre-based approach to teaching and learning emerged as a response to the process approach to teaching writing, which – as has been argued – neglects “the requirements of particular writing tasks and variation in individual writing situations”. In the ESP genre- based teaching and learning, genre-theory has also gone beyond regarding genres as rhetorical “text-types”, i.e. argument, exposition, etc., to considerations of genres as “a more social construct which shapes and is shaped by human activity. A common strategy adopted to teaching and learning specific purpose genres is referred to as “metacommunicating”. It involves the explicit analysis of examples of selected genres in the ESP classroom with a view to heightening learners’ awareness of the genre-specific language features, rhetorical organization, and communicative purposes. Johns’ ethnographic approach to genre-based ESP pedagogy, which aims at developing learners’ academic literary skills, best illustrates the point. Looking outside of the text to the social context, she assumes that for the purpose of genre acquisition, students require not only textual knowledge, but also the knowledge of social practice, and the latter can only be acquired if they become involved in research of literary activity, including genres, i.e. when they interview expert genre users and/or observe users carrying out genres. Similar conclusions are drawn Dressen-Hammouda. Her study of a geology student’s experiences learning to write demonstrates how it is possible to benefit from a focus on genre, in relation to the acquisition of disciplinary identity. Accordingly, the researcher argues that the teaching of genres should not merely focus on their linguistic and rhetorical features. Since disciplinary identity

considerably contributes to expert genre production, the teaching should also incorporate the particular disciplinary community’s “ways of being, seeing, and acting”. Corpus linguistics The period is also characterized by the increased use of corpus studies. Though some important research has been conducted on oral language, e.g. the University of Michigan Corpus of Spoken Academic English, the majority of work done in the area concerned analyses of written academic genres. Hyland’s corpus research on lexical bundles highlighted disciplinary variations in the academia as well as differences between professional and postgraduate writing. Postgraduate writing has also been investigated by Thomson, who focused on citation practices in PhD theses in the field of agriculture. Charles – in turn - researched stance and the phraseology of reporting clauses in citations in native- speaker PhD theses in such disciplines as politics and materials science. Hyland’s publications on metadiscourse, “those aspects of text which explicitly refer to the organization of the discourse or the writer’s stance towards either its content or the reader” belong to the most influential in the ESP corpus studies. Speaking of the ways in which writers relate to their readers, Hyland also focused on “textual voice or community recognized personality.” Exploring differences between the “hard” and “soft” disciplines, he complemented his text- based research conducting interviews with specialist informants. Attention has also been paid to “evaluative language” defined as the writer’s attitude towards propositions discussed. Accordingly, a special issue of The JEAP was devoted to examining and critiquing evaluative language and its purposes within and among academic discourses. Moreover, attempts have been made to combine corpus linguistic techniques with the Swalesian approach to genre conceived as a goal-driven communicative event associated with particular discourse communities, e.g. Flowerdew and Forrest ‘s on the patterning of the word research across different moves and steps across PhD reviews in applied linguistics.

In contrast to the wealth of corpus-based research on student and professional writing in the academy, there has been little investigation into EOP written texts. Most corpus-based studies concern spoken interactions, e.g. Cambridge and Nottingham Corpus of Business English, which consists of spoken interaction recorded in a variety of business meeting settings, the Nottingham Health Communication Corpus (NHCC), which currently consists of over half a million words of transcribed interactions between health professionals and patients. Corpus-based studies most frequently explored the fastest growing branches of EOP, i.e. those associated with constantly expanding professions, like English for Business Purposes, English for Medical Purposes or English for Legal Purposes. Though EST seems to have been a neglected area in corpus-based investigations of English for professional communication, initiatives of compiling a 100-million-word Corpus of Professional English, currently known as the Professional English Research Consortium Corpus, are underway. At this writing, it is a 17-million-word corpus of Professional English in science, engineering, technology and other fields. It is expected that future corpus-based studies will reflect “the increasing interdisciplinarity in the field” and the concomitant “hybridization of genres. Further advances in software will certainly drive the nature of corpus analysis forward. When complemented with genre analysis and ethnographic approach to data interpretation, corpus linguistics will undoubtedly make important contribution to ESP research in the years to come. One might as well expect that the use of corpora in the ESP classroom will become more popular in the future. As demonstrated by the results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2002 in 30 EAP support units at UK universities, 16 made no use of corpora at all, whereas concordancing, defined as “a means of accessing a corpus of text to show how any given word or phrase is used in immediate context in which it appears”, was being used in only about one in ten ESP/EAP courses in the United Kingdom.

The use of corpora in ESP teaching and learning seems to be justified by the fact that ESP learners are rarely conversant with highly specific language use. Neither do fluent ESP practitioners have much intuitive understanding of the way language is used in certain professional areas. Although the majority of research into specialist corpora discusses pedagogical implications of the findings, some researcher are doubtful about any direct impact of corpus analysis on ESP teaching and learning. There are, however, studies like Harwood’s that provide information on the differences between corpus evidence and language use in academic writing textbooks, and thus point to an important link between corpus data and ESP teaching. Such findings have led to revisions in ESP syllabus content, and greater use of corpus data in EGAP textbooks, e.g. Schmitt and Schmitt. They have also begun to influence ESP materials in many areas. The use of corpora in ESP teaching and learning can range from providing examples that illustrate accepted language use, or are a starting point for gap-filling and matching exercises to adopting an approach referred to as data-driven learning, the term coined by Johns to describe one-to-one writing consultations, during which the student and advisor explored online corpus data to solve language problems encountered by the student. Depending on the teaching/learning objectives, data-driven learning activities might encourage students to create and analyze concordances, n-grams or produce wordlists for the purpose of revising for a test or designing ESP materials, etc. They might as well result in “technology enhanced rhetorical consciousness-raising. Approaches to corpus work in relation to ESP teaching are changing in response to advances in technology. On the one hand, the more powerful corpus tools are, the more possible it is to gain access to larger corpora and discover more about language use in specific settings. On the other, the more complex and powerful tools are, the less accessible they become to students and teachers.

2.2 Future developments In his envoi to New Directions in English for Specific Research , John Swale – reflecting on the long way ESP has come in terms of research practices – states that over the last 50 years, the field has not only become deeper, but also broader. These developments can be attributed to the fact that many of the topics, which have been around in the field for some time, like the genre, needs assessment, for example, have been revisited and thus enriched with new insights and perspectives. Also, the formerly narrow field that could be defined “as having a few expert specialists at the top, followed by a large number of relatively unadventurous and underprepared practitioners” has expanded. However, a commendable body of research conducted in different parts of the world has remained unpublished, published in language other than English, e.g. ASP: La revue du GERAS , or in regional journals e.g. in the Brazilian the ESPecialist . In future some of the research topics will undoubtedly continue to be revisited and re-explored, like the genre, a topic initiated in 1981. It is likely that more attention and resources will devoted to genres unexplored so far, like poster discussions, conference presentations or research group meetings. Genre analysis might be considerably aided by corpus linguistic techniques employed to collect and analyze mega-databanks of authentic spoken and written discourse. Future developments in software will not only move corpus analysis forward, but will also provide researchers with access to larger corpora, allowing them to support their statistical claims about language use in specific settings. Also, as pointed out by Swales, one would expect that “the currently insecure relationship between corpus linguistics and ESP practice” might, as the years go by, “clarify what the corpus is most good for and what it is less good for.” Future research investigations will undoubtedly witness further interest in NA and a further move away from the objective, hard kind of assessment pioneered by Munby to “softer” analysis, more open to the subjective needs of the learners themselves and other relevant parties involved in the process of ESP

teaching, i.e. ESP teachers, consultants, administrators. Concern with ESP teacher development, given the specificity and demanding nature of ESP teaching and the fact that “the literature on ESP teacher education is surprisingly limited”, will certainly lead to research initiatives focusing on ESP teacher needs which constitute a basis for determining the content of ESP teacher education programmes. Researchers will probably also continue to be interested in what actually happens in the ESP classroom, especially given the fact that in the past 50 years there has been “all too little careful research” conducted in this area. They might as well focus their attention on less-popular academic locales, such as vocational and secondary schools, different businesses, on-line media, etc. As concluded by A.M. Johns, future ESP research agenda might be characterized by a variety of topics under investigation and methodologies adopted to research specific issues. Owing to further diversification of investigation locales, it may also bring to the fore more specific contexts as well as greater research complexity realized through methodological triangulation. Last but not least is more critique of the researcher’s work, the researcher him/herself as well as ESP teaching procedures launched. Doubtless, future ESP research might also introduce and explore topics different from the ones that have been the most salient so far. 2.3 Difficulties English Poses for EFL Learners, and How to Overcome Them It’s no secret that English is one of the more challenging languages to learn. Of course, the difficulty students have with it will depend on what language or languages they already know; English is naturally going to be easier to learn if one already has knowledge of a language that has the same roots, and is therefore more closely related to it. But while the same may be said to be true of learning any language, there seems to be something about English in particular that makes it especially tricky. In this article, we look at some of the specific difficulties English poses to those learning it as a foreign language, and what you can do to overcome

these problems if you’re in the throes of learning this complicated language yourself. 1. English has one of the biggest, trickiest vocabularies there is One of the most arduous tasks when learning a language is committing to memory enough words to allow you to express yourself regardless of the situation or subject. This is no mean feat in any language, but it’s fair to say that English is one of the harder languages in this respect. Here are some of the reasons why people find it so challenging. English has an unusually large and varied number of words. English has a vast number of words – the biggest of any language, according to some scholars. It’s a particularly complex lexicon because it has many different roots and influences, including Old English and Latin, which means that there’s huge variety in how words are spelled. What’s more, there are numerous instances of words meaning essentially the same thing, but with subtle differences that are often lost on those who don’t speak English as their mother tongue. For example, the words “plump” and “fat” both mean basically the same thing, but their connotations mean that they can’t necessarily be used interchangeably (“plump” tends to imply a healthy roundness, as in a plump baby or a plump roast chicken, while “fat” has more negative connotations and could imply obesity or otherwise undesirable weight). There are also plenty of synonyms that make little sense to non-native speakers, or that appear to mean the opposite of each other; there are lots of examples in this selection of funny synonyms . English spelling is hard even for native English speakers. Idiosyncratic spellings mean that it’s often difficult to guess how to spell an English word based on how it sounds, which impedes the learning process. Although there are plenty of recurring patterns (such as words ending in “-ing”, “- tion” and so on), there’s often no substitute for learning spellings by rote, because there are plenty of exceptions to rules, meaning that logical deduction doesn’t always work. (Look at the word “pronounce” or “pronouncing”, for example, and

watch what happens to it when it becomes “pronunciation”. The second “O” has disappeared, contrary to what one might have expected.) What’s more, the English language contains numerous homophones – words that are spelled and/or pronounced the same, but that mean different things – which makes it harder to learn the vocabulary and harder to ascertain the meaning from how the word sounds. “To know the ropes”, meaning “to know your way around”, is an idiom that comes from sailing. As with most languages, spoken English tends to be more informal than written English, presenting further complexity for the student with the unenviable task of learning the language. Slang is yet another aspect of the language for learners to get to grips with, knowledge of which is necessary in order to understand informal conversation (a very basic example is “yeah”, which is slang for “yes”). English is also littered with idioms, which don’t always make sense to those learning English, but in order to speak English like a native speaker, a knowledge of idioms is essential. You’ll hear phrases such as “fat chance”, “turn a blind eye” and “call it a day” adding colour to everyday language, and it’s not just the phrases you need to learn, but their meanings and when it’s appropriate for you to use them. You can learn more about English idioms in our article on 20 English idioms and their meanings and origins . 2. English grammar is full of subtlety “Can I have a slice of cake?”, “Could I have a slice of cake?” and “May I have a slice of cake?” all express the same idea in differing levels of formality. English grammar is notoriously problematic for EFL learners; its difficulty leads to a great many common mistakes , which even native speakers frequently fall foul of. But it’s not just these basic errors that EFL learners must conquer. English grammar is full of subtlety, and it’s only with experience that non-native speakers will learn to appreciate its nuances. Consider, for example, the difference between “I write” (the simple past) and “I have written” (the perfect present), to which other forms such as “I am writing” or “I had written” add even more complexity with

subtly different meanings. Then there’s the tricky auxiliary verbs that many EFL learners struggle with – such as “Do you want a slice of cake?” and “She has given me a slice of cake” – and modal auxiliary verbs, which express things like likelihood or obligation (“I might join you”, for example). Add to all this the idiomatic variations and their subtleties (it’s “make a promise”, not “do a promise”, for example), to say nothing of the complexities of punctuation, and you have a tremendously demanding task to master the finer points of English grammar. While the basic aspects of English grammar must be learned by rote from the moment you start learning the language, some of the more advanced aspects won’t be picked up until you’re speaking English more confidently and are able to start fine-tuning your existing English skills by listening closely to how native speakers speak the language, and by learning from your mistakes. Nobody would expect you to be able to master all this from the word go – it’s something you pick up over many years of speaking English. 3. Pronunciation is difficult and inconsistent Getting to grips with pronunciation can be a tall order whatever language you’re learning; even within northern European languages, the prevalent sounds can differ quite dramatically. The following issues are some of the main aspects of English pronunciation that make it even harder for those learning it as a foreign language. Certain sounds in English are particularly tricky The distinction between “three” and “tree” can be hard to pronounce. Different nationalities have problems with different aspects of English pronunciation, and there isn’t a great deal they can do about it other than practise repeatedly until they start to form the ability to create the right sounds. Many EFL learners find the “th” sound hard to pronounce, because it’s comparatively uncommon in other languages. Those who speak languages such as Japanese and most dialects of Chinese find it hard to differentiate between “r” and “l” sounds,

while the distinction between “b” and “v” is problematic for speakers of many other languages, including Spanish and Arabic. Another difference between English and some other languages is the number of consonants it’s possible to group together in a syllable – up to three; “stranger”, for instance, has three consonants (“str”) strung together before the vowel “a”. This is not possible in some other languages, and it can lead to difficulties in pronouncing it, with some students inadvertently inserting extra vowels to break up the consonants. With this, as with anything, practice makes perfect. Those struggling long-term with English pronunciation may benefit from elocution lessons, which coaches students through how to create different sounds by using the mouth, teeth and tongue in a different way. You can’t always guess the pronunciation from the spelling “Dough” doesn’t rhyme with bough, cough, thorough, through or Slough. Just as it’s not always possible to guess the spelling of a word based on how it sounds, pronunciation of already difficult sounds is made harder by the fact that it’s often hard to guess how a word is pronounced based on its spelling. Let’s look at an example to illustrate this. You’d be forgiven for thinking that because they all end in the letters “-ough”, the words “cough”, “tough”, “through”, “thorough”, “bough” and “dough” would all sound the same when spoken aloud. Not so. Each of these words is pronounced differently. The “-ough” sound in “cough” sounds like “off”; in “tough” it sounds like “uff”; in “through” it sounds like “oo”; in “bough” it sounds like “ow”; in “dough” it sounds like “oh”. Unfortunately, there’s no substitute here for simply learning the individual pronunciations; with no hard-and-fast rules dictating the pronunciation of words ending in “-ough”, it’s a labour-intensive series of words to learn. Luckily, not all word endings are as difficult to learn as this one; words ending in “-tion”, for instance, are all pronounced “shun”. This means that for most of the standard

endings, you only need to rote-learn the exceptions where pronunciation is concerned. There are so many silent letters A k night at a cas t le has a remarkable number of silent letters. English has lots of silent letters that aren’t pronounced, which gives EFL learners even more pronunciation issues to contend with. An obvious example is words that begin with a silent “K”, such as “knife” or “knock”. There are also other silent letters at the beginning of words, such as the silent “H” at the beginning of “honour”, the “p” at the beginning of “psychology” or the “G” in “gnome”. Less obvious are words that contain or end in silent letters rather than beginning with them. Examples include the “G” in “benign”, the “B” in “thumb”, the “H” in “character”, the “N” in “autumn” or the “T” in “castle”. It’s usually possible to learn the patterns containing silent letters so that you can hazard a guess as to whether a letter should be pronounced, but it’s sometimes a question of trial and error: if you pronounce a letter that shouldn’t be pronounced, the person you’re talking to will almost certainly tell you! Regional dialects alter pronunciation English pronunciation is made even more difficult by the plethora of regional dialects that mean that the same word can be pronounced very differently depending on who’s saying it. A good example is the way the “a” is pronounced in the word “bath”; there’s a broad north-south divide between those in southern England, who pronounce it with a long “a” to sound like “barth”, and those in northern England, who pronounce it with a short “a” as heard in the word “cafe”. If you’re exposed to a variety of accents when you’re learning English, it will compound the difficulty of learning the correct pronunciation. You can minimise this potential confusion by ensuring that you do all your learning with someone with a neutral dialect (or at least with the same dialect if you’re studying with more

than one person) throughout your English studies so that you learn to pronounce words consistently. 4. There are many variations of English Different English-speaking countries have different varieties of English. Finally, English is a particularly challenging language because there are so many variations of it. Though fundamentally the same language, it’s spoken quite differently in the various countries that have it as a primary language, such as the USA, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. As we’ve already seen it’s even spoken with variations in the UK, with regional dialects introducing local vocabulary (including unique words and sayings) and the whole language sounding very different in Scotland to how it does in England, and different again in Wales and Ireland. Within England there are distinctive dialects, such as ‘Geordie’ up in Northumberland, ‘Brummie’ in the Midlands, ‘Scouse’ in Liverpool and ‘West Country’ in Devon, Cornwall and Somerset, to say nothing of many other notable English accents. Getting used to the different sounds you might hear when conversing with a British person will take time, adding an additional layer of complexity to an already tricky language. If you need more help with advancing your English skills, we offer English as a Foreign Language summer schools of up to four weeks’ duration, which will allow you to study the language intensively and make rapid progress within small classes. There’s no substitute for hard work and determination when you’re learning English, but studying with like-minded fellow learners will make a complex task seem much easier and more enjoyable.

Conclusion The study of languages for specific purposes has had a long and eventful history and – as some would say – dates back to the times of the Roman and Greek Empires. Its modern origins, however, can be traced back to the early 1960s and are associated with J. M. Swales’ Episodes in ESP and the book by M.A. Halliday, A. McIntosh and P. Strevens. Also, owing to an attempt made by The ESPJ editors, John Swales and Ann Johns, in the editorial for Volume 6 (3), the scope of ESP research – at that time limited to EST in academic contexts – considerably expanded, eventually returning to the original broad definition of ESP proposed by P. Strevens (1977). The editors’ initiative led to a rapid increase in article submissions, to both special and not “special” issues. The most-frequently raised topics in the latter included needs analysis (NA), genre and rhetorical moves. They are still extremely productive for researchers and are discussed below since they continue to predominate in the ESP theory and practice. With the publication of the first issue of The ESPJ and Aspects of Article Introductions in 1981 as well as the appearance of Genre Analysis , the terms like genre and rhetorical moves gained considerable importance in the ESP field. Swales’ Creating a Research Space model (the CARS model) (originally presented in a slightly different form) “has had a tremendous influence on genre analysis in ESP and on the teaching of academic writing, both to international or L1 students, or to professional writers wishing to publish in international journals”. This move-based approach is an attempt at capturing the ways in which academic writers justify and highlight their contribution to the ongoing research in the field. The three main moves proposed for the article introduction and a number of steps between them express how writers establish the research topic, outline the previous research and indicate a gap or possible extension of their work. The use of corpora in ESP teaching and learning can range from providing examples that illustrate accepted language use, or are a starting point for

gap-filling and matching exercises to adopting an approach referred to as data- driven learning, the term coined by Johns to describe one-to-one writing consultations, during which the student and advisor explored online corpus data to solve language problems encountered by the student. Depending on the teaching/learning objectives, data-driven learning activities might encourage students to create and analyze concordances, n-grams or produce wordlists for the purpose of revising for a test or designing ESP materials, etc. They might as well result in “technology enhanced rhetorical consciousness-raising.

References 1. English for Specific Purposes World, ISSN 1682-3257, www.esp- world.info, Issue 46, 2015 2. English for Specific Purposes in Historical Perspective Elżbieta Danuta Lesiak-Bielawska 3. 17 Barber C.L. 1962. Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose. In Contributions to English Syntax and Phonology . Gothenburg Studies in Linguistics 14. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell. Reprinted in Swales. 4. Basturkman H. 2010. Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes . New York: Palgrave Macmillam. 5. Basturkmen H. 2014. LSP teacher education: Review of literature and suggestions for the research agenda. Iberica 28 pp. 17-34. 6. Benesch S. 2001. Critical English for Academic Purposes: Theory, Politics and Practice . NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 7. Berkenkotter C. 2001. Genre systems at work: DSM-IV and rhetorical recontextualization in psychotherapy paper work. Written Communication 18 pp. 326-347. 8. Bhatia V.K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings . New York: Longman. 9. Bhatia V.K. 2002. Applied genre analysis. A multi-perspective model. Iberica 4 pp. 3-19. 10. Bhatia V.K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View . London: Continuum. 11. Bhatia V.K. 2008. Genre analysis, ESP, and professional practice. English for Specific Purposes 27 pp. 161-74. 12. Biber D., Conrad S., Cortes V. 2004. If you look at ...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25 pp. 371-405.

13. Biber D., Conrad S., Reppen R. 1994. Corpus-based approaches to issues in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics 15 pp. 169-89. 14. Bley-Vroman R. 1978. Purpose, device and level in rhetorical theory. In M.T. Trimble, L.P. Trimble, K. Drobnic English for Specific Purposes: Science and Technology (pp. 278-88). English Language Institute: Oregon State University. 15. Bosher S., Smalkoski K. 2002. From needs analysis to curriculum development: Designing a course in health-care communication for immigrant students in the USA. English for Specific Purposes 21 pp. 59-79. English for Specific Purposes World, ISSN 1682-3257, www.esp- world.info, Issue 46, 2015 16. English for Specific Purposes in Historical Perspective Elżbieta Danuta Lesiak-Bielawska

Похожие

Types of discussion based on text (kurs ishi)

Establishing a rapport with your students (kurs ishi)

Learning approaches (kurs ishi)

Classroom management (kurs ishi)

Speech work (kurs ishi)