Strategies for assessing the reading and listening skills of a2 level students - Английский язык - Курсовые работы

Strategies for assessing the reading and listening skills of a2 level students

Загружено в:

12.08.2021

Скачано:

0

Размер:

110.9765625 KB

Students' attitudes towards authentic and non- authentic material in the ESP classroom Table of contents Introduction Chapter I Authentic texts and adapted textbook texts 1.1 Authentic texts and adapted textbook texts 1.2 How is meaning acquired in authentic texts and textbook texts? 1.3 Simplified material meaning and authentic material meaning 1.4 Theories against and in favour of authentic texts Chapter II Using authentic and non-authentic material in the ESP classroom 2.1 Methods and data 2.2 Presentation of textbooks 2.3 Questionnaire 2.4 Interviews 2.5. Discussion of the questionnaires and interviews results Conclusion Literature

Introduction During our practice at school we came into contact with various English textbooks used at the Kirov school system; books containing texts that quite often were perceived as irrelevant to the students. Many times we experienced that students were not able torelate to the texts and therefore were unenthusiastic in their reading and the following discussions. When we asked the students for their opinion on what they had read, the answer was often that the subject did not interest them and that it had no relevance to them whatsoever. When reading the two articles The textbook and With book in education ,published in Teacher’, we understood that this was a pressing issue. Jan Nilsson,the writer of The textbook Mona Hillman Pinheiro, 1 the writer of the latter article, by stating that students’ motivation in reading texts is higher when using authentic texts in the classroom. He further states that students today need situations where they can read, write about and discuss different issues they find important. He continues to argue that the textbook used in class does not provide the student with interesting topics; therefore the textbook should be banished. Hillman Pinheiro on the other hand states that the textbook is useful both to students and teachers. She believes that school material offers structure and guidance to students on how to read and learn. She further believes that through this kind of material the teacher saves some time when preparing the lessons. 2 Hillman Pinheiro states that teachers nowadays have so many things to do and so little time to spare; since all tasks are already prepared the textbook is useful.We believe in the importance of texts in English studies. Even though this particular debate evolves around the use of textbooks we believe, that if there is an ongoing debate as to which texts to use, it is interesting to examine the different attitudes towards the texts used in the classroom. I believe that texts play an important role in teaching and acquiring a second language. It is essential that a teacher uses texts that appeal to the students in order 1 Nilsson, J. (2005, 20/5-9/6). Ut med läroboken. Lärarnas tidning, p. 42 2 Hillman Pinheiro, M. (2005, 10/6-18/8). In med böckerna i undervisningen. Lärarnas tidnin

to get their attention and to increase motivation. Therefore I think that it is important for the teacher to include the use of authentic texts in the classroom. This extends the students’ possibilities of finding and subsequently reading books that appeal to them. This is supported by theory which underlines the importance of relevant texts and motivated students in the learning process. In the following, I will use the terms “textbook” and “authentic texts”. When I talk about textbooks we refer to the textbooks used in class – in our cases Kirov school. When I talk about authentic text I refer to texts such as news articles, novels and short stories in their original form written for native English speakers. A more detailed description of the terms can be found in the “Theory” section.

Chapter I Authentic texts and adapted textbook texts 1.1 Authentic texts and adapted textbook texts I want to examine students’ and teachers’ attitudes towards the texts in the books used in class. I want to find out if students and teachers prefer textbooks or authentic material or if both are needed in order to provide the students with the best possible study aids. I want to investigate which criteria go into the process of choosing the texts and to some extent which ways of working with the texts are preferable. By doing this, I aim to find out if it is possible to boost student motivation and thereby heighten their interests in reading and increase their learning abilities. Questions Basic questions are: • How do you motivate the students? • Is there a connection between the choice of texts and student motivation? • What are teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards textbook texts and authentic material? • In relation to the question above – which of the above mentioned types of text do teachers and students prefer? • Is it necessary to combine these two types of material in order to increase students’ motivation in reading or can we succeed in this by using only one? Limitations I decided not to take the students’ cultural background, class or gender into consideration. I do understand that these factors may play an important role when discussing motivation in reading texts but due to lack of time we decided not to include these factors in our paper. Intention is not to minimize the importance of these factors. I am more interested in general opinions when reading is concerned and unless the above mentioned qualities turn out to be of great importance they will not be included in our discussion. It might be interesting to see if the official documents help us decide what sort of texts to choose. It could be that the aims of the course plans do not require

the use of authentic texts in the classroom or that they encourage it. One of the aims in the teaching of English is, besides the communicative aspect, to broaden the students’ knowledge of the English speaking world – that is the cultural aspect. In most textbooks you find sections about parts of the English speaking world e.g. India, Australia and the U.S. What is interesting is the way the cultural aspect is presented. Even though the textbook is a few years old, the topic could very well still be of relevance to the students. But often fabricated texts are used – e.g. travel stories or visits by families to foreign countries, and these have a tendency to feel “forced” and irrelevant. Furthermore, many textbooks use adapted texts where cultural elements are removed since these are often considered to be difficult parts of a text. Hereby one of the aims of the course plans is compromised namely that a student should be familiar with English spoken in different parts of the world; this could include varieties such as Cockney and Pidgin English. Another aim to strive for is to make sure that the student is motivated beyond the actual learning situation. This puts a great deal of pressure on the teacher to find texts and plan the lessons so that the students maintain their interest in the language even outside the classroom. Lundahl discusses the various motivating factors and reaches the conclusion that authentic texts often motivate the students more. In the course plan it is not specified if one should or should not use authentic texts; nor is it specified if the teacher should use adapted texts. It states that students should be able to read prose, factual prose and factual texts but not whether or not these should be adapted to the students’ level by using a textbook or if the teacher should find “real life examples”. The teacher should make use of the fact that students are exposed to the language everyday in different ways – that is, include the different elements of English that students come into contact with in their spare time in a classroom situation. But it is not specified how this should be done. It seems that a great deal of freedom is given to the teacher; but with freedom follows responsibility. The teacher is to make sure that the aims of the course plan are achieved, but whether this is done by using of the textbook, novels, adapted texts or the text in its original form is up to each teacher to decide.

Bo Lundahl, 3 teacher of English didactics at Malm ц University, argues that English studies must take into account the current lifestyle that most teenagers have adopted. One should also take into account the new knowledge they have acquired and consequently introduce more suitable and interesting texts for students to read; texts that reflect a student’s background, experience and knowledge; texts which may be found in youth magazines, life-style magazines and newspapers. Also, teaching English texts today should not focus mainly on formal structures and lexical items. Instead, it should focus on meaning and content and the students should be able to draw their own conclusions about what they have read and comment on it. Lundahl states that authentic texts should be introduced in the classroom. “Authentic material” refers to e.g. books and articles where language and structure are not simplified in any way. According to The Oxford Dictionary of English, the term “authentic” has at least one meaning: “of undisputed source or origin and not a copy; genuine”. 4 For teaching purposes this refers to English books, novels or articles that have been written by an English speaking author to a native audience or speaker; in these cases the language used has not been altered. The term “authentic” has been used as a reaction against fabricated artificial language, which is mostly used in instructional dialogues 6 and textbooks taught in class. This term refers to a usage of language in a non- pedagogical way, which occurs naturally in society and reflects the culture of the target language. For instance, slang and idioms, which are rarely used in textbooks, could appear in authentic material.It should be made clear that authentic texts may be included in textbooks, but often the texts included will be subject to a certain level of adaptation. In the textbooks, the texts are often supplied with vocabulary lists, explanatory comments as well as with fixed questions. The original text can be changed formally and linguistically to suit the textbook needs. It should be 3 Skolverket, (2000) “Språk: Grundskola och gymnasiet: Kursplaner, betygskriterier och kommentarer.” P.60 4 Soanes & Stevenson (editors) (2005) “The Oxford Dictionary of English” , revised edition

underlined, that what is advocated here is not a total rejection of the textbook in the teaching of English in Swedish schools, but rather that authentic texts should be introduced in the classroom as additional material; authentic texts can provide the students with original language. Moreover, it could be argued that authentic material increases student motivation when reading in English. If the students are exposed to English in its true form, that is that the language is not simplified, they are able to deduct important cultural and lexical information. The choice of the text is highly important. Authentic texts focus mainly on contents and meaning and not on linguistic forms or other structures. Authentic material can present the reader with cultural messages as well as prepare students for a so called “pleasure reading”. Generally, authentic materials do not entirely replace the textbooks but they can be used as a substitution for certain texts that might not be well-suited for classroom use. Many teachers nowadays have realised that authentic texts have a motivating effect on students. For example, a newspaper article or an interview can be perceived as more vivid or “real” than the texts you might find in textbooks. It’s through these kinds of authentic texts that students and teachers are able to approach the target country’s culture and the people living there; we are able to compare our own culture and lifestyle with that of a particular country. Authentic texts do not have to be full-length books. They could also include material such as factual texts, ads, warning signs, menus, pricelists etc. The list is long and there are many ways to include these texts in the teaching of English. 1.2. How is meaning acquired in authentic texts and textbook texts? Kramsch believes that meaning is not acquired from the spoken or written language but from the dialogue which is being created between the reader and the text. It’s a “central code” which is defined as a system of ideas and customs that are involved in a certain culture’s meaning; a meaning which a learner should be prepared to encounter.Linguists have tried to explore the reading process by presenting various models. For a long time it was believed that there were two kinds of reading, namely the bottom up and the top down model. Lundahl tries to

explain the relationship between a reader and the text by referring to these two models. The bottom up model refers to the decoding of the language used in the text. That is, the reader is constantly trying to translate different words or in some cases identify different sounds which he or she combines into words and later on sentences. In the top down model the reader draws on his or her own experiences and background and this in turn might help them to draw their own conclusions about what is said in the text. The top down model lets the reader take control of the text and creates the meaning the reader wants to establish. The problem addressed here is the way this “meaning” is presented in the classroom. The bottom up model has influenced the reading criteria for many years. Texts for second language learners have been simplified in order to suit their needs and ease comprehension. Most of the time the simplified text is written in the present form with a vocabulary of approximately 300 words and short sentences with no more than six or seven words. Usually the story deals with a familiar situation where two people talk and a large part of the text is basically in a dialogue form. Simplification of the language used in the classroom is deliberately made by the teacher to perform certain pedagogical tasks and at the same time ease communication. In other words, the teacher presents texts in a simplified language to students so they can understand what they read.13 There is a discrepancy in the way language is learned in schools. If there is a tendency to familiarise students with the culture of the target language is it a possibility to do so by using textbooks where language is adapted? Shouldn’t students be exposed to a natural use of the language? ‘Top down’ and ‘Bottom up’ The way in which we read texts is not uniform, and much depends upon our prior knowledge of a text’s content and our ability to ‘decode’ the language within. In the case of a second language learner these two matters become even more decisive. It is in the nature of a second language learner to feel the need to understand every element of a provided text, and this entails the encryption of the

text at a very close level, from phonemic construction to sentence comprehension, sentence linking strategies through to the comprehension of paragraphs and finally an understanding of the text as a whole. This method is referred to as ‘bottom up’, and suggests a slower, more concentrated reading style reflecting that of the second language learner in her meeting with a new text. The degree to which the second language learner is required to study at a ‘bottom up’ level is dependent upon their level of language comprehension. The L2 reader confronted with a text that is considered below their level of comprehension would find the ‘bottom up’ scenario as somewhat unnecessary and time consuming. Coady suggests that “beginning readers focus on process strategies (e.g., word identification), whereas more proficient readers shift attention to more abstract conceptual abilities and make better use of background knowledge, using only as much textual information as needed for confirming and predicting the information in the text” 5 . Gabe summarises Goodman’s research into top down methodology by concluding that: Since it did not seem likely that fluent readers had the time to look at all the words on a page and still read at a rapid rate, it made sense that good readers used knowledge they brought to the reading and then read by predicting information, sampling the text, and confirming the prediction. (1991, p375) The proficient reader has therefore more success while attaining a so called ‘top down’ reading style, whereby their prior knowledge of a language helps in predicting language patterns which in turn aids meaning. However, in order to be able to decode the information 1.3. Simplified material meaning and authentic material meaning The writers of “Reading for meaning” state that as teachers we might have done the students a disservice by teaching simplified texts instead of authentic material. Simplification usually alters the original text. This, in some cases, hinders the learners’ comprehension, both culturally and lexically. “Difficult” words can 5 Mackay, Barkman and Jordan 1979, pp5-12

be replaced by easier words; hence the students will not get the chance to learn certain English idioms or phrases. The replacement of synonyms and other linguistic items may also affect the learner’s ability to adopt new words. One might argue that the main point is not to ignore traditional readability but to expand it. Language difficulty should be dealt with in terms of content, context and intent. One way of looking for these features is through markers of cohesion, such as adverbs and conjunctions that refer to forthcoming information. In simplified texts these markers are often deleted. Readability levels do make a difference in terms of comprehension. Students who read a simplified version tend to be more productive simply because they understand it. But at the same time, the language they are presented with lacks e.g. synonymy, transitional verbs and subordinate clauses etc. since this have been erased from the original longer version of the text. The danger of this is that the student might loose track of what the story is really all about. By contrast, authentic texts provide the student with real life materials which is non sequentially organised and encourages relational thinking when dealing with the text. Moreover, textbooks usually tell you what is right and wrong with a sentence grammatically or when vocabulary is concerned. But a student should be able to put this knowledge into a wider context; for example when he or she is given sentences that occur in different context but have or have not the same meaning. Furthermore, students normally let the teachers decide what they have to read when the textbook is concerned, whereas authentic material requires the student to investigate various levels of comprehension and at the same time be aware of their own knowledge discrepancies and qualities. Authentic texts can be better at involving the reader in the process of reading since they have a “real” message and at the same time can be perceived as more genuine. The cultural dimensions are more vivid since slang and everyday language are often used. The language can be perceived as more alive and not written with a specific aim (e.g.grammatical purpose) so that the actual plot falls into the background. In contrast, the authentic texts often have the plot as the essential element and this in

turn makes it easier to capture the students’ attention. 1.4 Theories against and in favour of authentic texts There have been different opinions concerning the use of authentic texts in the classroom. Krashen believes that a text should only be slightly over a student’s comprehension capability and is against the use of authentic material. Malmberg states that authentic material is only suitable for students in upper secondary school. Only then are students able to read and understand literature and factual texts. On the same line, Hellstr ц m declares that students are not able to read material written by native speakers in the same way as native speakers do. He believes that students who learn a foreign language do not possess sufficient knowledge to read authentic material and therefore texts should be adjusted to their linguistic level. By contrast Neuner states that when choosing a text, the linguistic level should not be the primary concern. The teacher should also take into account a student’s perception of the real world and all the information the student is presented with. Neuner talks about textual comprehension and puts forth the example that a student may guess the meaning or a message of the text by simply referring to the pictures or titles used in the text. Through personal and cultural experiences a student is able to draw relevant conclusions. Tornberg and S ц rensen expand this theory by stating that already from early stages students are able to understand more complex structures of a foreign language than they are able to produce; students should simply get used to these kinds of texts. In the beginning, they might not understand all the information given to them; many words might be unfamiliar to them but they can guess the meaning of difficult words and draw their conclusions about the meaning and content of a text. Advantages and disadvantages of using authentic texts in class Along with if and how to teach grammar, whether you should use authentic texts or graded texts (ones written or rewritten for language learners) remains one of the most hotly debated matters in TEFL. From what I’ve read, researchers seem to be moving towards more of a consensus that grading and rewriting texts is generally a good idea, and that students learn more from a text where the amount

of new language is limited, as this helps them guess from context and doesn’t overload them. This also ties in with the idea that the language two non-native speakers use to communicate in English for International Communication is nothing like the idiomatic, idiosyncratic and style-obsessed writing that you generally find in a British newspaper. Intelligent use of graded texts is also, in my opinion, common sense. Even if a text that was written for the entertainment of native speakers that is almost perfect for the language learning needs of non-native speakers can be found, surely it is worth changing, however little, to make it truly perfect for learning English. Whilst many textbook writers have also been moving in the direction of grading texts even in Advanced level books, this is by no means universal and many Business English textbooks have been moving in the opposite direction of having authentic texts from the Economist and Financial Times appear in even Pre- Intermediate books. Aside from the common ownership of publications like these and the ELT publishers, there must still be perceived advantages to the use of authentic materials at all levels. Many teachers also retain an attachment to this method of language learning. Whilst CLIL and Dogme are the trendiest new(ish) teaching methods for people to write about, the most popular kind of lesson among teachers who have taken on the criticism of PPP and grammar teaching is actually basing a whole lesson around a newspaper article. My own position is that it is rarely better to use a text just as it comes, however good the tasks you put with it. Having said that, I can totally understand the problems people have with textbook readings as they usually exist and are usually used, and the appeal that authentic materials can have. By examining the advantages and disadvantages of using authentic texts in the classroom, in both practical and pedagogical terms, I hope I will be able to give some hints on how to bring the advantages into classes and avoid the disadvantages with both authentic and graded texts, and to give a balanced view for those who are still undecided on when, how and how much to use authentic texts in their own classroom. They have to learn how to cope

If students are given a text that is several levels above what they usually read, students have little choice but to learn to deal with lots of unknown vocabulary. This should give them the motivation to use the reading skills you have been trying to teach them of getting a general gist, skimming and scanning, etc. These skills can then later be transferred back to the readings they do in their normal textbook. I say that students have “little choice” but to use those skills rather than “no choice”, because the other option of panicking and giving up is always there! To make this a successful experience for them, you will need to make sure that the tasks are manageable using just the skills that you are trying to instil in them, for example by making sure all the answers are easy things to scan (e.g. numbers and words with capital letters). You can also replicate the effect of forcing them to abandon their attempts to understand every word and read everything in detail with graded texts. This can be achieved with the simple technique of choosing a text that is two levels higher than the textbook they are studying. As with the authentic texts, though, you will need to make the lesson manageable and focused on the right skills, which will probably mean writing totally different tasks to the ones designed for higher level learners that are in the textbook. There is a sense of achievement Few things give more of a feeling of something really achieved in a foreign language than turning over the last page of a book you have read all the way through, and this is true however much you had to skip parts of the book or use your dictionary in order to get to that point. Although it is not quite the same to have finished your first real newspaper article, this can still give students a sense of achievement if you talk up what they have managed to do. You can give even lower level students this little push in confidence by giving the kind of manageable skimming and scanning tasks mentioned above. This is not an effect that can or needs to be replicated many times, however, especially with students who slowly come to the realisation that they are finishing the tasks the teacher has given them but not really understanding the text in the way that they would like to. You can

also partly replicate this sense of achievement with graded texts by giving them a whole graded reader book to read, praising them as they give it back to you finished. There is more of it around that students can help themselves to/ It is easier for students to find Perhaps the greatest argument for teaching students to cope with authentic texts is that it suddenly opens up a world of newspapers, websites, magazines, notices etc etc that was inaccessible to them before and that can provide a massive boost to the exposure they get to English. This is particular important with students stuck on the “Intermediate plateau”. You can reinforce this effect by telling them where the authentic texts you use in class come from and how they can get something similar for themselves. You can also ask them to find similar examples for the next lesson. You can partly replicate this effect with graded materials by making sure they have access to graded readers and magazines and website for language learners. You can also make the easiest authentic texts accessible to your lower level students by focusing your lessons on the language they need to one particular source such as street signs (included in the PET and KET exams). There is more stuff for teachers to choose from While this is true in terms of number and variety of texts, unless you have an awful lot of time on your hands to choose something of more or less the right level with the right language focus and write a full lesson plan and set of tasks for it, lack of time can actually make the selection of good texts you can use well smaller than if you were just choosing from all the available graded texts in the teachers’ room. See tips above for how to make a good selection of suitable authentic and graded texts easy available. You can sometimes find a translation Although you don’t want students to get into the habit of translating texts as they read them, there are uses for translations in class such as reading an introduction in L1 to set the scene with cultural information etc or to prompt

discussion to prepare them for a long or difficult reading. With more advanced classes, you can even discuss the differences between the two texts and/ or the experiences of reading them. Looking at the terrible translations that free automatic online translation services produce is also worth a laugh or two. You can compare several versions of the same story There are lots of interesting things you can do with a copy of the same story from a tabloid newspaper and a more serious publication, and people who have just got off their MAs in Linguistics almost all make an attempt to do so. In fact, in the last 20 years or so such activities based on Discourse Analysis theory have gone from something that challenged the false assumptions of sentence-based descriptions of language to something that has become an unquestioned standard part of language courses down to Pre-Intermediate level. As with many of the activities with authentic texts, there is no particular evidence that conscious examination of factors like this particularly helps the reading comprehension and language production of even higher level learners, and even less that it can be useful with lower level learners and students who read only in order to pick up and revise vocabulary and grammar that can help them speak better. This does remain an interesting activity though (if sometimes more interesting for the teacher than the students), so here are some tips on how to make it more interesting than just pointing out the differences between tabloids and broadsheets that students probably already know from L1. Things you can do with two texts include finding synonyms and grammatical forms that mean the same thing (useful for FCE and CAE sentence transformations), finding words that are nearly synonyms but have different positive and negative meanings (e.g. “determined” and “stubborn”) or levels of formality (“youth” and “yoof”), comparing topics and column inches in whole newspapers, and comparing ease of comprehension (usually mid-brow newspapers, freebie newspapers and local newspapers are the easiest for students to understand, with tabloids and very highbrow publications like The Economist the most difficult).

These activities cannot be easily reproduced with graded texts, but some textbooks do have similar activities with two different texts already in them. Less interesting but perhaps more useful is doing similar activities with dialogues, telephone calls and emails of different levels of formality. Students can follow a story and recycle the vocabulary In my own language learning experience, I have found the most useful thing about reading newspapers in a foreign language is that the same vocabulary comes up day and after day - and even more so if you are following the developments of a single story and also watch or listen to the news about the same thing. For example, I will forever know the Japanese for “reinforced concrete” due to the story that was biggest in the news when I was really into studying that language. As you can see from that example, the fact that vocabulary is often repeated and easy to learn does not necessarily make it useful for anything other than talking about the news, but there are ways of making that vocabulary more interesting and spreading the effect to students who would gain more from graded reading. One thing the teacher can do is choose a story or sequence of stories that is more likely to have useful language in it. This is easiest with ESP students who can read stories on their area, and this approach is very common in Business English and ESP teaching. Using a sequence of texts on exactly the same story as suggested here is, however, less common. Following a story is also not common on the websites that offer free simplified texts such as news stories. They might know the story already, making comprehension and guessing vocabulary much easier Some of the advantages that a graded text has in terms of the students being able to guess vocabulary from context due to understanding the language around it can be replicated with an authentic text by them being able to guess the meaning of the words they don’t know because they already know what the news story, Shakespeare monologue etc is going to say. Although we often try to introduce new information in our classes as well as new language, the research I have read and my own teaching and language learning experience suggest that we learn

language easier if it is simplified for us with things like knowing the basics of the story already. This is supported by recent research that suggests that CLIL works better for the learning of language if the topic is revision rather than new information. Having said that, once the motivating effects of being able to handle a more difficult text for the first time wear off, reading something newsworthy, surprising or controversial that they didn’t know before is bound to add something to the interest of the class, especially for higher level students. You can combine the advantages of both the familiar and unfamiliar by making the text a continuation of a story the students already know the beginning of or an unusual viewpoint or explanation of a happening they are already familiar with. The same techniques can also be used the first time students use a graded text that is a level higher than they are used to. The disadvantages of using authentic texts in the language learning classroom It's probably idiosyncratic My theory for why using authentic texts with language levels of all learners has been such a selling point over the years is simply that the words that are used to describe what are commonly taken to be the two options leaves one option in an unarguably strong position – the two words being “authentic” and its indefensible opposite “inauthentic”. In fact, though, the two good options a teacher has are usually to choose an “authentic” text or a more “representative” text. We try to choose between the hundreds of possible language points we could cover in order to tackle the most important and manageable first. In the same way, a graded text is rewritten not just to be simpler but also so that the language is the kind of generally used thing that students need in order to be able to communicate in the greatest number of typical situations, i.e. to make the language “representative” of the English language as it is generally used. This is not the case in most authentic texts, where the skill of a writer is often to make their use of language personal and therefore unrepresentative of how other people use English. Even when the individual writer hasn’t stamped their mark on the text too much,

you might also have problems dealing with the idiosyncrasies of particular genres or ways that particular nationalities of native speaker write. These points can be great to look at with very advanced learners and can be exactly what they need in order to show them that there is still a lot to learn in English. Needless to say, the last thing that will motivate an Intermediate student is to be told how much there still is to learn! These idiosyncrasies are often taken out of graded texts (which is the main thing that makes them so dull for native speakers, more so than the simplification of language) and it is possible to partly do the same with authentic texts. One hint is to avoid famous writers and just go for almost miscellaneous stuff like shorter newspaper articles. The grading of the various parts of the text might be different This can particularly be a problem with novels and poetically written magazine articles, where the descriptive introduction is often several levels higher than the story will be once the plot and/ or dialogue starts. The same is true of punning newspaper headlines. Approaches include giving the difficult parts in summary form and just using an extract from the original text, or doing activities just with the easy bits like the captions or dialogue. The information can quickly become out of date This can be a problem both for student, for whom the language might fly out of their heads at the same time as the information gets replaced with something more important. It can also be an issue for the teacher, who might have spent lots of time preparing the pre-teach and comprehension questions only to have to throw the text away after a couple of days. This is mainly a problem for newspaper news stories, so there is no reason why you shouldn’t use more long-lasting formats like magazine articles, newspaper articles with more analysis, fiction or biography instead. The difficulty can put people off reading For some people the challenge and achievement of reaching the end of an authentic text for the first time is just the boost to their motivation that they need, even if they then don’t touch another authentic text until they have managed to

reach a more advanced level. For other people, however, the struggle of dealing with authentic texts can just convince them that reading in English will never be worth the effort. The most common response to this from teachers and teacher’s books is to give students simple general comprehension and skimming and scanning tasks, and to skip the detailed comprehension tasks. This can work and give students a sense of achievement, but some students can feel it is just a con job to make them think they have understood when they haven’t really, especially if you try this trick a few times. You could try your best to choose the easiest authentic text you can find, but with a student or class that doesn’t like a challenge it is probably best just to stick to graded texts. The vocabulary is not graded However easy an authentic text you have managed to find, it is unlikely that every word in it is one of those “most used words in English” that are marked in learner’s dictionaries. This is particularly the case with children’s books, which can be easy and fun for adults to read but often have a vocabulary that is more suitable for the under 10s, and in which the most useless words are often those which are repeated the most often. This can be yet another good opportunity for students to test their guessing vocabulary from context skills. Alternatively, you can provide a glossary to the words you are not expecting them to know at that level but are vital for understanding that particular text, something that is sometimes given in graded readers and even test readings. Another technique is to underline the words that are probably new to them that you actually think are useful, so that when they get busy with their dictionaries in class or at home you know they will be somewhat guided in what they learn. The grammar is not graded The grading of grammar in a text is usually more difficult to spot and easier to forget about than the grading of vocabulary, but in a graded reader the writers are even more careful about the grammar than the vocabulary. This does not necessarily mean that all the grammar has to be exactly the same as they have already covered in their books, as grammar is easier to understand than produce

and seeing it in context for some time before they tackle it in class will make it easier for them to pick up. A good rule of thumb is that most of the grammar in the text should be what they have already studied, and most of the more difficult grammar should be within one level (e.g. halfway through the Intermediate level textbook if they are halfway through the Pre-Intermediate level) and guessable from context. If there is any grammar that is even higher level, you can try and get the students to ignore it by having the comprehension tasks only for the information elsewhere in the text, or providing a “grammar glossary” similar to a vocab glossary. authentic material sense survey The two surest ways of checking that most of the grammar is of the right level are using graded texts and rewriting authentic texts. Another possibility is just to use a short passage from an authentic text that only has the right kinds of grammar in it. If you do want to search for an authentic text that has the right kind of grammar, one way of searching is by genre. For example, stories usually have Past Perfect, Past Continuous and Past Simple, but jokes and anecdotes might use present tenses instead. The idiomatic language might quickly become out of date This has also been a problem with textbooks over the years, but most publishers seem to have twigged that now and made the language they deal with less idiomatic and more “timeless”. With authentic texts, you can perhaps avoid overly-trendy slang by sticking to articles from the stuffier publications or extracts from books (mainly from the 50s and early 60s) that were written in a simplified non-Shakespearean English but hadn’t got into the slangy language that many books and magazine articles nowadays have.

Chapter II Using authentic and non-authentic material in the ESP classroom 2.1. Methods and data To investigate whether or not our assumptions concerning authentic material was correct we decided to apply a quantitative approach and to use a qualitative way of dealing with the results. By this we mean that we analyzed the results we collected instead of simply presenting them. We decided on two different means of finding the answers to our questions. The first was a questionnaire which we handed out to two classes in two different schools. The purpose of using questionnaires as a method was to find out general opinions or certain knowledge within the respondent group. Authentic texts are usually too high level Assuming there are some levels of students so high that any grading would make a text too easy (and even then it must be possible to rewrite it so that there is more useful or even more challenging language in it), if you did take a text written for native speakers and try to match it by language level to a selection of articles from EFL language textbooks you would almost always end up with it in Proficiency (i.e. very Advanced) level. There are exceptions, though, including freebie newspapers like Metro, newspapers from non-English-speaking countries, some websites (again especially those from non-English-speaking countries), specialist texts in the students’ area of expertise, some instruction manuals, some notices and street signs, some pamphlets and leaflets, and some articles from Reader’s Digest. The fact that these can be more fully understood by lower level learners usually means that the language in them is more commonly used and therefore more useful to learn, but these also could usually gain from some judicious rewriting to tie in with the syllabus of the course etc if you have the time and technology. There might be language and cultural references that even native speakers from other countries, areas or age groups would not understand This can be a huge problem if the teacher also doesn’t understand! Ways of

avoiding this include using the English-language press of the country the students are from; using texts about something you know one or more students are interested in and knowledgeable about such as one of their hobbies; and using websites, newspapers and magazines that have an international readership. It might include language that isn’t in a dictionary This could be a good time for students to practice their “guessing meaning from context” skills, but that is only usually possible if they understand over 90% of the language around that word. This means that they have to be Advanced or even Proficiency level to be able to do so with most authentic texts. As with the point above, there are few good ways of using this factor and the best thing to do is almost always to try to avoid it by choosing more suitable texts, rewriting, or concentrating on another aspect of the text you choose. The texts are often too long This can be a factor with Sunday magazine articles that you’d love to use in class but cover six pages, and also for books for students to read at home. In fact, the shortness of a graded reader can be just as much part of the appeal as the simplified language. One solution with authentic texts is to use only an extract, but this can make understanding it even more difficult unless you can find some way of explaining very clearly what comes before or after the part you give them. There are also shorter news articles in the margins of a newspaper and on the Internet, but these rarely have the interesting storylines and language that are supposed to be the selling points of authentic texts. So, unless you are prepared to rewrite the text yourself there is usually no solution but to keep looking till you find the length you are looking for 2.2. Presentation of textbooks We were aware of the fact that the different classes used different textbooks, namelyVereshagin, Afanasyeva. Therefore we had to decide whether or not these should be treated separately or could be seen as more or less the same. Both textbooks are used in English B course and both contain writers such as S.Opponheim, S.Raimi, M.Twain, A.MilnJ., M.Barrie , Howard Pyle . The topics

of the books are by and large the same including topics like love, the classics, suspense and media. Even though the specific texts chosen may vary the general build of the books is the same. Both books contain questions to work with after the texts, and the questions cover areas like grammar, translation, word meaning and different writing exercises. Furthermore, both books are equipped with sections in the end of the books where the students can practice their skills in speaking and writing or work with the literature found in the books. Therefore, we decided to treat the textbooks as the same type of teaching material. There could be copyright problems For most publications in most countries it is perfectly legal to copy one class set of a text from the original, especially if you mark it clearly with where it came from. Restrictions usually only apply to making copies of copies and republishing things, and anyway language schools are not the first target of the copyright police, but it is always worth knowing what rules you might be stretching before deciding to do so. With freebie magazines and newspapers it might be possibly to get a class set together, but otherwise this is more of a possibility with graded texts such as graded readers or reading skills books. If they want to learn every word in a text, the reading stage can go on forever and cover loads of useless language Many teachers believe that explaining every piece of vocabulary is bad classroom practice and bad language learning, if only because they know of unprofessional teachers who are only to happy to fill up class time with this (usually preparation-free) activity and students for whom this is one of the anally- retentive habits that seem to be holding their speaking back. If you can persuade the students that sometimes some of the vocabulary is best left unexplained or at least left until they get home, that is one good response. It is also good, however, to try and look at it from their point of view. Most language students do not read in English in order to learn to read better, but in order to pick up the language they need to listen, write or (most commonly) speak well. If that is the case, learning skimming and scanning skills

are just a way of making a text manageable in order that they can do what they are asking you to help them with, which is to learn vocabulary. Ways of providing them with that vocabulary development without the class turning into one long teacher monologue include teaching and using monolingual dictionary skills, pre- teaching half the useful new vocabulary so that at least the explanation stage is split up, allowing them to choose only five words that they really want to know, giving them the pre-teach vocabulary to learn the day before, choosing a text where the language that they won’t understand is no more than one word every three or four lines, and giving exercises that help them guess which of several meanings the vocabulary has from the context. Many of these things are easier with graded texts but all are possible with authentic texts too. 2.3 Questionnaire We handed the questionnaire to 43 students in upper secondary school, second year. As it turned out, no students in the two classes were absent and thereby the level of participation was 100%. The questionnaire was divided into three sections; “texts”, learning situations” and “work with the text”. In the first section we wanted to find out about the topics that students preferred reading about and if they believed that these were reflected in their textbook. In the second section we were interested in finding out how the topic influenced the students in an actual learning situation and in the third section we hoped to see to what extent students participated in the selection of texts and which factors influenced them in the selection process. We asked the students their opinions on and attitudes towards these texts. Furthermore, we asked them questions relating to the theories concerning authentic and adapted texts. The survey was done in English and the results were analyzed. The students we chose were level B students and doing their second year in upper secondary school . 2.4 Interviews The second method was to conduct several interviews involving two English teacher and two students; all interviews were taped. The purpose of the student interview was to get a student perspective on the material taught in class. The

students were all asked the same questions, but were at the same time allowed to talk freely. These interviews were conducted in English since we were interested in the students’ thoughts and opinions, not their language skills. In order to contrast the student interviews and the questionnaires we decided to conduct an interview with a teachers as well. We wanted to get a teacher’s point of view on the use of authentic texts and textbooks. We asked them questions similar to the questions we asked to the students but with a slightly different approach. We asked the teachers questions about the reasons for their choice of texts; whether or not they used the texts available in the textbooks; their thoughts on choosing between texts; their general opinion on authentic texts etc. We also wanted see which factors influence a teacher’s choice of a text and if the teacher’s considerations matched the students’ wishes. Furthermore, we were interested in seeing to what degree the teachers used authentic texts in the classroom and what pros and cons the teacher had experienced with the different types of text. We decided to perform the interview in English with the same motivation as with the student interviews. We knew that we could not hope to achieve results which may be applied to the teaching and the learning of English in general. This, however, was not our intention. We aimed to find out how the average student respond to the texts used in the classroom; to see if and why the teacher we interviewed made use of adapted and authentic texts. Since no students were absent when we conducted the interviews it was possible to make rather precise assumptions concerning these particular two classes. But it should be underlined that we were interested in attitudes, opinions and perhaps discovering certain trends – not truths. To get the interview started I asked the students’ which topics they wanted to read about in their English studies. All students agreed that articles about current events such as terrorism were more interesting than e.g. texts about the Berlin wall; the students wanted to read about things that they could relate to. They did not find these themes in their textbook but were given articles from e.g. the internet and different English newspapers by their teacher. The students preferred the authentic

texts because they seemed more real to them. The texts contained modern expressions, slang and different dialects such as Cockney; they commented that it seemed like the kind of texts that you might read in England “with your morning tea”. Furthermore, they were enthusiastic about novels. According to the students, the novels presented them with a good story as well as challenging language; this made them focus mainly on the content rather than on the formal structure. They did not feel the need to look up every single word they did not understand – they were able to deduct the meaning of words through contents. The views on their textbook were mixed. Although they clearly preferred authentic texts, they maintained a positive attitude towards the texts in their textbook. Some of the students stated that if you are able to see the purpose of the text or exercise, the text itself became interesting. It depended very much on how the teacher presented and worked with the text. According to one of the students the textbook presented valuable strategies about how to read a text; at the same time they admitted that grammar is an important factor when you learn the English language and that the textbook can be a good guide.This was not a view shared by all the students. One of the students thought, that she often found the texts from the textbook meaningless because she felt that she wasn’t challenged. If she felt a text was tedious she lost the will to learn and more often than not, she just read the text without actually taking it in. When it came to working with the texts, the students were again a bit divided. Two of the students thought that the questions following the texts were satisfying. They said that the questions might not be the most inspiring, but they saw the purpose of the assignments. Taken from the student interviews To them, it made sense to read a text, adapted or authentic, which might not be a “perfect” text but where you could see the purpose. The other two students(Saryeva N,Mamadinov K.) were less forgiving. They argued that how the teacher dealt with the text was extremely important. If the questions following a text were too specific or “no-brainers” they did not feel any motivation and only completed the tasks out of duty – not out of interest. According to them, you

should be able to see the red thread when working with the text. The students all concurred that they were better learners if they were motivated. However, they had different views on what was needed to motivate them. For two of them, it was sufficient motivation if they understood the purpose of the text or exercise; they could overcome a boring text or a text directed at a more specific audience. They saw a higher goal, namely to improve their English. The other two(Aidaraliev B.,Alymbekov B) stated that “boring” books could become interesting if they were dealt with correctly; that is not to cling to “irrelevant” details, but to have more open and general topic discussions. Via the open questions they were able to see the book in a different light and to bring forth the positive aspects. What they could all agree on was that a very high motivating factor was their grade. When the teacher (Pitaeva N.M.,55years old) was asked if she used the textbook a lot in his teaching, she answered rarely. During this semester she had only used texts from the book two or three times. The reason for this, she explained, was that the texts seemed “fixed” to her and she knows from experience that articles and novels are more appreciated by the students she teaches. She made it clear that she found nothing wrong in using the textbook; she just preferred using other texts and activities. Her explanation for this was that students have a tendency to find the textbook boring and dreary and even though the text is graded according to level of difficulty, students need challenges that authentic texts provide them with; they feel that they are reading “the real thing”. She underlined that this factor was more evident if you were teaching a class where the linguistic level is higher. This was closely linked to her choice of topic. She experienced that if students found that they could relate to the topic their motivation increased. This was easier to achieve with authentic material. This really encouraged students to participate – especially if it the topic corresponds with their choice of school program. If the topic centres on students’ everyday environment it is easier to embrace it.

Another type of text that students found easy to embrace was music lyrics. For many teenagers music plays a very important role and as a teacher you can find an abundance of topics in the song texts. However, there are certain obstacles when using these kinds of texts; e.g. most of them are protected by copyright laws and therefore the teacher has to be selective and careful when using this material in the classroom. When I asked the teacher whether or not it was possible to exclude the textbook altogether and only use authentic material, his answer was quite clear. She argued that it was definitely possible, but not preferable. She saw advantages and disadvantages with both types of text. In regard to the texts from the textbook, she saw them as “labour saving”. If a teacher is short of time it is easier to present the class with a text from the textbook; here everything is already taken care of. Furthermore, the teacher can choose a small part of a section and pick out what he or she finds most important; you do not have to teach the whole book. The textbook could also prove valuable when it comes to text comprehension and even though the questions could be perceived as “tedious” and onesided it is a skill students should master. When authentic texts were concerned, she pointed out that even though students are often very positive towards these, preparing these texts for teaching is very time-consuming. In addition to this, more often than not the texts cannot be used more than once, since the main point of them is their up to date perspective. Moreover, when choosing an authentic text you have to take the linguistic level into consideration. The teacher needs to decide what the appropriate level for the class is. She mentioned that she tried to use Jane Austen’s Pride and prejudice and that it turned out to be far too difficult for the students. Here the authentic text missed its purpose. But the next teacher of English language(Haliullina I.R.35years old) she was agree for using Authentic texts during teaching process. She said it is easy to teach an English using authentic materials, said that the English presented in the classroom should be authentic, not produced for instructional purposes. Generally, what this means is materials which involve language naturally occurring as communication in native-speaker contexts of use, or rather those selected contexts where standard English is the norm: real

newspaper reports, for example, real magazine articles, real advertisements, cooking recipes, horoscopes, etc. She agrees that authentic texts or materials are beneficial to the language learning process.

2.5. Discussion of the questionnaires and interviews results When I discussed theories concerning the importance of motivation we mentioned that one motivational factor was that students should read texts that they find relevant. They should deal with topics they find interesting and familiar. If we accept this statement it is very interesting to see that almost all of the students rarely found their favourite topics in the textbook. This is a serious flaw, but, at the same time, also a flaw which is almost impossible to remedy. When we asked the students what they would like to read about, they preferred topics like current events and social issues that they could relate to. The student interviews confirmed this. If a textbook is supposed to supply this kind of topics it would require a new textbook every month. Therefore, it is not surprising that we saw a very positive attitude towards the use of authentic texts in the questionnaire and in the interviews with the students; most students would rather read authentic texts than the textbook. This coincides with what the teacher told us when he was asked the question of what generated the “best” response from students; he found them more interested and active when they dealt with texts that they could relate to. But he was also realistic in his response and made it clear that as a teacher You do not always have the time to prepare suitable authentic texts. Sometimes you need To use the textbook, and as he pointed out, it is not a bad thing. The textbook certainly has Its uses. It should be made clear that the students, especially in the interviews, stated that the textbook was not all bad and that they saw the purpose of the book; but at the same time, they underlined that they preferred authentic texts. Problems with authentic texts One problem with the use of authentic texts, which the teacher pointed out, is that they are not graded and sometimes can be too difficult for the students. On the other hand they should not be too easy either. Collie and Slater argue that the teacher has to be aware of the linguistic level of both text and class. Collie and Slater only highlight the problem but do not present a solution –except that the teacher should take the choice of texts extremely seriously. By contrast, Krashen offers actual guidelines and states that a text should always be just above a

student’s comprehension capability. This is obviously something a teacher should strive for, but at the same time, it is almost impossible for the teacher to manage. There might be 26 different levels of comprehension in the same classroom and, as the teacher I interviewed correctly stated, preparing authentic texts is a very time- consuming effort. Language One thing the interviews revealed was that the language of the texts was very important to the students; this was also shown in the questionnaire. In the interviews, the students made it very clear that they wanted to read “real” English language; they wanted to read texts where slang, idioms, and dialects were present. In the textbook language is often simplified in order to make it more accessible to students. This not only presents a danger of making the text inconsistent but it also excludes valuable cultural and lexical items; items which the students themselves found useful to learn. According to Swaffar, Arens and Byrnes, slang, idioms, and technical terms are useful in understanding the target culture of the target language and by excluding these the students misses this opportunity. Furthermore, the adapted language found in textbooks hinders the learner in his or her acquisition of new words since the exclusion of difficult words may limit a learner’s vocabulary. Another disadvantage with adapted language you find in textbooks, as Alderson and Urquhart point out, is that the reader may miss out on the actual plot of a story since key phrases and events may have been left out from the original story. In the interviews the students pointed out that it was extremely important that they were presented with a text that made sense. If presented with a story, they preferred the original version and they wanted to deal with the plot of the story – not with specific details. They would rather read a text which might be a little above their comprehension level instead of reading an adapted version. Reading and understanding texts When it comes to ways of reading a text and making sense of it Lundahl presents the bottom-up and the top-down models; both models were discussed above. The teacher interviewed preferred the latter model claiming that it was more

stimulating for students as well as for the teachers. On the other hand, he admitted that sometimes he used the bottom-up model simply because he found reading and basic text comprehension exercises a valuable method. As far as the students were concerned, they were divided as well. In the interviews all of the students favoured the top-down model even though some saw the purpose of the bottom-up method; they stated that dealing with a text should evolve around discussion about the content and not about specific details. They believed that they were better learners if they could draw their own conclusions when dealing with the text. In the questionnaire, however, the students were split between the two; they wanted both to find the themes of the text and discuss them in class but at the same time most answered that they were interested in translating words from the text and explaining them in English. Selection of texts If students are to choose between authentic texts and the textbook, they must be taken into the decision making process. In addition to the choice of which types of texts to use, there is also the matter of how to decide what to read. It was important to find out if the students were allowed to choose for themselves or if the teacher decided which texts to be used. When discussing the theories we mentioned that Verhoven and Snow considered student choice to be an important motivational factor. They emphasized that it is important for the students to be part of the selection of texts since this provides them with some sense of responsibility and this enables them to learn more actively. In the questionnaire however, we discovered that most of the times, the teacher simply decides what is to be read. When I asked the students what they preferred the answer was clear; they wanted to take part in the selection of texts. However, this might not always be a realistic possibility. First of all it can complicate the teaching if too many different texts are used at the same time. It is a very time-consuming process to choose these and it is very hard for the teacher to be updated with all the texts. Also, due to his or her training the teacher is better suited than the students to make an appropriate choice concerning which texts to use. This does not mean that the teacher should not pay

attention to what the students suggest but use the student suggestions in the planning of the lesson. Furthermore, as the teacher states in the interview, there might also be practical limitations. In his case the language department has a limited numbers of texts in sufficient copies for the whole class; and more often that not these books are classics and have been used over and over again. In the interviews, one of the students described the books as being old and worn, filled with scribbling and in general boring to look at; not exactly raising motivation. Even though there are plenty of reasons for letting the students take part in the decision-making, it is clear that there are many restrictions, both practical and theoretical. When the students were asked to give their opinion on the importance of reading texts in the classroom, 27 students (63%) answered that it was important to read texts while learning English. This in itself is not surprising. What might be of interest is that 10 students (23%) found the use of texts of little or no relevance at all. Of these, we know of at least two dyslexics in the group and we can assume that these are a part of the latter т group. Moreover, through a survey conducted earlier, we have established that the students at one of the schools favour the communicative approach to learning English. Since the question was “do you think it is important to read texts when you learn English?” some students may not have taken the communicative aspect of text-reading into consideration. However, 10 students showed a negative attitude towards the reading of text and this should be taken into consideration as this could have a serious effect on student motivation These are works of my students at school Kirova 8th form. Bashtykbaeva A.(15y.old) Akylbek k Aikuma(15 years old)

Murzaliev Sultan (15 y.o) Saryeva Nakinai(16 y.o.) Very important Important Pretty important Not important ОсновнойОсновнойОсновнойОсновнойОсновнойОсновной № 1 Do you think it is impor - tant to read texts when you learn English? Student topic preferences I also asked the students which kind of texts they prefer and what they, if given the choice, would like to read about. It was very clear that the students preferred novels, short stories and newspaper articles. When i compared this to the topics the students preferred I saw a high coherence. 22 students (51%) preferred

to read about current events in the world. Other topics high on the students’ list were music, English speaking cultures and history. It is interesting to see how these topics correspond with the fact that students favoured newspaper and magazine articles as well as the more classic novel. Typical novel and short story topics are music, movies, history and sports – topics that were also high on the students’ list. The results were not too surprising since both classes have chosen humanities as their main study focus which means that their natural interest lay in the study of language, culture and history.Основной Основной Основной Основной Основной Основной № 2 What would you like to read about? №2 Topic Student study preferences Since I was interested in the students’ attitudes towards their textbook and authentic texts, I asked them which they preferred. The result was that 34 (80%) choose authenti с texts instead of the textbook. But since 39 of the students (90%) answered that these authentic texts never, rarely or sometimes appeared in the

textbook, this is not a surprising result. Since the textbook does not contain the topics the students would like to work with, they naturally choose other options – here authentic texts. When the students were asked to state their opinions on the textbook, frequently used words were “boring”, “lack of meaning”, and “too easy”. Since the students do not think that the topics they want to discuss are in their textbook and they prefer novels and newspaper articles it is not surprising that they are not positive when describing their textbook. As a result only 14 students of the 43 (32%) have been inspired to follow up on what they have learned in class. Most of these liked the writer and wanted to read more; the others had read an extract and wanted to read the rest. Student attitudes towards the questions in textbooks When I asked the students about the questions following the text, the same attitude showed itself. Most of the students answered that they did in fact work with the questions following the text, but at the same time they did not find these very relevant. 25 of the students (58%) found that the questions were of minor relevance to the text and only 1 found the questions very relevant. Student democracy I wanted to find out the students’ attitudes towards how texts are chosen and how the different factors concerning the texts, e.g. the author and the length influence them. 29 of the students (67%) answered that their teacher decides what they are to read; 10 students (23%) answered that they are presented with different texts and then allowed to choose. What is interesting is that when we asked the students which method they preferred 31 (72%) preferred the latter alternative. It is not surprising that most of the students chose the alternative where they are presented with options; when you are given a choice it is easier to find something that appeals to you and at the same time you take an active part in your own learning. What is surprising is that most of the students are not presented with this possibility.

When the students are in fact able to choose between texts, we found that the topic is of the utmost importance for the students. 33 students (75%) answered that the topic is very important for the choice of text. Other important factors are the genre (25 students) and language (24 students). On the other hand, the length and the author matter to some extend to the students while the year of publication does not matter at all. To what degree is the following important to you when you choose a text? How to work with the texts Since I suspected that the topic might play an important role when it comes to texts read in the classroom I decided to include questions about how the topic influenced the students in different work situations. I asked them to what extent they were influenced by the choice of topic in pair/group and whole class discussions and writing about the topic. The overall impression was that the students were not especially concerned about the topic in any of the mentioned situations – except when it comes to writing about the text; here students were divided between being very much influenced and not being influenced at all. Furthermore, in the cases where the students seemed to be influenced it depended mainly on the pair/group/class in which they were placed. The topic in itself was not to be avoided but rather the specific combination of co-workers. Writing is especially interesting since this turned out to be the working method the students preferred. It is possible that students feel more comfortable with working with a text when they have time and perhaps dictionaries to help them. It provides them with a certain sense of security and control which is often lost in a classroom situation. On top of this, it enables everybody to take part in a discussion. Even the students who might need some extra time to think a statement through are able to participate. When the students were asked how they would prefer to work with a text, writing also played an important part. 22 of the students (51%) would like write a summary and 19 (44%) saw writing an essay as a good option. At the same time 19 students (44%) wanted to identify the themes and discuss them. It might

come as a small surprise that most of the students, namely 28 (65%), would like to translate words found in the text by using a dictionary. The reason for choosing this otherwise quite monotonous exercise could be that it is at the same time fairly easy and secure task.

Conclusion When we read the articles that were mentioned in the introduction to this paper I understood that the use of texts in the classroom was a much debated issue. How to make language-teaching more relevant to students was and still is constantly discussed by teachers and scholars. What stands out when reading the articles is that none of the writers seems to have considered what the students might think. Both writers argued their views on authentic material and textbooks used in class. But the students were not part of that discussion. At the same time, both writers argue for the use of one material and the exclusion of the other. According to them, there is no middle road. The questionnaires and interviews we conducted with students showed that they were very interested in taking part in the selection of texts. The text was important in keeping them motivated for further reading and class discussions. Authentic texts proved to be more appreciated by the students because language seemed to be more “real” English; they were able to relate to the texts. At the same time they believed that it was through these kinds of texts they would be able to read about topics they were interested in. However, they did not dismiss the textbook altogether and wanted to it – especially as a guideline for reading and writing. They saw the usefulness of the textbook when dealing with grammar and the structure of language. The teacher had a similar view when textbooks and authentic material were concerned. He also believed that through authentic material students could read about topics they could relate to, but at the same time he used the textbook in his teaching. Even though he had to find additional material, the textbook saved him time since he did not have to prepare everything himself. It is important to point out, that he did not see the use of the textbook as a compromise in his teaching; he believed that the questions and grammatical problems presented in the books were perfectly fine and it saved him from having to invent the wheel before every lesson. But when texts were concerned he usually went elsewhere. In this work with questions surrounding the use of authentic texts and the

textbook we have discovered that we cannot find a one-side solution. Based on the interviews and the questionnaires we have discovered that students and teachers appreciate the textbook, but at the same time need authentic texts as additional material. I agree with Lundahl when he states that students are better learners if they are motivated and take part in the learning process. Furthermore, we accept that one motivating factor for students is the topic; reading about things that interest you will heighten you learning ability and increase class participation. What we found when examining the questionnaires and when checking the textbooks was that the topics the students want to read about and the topics found in the textbooks did not correspond. However, the topics can be incorporated by using authentic texts such as novels and newspapers. What is important to remember is that there are more motivating factors than the topic. A teacher might very well be able to motivate the class by using only the textbook – it depends on the class and the teacher. What we did find out is that both teachers and students appreciate authentic material and we think that the goals stated in the curriculum can best be achieved by using both textbook texts and authentic text Both types have advantages and both have shortcomings so to us, a combination is preferable.

Literature 1. Alderson, J.C. & Urquhart, A.H. (1984). Reading in a foreign language. New York: Longman Group. 2. Andersen, Heine (editor) (1994). Vetenskapsteori och metodl д ra – en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur. 3. Arens, M. Katherine et al. (1991). Reading for Meaning. New Jersey: Prentice-Halls inc. 4. Brumfit, C.J. & Carter, R.A. (1986). Literature and language teaching. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. 5. Carter, R. & Long, M. (1991). Teaching Literature. Essex: Longman Group UK Limited. 6. Clayton, Jeanette et al. (2003). Blueprint B. Ц rebro: Tryck Ljung. 7. Clayton Jeanette et al. (2002). Blueprint A. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell Tryckeri. 8. Collie, J. & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 9. Eriksson, R. & Jacobsson, A. (2001). Spr е k f ц r livet. Stockholm: Liber. 10. Ejveg е rd, Rolf (2002). Vetenskaplig metod f ц r projektarbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur. 11. Gustafsson, J. & Peterson, L. (2002). Short Cuts 2. Stockholm: Bonnier Utbildning AB. 12. Hartmann, Jan (1998). Vetenskapligt t д nkande – Fr е n kunskapsteori till metodteori. Lund: Studentlitteratur. 13. Hillman Pinheiro, Mona (2005). In med b ц ckerna i undervisningen. 14. L д rarnas tidning, 11. p. 42 15. Johansson, B. & Svedner, P. O. (2001). Examensarbetet i l д rarutbildningen. Uppsala: F ц rfattarna och Kunskapsf ц retaget. 16. Kramsch, Claire (1993). Context and culture in language teaching.

Oxford: University Press. 17. Levihn, Ulf et al. (1991). Spr е kpedagogik. Malm ц : Grafiska AB. 18. Lundahl, Bo (1998). L д sa p е fr д mmande spr е k. Lund: Studentlitteratur. 19. Lundahl, Bo (2001).Att l д sa aktivt, kreativt och kritiskt. I Ferm, R. & Malmberg, P. (editor) Spr е kboken ( p 95- 107). Ц rebro: DB Grafiska. 20. McCormick, Kathleen (1994). The culture of reading, the teaching of English. 21. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 22. Nilsson, Jan, (2005). Ut med l д roboken. L д rarnas Tidning, 10. p.42 23. Soanes Catherine (editor) & Stevenson Angus (editor) (2005). The Oxford Dictionary of 24. English (revised edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 25. Skolverket (2000). Spr е k: grundskola och gymnasieskola: kursplaner, betygskriterier och kommentarer. Bor е s: Centraltryckeriet. 26. Tornberg, Ulrika (2005). Spr е kdidaktik. Kristianstad: Gleerup. 27. Verhoeven, L. (editor) & Snow, C. E. (editor) (2001). Literacy and Motivation – reading engagement in individuals and group. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Inc. Publishers. 28. Weir, C. & Urquhart, S. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and Practice. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Limited. Размещено на Allbest.ru

Похожие

Strategies for assessing the reading and listening skills of a2 level students

Developing writing skills of A2 level students with an essay

Development of creative abilities in teaching

Using direct method in teaching English

Methods and ways of teaching grammar to the second language learners at English lessons